Solo

Why do people pretend it was trash?

Attached: WEBPAGE_20190523_142849.jpg (327x334, 19K)

Because it wasn't good? It is the best of the Disney Nu-Wars flicks, but it still wasn't "good"

Because it was written like a D&D session.

It sucked because who the fuck cared about the story

Because it was boring and mediocre. The main problem of Solo was actually Solo himself, and everything related to the original trilogy.
They should have done something like Rogue One, with unknown characters.

Also, Emilia stole every scene she's in.
And I'd say I liked the "train" scene, for the most part.

Your mom.

because Sneed

RENT FREE

Nazoys are mad about the mouse killing their daddy Luke and want to crash the franchise with no survivors

I saw Hail Caeser and thought "this guy has charisma" and then I saw Solo and thought "no he fucking doesn't"

Are you the same person posting this? Can you please stop?

Attached: 1558574523426.png (298x966, 352K)

Attached: _tv_-_The_Gifted_-_Television_&_Film_-_4chan_-_2019-05-23_08.46.41.jpg (474x266, 26K)

Dragon Queen was actually hot in that movie. obviously CGI.

RENT FREE

SEETHING

it was OK but Woody Harrelson spoiled it. totally out of place and miscast.

It was just a movie. Its blessing and curse was that it had the Star Wars name attached to it. If it were about some space smuggler named John Doe everyone would say "That was fine" and then never think about it again. Like most movies.

They haven't seen it. I was one of those guys who didn't see it in theaters because TLJ was so bad, but I broke down, bought it, and then after watching felt deep regret that I hadn't watched it on the big screen. It's a solid 8/10

it took a massive shit right down Harrison Fords throat, there is no pretense here.

>Its blessing and curse was that it had the Star Wars name attached to it.
I strongly feel that if the movie was the same movie except with all SW reference taken out, it would have been a smash hit. And at the end people would be screaming for a sequel to learn more about that scary guy.

Ron Howard has no distinct style as a director, everything was very middling and safe and corporate. Woody, Glover, and Ehrenrich were all bad choices for their roles, which really did the most damage in my opinion. The production design was perfect, everything looked great and managed a middle ground between the smooth polished look of the prequels and the grime and dirt of the originals.

Just because you post nonsense doesn't make them wrong

It didn't, though. You haven't seen it. I thought it would ruin Han's character arc as well, but it doesn't, although it tries hard to ruin Lando, which also somehow fails.

That was probably the one thing I didn't like about the movie. Felt a little too on the nose.

can’t grow anything good when the soil’s bad

It's not trash, but it's not exactly worth watching either. I watched it once and I never want to see it again, much like Rogue One.

>Because it was written like a D&D session.
This. I watched it for the first time this weekend, and I felt like the storyline was just a series of fetch quests.

Watching actors race from scene to scene while we're told that it's VERY IMPORTANT isn't a compelling story.

>everything was very middling and safe and corporate
JJ Abrahams has a distinct style and the force awakens was exactly what you described. Stop being a total fucking retarded idiot.

SEETHING

SEETHING

he means the game retardo and he's right

I honestly can't remember anything I liked about it.
Actually the mountain side collapsing was cool.

RENT FREE

Yikes!

Attached: 1513288930021.jpg (500x700, 148K)

RENT FREE

It’s the Abrams style; gorgeous young 20 something actors running through hallways while screaming plot is exactly how he makes his movies.

Because people hate nuwars, almost nobody watched it and the few that did didn’t think being mediocre at best was enough to warrant praise.

They didn't bother watching because of TLJ. It was forgettable, not bad.