Can someone explain this?

Can someone explain this?
Why do 700 people go and rate an episode of planet earth 1/10?

Attached: dhedrrhhd.png (635x641, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt6209140/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt
spectator.co.uk/2018/09/why-is-a-bbc-executive-calling-for-the-removal-of-middle-aged-white-men-from-television/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

They hate grass.

bots?

probably mentioned climate change in one of the episodes and all of them became inundated with 1/10s

Some men just want to see the grass burn

It's probably rockfags

FUCK GRASS

Amerifat climate change deniers

the ratings by demographics are all above 8 so there's some fuckery going on

imdb.com/title/tt6209140/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt

Now that I've seen your thread I am going to log in and rate it 1/10 aswell.
So there's one reason

It's the same for most episodes of planet earth 1 and 2, is this the power of Attenborough hating boomers?

False flagging operation in preparation for imdb doing a rotten tomatoes?

>2019
>still being a grassman

Attached: 1486235084004.png (957x710, 539K)

I thought boomers didn't mind Attenborough, I wasn't aware anyone on the planet didn't like him.

because it was boring

rick and morty fans trying to be top rated show

pajeets hired to downvote episodes by other studios so planet earth falls below other their flagship tv series

Keeps perpetuating the myth of man made climate change in order for the government to seize the means of production.

This is why IMDB is a terrible ratings site, it shares the same problem as Metacritic: people are inclined to vote either 10/10 or 1/10 to influence the score the most

BBC can't wait for him to die already.
>spectator.co.uk/2018/09/why-is-a-bbc-executive-calling-for-the-removal-of-middle-aged-white-men-from-television/

doesn't warrant a 1/10

There's alot of articles about how Chernobyl is the highest rated show ever blablabla.

It's probably things like this get driven down by marketing divisions to push their new shows.

Not him but he was top dog king dick of the BBC
for a long time so maybe pissd people off with internal politics then or maybe stretched some political influence a time or two. Looking at his Wiki I don't know why he wouldn't be considered based at that time since he commisioned Civilisation and the Ascent of Man some of the most based documentaries of all time but I do seem to remember a documentary that about some comedy or other that portrayed him in a villainous light.

>Keeps perpetuating the myth of man made climate change in order for the government to seize the means of production.
Man made climate change is real.

The claim that we can fix it by inconveniencing ourselves is a hoax.

Either bots or Americans who got really upset about the British vs. American nature documentary pasta.

Attached: BBC Planet Earth 2 Viscacha.webm (1280x720, 2.74M)

>because it was boring

The mantra of a child.

that is one smug ass fucking kangaro-looking motherfucking rabbit