OH NO NO NO

link it you fucktarded faggot. don't make google that shit.

this is a fact which can not be repeated enough

dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7059243/Quentin-Tarantino-quizzed-Margot-Robbies-lack-lines-Time-Hollywood.html

Imagine thinking that you can come with suggestions on how someone should write their own screenplay like you're some fucking guy who actually matters.
There's always some guy who needs to chip in with his own suggestion or idea on how something should be done, even though nobody asks.

No, the actual clip. Not the fucking article on little bens shit rag.

Pathetic response. Should have just mentioned that he's made several films with female leads and this isn't one of them. And then go on to say that constantly arguing this point only further divides society and men and women

Yet we arent killing them yet (in videogame)

Yeah, I truly detest them. There's all those jokes about how awful lawyers are, but journalists are just as despicable.

IM
SHUTTING
YOUR BUTT
DOWN

oh you're not from around here you're like a paparazzi guy? nah, I ain't gonna go for it

Tarantino actually responded the right way... just strongly saying he disagrees with her and ceasing any further conversation. These scumbags are just waiting and relying on you to acknowledge them and validate their dishonest gaslighting.

tarantino is an incel

Uno Farto @ 3:17

Attached: 220px-Quentin_Tarantino_(Berlin_Film_Festival_2009)_2_cropped.jpg (220x253, 16K)

Wasn't it the Guardian?
youtube.com/watch?v=nyErR1FS1_0&feature=youtu.be

It seems like more people are realizing how despicable journalists are. Before, journalists had a monopoly on media and their were only so many sources, so people kind of just passively took what was presented and trusted them, but with more information available, people have gotten much more media literate and it seems to have resulted in people much more keenly able to see how snakey and dishonest journalists can be with stories and arguments.

I would love to see the wider, mass culture come to despise journalists and treat them like the worthless tabloid-tier scum that they are.

Oh they did change the title btw, it was "lashed out"

I admire Margot for not flattering that woman's bullshit and standing by Tarantino and giving an actually nuanced, honest response that doesn't simplify things to resentment politics.

Haha, they did, wow. The comments for the vid were pretty much universally indignant about the title.

Good journalists are still needed if only because the average person is literally too stupid to understand what's going on, and because politicians/etc need someone to hold them to account.
The problem is that all these shit journalists (of which there are more) make the good ones seem shit too by association which ruins the entire field

>H-H-H-HOW DARE THOSE PESKY JORNAULISTS QUESTION MY PERFECT INFALLIBLE DADDY, QUENTIN TARANTINO?????

grow the fuck up. the whole point of journalism is to ask things people don't want to be asked. tarantino is not a saint, he deserves to be put on the spot as much as anyone else. DEAL WITH IT.

>admire

LMAO, people are so gullible. What she did was "defend your boss to save your ass". She would totally endorse that line of questioning if it was another director doing that to another actress.

>eating themselves
Love it!

Imagine going to college and being told you will change the world with your investigative journalism.
Imagine graduating only to find out that no one will pay for journalism.
Only large corporations that will pay via advertisements or the occasional national government that needs to manage democracy.

So you get a job writing click bait on for the absolute dregs of society. Any nonsense just to generate clicks.
The you have to post it to all the most retarded corners of the internet.

Then realise this journalist is probably poor compared to the average 4channer (that has a job) and reads far more garbage and spends far more time online.

Lel you fucking failed at life.

he said it calmy but left furious

Attached: 1493605727442.jpg (224x225, 21K)

In a few years she will go #metoo on his ass and call him out for opressing and objectifying her.

This, women are subhuman evil parasites and will lead to the destruction of everything.

This kill all journalists there are no good journalists

You've basically just described Diane's story line from Bojack Horseman. The only thing you're missing is the narcissism and self-entitlement

Quentin is a hack, so i'm actually chuckling.

Everyone knows me too are old ugly unemployable whores that don't want to admit to enabling a sexual predator in their own way. 90% of these women will have their careers replaced by hot young models who know too well how lonely and stupid their feminist counterparts really are

Also, trannies

Attached: Screenshot_20190522-202543.png (1280x720, 440K)

I'm more and more convinced a lot of journalist prayed to God to make Trump president so they can have what to write about.

