So why didn't he create infinite resources?

Hulk was the only avenger strong enough to use the gauntlet without dying. If he used it again it might have killed him.

why didn't he just wish back alive the people who died?
If Thanos could recreate a whole universe, surely the stones can do this

Captain marvel could have done it

Yes but the Russos are misogynists and made sure she didn't shine in this movie.

I assume it’s because the gauntlet they made couldn’t harness the power properly

Why doesn't ant man just fucking throw Thanos into space

No, she couldnt or she would have.

glove was too big

Thanos would portal back to earth and be even more pissed

They should have had a scene of him going there and talking to Natasha.

>Thanos forces the best craftsmen in the universe to forge him a gauntlet that can withstand the stones, and murders all but one of them after so that no-one may every replicate it
>Tony Stark just throws them in an Iron Man gauntlet and it works just fine

Attached: 7 minutes.jpg (463x543, 50K)

>it kills him
>just fine

This is a children's movie being discussed on a website that requires you to be 18 years or older to browse lmfao

Capekino is serious business.

all movies are for children, adults have better things to do than sit in front of a screen for several hours

Apparently the stones can't heal the damage they cause. Look at how Thanos heals every wounds and even the damage to his clothing but nothing that has to do with the snap.

Attached: healing.png (742x646, 911K)

Do they now?

>people are unironically taking that bloated corpse's autism over sparkling rocks seriously

Attached: 5A09A90D-99CC-4E7B-83B2-4027BD61FFF6.jpg (514x623, 117K)

>can kill every life form in the universe
>sorry a broken arm is just too much bro

The stones exact a price on their user. It can't be undone with semantic loopholes. The soul stone test proved that

adults do, yes. like posting on Yea Forums.

Irrestible force vs immovable object.
Omnipotence does allow for the creation of a stone too heavy to lift, but Thanos or any other user of the gauntlet is not strong enough to handle it. Something has to give and this is what happens.
Real talk, this is just to answer the infinite resources and saving Tony question. Can't do it because the movie establishes it as impossible by way of not having even the strongest user with the best equipment being able to do so.
Its hardly amazing writing and there are still plenty of concerns but it tries to be consistent if nothing else.

family was watching age of ultron on tv today and i thought, why didnt thor just place mjolnir on the trigger so ultron and his minions couldnt drop sokovia

hulk could just use it on the other arm

that's not how gloves work you stupid cunt

because he's a negative utilitarian obviously

And then he would have two crippled arms. Perfect plan.
Of course he could just drop the professor persona and go back to savage hulk or whatever. Those should still be functional.
At least they would be by comic logic. Also removes any development for the character, perfect to maintain the status quo.
She-Hulk when?

>Irrestible force vs immovable object.

makes no sense. if there is such a thing as an irresistible force, then there is no such thing as an immovable object. if there is such a thing as an immovable object, then there is no such thing as an irresistible force.

omnipotence either means the power to do everything, or the power to do everything that can be logically done. if the former, then we can come up with a contradiction. therefore, we can't have that kind of omnipotence. the second kind is logically sound.

When did evil blue lady figure out how to use a time machine?
Why could a huge ship and army be so easily transported in the future?
What's the deal with Antman trying to fix his van during the final battle? They didn't even use it.

It doesn't make sense. The reality stone alone can turn matter into bubbles. Logic says all 6 stones should give you the ability to become into a Superman like being. I mean Captain Marvel is the hardest living being in the MCU and she merely got a whiff of the power stone.

It is possible that another user might be able to reverse the damage, but if we consider that the backlash is proportional to the usage, it would mean that the next user would have to sacrifice more in order to reverse what the stones wrought in the first place. Thereby making it an ever greater chain of consequences.
Which could also explain why the Hulk had so much trouble performing the second snap. Naturally this is conjecture.
As for the omnipotence, the idea would be that the user can only perform such feats to the level of their own compatibility and resilience. Thus still imposing a hard limit on what can be done. This remains conjecture and is why I said there are plenty of concerns about the whole thing.

Super space tech makes it trivial. Admittedly they should have left the date up in the air but I think it only states 2014. In relative time it means they had months to figure it out and make more Pym Particles.
Since time travel means going really small anything of any size can be transported so long as the resource exists.
Trying to throw the stones away to prevent Thanos from using them. Then they could jump there once they have dealt with him. Of course it would also mean that if they lose Thanos does what he wants and the collapse of other timelines but that was just a setup to kill Stark.

why not create a star trek replicator that runs on light

>As for the omnipotence, the idea would be that the user can only perform such feats to the level of their own compatibility and resilience. Thus still imposing a hard limit on what can be done. This remains conjecture and is why I said there are plenty of concerns about the whole thing.

this also makes on sense, because you are omnipotent. by definition, you are powerful enough to do anything.

the issue here is how broad 'everything' is.

So the glove can adjust it's size to anyone wearing it but what it can't do is move the thumb position. Got it. Good job, Tony

Space stone btw

It seemed pretty obvious the Infinity gauntlet let you cast things with slight protection for the user. Hence the snap killed the glove and didnt fuck up Thanos the first time round. Its basically a one use shield!

why didn't they use snipers on thanos

>Captain Marvel
>Avenger

Attached: 06647ea0245c55926ee895617f7e765a.png (531x313, 173K)

I'll fully admit not to be equipped to deal with the philosophical repercussions of the nature and degree of omnipotence in an ill defined setting.
By right since there is backlash the user is not omnipotent, just able to change natural laws up to a point dictated by their, for lack of a better word, worth.
But really, this is just a mean to ensure that the door is closed on the debate for infinite resource and reversing the backlash of using the stones in order to have something to point ot when people ask why they dont use the stones to deal with existing antagonists and issues.
As this thread proves, its barely a functional solution if at all.

why didnt they just shoot him to death like in fortnite?

Why can you just create an infinity gauntlet out of anything?

Based Russos

have sex

TONY STARK BUILT THIS

IN A CAVE

Didn't hurt Hulk any more than Thanos

Okay dubs I will

enjoy it

Thanks fren

The same tony stark that solved time travel and has a nano particle suit that can make a god bleed.

The movies do a ton to set up that Stark is unparalled in many ways. He's the human foil to Thanos. Him figuring out the stones when they were able to build Vision, utilize the Tesseract, etc, isn't surprising. The dwarves were magical craftsmen, not genius scientists.

THERE'S ALREADY A FUCKING UNIVERSE FULL OF RESOURCES. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

you've blessed me with this image user, i thank you.