Are the sequels worth watching? Nothing is more satisfying than seeing atheists get destroyed

Noone can disprove that the easter bunny exists. now bow you shits! bow to the bunny!

Attached: bunny.jpg (730x584, 47K)

If you are trying to prove something it helps to actually prove it.

That's just the way it is. If I claim that I'm actually a talking wheelbarrow it's down to me to prove it, not for someone else to disprove.
Do you claim not to be a colossal faggot? If so prove it

>Unicorns don't exist
>You can't prove they don't

Agnosticism is purely for the sake of argument, not thinking.

There is no teacup orbiting Pluto. The thinking man doesn't say "hmm can't prove that so we don't know if it's true". They have better things to think about.

A common misconception.

Atheists merely do not believe in God.
This is not "certainty of God's nonexistence", but merely a lack of belief in God.

You can be atheist and agnostic.
You can also be agnostic and believe in God, some people think faith without proof is the whole point even.

Stop thinking agnostic is some kind of middle ground.

Why can’t modern Christians form coherent arguments or philosophy? Is it because burgers have taken control of the dialogue? Christian Guys like Dotevesky or Tolkien don’t seem to be around any more

Why are atheists unable to define atheism?

Why is American "Christian" cinema so shit?

American evangelicals mearly pay lip service, the bible exists to justify their lifestyle in their eyes they don't think about it's words and the meanings.

>They have better things to think about.
Why? The thinking man's curiousity knows no boundaries. It's the primary motivation for thinking.

Prove it.

Blame this faggot.

Attached: 1506358574285.jpg (220x236, 13K)

It's all a racket for the Jews.

Attached: 416874510.jpg (1280x720, 88K)

the concept of "belief" as a whole is for the weak

Attached: 1558720037992.jpg (170x227, 9K)

>Why are atheists unable to define atheism?
Don't care lol

>You can be atheist and agnostic

Attached: f3217f_6615771.png (1200x1335, 269K)

>encouraging discourse is discouraging philosophical thought

this

Attached: art.webm (480x287, 2.76M)

How many modern protestants do you think actually read the bible, how many can aeperate the metaphors from the truth, there are no scholars working their lives to figure that out like in the Catholic church, they just see words and pick and choose what counts.

too bad that all you think you know is purely a mirage. the true nature of the cosmos evades you and all that is left are beliefs.

seething

I could be, but I might also not be, can you prove it one way or the other?

enjoy this shitty graph

Attached: shit taste.png (805x631, 12K)

Oh no!
How can i possibly argue against this?

Attached: 1485244452101.jpg (819x460, 30K)

>spawn a branch of drooling retards who become the face of christianity

Faith and rational are mutually exclusive, a man can have faith in something above while acknowledging that you can't prove or disprove what he has faith in exists.

Yeah but alot of those proofs are circular, such as St. Aquinas, or don’t have the same view of god as would be viewed by the church, see Aristotle for God as a starting point or existence beginner

wtf is this from?

So not believing in anything will make me strong, right? Because that's what Nietzsche fanboys seem to think.

Attached: 1546564561520.png (1144x772, 267K)

sure, but the man with faith is a retard if he keeps his faith when there is otherwise reasonable doubt

>become
It has always been this way and if it wasn't then the decline isn't just a symptom of protestantism but also a sign for the weakness of catholicism

Attached: 023.png (680x680, 221K)

>Faith and rational are mutually exclusive
So you understand everything around you? There's some things you just have to believe because the human brain can only do so much.

Reasonable doubt is the best time to have faith, it's when he puts too much stock in it when he becomes retarded.

simbly ebic

Attached: The tiger.jpg (900x1200, 98K)

>So not believing in anything will make me strong, right?
No, lifting will make you strong. Shitposting on 4channel just makes you older.

Its a mediocre movie but i just love how butthurt atheists get anout it.

>NO NO NO HOW DARE YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME

is it really so hard to admit you just don't know the answer to a question?

That's the idea isn't it? How much of what people takes as fact have people actually seen, it's all words in books that say they are fact but can you ever be sure? How do you know any of this is real?

