Confirmed fresh
Apologize
Confirmed fresh
Apologize
Other urls found in this thread:
variety.com
twitter.com
Was 60% always fresh?
to be honest these are better than capeshit that always gets fresh
i might pirate it when it's out, not gonna feed disney lol
60% is not fresh............?
that's the threshold, i believe.
Barely fresh
I see the mouse panicked at the 59% and pulled some strings
>if it's fresh it's because disney paid reviewers
>if it's rotten it's real we did it guys we won!
Based Disney ALWAYS wins
Nope
>I see the mouse panicked at the 59% and pulled some strings
Why do you think RT fucked with the audience rating?
Who cares, I don't give a shit about this monkey movie. Get back to me when Mulan is finally out
>Get back to me when Mulan is finally out
>Not knowing it's gonna be Feminism the Movie
>(((Verified))) ratings
Oy vey!
The owner of Rotten Tomatoes used to own Fandango and was a former employee of Disney.
Translation: Disney, thru their loyal cuck, mostly owns RT.
God why do they have to ruin good female characters.
>Rotten Tomatoes
Sorry sweaty, this site is a joke now.
>91%
or does audience score not matter anymore?
I don't get it, Mulan is already perfect the way it is, but they're somehow going to inject it with more feminism?
more like freshold am i right
Verified and non verified are separated now, but you can still see them and vote even without buying ticket.
>Verified and non verified are separated
For now. Rotten Tomatoes WILL get rid of the All Audience score count eventually until only verified user ratings exist. This is the playbook Disney's going forward with in response to the backlash over Captain Marvel and TLJ in preparation for movies like Aladdin 2019 & Episode 9. Literal Orwellian tactics.
It never has
>you can still vote but it doesn't matter because you have to go through 2 sections to see the real score
>or does audience score not matter anymore?
(((VERIFIED.)))
(((RATINGS.)))
They're deleting anything that doesn't fit within (((their))) identity politics.
NO NO NO NOOO!!!! HAHHAAHAHAAHAAAAA!!!!
>old bad
>new good
This is what progressives believe. It is ludicrous.
There's also the bias of everything seeing this are people who probably want to so of course the score would be higher.
no
these remakes are done so disney can sell more merch from kids who will be watching this for the first time. and merch is where the real money is, not box office
oh the diversity is great just love Will Smith's mocha skin and all the middle eastern representation yas queen slay
VERIFIED
hey this movie sucks the cgi looks cheap the actors are bad will smith is annoying and jasmine was hotter as a cartoon
NOT VERIFIED
Gets extra disney points still only 60%
Apologize for what exactly?
>There's also the bias of everything seeing this are people who probably want to so
Normies, basically.
Lol because it's a "diverse" film, the critics are too afraid to give it a low score.
>NO SLAVE JASMINE
WHAT THE FUCKK!!!!?!?
I've seen it fluctuate between 59% and 60% several times now. Disney's desperately trying to "Fresh" out this movie badly with their (((connections))) to critics, but it'll ultimately end up as a sour note and forgotten before the end of the year as an unnecessary remake.
Exactly why I've thrown in the towel on "progress"
>shows score for ALL critics
>Top Critics score is hidden behind 2 buttons
>shows score for "validated" votes only
>all votes are hidden behind 2 buttons
why do they always favor the obvious higher score mmm?
I like that a 2.5/5 counts as a fresh rating on Disney movies but not on movies like Detective Pikachu that threaten to take sales away from a Disney movie.
"Hey massive income inequality, a barely supportive gig economy, and wrecking the middle class is good and progressive because the middle class thrived in the '50s and as we all know everything from the '50s is terrible!"
"PREACH!"
Yes, why do (((they))), indeed.