Your confusion journalist with click bait bloggers who get paid per impression.

Why bring him up, but apparently t man has made comments about this

It's a zero sum game. Too many lines equals him getting blasted for misrepresenting women.

Attached: FB_IMG_1558544603862.jpg (888x888, 155K)

To make my point? Why not?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I bet you thought she was real brave

They've replaced lawyers as society's scumbags.

...wait. Y'know who else are stereotypically portrayed as lawyers?

Except that so many actresses, like a Brie Larson, would have gone along with that bullshit and thrown him under the bus. She made the decent and honest decision and realized there wasn't an issue. In other words, she has a brain and a soul, still.

This, we already avoid working with them in some cases, more and more men are realizing most modern women aren't worth the time spent on them.

You mean feminists pick and choose their targets?

I sure would like to see some of these supposed decent or good journalists. I guess there are some okay, left-of-center ones at the Atlantic etc. Most are dogshit.

Thanks to the internet, all that's left for old media is shitty political commentary and literal bullying in the name of a supposed utopian society they think they live in

Thanks bro, was afraid someone might actually forget this.

>margot robbie, a very talented actress... uhm, actor

ALL journalists no exceptions

>t. subhuman journo slime
I'm making a database of journo scum so that when the war begins and society breaks down I can hunt them down, brutally rape and sadistically murder as much of them as possible

I honestly hope the next right wing lone wolf terror attack/mass shooter is directed at journalists. I really really do.

QUENTIN TARANTINO FUCKED A MIDGET AND ONE DAY DESTINY WAS BORN.

>deflecting any legitimate criticism of the media with 'muh antisemitism'

Attached: 1522016880804.jpg (682x768, 149K)

Nah, 'proper journalism' is evil by nature as well, not just clickbait. I lost all remaining respect for journalism when I took some classes on it and came to learn the way it works.

Basically, journalists speak in a rhetoric of emancipation and justice, but their actual modus operandi is to reduce everything to stories, material, content...

Never mind the actual reality they're misrepresenting and falsely narravitising, the actual real people, real lives they're tampering with and destroying... the way that they're taught to look at everything is in terms of storytelling and how it will appeal to the viewer. So they dehumanize their subject (even if they're pretending to care), the subject is just grist for the article. They spin things however they please, drum up false antagonisms, reduce people to cliches and situations to hot button topics (as you see with this journalist engaging Tarantino). I sometimes think that journalism attracts a particularly weaselly type of person, but I also think it's that they treat so many lives as material for a story that over time they get desensitized to ruining lives. They have a circle of peers legitimizing and rationalizing their actions and even telling them that what they're doing is important. Same reason lawyers get desensitized. After so many lies, the perversity of their livelihood is lost to them.

They always ask the stupidest fucking questions at these film press conferences and it's always with the sole intention of then having some material to write stupid articles like this about it

This much better version of that pic.

Attached: 1341880551829.png (201x199, 26K)

Like I seriously wonder if journalist types can go an hour without having a dishonest thought or misrepresenting or making false accusations or implications.

I mean, I am right. Has this ever not been the case, ever?

Quentin, please respond to my deliberate identity politics bait, follow up question, please give a real answer

Nice. I still like it when that one journalist tried to make Tom Hardy answer some weird question about homosexuality and he hit back with 'What the fuck are you on about, idiot?' kind of response.

It's just a fucking movie bro.

where is the link, faggot.

The weird thing is that journalist is actively, knowingly creating dishonest bait and yet at the same time somehow paradoxically unaware of her dishonesty. Like she's trained to comb through things for bits to dishonestly misrepresent for an argument, yet the whole time she's telling herself she's the good guy and a warrior for justice.

It's just so profoundly out of touch with truth and reality and grace. Just mind-bogglingly nihilistic. Totally out in the void.

Holy molly, all these seething incels in this thread. I didn't watch the movie, but if MR is indeed used more like eye candy instead of an actual character, yes the reporter has every right to ask Quentin to at least explain himself.

