Guy says hitler is the most horrible murderer who ever lived

...

Even if we pretend the holocaust happened exactly as portrayed, Stalin and Mao still killed far more people. Interesting how they don't teach about Holodomor or the Bolshevik uprising, isn't it?

they want people to forget the consequences of their ideology

they were detained in camps but the systematic killing of the inmates (especially by gas) never happened and was never ordered by the Nazi party
99% of the deaths can be attributed to disease, much like every other detainment camp in the Second world war

when next to jews
>there is no such thing as the holocaust
when nowhere near jews
>6 millions were not enough

there's a scene in Dune Messiah that basically follows this post lol

nice reddit meme please take it with you and go back you fuckhead

The holocaust never happened.
But I wish it did.

>biggest achievement ever
>there are more jews today than ever before
If the holohoax actually happened, there wouldn't be any jews today.

Every lefty I know hates Maduro and call them traitors to the socialist cause by using it to "mask fascism" which is the "actual ideology in venezuela"

>The most horrible murderer who ever lived, killed by Adolf FUCKING Hitler?!

Attached: Meryn fucking trant.gif (633x356, 3.88M)

Eh just start a Venezuela thread in any appropriate board and they'll come out of the woodwork. Also in uni the resident commies were actively being hostile to the "bourgeois" Venezuelan students.

Hitler fought in front lines of WW1 for two years until he was wounded and hospitalized after being hit by shrapnel in the Battle of the Somme. Frankly, the notion that he never killed anyone personally is laughable.
Furthermore, all the deaths of WW2 can be laid at his feet as he was responsible for starting the war by invading Poland.

how many people did he kill the frontlines?
how many people did he kill at his feet?

>Furthermore, all the deaths of WW2 can be laid at his feet as he was responsible for starting the war by invading Poland.
Nigger, he "invaded" Danzig that wanted to join Germany, it was Poland and the allies that backed it that chimped out.

This kills the stormcuck

Attached: pol_btfo.jpg (5459x4091, 3.47M)

nah didn't happen

Stormcucks hate facts and logic

Wouldn't logic dictate that America saved the Jews and thus shouldn't feel any guilt whatsoever about them?

>only sources are jewish propaganda groups
big think

>>only sources are jewish propaganda groups
Prove it. Or will you continue to spew baseless shit like you always do?

Attached: ahem.png (3018x8180, 3.67M)

for me, the proof that the holocaust happened is the nuremberg trials. no one denied that nazi atrocities happened; they individually denied culpability and professed that they were only following orders. why would this be necessary for simple work camps that deloused their workers upon entry, and had all its deaths from typhus outbreaks?

stormcucks like to cherrypick sensationalized witness accounts and explain away physical evidence with the same bad-faith arguments as flat-earthers.

Hitler was too nice to win. He even caught a Rothschild and let him go just for money.

come to Yea Forums friend, the best board on the internet

Attached: aaaggggghhhhh.png (343x433, 345K)

Stop projecting.

>the absolute state of stormfags
Can you refute any of the points made here?

still better than Yea Forums and yes I agree with you

Here is some advice for you, you don't have to be a neo-nazi in order to deny the holocaust.

You assert them without providing evidence so I can dismiss them without refutation.

>achievement
Your Fuehrer is dead, and the Jews are not. Because the Jews have numbers, and big fucking noses.

The sources are literally in the two images I posted. Are you too low IQ to check them out?

>"A lot of people say Hitler was a bad man"
>"LOTS OF CUNTS!"

>jewish propaganda are real sources
>but actual sources aren't
Fuck off, kike.

the vast majority of the sources appear to be Wikipedia articles

According to , you'll have to prove your assertion that those are jewish propaganda groups, or else they can be dismissed without evidence.
I'm waiting, retard.

gee, I wonder if

jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/

is a Jew propaganda outlet or not

>pilpul
>moving goalposts
>shifting the burden of proof
Nice try, kike.

In order to be on the same page with a stormfag, you have to accept their paranoid fantasy worldview. It's really not worth it.

>assumes I'm fat and american
well I guess I don't need to bother reading the rest of this since its just aimless sperging and making shit up

Every single thing from that list, from what I've seen from a quick glance, has been chewed and argumented over a million times
>no one denied that nazi atrocities happened; they individually denied culpability and professed that they were only following orders. why would this be necessary for simple work camps that deloused their workers upon entry, and had all its deaths from typhus outbreaks?
What the fuck are you even talking about? Virtually every single one, aside from Hoess (who was tortured and gave false information like saying 3 million people were killed at Auschwitz (just one example)) denied the holohoax and deemed it an impossible to happen. Even high ranking members, personal to the Fuhrer himself like Goering, Speer, Bormann, Hess - none of them even gave any inclinations to have known of mass genocide going on.

