Avatar 2 will be the first movie in 3D watchable without 3D glasses

Do de do doo dee dooo dee do do dah dee

Avatar 2 and all future sequels will employ a “RGB laser projection systems that will exclude the need for 3D glasses to watch a 3D film.” The system provides bright images at a high frame rate, allowing crisp visuals that eliminate the need for special glasses.

Uhm, I have assymetric eye sight. I can't even see those magic eye puzzles where you kind of let yourself go crosseyed to see an image. So will I just see blur?

Does the 3DS work on your eyes?

Fuck right off, there's no way they'll be able to make that possible without plenty of people not being able to see what's going on due to being in a front row. Cameron is an innovator but no fucking way will they be able to do that

Wasn't 3d the whole shtick that made Avatar so much money? It was supposed to "change the way we watched movies" and it was basic 3d junk that would've been fine without it

Yes. But that's rear projection.

Well, is it FILMED with 4D cameras? Or is it one of those shit gimmicks where a movie isn't filmed with 3D cameras and is just made 3D post production.

wrong. 3D in 8k without glasses has been achieved, skip to 1:00 in
youtu.be/9STBsPHIEPA

It doesn't matter, it didn't catch on with porn.

Not to mention the shifty squeeze has already been applied to small cinemas to force them to upgrade to the latest cameras and film format at their own expense, and now apparently every single one will need to be up to date with hololens 2.0 by the time dances with wolves in space 2 electric boogaloo is released.

Avatar was a massive smash only because it was everyone's first chance to check out the new 3d tech, now Avatar 2 will be the same with some new gimmick, and still most likely a shit film as well.

sauce?

Oh. So it's 3D but it's not? Like last time? Oh ok.

Is it the compression of youtube/the camera or does it have very bad artifacts?

The only thing that worries me is that it's been in production for so long that some of the CGI might look dated by the time it's released.

And they are saying there is only a small cone in front of that device where you can see in 3d. Off to the side is no good, like other user said. So what then? Special cinemas of 5 seats wide and 700 rows back?

Just use new textures, and that other modeling thing that's like the bumpy skin of the object.

>high frame rate

Higher than the Hobbit films? Like 60/120fps?

That was in 2015, Avatar 2 will be out in 2021. 4k TV wasn't in an average person's house until 2015.

I'm ready.

Attached: 1.jpg (1335x649, 111K)

Who’s the hooded guy and the glow head between genie and avatar chick?

Attached: avatar reddit.jpg (938x630, 588K)

Awesome, just like the 3DS which was a load of shite

The villain from amazing spider man

Genie and Doctor Manhattan makes everyone else obsolete

Source? What is this?

None of that was in 3D for me, what a scam

daba da diba da dudam da da dam

Ronan from GOTG and Electro

>crlt + F
>Tobias

What the fuck tv?

Honestly it won't.
CGI these days is actually worse than Avatar's.
They don't care about shadows, and weight today.
Black Panther's CGI was terrible, same with Homecoming, whereas Avatar's creatures and movements actually look real.

I hate Avatar and think it's a terrible movie, but mainly because of the plot, it still holds up.

Who’s between mystique and Ronan?

Night King I think

holywood only now catching up with nintendo

Attached: file.png (1024x768, 1.13M)

ivan ooze from that power rangers movie

Attached: file.png (1200x630, 1.36M)

how could you forget the most important one of them all

Attached: bluemyself.jpg (1280x720, 50K)

>more 3D shit gimmicks
Can't wait for the next wave of 24K Ultra High-Fidelity 3D T.V.s to just absolutely sweep the market in ten years and die off in a matter of weeks.

doc could solo everyone in that image

Attached: doc.jpg (1920x794, 497K)

Nintendo does what Hollywon't

Even genie you think?

Do you guys think the Avatar sequels will actually be successful? So much of the success of the first one had to do with all of the media hype around it, how expensive it was to make and how much new technology went into its creation, and had very little to do with how good the movie actually was. It was lightning in a bottle that's going to be hard to capture again 10 years later, and these movies are so obscenely expensive to make that they really need to make an insane BO to turn a profit.

genie is the only one there who's powerlevel isn't really laid out clearly but yeah after Manhattan had finished off all the others I think he would be able to dismantle lampman

I think freed genie would be a stalemate, slave genie would get rekt because he can’t really use his powers

so just like those 3D slot machines where they have multiple screens on top of each other?

>3D watchable without 3D glasses

That's called a play, dude.

What's this from?