>Catelyn's kidnapping of Tyrion Lannister was the reason Tywin Lannister and Jaime Lannister went on the offensive against Ned Stark which later triggered the whole war
>Tyrion Lannister becomes Hand of the King in Tywin's absence
>Tyrion Lannister is instrumental in the defense of King's Landing at Battle of Blackwater, though Joffrey gets the credit
>Tyrion Lannister gets married to Sansa Stark, the now Queen of the North
>Tyrion Lannister is accused of murdering Joffrey Baratheon and sentenced to trial of combat which leads to Oberyn Martell's death.
>Tyrion Lannister murders Tywin Lannister
>Tyrion becomes the Hand for Daenerys
>Tyrion is later on trial for the murder of Daenerys
>Tyrion is the one suggesting Bran to be King
>He is not mentioned in the history book.
Catelyn's kidnapping of Tyrion Lannister was the reason Tywin Lannister and Jaime Lannister went on the offensive...
It was a nod to Varys saying he wouldn't be in the history books after Blackwater but yeah, zero mentions is just retarded.
At last, it was truly a song of ice and fire
Why would anyone write about a fucking midge?
Yeah but it was SO funny
Because he is the reason all this shit happened.
Was he not joking when he said that?
Jesus
>You will not be in the history books
>and by that, I mean while I'm writing them I will refuse to mention you whatsoever.
What a dick.
No no no
It was a song of what
And who?
And im diehard fan
Oh no, chroncilers lied!!! What an absolute fucking reveal!
what motivation would they have to lie and exclude tyrions involvement? he was a pivotal player. it would be like writing about the american revolution and not mentioning anything about thomas jefferson
Was it not a wind up?
Why are you talking about this dead show?
He's not a midge, he's a based dwarf.
Because he's the imp and has a terrible reputation in westeros
And how would they lie? If you read the History books and come the part where Joffrey get poisoned, wouldn't you ask who it was that poisoned him? Multiple lords and witnesses was saw it was Tyrion. Yeah, we know it was not Tyrion but the people of Westeros sure believes it was him who killed Joffrey. Never mind the fact he killed Tywin, the Hand of the King, as well.
It is literally impossible to not mention Tyrion in the History books. That is why it is so stupid.
>thomas jefferson
who?
wouldn't that just encourage them to write terrible shit about him? people didn't not write about hitler or stalin because they didn't like them
Good point, I'm literally just trying to understand the process behind shitty writing
They thought it would be funny. That is why. It doesn't make sense, but that is the reason. This is people who earn millions on 'writing'.
He's not in the official history books because he's a threat to the (((faith of the seven))).
somehow
clap-clap. How are your STEM studies going?
Maybe they guy hates Tyrion. Or Bran hates Tyrion and he ordered the book.
I think you mean the ((((iron bank)))
The Maesters and the Faith don't like each other though.
so how would he get away with that? would he just not mention who assassinated the last king, or tywin lannister, or who was serving as the kings hand?
yeah that works better.
honestly I just wanted to post about final fantasy tactics
>and then King Joffrey was poisened by an uncle of his, as most believe, or maybe his uncle's wife
>and then the Hand of the King was murdered by a previous Hand
There, just skirt around him a bit and done
more of a gadfly really
>Tensions rose between the two houses after the Lady Catelyn Stark accused the Lannisters of the attempt on her son Brandon's life.
>While Tywin Lannister was occupied fighting Robb Stark, King Joffrey ruled with the guidance of his Small Council.
>Despite the valiant defense of the city's forces, King's Landing was saved by the allied armies of Tywin Lannister and the Tyrells.
>Though she would later be Queen in the North, at the time Sansa Stark was in the clutches of the Lannisters, who staked their claim on her and the North with a marriage pact.
>Sansa Stark's disappearance after the wedding made her a clear suspect in the matter of Joffrey's poisoning. However, the Lannisters found another to stand trial, perhaps to still the turmoil around the assassination. They couldn't have predicted Oberyn Martell would use the opportunity ...
>Tywin's assassination took place, it is said, on the privy. The details are unclear and closely guarded by the Lannisters, possibly because the circumstances are of a nature unbefit his dignity.
>Although Daenerys' invading forces were mostly foreigners, she was accompanied by a number of Westerosi advisors. Only one is known with certainty, the slaver Jorah Mormont; the others, traitors all, are thought to be of similar ilk.
>Daenerys did not inspire love, even among her followers. She was killed by one of her own men the day after the Fall of King's Landing. If he was punished or tried is unknown, perhaps unlikely given the relief brought by her death. A new king was soon elected.
that would still be mentioning him, just not by name. even then, that's retarded and people would be wondering why this hand or uncle isn't mentioned by name
You only know of Jefferson because he's mentioned in the books.
>the lannisters found another to stand trial
>the details of tywins assassination are unclear
the first is so vague anyone would wonder who this "another person" is and the second is an outright lie.
>Becomes Hand of the King for Bran
>Presumably Lord of Casterly Rock, Warden of the West and continues the Lannister line
>Ensures good governance in his fiefdom and across the realm
He'll definitely be in a history book if he gives it patronage. It would have made more sense to have Tyrion be Master of Coin instead of Bronn (should have been Master of War). He's not corrupt, wouldn't embezzle and can actually manage finances.