Keep in mind that the whole trial was a sham and they were judged and sentenced way before it started. But none of them admitted to it and all of them argued against how impossible the whole explanation that the allies gave them, was. But at the end of the day - it didn't matter. It was a circus trial to give more legitimacy to the allies.

Attached: 1558358406294.jpg (200x200, 38K)

Nah, you'll actually have to prove it without making an unsourced accusation.
>shifting the burden of proof
Jesus fucking christ you dumb cunt I actually have proof, while you have nothing. So of course I'll ask you to provide backing to your claims.
Also please point out where I moved goalposts.

What a moron you must be.

>Every single thing from that list, from what I've seen from a quick glance, has been chewed and argumented over a million times
Okay then, I'm sure you won't mind refuting them instead of just claiming something like this.

Charles Manson was given multiple first degree murder charges despite never actually killing anyone. He should've been charged with multiple counts of conspiracy.

The law is arbitrary.

Is it kike propaganda because it was written by a Jew or because it goes against your beliefs?

Refuting something as "Kike propaganda" is the same shit I deal with commies when they say that I'm sharing "Capitalist propaganda." It's completely baseless and does nothing to address the arguments.

>this group with vested interests is unbiased, i promise
>i offer no proof of my claims, but you have to, goy
Fuck off, kike.

>Is it kike propaganda because it was written by a Jew
YES RETARD

Lots of cunts
Go back faggot

>stormcucks like to cherrypick sensationalized witness accounts

I don't know senpai, seems like you're projecting a bit here.

Holy fucking shit I can't believe I share a board with you retards.
I LITERALLY OFFERED YOU PROOF OF THE HOLOCAUST.
YOU THEN DENIED IT AS "KIKE PROPAGANDA"
I THEN ASKED YOU TO PROVE IT WITH ACTUAL FACTS AND EVIDENCE INSTEAD OF NAME CALLING.
[you are here]

>no source
>>>>>proof
Do you get paid by the post, or does your local synagogue offer free wifi?

>>no source
What the fuck are you talking about. The sources are in the images. You just decided to collectively classify them as "kike propaganda".
I now ask you to prove this accusation. Go on.

>It's kike propaganda because a Jew wrote it

Epic. That's some nigger-tier debate logic you've got there.

Attached: 375px-The_Debate_Pyramid_v2_Detailed_TT_Norms_Medium_Text_Outlined.svg.png (375x375, 65K)

""""proof""""" thats clearly written by someone in fucking tears and ranting about muh muritardz

This is such a poor infograph.

nah at least Yea Forums is 50% on-topic, literally every Yea Forums thread is total shit

>even blacks know not to trust anything jews wrote because they ALWAYS lie
really makes you think...

>Guy says anons who like lolis are the words and deserve the rope
>Ask how many little girls have anons raped
>Uhhh I don't think they have ever personally raped anyone but...
>THEY DESERVE TO DIE, KYS PEDO

Attached: 60381020_444995809597171_8638092453493049138_n.jpg (1080x1292, 163K)

>still going
You just don't get it, do you, kike?
Your sources are biased and have vested interests, so unless you can prove they actually provide objective analyses they can be rejected as easily as you spew them.

ad hominems haven't been relevant logical tools since Aristotle - around 2,300 years ago.

Stormfags are the niggers of the white world.
THE ACTUAL FUCKING SOURCES INSIDE THE IMAGE THAT BACK UP THE CLAIMS MADE BY IT. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND HOW SOURCING SHIT WORKS?
Every piece of evidence for the holocaust is backed up by a historical source in both of the images I posted. Now, you'll have to debunk those sources in order to prove the pics wrong.
You still haven't managed to do this.
protip: calling it kike propaganda is not proof

Why must you be a neon nazi alt right gop drumpf supporting fascist to know the truth about the holohoax? Is it illegal to question or something?

>Your sources are biased and have vested interests
Prove it. THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU, SINCE IT IS YOU WHO IS MAKING THE CLAIM YOU DIR

winner writes the history

>hey man you're just wrong unless your argument conforms to my very specific standards, addresses only the things I want you to, and also you have to ignore any bias in my sources bc I say so, ok sweaty?
ok shlomo

TY FUCKING NIGGER

>literally seething

If it's debunked then why not allow any excavations of OR camps?

holocaust 100% happened but Jesus Christ almost everything here is wrong

>THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU
Stop shifting the burden of proof. I need no proof to dismiss your claims since you provide none to support it.

