In the end, did Tyler win?
I don't care about the comics
In the end, did Tyler win?
>I guess the real fight club was the friends we made along the way
>need actor to play chad
>hire guy literally named brad
wtf fincher is such a hack
No, Tyler got smoked
The comics suck but I admire his balls for going back for seconds and even thirds. He really should have done an original story though, shit is fanfic tier and his shock value schtick is quant as far as comics go
Wtf you're retarded.
Brad was the perfect choice, and no one else but incels use the term chad
He did get smoked but he still completed his mission.
The buildings blew up
He would've liked to do more damage and could have if John didn't realize what was going on and try to stop him, depriving Fight Club of their leader. Durden got some shit done but it wasn't total societal upheaval or anything
Yes, the the narrator and marla died right after in the explosion
The first shot of the movie is the van they rigged with a bomb in the building they end up in
You're right
And the narrator disables that bomb (he knows how to because tyler knows how to) right before tyler beats the shit out of him and takes him upstairs to watch the other bombs go off at the end of the movie
Forget what I said, the Narrator defused the bomb, remember?
in the movie, tyler 'dies'. in the book, the narrator goes to a psychiatric hospital, were there is a bunch of workers who are part of the mayhem project, waiting for the second coming of tyler.
> the comics are garbage that palahniuk did to cash some money, because he was on some sort of financial problem - he explains on joe rogan podcast
> his last book, ADJUSTMENT DAY, is, borderline, a spiritual sucessor of fight club and talks about US being divided into a country for blacks, gays and white. IT SUCKS. palahniuk lost all his creativity, every drop of it. and being an edgy guy, this pc scenario is the worst possible also.
I know about the ending of the book
Someone please fucking explain how the narrator beats Tyler Durden. How would shooting a hole through one's cheek destroy a figment of his imagination? It doesn't make any sense and I've seen the movie like 3 or 4 times
I love the movie and it's one of my all time favourite but I can't defend that, it's the film's only problem
Checked
based and checked
this and se7en are anarchic as fuck and them fincher start doing movies with such hermetic visuals, everything is clean and smooth, there isnt the same energy.
is the hollywood neurosis to "become a serious director" and getting oscars nominations?
i miss the filmmaker that he could be. not that he is bad, but i expect him, at this point, to be a more relevant guy.
Kino like Fight Club and Se7en can't be made now.
SJW twitter femboys would think that Fight Club is sexist and anti-establishment and they would say Se7en is a glorifaction of violence
No, seven would get shit for religious references.
More importantly, who’s cock was that at the end? Are the stories true, is it really Brads?
he isn't shooting himself. he's shooting tyler
I think it would get shit for having religious references and being violent and the fact that the only woman in the film gets killed
Perhaps
You're joking right?
No, what do you mean?
only with jews and muslins, you can crap all over christianism with no consequences.
yeah, theres that. to be fair, roger ebert was a faggot taking those approaches in the 80s. he was all butthurt about stuff like blue velvet.
social media is the big problem, give voices to a bunch of retards and now movie studios cannot take not even the most minimal chances - and arthouse movies are almost a parody of they used to be.
bump
It's sad man
He did the same thing with Fight Club.
Cmon Brad stop being coy, was it you or wasn’t it? If not, who was it?
Is that Marlas penis? It could be hers if it wasn’t for all that hair, women aren’t that hairy
Because you got dubs I'll tell you.
It was my penis, yes I Brad Pitt browse Yea Forums
By showing that he’s not afraid to die or feel pain he killed ‘tyler’
Holy shit, digits confirm!
C-could you post pics of Gwyneths feet?
Shhhhhh.
That makes sense
I meant Ahhhhh not Shhhh
Sorry I'm afraid I can't do that.
Fuck footfags(don't tell Quentin I hate footfags)
bump
based
>Fight club comics
>book released in 96'
>Recent was a "graphic novel"
Only one was a fucking comic because most of you idiots that think this shit is "kino" saw the movie first then read the "comics". I guarantee none of you posting in here we're even born when the book came out. Fuck all you. This site is ruined for appealing to you fucking underage fat asses and avengers fans.
Sup summerfag. Can't wait until you're back in your cage and have to be in bed when mommy tells you. Go heat up your chicken tenders and go back to
a continuation make sense in the universe of the book.
that said, he could do it AS A FUCKING BOOK.
ok, fine, a 'graphic novel': chooses a terrible artist and fuck it all up. the story isnt good but a decent art could save it. a brian bolland, a frank quitely, a lee bermejo or a alex ross.
no, gets some dude who does generic stuff.
it was terrible.
but he is being terrible since the early 2000s? i think RANT was his last solid good book.
Why are you so angry user?
He gave himself brain damage, but really reall really well aimed brain damage that one hit the that is responsible for Tyler
Who gives a shit?
Also how is Fight Club shit?
No this is how
zach braff should have played norton's part
No Norton was perfect
>Fight Club
How did Fincher manage to go form Meatloaff fighting in a basement to Norton shooting nigs in the streets?I don't get it.
if you read this with braff's voice, it takes it a higher level
makes sense though
the purpose of fight club was to emancipate men from materialism so they could self actualise instead of chasing things they never needed or even wanted and to build their strength and courage through fighting
once norton wasn't chasing after ikea furniture, he realised what he wanted was to secure the existence of his people and a future for white children and the club gave him the body, the mind and the means to do just that
more 20 years after and it's still relevant, visionary work
You're quite the comedian
You guys are joking right?
by being willing to shot himself the narrator shows enough mental strength to overpower Tyler and remove him from the mind
None of these people are joking. They are actually stupid.
In the book the ending is a bit different. He does end up shooting himself and gets sent to a mental asylum. However, he is still worried about all the Space Monkeys that are still running around doing god knows what. They send him notes and secret messages saying stuff like, "we are waiting for your return Mr. Durden"
this is quite cool because it gave him a messiah status, like his body was just a vessel for the second coming of this entity.
but it should remain like that, some sort of vague hypothesis and not a continuation, on shitty comics.
but even palahniuk agree that the movie end was better - and it was for a movie. it was more cinematic.
the script is so good that the whole 'youve met me on a very strange moment of my life' sounds like a palahniuk thing and it wasnt.
kino adaptation, knows to respect, to make it better and what to discard and/or change.
Not enough people give the writing of the film credit
/thread
>christianism