*BLOCKS YOUR PATH*

Attached: idw.jpg (960x960, 118K)

reasonable doubt and faith literally have nothing to do with each other. they're totally unconnected as concepts.

>you can't disprove something i just made up
You can't disprove the existence of a Flying Spaghetti Monster, we've already been through this

>being a limpwristed pussy-ass fencesitter is for the thinking man

Attached: 48CD69F0-286E-4BC1-8A85-0E70677DD4EA.jpg (640x480, 93K)

There hasn't been a worse, more despicable and more disastrous event in history than Americans attempting to teach Christianity.

Attached: aquinas.jpg (324x450, 25K)

No "they" dont. Atheists by definition simply live their lives without believing in a deity.

>papists

Attached: 50202702-6FA9-4D68-A6D2-9EB435E7E64D.jpg (1484x1079, 285K)

>choosing to believe what some faggot in a book says
>not looking at the world and making the decision yourself
Sitting on the fence implies there are only the two options, only a cuck thinks in absolutes.

according to elemental logic, if the burden of proof isn´t on the one making the claim the we could believe anything anyone says.
ie: i have a million dollar on my pocket
ie: i have both male and female genitals
ie: my cow has no diseases
did you understand now why? dude, is not that hard to understand that, if you claim something then you prove it, it´s your claim so you gotta provide info.

There are literally two options between theism and atheism. I didn’t day “Christianity” or even “monotheism” and atheism. Yes or no, god(s) exist in any form or they don’t.
Congrats on your F in English

>You're as bad as religious fags quoting the bible.
you are a fucking illiterate piece of shit. Also, atheist should fuck themselves for asking for "evidence" of god, it´s a futile discussion, asking for evidence of that imply atheist dont understand how religion works, but hey, burden of proof? it´s fucking logical and practical

Why is it always exactly the same pictures?

The same reason papists complain about the same handful of televangelists and one church in Sweden every time

disprove it then, faggot.

Do you also think the Earth is flat because you've never experienced its curvature and don't believe things that are in books?

I want to know the answer then user, which extreme or the other?

Dont bother. The entire fact that hundreds of years of science and discoveries are based on the scientific methodology, allows cretins like him to post on the internet using a computer sending signals at the speed of light accross the planet.

None of these advancements were possible, without rigorous peer reviewed academia, *surprise surprise* places the burden of proof on the one making a claim (or a hypothesis).

>only a cuck thinks in absolutes.
Do you even see what you did there Obi-wan?

Sidestepping your glaring grammar and syntax mistakes.
>for evidence of that imply atheist dont understand how religion works
Then prove how religion works, or do you mean "faith"? Because religion is an organized institution. "Faith" is something personal. If you meant "you cant explain faith", then prove how it works, otherwise its bullshit.

Thats how science works. Thats why youre posting on a computer.

Burden of proof is on the one making the claim. You're losing at your own game, faggot.

>Oy vey praise Rabbi Yeshua goy

Attached: 1494761591782.jpg (1024x860, 125K)

Good thing I'm not a Romanist, then.

/thread

t. christian
who the fuck even cares about proving or disproving god? It defeats the whole purpose of a BELIEF.

Do you believe in God?
This is a yes or no question. There's no third option here smart ass.

Define god.

Except it matters greatly. The fact that Jews, Muslims, Christians and even Hindus slaughter other people in the name of their god every year, makes this issue even greater.

Just because you are a civilized and possibly rational human being, doesnt mean that your "faith" isnt just your mind fooling your brain into believing into something so strongly, that it "becomes real" in your mind.

This has been studied countless times with MRIs and catscans. The brain isnt the mystery it was 20 years ago.

Because those words in those books give us medicine and give us technology like the ones you’re using now. I have reason to believe that they are real because they actually create real results and affect our lives.

Conscious immaterial entity that is capable of affecting our lives.

This.

Logic is a harsh mistress.

Please don't be this retarded

I pray for atheists will come to know Jesus.

But how do you know any of what they say is real, sure we see the result but do you personally know the workings of it?