>The proof is that trial where defendants were tortured and blackmailed
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA if you're going to be retarded then why not just say it was a picture of a sad jew that convinced you of the holocaust? Worked for Eric Hunt

>It was a circus trial to give more legitimacy to the allies.

That's ridiculous user. It's not like they callously used weapons of mass destruction against civilian targets, turning cities to ashes.

No, I for one believe what the jews say. Millions were gassed to death with a delousing agent, buried, dug up and then their bones broken up and disappeared to hide the evidence. If you can't trust the word of jews then who can you trust at the end of the day?

Attached: burgundy science.gif (500x272, 502K)

Nice strawman faggot.
This is just how arguing works. Here I'll run it down for you:
>you claim that the holocaust was faked
>I refute that by providing various sources PROVING that it did
what you would have to do now is to bring up a counterpoingt (again backed by evidence) in order to refute my refutation. You didn't do this. Instead, you called my sources kike propaganda and told me to prove it that they're NOT, when the burden of proof in this case is clearly on you.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)

>Okay then, I'm sure you won't mind refuting them instead of just claiming something like this.
Okay then. I'll give you a quick one. The Goebbels except from 1942 has no source, no original German translation or whatever. It's from the "JewishVirtualLibrary" who took it from Louis P. Lochner. Also, the original translation is quite different from the once you have:

" The Führer once more expressed his determination to pitilessly CLEAR OUT the Jews from Europe. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction () will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies."

No way here does it says "genocide". And since we know the original goal of the National Socialist and what they wanted to do with jews when the war is over, it's safe to say there wasn't any holocaust going on. But I've chewed on this subject a thousand times and I prefer not to waste my time anymore on it. I've come to realize that arguing with retards is simply futile and a waste of effort.

A thing overlooked by millennials is that back in Hitler's era, the concept of time and life itself were viewed differently. They were immersed in the moment and very active. The concept of sitting at a computer or being on a smartphone were alien to them obviously. It would be considered degenerate and unnatural. The Nazis didn't kill all of the J's as we read about but even if they killed a million (at the most) back then that was natural because man sought glory, victory and honor. How many Nazis died honorably defending their nation and families? And how many Nazis were progeny of men in WWI who were literally gassed (mustard gas).

America used mustard gas in WWI and so did Germany. Yet it's only the J's who whine about it now. And they likely weren't gassed at all. Fucking fags.

But evidence provided by revisionists is dismissed by virtue of it being evidence from revisionists. Now you're trying to claim authenticity?

>I need no proof to dismiss your claims since you provide none to support it.
How many fucking times do I have to tell you that the sources are in the images I posted?

>Millions were gassed to death with a delousing agent, buried, dug up and then their bones broken up and disappeared to hide the evidence.
Don't forget diesel exhaust from faulty Soviet tank engines that would take hours to fix, if the totally legitimate Gerstein Report is to be believed

He fought as a soldier in ww1, it's fair to say he killed a bunch of people.
Fuck off. This is the lowest form of discourse. You simply rely on the fact that the other person doesn't have the time to sift through and refute the multiple pages of nonsense you spam at them, and then claim you've won the argument. What's even worse, whenever I've bothered to go over them I found lies and/or misrepresentations of the other sides argument within the first few paragraphs.
It may surprise you, but most National Socialist aren't/weren't in it because they want jews dead.

>Fuck off. This is the lowest form of discourse. You simply rely on the fact that the other person doesn't have the time to sift through and refute the multiple pages of nonsense you spam at them, and then claim you've won the argument. What's even worse, whenever I've bothered to go over them I found lies and/or misrepresentations of the other sides argument within the first few paragraphs.
simply based and accurate

Attached: 1556463700328.gif (328x366, 826K)

>you claim that the holocaust was real
>I refute that by providing various sources PROVING that it didn't happen
>you shift the burden of proof, asserting your myth as objective fact
I didn't know upholding the holocaust was a religion.

Not the user who either of you are replying to, but he is right in that the burden of proof rests with you for the claim that his source is "kike propaganda". You made the claim that his source was biased and therefore invalid, so now you must prove it.

>the holocaust was a religion.
Well, desu, maintaining the lie has practically become the jewish religion. It's the only way they know how to silence the opposition and prevent the pitiful goyim from questioning them or their influence. It acts as the perfect shield for them.

How many times do I have to tell you that there are almost no sources and the ones you provide are biased and are not reliable?