Also guy need to learn the difference between a hypothesis and a premise.

God I fucking hate journalists. Reminder that while Breivik slaughtered kids at Utoya, their parents sat at home without calling their children, fearing the gunman would find them if they called. Yet, every last phone went off in the dead kids' pockets, according to eyewitnesses. Goddamn journos called them constantly, wanting their latest scoop.

Disgusting. Sums up everything wrong with them. It's all for the story.

And anons have every right to call the repoter a seething femcel based on her opinions and actions. So fuck off

>on her opinions and actions
and her appearance*

>HBO series bowling shirt

FPBP

Based

the only universally acceptable opinion

>the whole point of journalism is to ask things people don't want to be asked.

Funny how that was put on hiatus for eight years straight when Obama was in office.

Most journalists shouldn't really be called "journalists" at this point.
They're basically prostitutes, but with PR, agitiprop and advertising replacing filthy sex-acts.
Actually they're lower than prostitutes. Prostitutes are actually honest about the fact that the whore. Journos aren't.

>s-stop inquiring for the truth let us have our comfortable lies
anti-journalist zoomers kys

Fuck off, Rian.

>The whole point of journalism is to ask people I disagree with things they don't want to be asked.

There we go, minor fix.

Journalist detected.

And LOL at journalists being the arbiters of truth. Quite the opposite, which is why we hate them.

Whoa, the title says it all and I don't have to read the rest. I can't believe Tarantino was furious.

That's based tho

No one is ever going to fuck you. Stop asking.

What did he mean

Attached: D6xrK9GXkAEx3bS.jpg (1200x525, 82K)

>the good ones
MAGGIE HABERMAN IS GOAT QWEEN OF NEW YORK

>five years
what a saint

"DID YOU PUT THE HYPOTHESES IN THE INTERVIEW?" Tarantino said calmly.

I, too, don't care about personal accountability, reliable sources or the truth. The latter should bend to my political views or else I'll get angry.

Like you, the bitch asking those kinds of questions falls into that category. Only she's on the opposite end of the political spectrum.

Let's not pretend we don't know who you fags are and where you come from.

Hi Donnie. Get impeached.

"I got an idea based off a couple old kung-fu flicks. Get me those Scorsese and Coen brothers actors and actresses. I want that slut with the cute feet from The Wolf of Wall St."
The cast isn't even impressive. It's just run of the mill and worries me it's going to be lacking in one area like all the others: dialogue. Unless you're in your early teens where you think fast talking, being quippy and over emoting for the camera is cool. I get it. His movies were pretty cool when I was that age, too.

you are aware that arabs are also semites right retard?

Jesus, that "journalist" is literally why /pol/ puts ((())) around so many articles.

They didn't give suggestions about how he should write his scripts. They just suggested the hypothesis that he was a sexist based on his scripts.

Pretty good post user-kun

> oh noooo, sjw soibois dare attack my cuck faggot nigga lovin talentless hack

Attached: laugh6 - the jap.gif (268x268, 1.98M)

>get out of my house alan

What a faggot. He's clearly seething while he takes a sip of water the question was asked.

"Well I reject your hypothesis." then sits back and lets the actor speak. I'm torn on this. It's both based and not based. If he'd just said that line without wearing it all over his face it pissed him off it'd be based. A one liner with no explanation would have worked as a nice fuck you had it not been for that.

There are some real deal trannies in this thread. Makes me sick.

Perfect response:
"I wrote a specific, nuanced female character in a smaller co-starring role that was meant to help serve the narrative and be an homage to some historic woman. I didn't even have to include a female character but I did and then cast for it and Margot auditioned for the role knowing how much screen time they were going to get and accepted the role. It was HER CHOICE.

there are actual investigative journalists who are doing actual work trying to exposing shady shit out there.
These people we are complaining about are not journalists, they aren't even beat reporters or anchors with a nice smile who read a prompter.
They're basically clickbait writers who come up with gotcha questions to farm for stupid out of context answers to write ridiculously misleading headlines that garner clicks. They do nothing of value and their work has no substance at all.