You just proved to me that you're too stupid to understand the things you quote. Lying doesn't change facts. It does not matter if you believe the person making the claim or not, this isn't court. What comes out of a person's mouth does not change reality.

>elemental logic
thanks for the chuckle

Uncivilized people are uncivilized. Civilized people are civilized. It has nothing to do with faith.
Uncivilized people will find any reason to slaughter each other, if it's not faith then it's politics or whatever. The idea that people are actually killing each other over their believes is idiotic. The belief is just the excuse.

I wish life after death was real.

>Because those words in those books give us medicine and give us technology like the ones you’re using now.
How do you know? Because someone told you, or because you've seen how?

If I sound retarded to you right now, imagine how retarded you sounded to me earlier.

The only evidence for God is that satan clearly exists. This faggy boomer shit isn't convincing anyone.

If you suppose a counterclaim exist you too are left with the burden of proof, the argument must then remain in dispute until definitive evidence is provided. Only idiots use this argument in disputes such as these. Agnosticism is the only correct answer, then. Effectively saying "I, nor anyone else knows."

You don't have to "believe" to accept the most reasonable claim at this point in time, especially those that supported by logic and facts. By "believing" in something you essentially eliminating the most powerful tool you brain have for the illusory comfort of false confidence and being unable to objectivity consider the opposite point of view. That's all there is to it.

Attached: 1529965391994.webm (490x360, 1.98M)

That's just some artificial rule of thumb. It isn't like something automatically doesn't exist just because someone can't prove it.

Me: There are some solar systems with more than 3 stars
You: Prove it
Me: I can't
You: Ah ha! Then it must be the case that there are no solar systems with more than 3 stars.

See the fallacy.

Why would I jump to another extreme if I didn't believe the other?

That was my first post in this thread, christ cuck

>Philosophical leaders use deities as a concept to centralize the absolute morale authority of the lessons we learn from own stories
>So called 'living text' is allowed to adapt via interpretation as new objective knowledge is gathered and applied as a better understanding of the base truths in the original stories
>Learning the 'mind of God' through observation his greatest work instead of a overanalyzing ancient text
>Somewhere along the line, short-sighted literalists take the reigns
>Those same retards turn into hedonists the second it feels socially advantageous
Y I K E S

There's a scar on my ass that happens to be a perfect map of the London underground, prove me wrong

>If you suppose a counterclaim exist you too are left with the burden of proof
No you aren't you fucking retard.

If we’re talking basic biology it would be very easy to verify what they say by just dissecting a body and seeing the inner workings of it or taking a tissue sample and looking at it through a microscope. Same for like a car or a computer and seeing every facet of it and how it works. I’ve looked at these things in high school and what they say and what i’ve seen both correlate very well, so I can assume that they are correct. Every thing science related is based off an assumption and then experimenting to see if it’s correct or not, I believe this process is AS CLOSE to the truth as we can possibly get. Maybe not the whole truth, but there are things we can concretely know about the universe around us through experiments and results.

lmao, go back to r/atheism

Believing in something doesn't mean you won't allow yourself to investigate if it's true or not. You can change your mind you know?

Teacher in second movie did nothing wrong. All the other movies were bullshit arguments. Kid asked religious question teacher answered no harm done. The other movies are just bad meme Christian arguments.

Kevin Sorbo being a dick Atheist was funny

Attached: PIE.jpg (1366x768, 75K)

I love how my 100% true and reasonable post only gets meme answers, doing wonders for my ego.

>See the fallacy
Yup. Your post was a strawman

>doing wonders for my ego
Too bad that's the only way you can massage your ego.

>Philosophy class
>Ever denying the existence of God
What a bizarre premise, Philosophy has more Christfags than any other faculty I can think of outside theology at Christian universities

sounds like the tao

No godfag. Doesn't surprise me that you don't understand how logic works.
>You: There are some solar systems with more than 3 stars
>Me: Prove it
>You: I can't
>Me: Then you cannot state with certainty that there are solar systems with more than three stars
Doesn't matter if there are or aren't solar systems with 3 stars. The point is that you cannot claim "is" if you cant prove that is "is." That's why you morons get so stuck.