>I refute that by providing various sources PROVING that it didn't happen
You haven't done this.

Stop thinking with your feelings. Look at the vast contributions into the field of science by Jews. Is James Franck a propagandist when he described the behavior of electrons on atoms? Is Jack Steinberger a propagandist for discovering the muon neutrino? And Arthur Eichengrün when he helped invent aspirin?

You stormniggers are honestly the worst faggots when it comes to debating. Always evading the central thrust of an argument. Always denying substantive claims and objective analysis. Always arguing in bad faith. We should have freedom of speech, if only to see how stupid you are.

HOW MANY TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU THAT YOU HAVE TO PROOVE THAT THOSE SOURCES ARE UNRELIABLE AND BIASED?

>I refute that by providing various sources PROVING that it did
And you haven't done this.

not at all because his source is fucking garbage and not worth my time
did you even look at it? its actual sperging and shitflinging
lol

what shitty school did you go to that accepts Wikipedia as a source?

>keep your mouth shut about our lies and overrepresented influence, goy, or the scientists will disappear since they were all jews.
Just shut the fuck up, man. The only reason jewish "scientists" even exist was because the old European leaders were kind to let you in. And you took advantage of it.

You have to prove or in the very least provide evidence that your sources are reliable, which you haven't. You see, my great-grand uncle thrice removed worked at treblinka and he said there was no holocaust there. Would you accept this as reliable proof? If not, why should I accept your "sources"?

>jews are one of the most opressed people in the world
>hitler happens
>now a feared ethnic group with their own first-world ethnostate
Nice job stormfags

Attached: Gomer_Pyle.png (398x446, 121K)

>its actual sperging and shitflinging
Congratulations, you have taken the first step, which is stating that his source is invalid. Now you must follow through and prove your claim.

>holocaust 100% happened
How can something happen if it wasn't even a thing when it supposedly happened? The word Holocaust wasn't used by many people until like 1960, and it wasn't until the 80s when Jews got organized and modernly wealthy that they forced it into all public schools.

Hitler never once referred to Jewish prisons as "le Holocaust," it wasn't even considered a big deal. There's not a goddamn overdramatic term for the Japanese prison camps in America during WWII. Why not? Because the Japanese aren't babies. Prisoners of war exist. That's all the Jews were in WWII. But they can't take being unspecial so they hype up their experience to seriously Biblical levels.

People lose wars. It's the definition of war. The Jews lost WWII. Take it on the chin like men. And maybe don't associate with subversive insane Communist parties, which they still do. Look at America propaganda about Japs, Vietcong, and Germans, it's all caricature. But only the Jews bitch about it now. Show me a single Jap who cries about "racist cartoons." Whereas there are literally rabbis who go to Congress and cry about merchant memes and demanding they be outlawed.

TL/DR: The Holocaust never happened because it was never called the "Holocaust" during the entire war. Jews were POWs and when foodstuffs ran short some of them starved. No different from Jap or Chink or African POWs for a thousand years.

>now a feared ethnic group with their own first-world ethnostate
America has been jewish run since the 18th century.

Jesus christ

Attached: NIGGER.png (1663x819, 168K)

The holocaust is a religion to secular jews. It's the most important aspect to Jewish identity in both Israel and the diaspora

>Is it illegal to question or something?
yes

>It may surprise you, but most National Socialist aren't/weren't in it because they want jews dead.

No no no, the world revolves around a creepy, ugly, little rat race of a few million from the deserts of the middle east.

Attached: 1511225041526.png (536x622, 362K)

Jews have never been oppressed, they've exploited their host nations then claim prejudice when they're expelled.

>Now you must follow through and prove your claim.
Click his image to expand, there you go.

How retarded are you?

You are the one making the claim, therefore you have to prove it. It's that simple, really.

>The Jews lost WWII
They were the only winners of WWII. Both western capitalists and soviet communists were thoroughly on the side of the jews

One observation I made during Game of Thrones is that when Sansa confessed she was stronger after suffering abuse and rape, it was primarily Jewish women who screeched. Yet these same Jews define their entire lives by the Holocaust and move "Forward"' away from it as an ideology. Imagine the neuroticism involved here. It's genetic at this point. Most Jewish women probably would benefit from rape because then they could focus on something real.

>claim the holocaust is real
>i ask for evidence
>you sperg out claiming i need to prove it didn't
Stop shifting the burden of proof.

Make no mistake. WWII wasn't fought for borders or any of that pointless shit. It was a battle against jewish influence and the hold they had over Western democracies and the Soviet Union. And the jews clearly won.

