Is he circumcised?

I'm not gay enough to check.

Attached: 884.jpg (240x320, 12K)

Other urls found in this thread:

howtotalkaboutarthistory.com/reader-questions/why-do-all-old-statues-have-such-small-penises/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Why is his dick so small?

Yeah he is
t. unironic gay man

The more important reason is why does he not make it bigger

Attached: dr20manhattan203.jpg (344x650, 54K)

have

he doesn't care about such unimportant things

it's called a "grower"

>dr Manhattan
>american
>wall street
Checks out.

gay enough to think about it though
you forgot to think no homo, faggot

Attached: 865478964.jpg (203x226, 6K)

A circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis contain the same number of particles. Structurally, there's no discernible difference. Cut and uncut are unquantifiable abstracts. Why should I be concerned?

>leaving humanity behind
>dick NOT lower than the balls
baka desu

He can make it take any shape or size he wants, he probably keeps it small just to avoid hitting it on tables and shit.

Imagine though when hes fucking, he could turn it into all kinds of crazy shapes, make it grow and shrink and really do anything. If he wanted to he could seduce an evil bitch, get her in bed, and then while he's inside her he could just make his dick 1000x its normal size and literally explode her into a million tiny pieces.

Dude is overpowered as fuck.

>cut particles off of dick
>same number of particles

user this is illogical, the same dick uncut would have more particles than a cut version.

The original line didn't make sense either.

He could have even made it so big that instead of taking refuge on Mars and building a clockwork temple there, he could have done that on his own dick and lived on it. Absolute madman.

>A circumcised penis and an uncircumcised penis contain the same number of particles
OY VEY

What was the point of this character? Serious question.

to advance the plot

To give a very simplified summary, the character is an amalgam of vastly overpowered superweapon type characters like Superman, except in this context, he has lost his touch with humanity and has little moral compass like Superman does. It poses not the usual cliche question of what if Superman turned evil, but rather what if Superman didn't really give a fuck, and also had a sick blue swinging dong.

When an American is scammed out of his foreskin, this is the kind of argument he gives

Attached: downloadfile-7.jpg (474x535, 30K)

>claims to be above it all and says he doesn't care about anything
>still makes himself 6'5" and ripped, when he was a scrawny geek before the accident
Bullshit he doesn't care. Ozy was clever to pick up on his ego.

Nod to michaelangelo. Small penis implies being less animalistic, more adept with higher human faculties such as intellect and spirituality, downplaying human desire and sexuality. Literally speaking, the small penis makes him appear super-human.

>Literally speaking, the small penis makes him appear super-human.

How is having a small dick superhuman

He should have a constantly fully erect 5 foot penis.

I just explained you idiot. It downplays the animal “inferior” aspect of humanity, which is desire/sex/reproduction/death

Read:
howtotalkaboutarthistory.com/reader-questions/why-do-all-old-statues-have-such-small-penises/