> i claim the universe does exist
> you cant prove that we in fact do exist and are not rather in a computer simulation so therefore we live in a simulation

why are atheists so foolish

It's one thing to claim that a solar system exists with more than 3 stars.
It would be another to claim that you know of one in particular, and that it's gravitational pull impacts the Earth and the life on it such that recognition of it's existence is supremely important.
The 'clockmaker' deist God that has doesn't interfere with the world beyond it's conception is the former, the God of Abraham that the vast majority of monotheists claim belief in is the latter. No one really argues with deists.

The tao is conscious?
Don't know anything about taoism.

I think the real problem is that people are afraid our sense of right and wrong will go away if religion does.

>so therefore we live in a simulation
And there is where you made it a stawman.

Religion has existed as long as humanity has, it doesn't stop people from doing wrong.

That's wrong, the path divides many directions. On one side you disregard all gods, and on the other you have a thousandfold path for each denomination of every religion and their ideology. Somewhere in the middle you admit, I don't know the answer, "I will decide my own path, I will follow my own worldly observations and make reason based assessments and use rationally guided intuition to determine the gaps, to find applicable hypotheses and then experiment upon them until truth is found."

People often disregard religion, and others disregard science. I think science is simply the art of finding the truth of god, whoever or whatever that may be.

Yes you are. You don't simply defer the claims of another without a counterpoint and assume you're correct. There is no objective, or observable evidence that some form of deity exists. Likewise there is no evidence it doesn't exist. Maybe it isn't god, perhaps it's the "simulation" conundrum. Solipsism isn't an untouched subject either. The embodiment of gods as we've come to know them are perhaps short sighted, coming as far as we have in science there's very little in the way of evolution of religion.

In any case to refute the existence of god is making a negative claim regarding the existence and thus you are left with the burden, as is the theologian in proving the existence. I, being in the middle adequately address the shortcomings of the knowledge at hand and refuse to take part.

It's a fair concern. I don't personally believe in a god, but I've seen quite a few people turn into short-sighted hedonists the second they realize there isn't eternal damnation lurking in the end.

it's actually quite easy to prove a 3 star system (which actually exist). we can find them the same way we find binary stars, as their gravitational interaction will have them revolve around a common point.

it doesn't work with god. you claim their is a divine being with more or less infinite power. you cannot prove nothing exists, because if it's literally nothing then there's no way it will interact with anything. the default stance is skepticism, unless quantifiable facts show otherwise.

I guess so but in their minds, there's probably a lot of wrong that has been avoided because of it and people's fear of hell.

there

what the fuck is wrong with me

Imagine believing in a magic sky wizard

Attached: thumbsup.jpg (900x900, 86K)

I think that it's time for atheists to band together and start slaughtering the religious. We cannot share this universe with them. Tolerance will do nothing.

Atheism doesn't stop someone from doing wrong so what you say is meaningless.

>No one can disprove that the easter bunny exists. now bow you shits! bow to the bunny!
Santa is Godin and he's real. Prove me wrong!

Attached: santa christmas yule odin.jpg (300x213, 17K)

Imagine believing anything.

Attached: A4275FC1-43F6-4FE1-85E4-86DF956885ED.jpg (410x264, 14K)

>Atheism doesn't stop someone from doing wrong so what you say is meaningless.
Well, it doesn't cause them to do wrong by default like Judean religion do. Once you create the spook of evil, then people will larp as evil. Without that, they're just being assholes and it has no glamor or edge to it.

Attached: 1f5f653c1870dd4bba351788da8fd0a0-d5r8re8.jpg (794x1162, 167K)

>Atheism doesn't stop someone from doing wrong
Where did I claim it does?

>Sitting on the fence implies there are only the two options, only a cuck thinks in absolutes.
STFU Jewdi

Attached: 1554333973435.jpg (600x900, 99K)

I don't "imagine" because mental images aren't real.