What? The evidence is right here:
Now, it's up to you to prove that this evidence is wrong. This is something you still haven't done, apart form calling it jewish propaganda, again without any proof.

>ethnostate
Israel is like 25% Arab and rising. Not that there is any actual difference between Jews and Arabs

>jews are great
>source: jews
>what do you mean thats not good proof???

Have you even read through those yourself? They are dubious at best at the few sources provided are likewise.
Provide some actual evidence instead of your nonsense pictures you lazy kike.

I work overnights in a morgue and I can tell you there's no way in hell 6 million were killed. The manpower wouldn't would be possible in that time frame. Even today, it'd be an incredible feat.

please don't draw the jabroni geeks to our board please

Attached: jabroni.jpg (480x360, 22K)

Nazi infographs aren't evidence, sweatie. Pretty sure one of you taught me that

Again. Conclusively prove that this is the case. Bring up evidence that the sources are dubious/illegitimate.
It would be easy for me to go:
>jews are bad
>source: stormfront infograhics
>what do you mean thats not good proof?????
And use this to argue, but I don't.

>Nowhere does it say "genocide"
You're right it just talks about their destruction. Everyone with a brain knows that Nazis used "destruction" as a code word for "peacefully move them to Madagascar we dindu nuffin"

>you need to conclusively prove that this is the case
>but i dont need to prove my assertions :^)
Stop shifting the burden of proof, kike.

they're about jews, by jews
thats literally as biased as you can possibly get, stop pretending to be retarded any time

Simple question for revisionists/deniers: 5-6 million Jews disappeared from Europe following WW2 if not murdered in the Holocaust where did they go?

Attached: jewsineurope.jpg (2400x1186, 269K)

Unless you can conclusively demonstrate how each of the points made by said Jews is wrong, you have no argument.

A holocaust denier only denies the gassing and ovens stories they don’t deny Jews were rounded up and put into camps where a lot died for various reasons, they just deny the rediculous stories

Stop shifting the burden of proof, kike.

finna basedola

You don't get 5-6 million dead through typhus outbreaks alone dude

So you can't provide direct counterarguments, got it.

I disagree with them, that makes them wrong and cucked

Miami

>You're right it just talks about their destruction
Yes, their "destruction" as an influence on Germany and Europe. As a power. As a force. Are you braindead? That's like saying "Goebbels" meant by "destruction of our enemies" their genocide, as well. Or are you trying to say that the Nazis wanted to exterminate the whole world? World holocaust? Maybe they had plans for the universe, as well?

>source: holocaust museum
clearly a very reliably, unbiased source

no joke, i brought this up to an obvious heeb hysterically "defending" his people on here a few weeks back. he literally said "those are just lies to discredit the holocaust" lmao
pilpul is an amazing thing

I need no counterarguments if you provide no arguments, kike.

I take it you apply the same standard to all WW2 casualties right? Can't trust German sources for German deaths, American sources for American deaths, etc?

This is such a routine it's gotten really stale. Are you not tired of being utterly BTFO in /his/ every single time and then resorting to "muh kikes"?

Madagascar, of course

Attached: madagascar.png (1002x1500, 2.05M)

Proof of these deaths? Physical evidence? A photo of somebody starving in a prison isn't evidence btw.

>Can't trust German sources for German deaths
This is actually true though, the Dr*sden bombing never happened but it should have happened.

>Proof of these deaths?

Historical documents:
imgur.com/a/725A7

Einsatzgruppen records:
imgur.com/a/AubwH

Complicity of High Command:
imgur.com/a/MbpVq

Disease, starvation, some emigrated to places like America and Israel. Many were killed of course, but I think that was more due to decisions made by local camp commanders and SS leaders rather than government policy.

the only thing I trust is my lord and savior Jesus Christ and he knows about Jewish trickery and threw them out of his temple for a reason

>some emigrated to places like America and Israel
Do you have any census data to back that up? Such a migration would be one of the largest in history

>provide no evidence
>get utterly btfo
>pretend you won anyway
Classic kikery. There clearly is no use arguing with you, since all you can do is pilpul, insist your myths are fact and attempt to shift the burden of proof.

Jesus was a Jew ya simp

I'm just gonna assume you're also jewish and not arguing in good faith since literally all you can do is try to shift the burden of proof with really weak pilpul

Wrong.

"It's written by Jews" isn't a counterargument. Prove the points wrong or you're wrong, wrongnigger.

Post the one where his head is shooped and has yellow text all over please

Why

Are

You

Typing

Like

This