>tfw no Snow
Tfw no Snow
Nathan Butler
Other urls found in this thread:
Julian Brown
wtf is this picture
Isaiah Barnes
Look for Kubrick and then see if it makes sense.
Thomas Baker
i dunno but for some reason
youtube.com
Nathaniel Mitchell
I tried to organize horizontally in terms of chronology, and vertically in a way in which to make clearer the similarities between the figures. Some of the directors were represented in a very general way, based on my thoughts on various films. Some were represented more specifically, with only one film or a small group of films in mind.
Each column is governed by themes and tendencies that make it a kind of sub-system within the overall system. The point and the line on column 1 does not mean the same thing as the point and the line on column 10, so the figures on the first column are to be interpreted more in relation to each other than in relation to the figures on the last column.
Although there is a certain rigour in the concept and in the drawing itself, I think it is also interesting to take a more intuitive look. Every figure is supposed to be more or less autonomous, not only fitting into the general scheme but also creating something that resignifies the other figures.
Noah Jackson
You’re too smart for this shithole. I’m serious.
John Miller
Unless this is something lifted from *eddit and I just got pranked
Bentley Roberts
so like
>chaplin: starts off well, conflict is introduced for comical effect, conflict is resolved and all is well again
whereas
>warhol: shit all happens; just a mess of post-beatnik lifestyle
am i close?
Oliver Moore
>actually falling for this totally airy borderline meaningless pretence
lmfao
you're not too smart for this shithole, don't worry
Ryder Morris
Sneed
Justin Roberts
Go back to your Sneed thread dumbfuck.
Liam Allen
either schizophrenic or genius, you clearly need to work on expressing yourself
Ian White
>Lynch
>Rivette
Makes sense desu
Michael Lopez
Dumb fucks, remember the memes.
Xavier Diaz
i dont even know half of em
Justin Allen
>user comes here with this turned up to 11 loss meme, feeds you a few empty phrases about how you're supposed to interpret it, and you think you're smart for having fallen for it
k e k
Easton Perry
Get cancer
Eli Gray
Dreyer doesn't penetrate the framing, he surrounds it, Bergman penetrates. They should be switched.
Rivette should be replaced with Malle.
Cassavetes should have more black squares following the line, often not just a singular subtext.
Tarkovsky should be Bresson but with the corners facing outward.
Jackson Hall
>Lumiere bros
>DW Griffith
>Sergei Eisenstein
>Orson Welles
>John Ford
>Charlie Chaplin
>Leni Riefenstahl
>Jean Luc Godard
>Alfred Hitchcock
>Ingmar Bergman
>Brian De Palma
>Stanley Kubrick
>John Cassevetes
>John Carpenter
>Douglas Sirk
>Andy Warhol
>Werner Herzog
>Sergio Leone
>David Peckinpah
>Terrence Malick
>David Lynch
>Quinten Tarantino
>Frederick Wiseman
>David Cronenberg
>Asia Argento (whatever her dad's name is)
Howd's I do?
Ayden Rivera
>that malick
no
Hunter Taylor
>not a single curve
hah
square as your brain, let
Elijah Richardson
Literal nonsense OP
You can invent any interpretation you want of any of this
Jordan Wood