Attached: Descent_of_the_Modernists,_E._J._Pace,_Christian_Cartoons,_1922.jpg (2000x1960, 2.15M)

>Why is American "Christian" cinema so shit?
"HURRR DURRRR AAMERICANS AM I RIGHTTTT! They can't make films"

Attached: Yeshua the kike god.jpg (474x711, 71K)

Love these threads. Don't care if they're started by actual religious morons, trolling atheists, or the SFM's Most Loyal Pirates. I love these threads because I just enjoy spamming science memes.

Attached: this week in science 2000000bce.png (780x614, 377K)

The Descent into Adulthood

Attached: Jesus.jpg (530x794, 74K)

>Civilized people are civilized. It has nothing to do with faith.
It absolutely does. The 30 year war in Europe was so violent, so desctructive, that people quickly turned away from Christianity and went back to greek humanist ideas. Moder European Christianity is a neutered form of what it used to be. In fact, European VALUES is what made Chrisitianity more of a tradition than an actual faith. Furthermore, the puritans and other more "radical" Christians emigrated to the USA.

So again, your belief is a neutered version of what the "book of god" and Christian history is about.

Attached: bunnylol1tu.jpg (549x614, 93K)

They're started by religious trolls and atheist morons most of the time.

>So not believing in anything will make me strong, right? Because that's what Nietzsche fanboys seem to think.
Become the OVERMAN

Attached: Nietzsche serpent jesus religion.jpg (695x732, 183K)

>Why can’t modern Christians form coherent arguments or philosophy?
Because their religion is inherently flawed and flimsy.

Toppest of keks, my fellow /r/atheism poster! Let us revel in our intellectual superiority and lofty chances of copulating with females!

Attached: 1555342637965.jpg (644x800, 35K)

According to the scientifical method. Religious people will never understand this: Atheists don't know God doesn't exist, they have no means to know this for sure. They only look at the evidences and conclude there is particular reason to believe in a God more than anything else. Atheists, like everyone else, don't know. They just don't believe.

>Mel Gibson
>american

Agnostic regards the belief in whether gods are provable.
Agnostic is nothing on it's own, you're still either a theist or an atheist.

You kinda proved his point though. If people are willing to renounce their beliefs because of their values it means their faith have nothing to do with how they act.

Religions killed millions of people but never saved a single one.

>Well, it doesn't cause them to do wrong by default like Judean religion do
You had many reasons to do many immoral things in your life but you chose not too because ''it is immoral just cause xD''. You justify your morality in something outside of materialism and it was highly influenced by christian morals of your culture. You're a religious person.

>I don't personally believe in a god, but I've seen quite a few people turn into short-sighted hedonists the second they realize there isn't eternal damnation lurking in the end.

That's because they were already had a weak moral system to begin with. If someone believes for years that they'll win 1 million dollars and then realize they won't, of course they're gonna turn crazy/bad. Their life was based on something they had no proof was going to happen.

>"Then how did the universe come to be?"
The point of religion, the "benefits" if you will, is that it creates a fixed morality so that people can live their life around them, everything else is just backstory. Trying to prove a religion is "right" with these kinds of questions is pointless, since there is no way of convincing every single human being that X thing happened at the beginning of time. Focusing that much on the backstory is the sign of a retard.

Yup, and they used science to do so.

Attached: religon choices.jpg (1691x1325, 556K)

>t. someone who has never read a history book

>Focusing that much on the backstory is the sign of a retard.
Then Jews, Christians, and Muslims for instance are retards because their religions are based around "the beginning."

>You justify your morality in something outside of materialism
What hippie gnostic?

>materialism
Religion nut term for 'everything that exists outside of their fantasy larp ghost realms'.

Morality comes from cause and effect and always will. You invent "evil" you create larpers and false morals

Attached: star wars white men evil.jpg (697x1052, 292K)

It's worse than that, they lose morals because of religious morals.

They based everything on the fear of punishment coming from a God they gradually realise doesn't exist, so it's like a moral jackpot, thinking everything is now allowed.

But if someone never believed in a God, if he wasn't brainwashed as a kid, he will build his morals on logical reasons and won't be delusional when he reach adulthood.