C O P E

It's not just the movie business. It's especially bad with sports aswell.
>"Mr. Footballer, you've been playing really well for your lower table team and some of the biggest clubs in the world have shown interest in you. Can you without a doubt swear on your mother's grave that you will forever remain faithful to your shitty current club"
>"well I like playing here and have not been contacted by any other clubs, but it's obviously flattering to be considered by legendary teams X and Y. You never know what the future brings but at this point in time I have a contract with my club."
>Headline the next day: Mr. Footballer talks about leaving his club! "X is a legendary team"

The only reason Margot Robbie was in the film is so that she can get killed in it.

>as much of them
as *many* of them

Attached: 20190523_110533.jpg (833x720, 135K)

Not sure why they're getting in his business on that. Jackie Brown and Kill Bill have "strong women" as main characters. Natural Born Killers too kind of? Been forever since I saw it.
They're just looking for problems where there are none.

That's why he's pissed. Based on his body of work from those to Grindhouse he should be heralded by them as an advocate of STRONK WAMYN. This cuck is on their side but he'll get eaten by them eventually if he doesn't hold steady. Why does the left always eat itself? Why is nothing ever good enough?

>Bringers of knowledge are scum

Spotted the /pol/fag

I feel like I remember old action movies doing that a lot
>oh you're a journalist? Fuck off

We're on our way.

Unironically this. My son would be where my legacy is anyway, so for him to become a journalist would be devastating

Context (Notebook 14:136), transl. by A. user:
'As you now think of the Jesuit with disgust and shivering [...], so you will eventually think of the journalist. Among butchers there can be fine (Da. brav) men, but a certain crudeness is inseparable from being a butcher, it goes with the trade. Worse it is to be a journalist: a certain degree of dishonesty (Da. uredelighed) is inseparable from even the most honest journalist. Humankind's (Da. Slægten) deepest fall from God is signified by the "journalist". It is the ungodly attempt to make an abstractum into the absolute power (Magt, cp. Ger. Macht); and the anonymity was the completion of the lie's triumph. If I were a father [etc.], I would give him up. It would be possible in the given instance for the daughter to become the lost one, and the son regained, but the idea of it [is true]'.
WEW
E
W

>Ben Shapiro runs every new site with “Daily” in the name

Attached: C29C9337-8828-40B7-933E-0FCF9D8CA4D4.jpg (500x679, 178K)

maybe a little but it is mostly that the standards for investigative journalism are so low these days. A quick interesting headline that grabs peoples attention but does not contain many truths is more valuable then a stinky moldy but truthful piece.

Incels rise up!

Look at all dis Trumpite butthurt. We need to murder clickbait, not journalism as a whole.

>reddit spacing
kindly fuck off

if you're gonna insult him don't call him "Quentin" in the same sentence, mr. Tarantino or you misogynist pig would have been more adequate

>Margot, 28

god damn, margot still looking literally perfect.

fuck bro you really think anyone wants to read all that?

>woman do bad
>see woman bad!
>woman do good
>woman lies! Woman be bad later i promise!

>/lol/pedo in charge of being literate

WE GAMERS WON'T TAKE THIS ANY LONGER

Attached: tgt23.png (361x520, 164K)

it's an incredibly disrespectful accusation. what's even the point here? make him look like an evil man? It's just shitty journalism. sure, margot handled it beautifully, but Tarantino doesn't own that bitch journalists any kind of response for that fucking stunt.

Based journalists making sure those commies never got to grow up

>the daily rebrand
He's just trying to be honest about his business model.

>mfw I'm the same age as Margot Robbie
kill me right now I need to leave this website.

Attached: 1549401040220.gif (265x257, 1.78M)

She looks EXACTLY like I envisioned somebody who would ask that question.

Attached: journalist.jpg (993x518, 100K)

So? people who work in the movie and tv industry are just as scummy. I really don't care if they eat each other

arabs are more semitic than modern jews ever were

Attached: QTcap3.png (422x562, 392K)

yeah go work on being born a cutie blonde Australian then things will work out

Attached: jesus christ.gif (245x200, 1.66M)

All of their faces. I wish I could get a closeup on just Pitt and Dicaprio for that so I could see their little microexpressions throughout that conversation.

