Why not just take a new picture? You have the actor under contract, no? Lol...

Why not just take a new picture? You have the actor under contract, no? Lol, there had to be set photos they could've given to vanity fair to use
mobile.twitter.com/Dataracer117/status/1132747149400334338

Attached: D7hTfv-WsAIeOTi.jpg (1024x1024, 202K)

vanity fair is lazy

because he's fucking dead you idiot

Are you blind? Thats two separate photos of the same pose

>promotional picture in some shill magazine is slightly shitty
This seems like the stupidest thing to nitpick, but The Quartering will be bitching about it for months, I bet.

have sex

no one's ever really gone

Folds look pretty similar

seems like Daisy on the left is shopped

>expecting anything remotely decent from Vanity Fair/Entertainment

the cloak is starched in position so that you get these gravity-defying, perfect folds and flowing fabric.

who?

what the fuck? It's not even the same photo. The folds are literally not the same.

that cunt doesnt look human on the best of days.

Pretending this isn't bait for a minute, you know Mark Hamil is still alive right?

What movie?

This shit bothers me

Attached: D7hTfv-WsAIeOTi~01~01.jpg (161x399, 20K)

Who is that handsome boy on the left

Kill yourself faggot scum

Attached: 1548638832436.webm (640x640, 521K)

Michael Jackson, Moot, Sigourney Weaver, take a pick.

..are you sure, user? have a look at the news

God I wish she had a dick

Kill yourself faggot scum

REBEL faggot scum

Yeah but Luke is dead bro...

Is Daisy Ridley channeling Clint Eastwood there?

he's locked in my basement

Cheaper to use a photoshop monkey than get a new photo