"Science" is mostly belief because we can't be an expert on everything. Scientifical method is too allow yourself to question those beliefs without being biased

That's not entirely what I meant. A religion can be based on anything, but the most important part always should be the set of morals imposed by that religion.
Trying to prove that your religion is "true" or "correct" by asking meaningless questions like "Bruh why do the birds fly if my god not real?" just makes you sound like a caveman.

>The point of religion, the "benefits" if you will, is that it creates a fixed morality so that people can live their life around them

What kind of weak-ass lie is this?
The biggest religions in the world are about following the strict guidelines for worshiping a particular bloodline of prophets.

Ok, who the religions did save ?

>Focusing that much on the backstory is the sign of a retard.
So we came from ''Science explains everything so we don't need religion anymore'' to ''why bother explaining the nature and the meaning of reality''.

What you said is the equivalent of saying Krypton is irrelevant to Superman.

Yeah, but said rituals aren't really benefits and more often than not treated as chores.

No, I wasn't talking about science here.

Based capeshitter.

>Adam and Eve being the first human beings and causing original sin isn't possible? D-don't worry about that, it's just backstory!

You apologetics suck ass.

Attached: 1339105585495.png (366x455, 232K)

Attached: 2nd law disproves evolution.png (684x936, 149K)

Let me know as soon as the destruction starts user

Attached: bias.png (684x989, 309K)

>rituals aren't really benefits and more often than not treated as chores.
Life-pledge recitals, animal sacrifices, blood consumption, strict diets, and genital mutilation are more than just "chores.

You took your definition of rituals from video games and movies.

No, believing in baseless crap just because our ancestors did makes you sound like a caveman.

I agree.
That's why religions should focus more on the don't be a piece of shit part instead of the other stuff.

>Religion nut term for 'everything that exists outside of their fantasy larp ghost realms'.
Materialism is the belief that the physical world is everything there is. Is a reductionist doctrine which goes against the very nature of every single human being. You're not a materialist.

> Christian fags believe faith and knowledge are the same
> Christian fags believe that atheist "believe" in the non existence of god

This thread is always funny.

Lack of belief in divine beings, that it was easy

Disbelief in a god's powers and origins is made clear by most religions as a an affront to their god(s). The origins and logic does matter if the dudes that made them up said not believing in the origins results in divine punishment.

Why would Atheists believe in the non existence of something? Wouldn't it(god) just be a non factor in their beliefs? As in they don't even consider it worth disproving?

Your post is just another advocation of ignorance.
>"Stop caring about the origin, history, and rules! Just believe and follow!"

Attached: 1490138491537.png (440x478, 376K)

That quote is from a fucking pureflix movie, it's not supposed to make sense.

>That's why religions should focus more on the don't be a piece of shit part instead of the other stuff.
The problem is they inherently can't.

>That's why religions should focus more on the don't be a piece of shit part instead of the other stuff.
You have to make a case as to why this is beneficial and this is slowly dwindling nowadays.

Yes, but religion promotes denial of things that do not fit into your religious views, even if those things are objective facts. It also promotes hatred and violence against those who do not share your views, even if those views are valid and non-destructive. It also promotes the lack of critical thought in preference of a baseless doctrine.

It makes perfect sense though. Atheists care too much about something that doesn't exist or will ever exist.

This.

Attached: God's Not Dead 2014 English Movies 720p Blu Ray x264 AAC ~ ☻rDX☻.mkv_snapshot_00.57.17.jpg (1280x1440, 756K)

>As in they don't even consider it worth disproving?
Except some Atheists live alongside religious people who can do a whole lot of damage around them so it becomes important.

>Do you believe in God?
Yes.
No.
Maybe.
What is god?
I believe in many gods.
I am god, but I don't have faith in myself.
I don't know.
What is belief?
Do I have a choice?

You're thinking about politics.

We all do

Attached: MV5BNDA5Mzk1MzMyOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTMxODUzNA@@._V1_.jpg (1536x921, 1.09M)

That's not exactly what I mean. What I meant is that discussing the origin of life with a theist is pointless, since you will never convince them that godman didn't do it, therefore religions should focus more on trying to teach their morals instead of convincing people that skydude shat out the universe. Science SHOULD research into why the fuck does everything exist and how does reality work.