Attached: LACastcap1.png (1411x271, 660K)

>accusation
lol there is no accusation. Margot doesn't have many lines and she asked why. Tarantino's response doesn't even make sense

>I have no actual arguments for my blatantly authoritarian desires, so I'll complain about the way you format your posts instead

Truly the master race. Your kind are always so terrifyingly brilliant and verbose.

There's a reason women used to be kept in line. They can't help themselves but drift into senseless chaos. Why do you think Pandora was a woman?

>/thread

You do know Pandora wasn't real, right?

You need to have sex before you can have a son, /pol/-weenie.

>being a /pol/smoker
cancer

it's really insulting to suggest just because she apparently didnt have much lines that her non-verbal acting was irrelevant. kill all journos.

>Margot with that thoughtful, insightful response

Shes such a class act

She wasn't suggesting that at all tho. That's purely your own projection

There's a reason why /pol/ hates journalists. Before Hitler came for the police, the judges or the teachers, he came for the journalists. Their entire profession is based on questioning the status quo. Nobody would know of corporate, legal or governmental fuck ups if it weren't for them. Without them, you'd be forced to swallow whatever you're served by the state or corporations.

Naturally, fascists are terrified of the press. They don't want you to question them. That's why they put so much effort into delegitimizing an entire profession. They dig up stories like this one to say: "See? They're ALL like that!"

>the whole point of journalism is to ask things people don't want to be asked
LIKE HOW HILLARY SHOULD HAVE WON AND RUSSIA HACKED EVERYTHING!!!!!!! IT WAS HUR TURN

Fpbp

Journalists go out of their way to try and "make names" off people.

Never trust a journalist.

>Their entire profession is based on questioning the status quo
Only if the status quo isn't left wing.

If you're as far right as yourself, everything is left wing.

How did you learn of the emails, pea-brain?

have sex incel, lmao

I see what you did there.

>Triggered by questions

Wew lad.

What is:
>Fast and Furious Scandal
>Vince Foster
>Monica Lewinsky
>NSA abuses of power
>The crazy fucking shit that was in the TPP
>the expansion of the executive 'kill list' under Obeezy

And that's just the shit I can remember off the top of my head. Just because you want to ignore decent journalists exposing bullshit on the left side of politics doesn't mean it's not a common occurrence.

What emails? CNN told me it was illegal to to read them. Don't you remember?
youtube.com/watch?v=-beYBLrkNAg
Are you telling me they lied? Now why would they say that? I mean a jerno purposely telling lies to people to shape a narrative is just fantasy right?

This is really it. The weak fucks that insist on men giving up their rightfully held power need to be eradicated by the strong. Why give up position? Lots of alpha men think they will be able to continue living their high quality lives isolated from the bullshit, but I think we need a cleansing so that the taint doesn't spread.

you're gonna rape fat male journalists, fat female journalists, feminist journalists etc? You do realize this post doesn't make you badass, funny or cool, right? It makes you look like an "incel"

kys, nigger faggot

Sure, let's just ignore Fox called for Hillary to be locked up.
>Journalists are scum!
>... unless they support my agenda, hehe.

>decent journalists
So you want us to let the others run wild just because 3 of them might be good?
Better to be safe and hang the lot. Never trust a journalist, never know when the knife in the back is comming.

>BUUUTTTTR MUHHHHH FOOOOOXXX NEEWWSWSSS
2010 called, they want their talking points back.

Do you think they give all the famous people, who don't really need one, a name card so that the less famous people, who do need one, don't feel sad?

It is write on the journalist's face that she is a feminazi

Called it.
See

oH MY GODDING SIDES i literally can't remember last time I laughed this hard. Thanks user.

>Jewnalists
>Bringers of knowledge
L O L
O
L

Cool argument, buddy. Benben should take lessons from you instead.

>Says the commie while he kills anyone who questions the commisar.

What the fuck is wrong with the French

Absolutely.

>so i'm actually chuckling
Formerly?