They might specify "her husband"
>the second is an outright lie.
How so?
It was nothing more than a 'hahahaha so funny' moment for normies, like Edmure fumbling and banging his sword against his chair. Kills the mood.
>They might specify "her husband"
and they wouldn't specify who this major lady was married to? again, anybody would wonder.
>How so?
It was no secret that Tyrion killed Tywin, everybody knows he did it and how he did it. Cersei spread word and put a bounty on Tyrion for it.
>Bran is supposed to make an excellent King
>Gets bored and leaves the meeting on how to rebuild the Kingdom after like 30 seconds
Yeah that was a retarded scene. Just one among many.
And who.. are you
>anybody would wonder.
Does this matter? There would probably be a lot of distorting the facts, misinformation, etc. There's been mention of maesters with their own loyalties and agendas (in the books anyway)
>Cersei spread word and put a bounty on Tyrion for it.
True, I forgot about that
>Does this matter?
Yes it matters, how would the other Maesters ever approve of such an incomplete history?
>There's been mention of maesters with their own loyalties and agendas (in the books anyway)
Yeah but skewing history is different from not mentioning a major figure in the war entirely. It would make more sense if Tyrion was just painted in an extremely negative light.
Ah right. He becomes the Hand of the King three times.
You guys deserve upvotes.
>Does it matter
Uh yeah? Who nobility marries matters a fuckton. I know the series don't give a fuck about feudalism and marriage ties, but it does matter who the Heir to the North marries since it is not matrilineal.
>Northerners won't accept being ruled by a king
>Even though he's a Stark
>They'd much prefer being ruled by a Stark instead
>However, the Lannisters found another to stand trial, perhaps to still the turmoil around the assassination.
Got a good chuckle out of me. The fact that this mysterious "another one" was one of the Lannister's own blood (never mind the first husband of the later Queen of the North) seems like it generally would deserve mention. Not a bad attempt, but despite this phrasing technically not being an outright lie, it's such a misleading half-truth there's barely a difference between this and just making shit up.
Yeah, but he didn't do much for Daenarys except follow her around and give shit advice, no policy involved for her.
>Shit TV Series is shit.
whenever i'd read the leaks i'd always stop whenever they said that sam well had a book literally called 'a song of ice and fire'. i'd read that line and think 'no fucking way are they that fucking retarded, these leaks must be fake!' image my shock
umm, sorry lord hand, you're not mentioned
>laugh track plays
What do you mean I'm not in it?
>audience erupts in laughter
umm, yeah, the archmaester didn't like you
>scene fads to black with laughter, Tyrion puts on a shit-eating Sandler-tier smile, Friends theme starts playing
The other maesters could be in on that maester's agenda, or there's not that good of a peer review process in Westeros. And Tyrion is a major figure, he's not PIVOTAL to any event except Tywin's murder. In every other case, his actions and influences can be ascribed to other people or to groups in a way that makes the joke in the show believable. The only thing that makes unbelievable is the expectation that the writer is devoted to the truth, and Tyrion is the person they've specified might be subject to that kind of distortion
He is pivotal to both Tywin and Joffrey's murder, as the entire realm things he was responsible for the latter. That's regicide and the killing of the most important man in the war. Why would the Maesters go through such lengths to leave Tyrion out of it and distort history to such a degree?
Varys said it : your name will not be mentioned in history books etc.
Joffrey's murder can be blamed on other people, like Sansa and Oberyn. Someone might even put two and two together about the Tyrells. The reason could be political: with a new status quo where Tyrion and Sansa both have important positions, the maester might want to put the blame on the mostly dead Martells or Tyrells so as not to cause any further enmity, and erase Tyrion's crimes; or conversely, they might blame Sansa because they want to undermine the new Stark king.
Yes. But there was a trial. And it was concluded that Tyrion was the murderer and sentenced to be executed. When you are writing history you are writing about the facts and outcomes. Not theories or speculations. It is literally impossible to not mention Tyrion in the History books.
kek'd and checked
He never had the markings of a varsity imp
Fake news, here's how it really happened.
>Tywin Lannister and Kingslayer went on the offensive against Ned the Usurper which triggered the whole war
>King Joffrey executes would be usurper
>King Joffrey protects King's Landing until Tywin Lannister gives final push to make Stannis the Menace run
>Sansa is not married to King Joffrey
>King Joffrey dies via poison planted by Olenna Tyrell
>Oberyn Martel dies trying to prove Mountain's guilt
>Tywin Lannister dies while trying to prove he can shit gold
See, how does that not make sense?
Alicia and Lavian can ride his dick all they want. But Agrias is pure.
>And the kingdom fell into chaos after two rulers were murdered. No one knows who did it. Probably poisoned by their enemies.
10/10 history book. Would read again.
its almost like you guys have no idea how history books were written back then, they basically were green text highlights
>king robert died fighting a forest pig
>his son was poisoned
>the northererns civil wared but were defeated
>some bitch with dragons got uppity
>king bran is now king
exactly yet no one knows of Jeremiah Woolington who created the whole concept of right to own blue jeans
>Not theories or speculations. It is literally impossible to not mention Tyrion in the History books.
Unless you're biased and manipulating facts with an agenda.
If history is all fake, how does GRRM know the medieval period was as bad as he thinks it is? LMAO