The only thing that gets me butthurt is that no atheist is actually like this. OK, maybe Richard Dawkins, I don't know him, but he seems like it.

Like I'm an edgy atheist, and my last GF was religious. Like I gave a singular shit if she prayed to some sky ghost. Like shit, go for it, whatever makes you happy babe. Fuck

Dave Mustaine is a born again now brainlet.

Attached: dave mustaine.jpg (500x375, 63K)

>What I meant is that discussing the origin of life with a theist is pointless, since you will never convince them that godman didn't do it
You have a cartoonish view of what a religious person is.

What the hell does that poster even mean?
>Atheists say my faith is unfalsifiable.
>But I.
>I say my faith is unfalsifiable.

Is this a movie for boomers or something?

This is the bullshit religious institutions tried to say when anthropology and biology proved that their foundations were not-original or were not possible.

One of the main reasons Abrahamic religions hate evolution being taught in schools is because it goes against Adam and Eve thus eliminating the concept of Original Sin and showing the contradiction of Abrahamic prophets existing.

Attached: 141ae797912ac14e8346e48c15d55aec--rage-evolution.jpg (236x288, 25K)

All of your attributes to religion can be applied to any sort of belief, including atheism. The difference is that christianity and other religions have justified reasons to NOT act immoral towards people with different views, while atheism doesn't.

>That's just the way it is.
Except it isn't. Things are true or not independent of whether we can prove them or not.
Burden of proof is just a rule born out of practicality, it has no inherent meaning.
Science doesn't deal with truths, hence why it can only formulate theorems. It can't reach truth because it's something empirical born out of experience, and ultimately reason and logic is based on that which is unprovable.

>atheism doesn't.
Of course it doesn't. Atheism is just the disbelief in god. It's up to family and societies to establish moral values.

>needing the constant threat of a sky overseer literally torturing you for all eternity to not be a fucking dick to other people
BASED and REDPILLED SOCIOPATH poster.

>other religions have justified reasons to NOT act immoral towards people with different views

>religious texts literally say to mutilate, banish, enslave, or kill non-believers

Attached: (You).gif (267x199, 1.77M)

*proves God and heaven exists*

Attached: chris.jpg (220x325, 25K)

Relgious people are literal retard NPCs

Attached: 1524510446548.png (600x536, 253K)

>Trying to prove a religion is "right" with these kinds of questions is pointless.
>Focusing that much on the backstory is the sign of a retard.
This is some scummy, deceitful shit you're spewing.

Attached: giphy.gif (288x200, 1.88M)

So...any proof that God does or does not exist yet? Or are you guys just going to fight each other because of your beliefs?

Atheism isn't a belief. Also, religions actively promote that you do act negatively towards others, either directly or indirectly. I say indirectly, because by the nature of having a closed believe that is not open to debate, you are immovable no matter what. Additionally, having such a belief means that you think others are inherently wrong and sinful. Religion is the ultimate us vs them mentality.

>christianity and other religions have justified reasons to NOT act immoral towards people

Attached: p9-dyer-a-20160504-870x649.jpg (870x649, 92K)

Anyone have the finnish-hyperboream version of this one?

Attached: DarkAges.gif (363x323, 9K)

That definition applies to ghosts, satan, magic etc. It’s a bit broad

I fucking hate this bullshit graph.

NOOOOOOOO IT GOES AGAINST CHRISTIANITY THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING BROS

It's because it's factually bullshit. Go back to /r/atheism newfag.

>Atheism isn't a belief.
C'mon now.
>Religion is the ultimate us vs them mentality.
Have you been living under a rock? A lot of atheists think that all christians are double digits IQ morons. Just take two second to look at this thread. I think you're a bit hypocritical here.

>questioning things is pointless
Thank you for proving that religion is no different than brand loyalty and drone consumerism.

Attached: e7a.jpg (1916x945, 238K)

If you guys can't understand how religious metaphors work, I don't know how you can understand movies. You guys know movies aren't real, right? If so, can you not believe in God but it appreciate religion?