Are you having an aneurysm? Hallucinations?

Just as good as your whataboutism argument eh?
Contra Points needs to train you lot better.

Of course, actresses are basically prostitutes but get paid more without fucking plebs.

>Thinking going "DATS WHAT HITLER DID" is going to win you any argument here.
Okay give me 5 reasons why we should not just thrown them in work camps and give them showers?

Attached: 1501548286734.gif (291x400, 570K)

>misrepresent an entire profession
>CNN is journalism when FOX isn't
>let me just throw in some buzzwords and see if he falls for it
Anything else?

Quentin is clearly seething too much to come up with a better response, but he made the correct call in answering very briefly. And at the same time it is clear that every panelist thought her question was obvious bait trying to stir shit up and they all wish they could just tell her to fuck off.

The main issue of Tarantino in this is not about disagree with the journalist but to assume, whatever how she looks like, she is a buzzfeed kind of one if you know what I mean.

Because I'd rather see your ilk in there before anybody else. The use of an anime reaction image already strips you off any basic human rights in my book.

>If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world, but I am sure we would be getting reports from Hell before breakfast.

-William Tecumseh Sherman

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Not a buzzword. Address why you think Fox is worse than CNN? Because they wanted to lock her up? So? you are really going to bat for that silly old bitch? Look what she did to Saint Burnie.
I will remind you we do have all the dumb shit they(CNN) have done for the last 3 years archived.

ALL OF A SUDAAAAA

>better
>it's a fucking thumbnail

I fucking hate journalists with a psychotic rage. How has THAT not been a target instead of schools and churches

Why does Phoenix even attend Hollywood circle-jerking events if he always acts like he detests every moment of them?

Yes, let's just dismantle the entire fifth estate because some pseudo-fascists on the internet don't like clickbait and are too stupid to ignore it.

Shit like this is why your little clique is considered the absolute dumbest circle of Yea Forums.

>Leftist scum instantly abandons his anti-nazi stance and becomes Hitler himself.
The abyss stares back.

Why do you hate Israel goy?

(You) ain't wrong.

Let me guess you are a blogger?
Want to know how i know? How asshurt you are getting about it.

Yeah HIT ME !

In our context it is a buzzword because you inserted it without any relation to the topic at hand. Stupidity, laziness or simple derailment tactics - doesn't matter. I merely reminded you of your dishonesty and you're going ham. Just look at how all over the place your post is.

The lesser evil purging a greater one.

You just didn't!

Attached: 1558273002030.jpg (1024x576, 39K)

Boy, kiddo. What a brilliant deduction.

It's completely wrong, but seeing as how you've already made up your mind about a whole other host of delusional shit, we might as well let you cling on to this one as well.

*Pathetic deflection attempt*

>russia hoax
>the smirking kid hoax
>justie smollet hoax
>kinds in cages hoax
>the kavanaugh hoax
i'm sure i'm missing much more. they lie to our faces in this day and age, just imagine all the lies from the pre-globalized world.

> it is a buzzword because you inserted it without any relation to the topic at hand
>let's just ignore Fox called for Hillary to be locked up.
>Does not see the whataboutism
So i see it is a tactic of the left to deny saying what they said to try to win.

Anti-journos sure look like reasonable, stable individuals.

Holy shit you are mad as fuck right now.

Attached: 1503539007730.jpg (677x813, 72K)

>literal job is being the dumbest person in the room

Btw anyone who calls people "kiddo" is just showing that you are masking asshurt. That is internet tough guy talk rule 1.

>"See? (((They)))'re ALL like (((that)))!"

Probably because (((they))) are.
How much did you hear about the lesbian cabal ruling Worst Korea with astrology for 30 years? Not much, I know because I was around for it too. How often do you ever hear about the, still ongoing, Gilets Jaunes? Once? Twice? Three times (although not a lady, just like those other losers on your discord will never be)? Especially because these are your average goys against the (((establishment))), but for whatever (((reason))) the (((journalists))) and (((media))) don't support them or even report on them.
Do you want me to go on or should I just chalk all of the examples up as a (((pure coincidences)))?

