All those moments.. gone like tears in the rain

All those moments.. gone like tears in the rain

Attached: A7370860-EB7F-403E-A870-BD3114F4AE9E.jpg (1280x720, 34K)

wow

Go listen to linkin park you robot fuckhead,
nobody cares about your meteor shower.

>waaah I saw spaceships blow up and only lived to be a few years old
that's too bad

Laughed

He still had more sex then you incel

>I have seen beams
Hmm, I don't understand. What exactly did he mean by this?

>gone... like you cummies when flush them down the drain instead of impregnating a white woman Deckard you fucking incel. Time to have sex.

Powerful.

>The wondrous experiences I've lived will fade away to nothingness because I'm a robot meant to die, while countless automatons are enjoying mindless vapid lives they take for granted by nature of being living beings

Attached: 1545275586064.png (656x755, 39K)

Huh? He never said anything like that. He started talking about spaceships and stuff remember?

Movie is so garbage compared to the book

>the
Fuck you nigger

>Dude.. my bionic eyes work

Attached: B85C3533-F0BC-44E4-8BC5-6A01CD1BA894.jpg (600x338, 16K)

It's the subtext faggot

Deckard, my man, do you even realize the importance of these events which I am vaguely describing right now? Lasers going pewpew and ships going boomboom in space. This changes everything! Your perception of replicants such as myself and a possible love interest of yours shall never be the same, I'm sure. Peace out.

Attached: lecbeamsman.jpg (1001x667, 49K)

>Sean Beans Glittering In The Dark

Attached: dc60a05a919ecfb1bfc0235e41cd77cc.jpg (700x544, 38K)

Subtext? Dude it's a movie not a book, there is no text. Are we talking about the same thing here?

Time.. to.. die

I've seen sneed posts get deleted so fast you would have never have thought have happened....

read between the lines, brainlet

>hurr durr I'm just pretending to be retarded

Adios amigo

Attached: 1558526418180.png (600x842, 142K)

LeL my man went full retard

The subtext is that in the scene he finally becomes a human

Also he is what all humans are because he also enjoys life but is miserable when he realizes he's going to die and there's no way to avoid it so he goes to his creator and throws a tantrum at him, why give him life if he's going to take it away and make all his actions forgotten and meaningless. This is the same as us, we feel the same exact thing about our lives except the difference is that he actually has someone to blame it for and someone to leash out on aka his creator, we don't. If we had someone to blame for this then maybe we would get angry at out creator for giving us life then taking it away and would also kill him. The Replicant and his creator is the same as we and our "God" (creator). Except we don't even know if he exists.

The replicant tries to become human and thinks that the reason he isn't human is because he has to die while other humans get to live. But he's wrong, because humans have to die too. It's just a matter of different life span. What really makes him human at the end is accepting that none of the things you did will matter and everything will be forgotten, because that's what human life is.

The replicants in Blade Runner know they're replicants. Except Rachael. She's a new type of replicant and shes been given somebody else's memories to cushion her emotional responses so she can be more easily controlled. So if Deckard is also a replicant, he doesn't know about it either. So hes the same as Rachael. So it follows that he must have somebody else's memories too. And there's really only one person who's memories he could have.

GAFF IS DECKARD. If you think about it, it makes complete sense. Who is Gaff anyway? I propose that he was the best Blade Runner in the business before he got injured and acquired his limp, possibly even going after the replicants in the film. He's right up there in the cop ranks and appears to be close to Police Chief Bryant, the same relationship Deckard re-assumes when he's hauled in at the start of the film. Deckard isn't even allowed to fly his own police car. Pretty much every time he needs to go somewhere, Gaff has to drive him. He's a real dick about it too, he doesn't talk to him or even acknowledge his presence. He just drives him around with that resentful scowl on his face. How come Deckard isn't flying himself?

Right through the film, Gaff shows complete contempt for Deckard. Right at the start when he approaches him eating those delicious looking noodles, his way of saying "hello" is by hitting him on the arm with his cane. All the way through he's basically a massive prick to him. The relationship makes sense - this whole endeavour of using a robot to hunt robots is experimental. If Deckard has Gaff's memories and skills than who better to keep a close eye on him to assess how things are going? And how much would Gaff hate doing this? The more Deckard succeeds, the more reason Gaff has to hate him. He's everything Gaff once was and serves as a painfull reminder.

