Why didn't Harry Potter just use the time turner and go back in time and kill baby Voldemort?

Why didn't Harry Potter just use the time turner and go back in time and kill baby Voldemort?

Attached: frodo.jpg (600x599, 45K)

something something dullest franchise

his wrist would go numb from having to spin the thing so many goddamn times

Why did Voldemort keep the horcruxes on Earth and not on some distant star millions of light years away?

The better question is, why didn't Harry Potter just use the time turner to prevent the creation of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1520007433665.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

because hp time travel doesn't change the timeline it confirms it
if something doesn't happen then time travel can't make it happen

Why didn't Voldemort just Accio Harry Potter
Why didn't Dumbledore Accio Voldemort
Why didn't Snape Accio Lily

expect, you know, the times when it works like that user said and not like what you're saying
people have gone back and changed things

Why didn't Harry just fuck Hermione's pussy raw?

Horcruxes can’t go back further in time than when they were born.

Why didn't Harry Potter rape everybody, use the time turner to go back in time and pretend nothing happens? he could do it several times a day till his dick goes numb.

like?

Why don’t I?

i really do not give a fuck enough to prove anything about hp of all fucking things
go to the wikia about time turns
it was some boy and girl what went back and time and fucked something up, and then they had to fix it
and it wasn't like a few minutes, it was years

Because that isn't how the time turner works
You are too dumb for Harry Potter
you can't actually change the past, they don't stop Buckbeak from being killed, he never dies, it's a closed loop

Avengersfags literally can't understand properly thought out movies
They also indicate it only works for 5-6 hours, they are brief closed loops

How are you still posting about this

>some boy and girl what went back and time and fucked something up, and then they had to fix it
sounds like some random fanfic tier shit

that one time at the nude beach when hermione tripped and fell on harrys erected penis and he instantly came deep inside her. from that moment harrys became addicted to her pussy and forced her into nonstop sex. hermione went crazy after her 26. orgasm in a row and went back in time to undo the slip.

haven't you read the books?

That's from the play which is fanfiction.

>Muh Hermione isn't black
Have sexy, intel

stupid

shit I forgot this scene, might have to reread the series

based

It's from that one book where Rowling had Raimi ghostwrite for her.

why didnt Frodo just eat the ring?

Because Voldemort is alive

Because Harry SHITTER has no real plot or worldbuilding. It's just a series of asspulls that immediately stop existing the moment they serve their purpose in the story.

Because he cannot risk becoming the VERY thing he fights against!

Why didnt Harry Potter just use the Infinity Stones to stop Voldemort?

"No!"
My celibacy is my power; you will not get away with kissless virgin-shaming anymore

REASONS

>wow, time travel! I bet lots of things were improved or changed by it, like killing Hitler and curing smallpox!
>no, just saving a hippogriff and wizard Bin Laden
Oh

Not true. It has good world-building like Twatlight, another YA series. You sound like an asshole whose opinion on a series is entirely based on how much its popularity annoys him

>that image
Very nice but Harry Potter and ASOIAF deserve to be below shit tier
at least LOTR along with the others in there are considered classic books by people who aren’t awkward millennials
There are people who consider Tolkien’s work to be literature and I don’t necessarily disagree
Neither Rowling or Martin have ever produced literature

>buckbeak gets axed
>time travel to prevent buckbeak from getting axed
are you retarded?

Because then the Present Voldermort would still alive and only baby Voldemort would die changing that timeline until Ron returned the Horrocrux to his time

Nope. It's shit. Boring use of magic, nonsensical world building, shitty by-the-numbers story., disingenuous plot twists. It's the most mundane fucking thing possible. The first books were ok because they had a childish sense of wonder and I suppose a child could enjoy them.
But if you like HP as an adult you are an honest to god brainlet and a pleb.