Why not just take a new picture? You have the actor under contract, no? Lol, there had to be set photos they could've given to vanity fair to use
mobile.twitter.com
Why not just take a new picture? You have the actor under contract, no? Lol...
vanity fair is lazy
because he's fucking dead you idiot
Are you blind? Thats two separate photos of the same pose
>promotional picture in some shill magazine is slightly shitty
This seems like the stupidest thing to nitpick, but The Quartering will be bitching about it for months, I bet.
have sex
no one's ever really gone
Folds look pretty similar
seems like Daisy on the left is shopped
>expecting anything remotely decent from Vanity Fair/Entertainment
the cloak is starched in position so that you get these gravity-defying, perfect folds and flowing fabric.
who?
what the fuck? It's not even the same photo. The folds are literally not the same.
that cunt doesnt look human on the best of days.
Pretending this isn't bait for a minute, you know Mark Hamil is still alive right?
What movie?
This shit bothers me
Who is that handsome boy on the left
Kill yourself faggot scum
Michael Jackson, Moot, Sigourney Weaver, take a pick.
..are you sure, user? have a look at the news
God I wish she had a dick
Kill yourself faggot scum
REBEL faggot scum
Yeah but Luke is dead bro...
Is Daisy Ridley channeling Clint Eastwood there?
he's locked in my basement
Cheaper to use a photoshop monkey than get a new photo