Then we have the one big clue. The unicorn.

Attached: graff.jpg (825x464, 211K)

my man I seent beans lmao

Time.. to.. DIE?

So why'd he kiss the old guy? And why's the detective kinda raping the robot seen as romantic?

Good post!

Attached: hy.jpg (1280x692, 118K)

Because being gay is based and redpilled and women deserve nothing but rape so that's also based and redpilled

the detective is also a roboto
see also you can add all the other clues true the movie like pictures at the dec house

Holy shit, you're right.

reddit

This is why 2049 is unironically better. Don't attack me Blade Runner scholars

Both Blade Runner movies really are pleb filters

Attached: 1549908710853.jpg (500x700, 73K)

Guys come on, I know it sounds amazing that he's seen beans when you were a kid, but it's time to grow up.

This absolutly not what was implied

>I've seen planes and shiet
wow so deep

Attached: 784566435243543263.jpg (950x534, 63K)

Thinkin bout thos beams

>It's too bad she won't live! But then again, who does?
>*Turns, walks away, then turns around after a few steps*
>Actually, let me clarify what I meant by that statement.
>You see, what I meant was that Rachel, the replicant created by Tyrell Corp, will not live for long as she has a four-year lifespan. Now, when I rhetorically ask who does live, my intention is to compare the very limited lifespan of a replicant to that of a human being. After all, death is an inevitability that humans and replicants alike must live with, and in that sense, are humans and replicants really so different?
>Take that Roy Batty guy for instance. I was standing here for the entire duration of that speech he just gave waiting for him to let the so subtle white dove go so I have my cue to come in. I couldn't really understand what he was saying through his mumbling, but I think I heard something about spaceships and someone named "Ryan." He might have meant Ryan Jones, the janitor of my apartment building. Anyway, he only sought to lengthen his own lifespan to survive his predetermined death. Any one of us would have done the same, right?
>Now, let's move on to those origami figures that I would leave in crime scenes for no discernible reason...
>Are you listening to me, Deckard?
>*Leans forward, raises voice*
>Let me make this perfectly clear, Rick Deckard! You are not a human being! You are a replicant created by Tyrell Corp whose sole purpose is to hunt and eliminate wayward replicants such as were Roy Batty and his three companions!
>Etch this into your brain, Rick Deckard!
>YOU ARE A REPLICANT
>*Turns and walks away into rain that will be lost in time*

bravo ridley

Attached: subtle.jpg (1280x720, 46K)

Furthermore the whole movie/book shows that death is always a problem and no matter what times you live in, whether you live in cool cyberpunk world with lots of technology, the problem of death always stays the same, and you will always feel miserable. A medieval man will be sad and miserable for having to die the same way a cyberpunk man does

Your favorite movie is probably Tale of Two Kitties

Hmm yeah I remember this but I still don't get what he meant to this day. Probably nothing, just artsy mumbo jumbo for pretentious assholes to pretend is deep.

i always thought this line was cringe desu

the old guy was his daddy aka creator aka G-D
he showed him cursory love before slaying him, ascending past his level, demonstrating that his creation had succeeded
did roy actually have instinctive familial feelings for him? he clearly showed that he was upset about imminent death and reacted in a childish way, as said. but his tantrum was carried out with a freakishly powerful man's body and ended in gruesome murder.

as for your second question, it's because harrison ford is sexy and the robutt could not help but submit to his masculine power

HEAR ME OUT
what if
the foil animals and the detective were just products of Deckard's subconscious him to the conclusion that he was a replicant

Attached: 1500230921710.gif (800x430, 897K)

Imagine all those Zoomers replying to this obvious joke with such venom, thinking they're finally fitting in while they are in fact sticking out like the newfigs they are.

>1337
Very based and redpilled post. I got a good you harvest so here's one for you.

>time.. to die
>dies
bravo rutger