No, because if you don't believe in god then you're a sinful pagan that will burn for all eternity.

Your shitty opinions are your own problem user. Just keep them out of everyone else’s lives and we’ll get along fine. The founding fathers had enough sense to create a separation between church and state to stop you cucks

> It's up to family and societies to establish moral values.
Yeah, because a bullet, which is a piece of metal, being fired at a certain speed and then piercing flesh blood vessels is ''EBIL!!!''
> to not be a fucking ''dick'' to other people
stop throwing words around without explaining their underlying meaning
I never said that all religions are equal. You can see that when you understand that you can kill someone than rape their body under atheism.
>Atheism isn't a belief.
Is the belief that God or gods is not a good explanation for the nature of reality because of reductionist materialism. Atheists tend to be more liberal and suicidal than christians for example.

>no pls
Wow rude

>The difference is that christianity and other religions have justified reasons to NOT act immoral towards people with different views
How has that been working out?

But hell is just a metaphor so I'm fine.

>Atheists care too much about something that hugely influences the world view of the overwhelming majority of the population, including lawmakers
Christ you're stupid.

>Asking for "evidence"
If the athiest you're talking to isn't a total subhuman asshole, then they won't ask. 90% of the time it's some religiousfag getting into an argument to try and convert, and that's when the burden of proof statement comes up.

god is dead

Attached: tront.jpg (580x524, 34K)

I just pick and choose the parts I like from various religions/philosophies to construct my religious views. I call it my religious beliefs because in the US you can basically get away with anything when you say "muh religion." It's great.

The graph doesn't present itself as factual; just as a personal opinion. Note that "SCIENTIFIC ADVANCEMENT" can't be fucking measured by any generally agreed-upon measurement.

>and that's when the burden of proof statement comes up.
The burden of proof is a law term and is useful when you want to punish the right person for a crime.

>The graph doesn't present itself as factual
I know
>just as a personal opinion
I know, and it's a factually bullshit opinion

I'm gonna save this image and post it with some garbage statement like OP for those sweet guaranteed replies in a bit. How long should I wait to do so?

xDD

Attached: impact of Finno-Korean hyperwar on science.png (3630x1615, 783K)

Can anyone give me the basic gestalt on the Finno-Korean hyperwar?

Preventing degeneracy from destroying our civilizations and giving hope and meaning to the lives of hundreds of millions of people 24/7
Atheism is not more moral or righteous than religion so it doesn't make sense to spend so much time attacking something that is subjective by their own definitions. Also, the specific focus on religion(read christianity) and justifying it in some sort of moral good that should be done for humans is nonsense when atheism brings more destruction to the world than many other religions.

Attached: finno-korean hyper war.png (317x1442, 282K)

> The works of the Creator, ever present to our senses, give a living and perpetual testimony of his power and goodness far surpassing any evidence transmitted through human testimony. The testimony of man becomes fainter at every stage of transmission, whilst each new inquiry into the works of the Almighty gives to us more exalted views of his wisdom, his goodness, and his power.

-Charles Babbage, inventor of the first computer

Attached: charles-babbage-medium.jpg (360x450, 59K)

If God is real he is evil lol. he is the final boss of this world.

>t. played too many jrpgs

Name 10 games and 5 ludo that have the god of a religion as the final boss.
Hard mode, no SMT.

>Charles Babbage
but today we have freaking Bill Nye

>The Virgin "God is evil"
>The Chad "God is a trickster God"
People with autism exist, and AIDS emerged less than five years after humans eradicated smallpox. God likes to fuck with his creations because he is bored.

>thinks atheism is a belief
I almost forgot that religiousfags are completely beyond reason.

incorrect. people come into life being told god exists without proof, not the other way around

Atheism is a belief based on a worldview and you're not completely rationalist nor would you want to be.

It's not though, it's the rejection of the belief in god. An atheist can have beliefs, but atheism itself isn't a belief, it's the absence of one.

BuT DiNoSaUr BoNeS aRe JuSt TeStInG YoUr FaItH

>if you don’t believe in god then why do you hate him
K I N O
I
N
O