Why couldn't magic fix his eyesight?

He isn't wearing glasses but only a rim. His eyesight is perfectly fine.

Harry's parents were going to but then Dumbledore showed up and forbade them from doing so, claiming, "Alas, I'm afraid that won't possible, Lily, James. Spectacles can come in handy, you see. I have a pair myself above my deviated septum that are just the dandiest half moon in shape".

He did something similar in one of the books, half-blood prince, if I recall. It was that scene completely detached from the rest of the plot where he just casually strolled into the pregnancy ward of St Mungos and threw a cutting curse right threw a newborn's arm, severing the wrist from hand permanently.

When the infant's parents tried to get medical help, Dumbledore simply stood in their way and held up his own blackened hand, whilst throwing them a knowing, wizened smile from beneath his half moon glasses.

Why, magic couldn't even fix the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises

Someone post it

You know, never believe it's not so

This.

When Hermione gets morphed into him she comments on how shitty his eyesight is

It was kind of a bitch move for her to make fun of his cock size in front of everyone when they got to the burrow though.

You reckon wizards do the Engorgio spell on their dicks?

If it would work on your dick, then could it also work on abstract or even things that seem impossible?

If so, then why didn't Harry just cast:

>Engorgio my magic!

or

>Engorgio Hermione's breasts

Or even, "Engorgio Voldemort's suicidal urges"?

He chose to wear them because it helped him socialize

you now remember that giant French woman who wanted to fuck Dumbledore

>Engorgio Voldemort's suicidal urges

Attached: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (250x248, 15K)

Maybe the "fix eyesight" spell is particularly complicated and high-risk, and there's a chance your eyes will explode or something

Attached: harreh.jpg (720x708, 66K)

Magic can't fix everything. For example, it couldn't fix the fact it was part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of dull franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: No!.jpg (1578x2842, 1.37M)

Now that would have made for a compelling plot.

Imagine Hermione exploding Harry's eyeballs right before he even got to see Hogwarts.

Why did sirius or any inncocent person went to prison since they had potions that made you tell the truth? Like wtf

They saw his second name and mistakenly assumed his skin colour.

>*voldemort casts avada kedavra*
>*muggle casts barrett m82 headshot from 1800 meters away*
that was easy

Attached: magicucks btfo.gif (400x225, 865K)

What are the points of locks if theres spells that can open them anyways? Like the door to the headed fucking dog

Well in Sirius' case there were witnesses who saw what they thought was him blowing Peter and that street up, plus there was a shitton of evidence pointing to him, and everyone thought Peter was ded
As for why they didn't use a spell or potion I guess they just didn't give a shit and wanted someone to blame so they just threw him away

Locks are the forces preventing our souls from travelling into a new reality.

The key is our will, and our will, and what we do with it, is only limited by the self imposed locks binding our imagination.

Dumbledore knew this, and he'd seen the horrors idle wizards had conjured in periods of fleeting creativity firsthand. So the little victory was devised; the lock and the key to the three headed dog, the potions professors storeroom and the bubbling membranes held within. The old box full of moving phots. A deceptively simple function for a secretly boundless spell.

It would only take one young wizard, and enough will, to say,

>"Alohomora... the gate to hell!"

For chaos to be unleashed

Checked and based

Rowling explained in a tweet that wizards don't believe in curing birth defects, like bad eye sight, because it's ableist

I wonder if there are any Down Syndrome wizards

Neville