Attached: 78565.jpg (501x451, 94K)

Whatever you say, kiddo. Are you excited for your summer vacation?

Cuz it's pretty damned obvious you have no experience with the real world and the subtleties involved with adult life.

Large scale wars do that. Say what you want about it, but does a great job of wiping the slate clean.

>ALL JOURNALISTS ARE SCUM!
>You seem to be acceptant of other journalistic outlets. Doesn't that make you a liar?
>M-MUH *flips through cards* WHATABOUTISM
Sorry man, you seem literally too stupid to have this discussion. It was my mistake, I shouldn't have pressed it. Legitimately sorry.

There hasn't been a difference between either since 1945, if someone replies to this I'll tell a story about Marxist infiltration of journalist schools in the west.

youtube.com/watch?v=b_yCj6fXtlA
Does anyone remember that time when CNN doxed and blackmailed a person for making a Trump meme? I remember.
So how many confirmed kills you got tough guy?

The blogger cries in pain as you point out his bullshit

Yeah man, only Der Stürmer told the REAL truth!

The moron responds with memes in the absence of actual points.

THIS.

Attached: 2b.jpg (1920x1080, 1.22M)

One may call him a swindler, a fake news factory or a propagandist. It will wash off him. But call him a blogger and watch how he recoils and says "I HAVE BEEN FOUND OUT!!!"

Arabs are as much of a real ethnicity as Belgium is a real country

I feel like there is enough material present to have a good discussion without even bringing up Jews at all but low and behold, this whole fucking thread is jew this russia that orange man. I wish I could stay on track for one thread. I don't care if we say nigger and agree that trannies get the rope, I just don't want to talk about jews anymore it's every fucking thread on every fucking board.

Attached: applause.gif (219x186, 1.76M)

KILL THEM ALL!

Jews get a pass in my book. it is just the journalists that get the gas chambers.

says the blogger

The real issue with that headline is that it creates the expectation of another "I'm shutting your butt down" or "what's going on here?", that he went full autism, but when you watch it it's really disappointing.

>When cornered the blogger goes on the defense usually with a weak NO U.

>a swindler, a fake news factory or a propagandist
That reminds me: how do you browse Infowars, Breitbart and all the other opinionated fiction outlets without getting hit by the irony?

No there has been some marginal small scale medias that have continued the tradition of real journalism but they are few and far between and often extremely confidential.
My story is as follow, I was interviewing a man, well known in the french political world for his high quality confidential letter, each week a complete matter of fact report on recent political developments and a single in depth historical report about a single relevant political personality.
He went to the Paris journalism school in the early 50's and he told me that even then, all the teachers were communists, and not just in ideology but were members of the communist party, and that all the students but two were also communists, and that he and another guy were forced to write their reports essays et all from a communist perspective to r they would be removed from the school, so him and the other guy actually pretended to be Marxist leninist or Maoist but the other guy at some point in an informal discussion with other students let something slip that wasn't commie compatible, the students ratted him out and he got expelled.
The man in question I interviewed actually managed to compete his cursus but only because he successfully posed as a communist.

>Another tactic of the blogger when he has lost is to project any shit he can on to you

> because he successfully posed as a communist.
He would have an easyer time today i think.
All you have to do is claim you are a tranny and have an IPhone and a starbucks latte in your hands. Just keep saying the line
>It was never tried
You fit right in. None of them can tell you apart from the rest.

>say stupid shit
>get called an idiot
>OH YOU MUST BE THIS BOOGEYMAN I DON'T LIKE
You ever get tired of these mental gymnastics?

not him, blog more

operation resurrection when?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Resurrection

Fuck feminist. He kicked her in the gnads. Based Quentin.

>You know when the blogger is angry with you because he keeps saying words like "BOOGEYMAN"
>This is when you know the blogger is crying behind his keyboard praying to the god he does not believe in wishing you would just leave him to his blogging and not expose him for what he is.

Yup

Attached: Untitled.png (301x62, 4K)

>the right hates people who expose the truth
really makes you think

screencapped for my blog post tonight

Attached: sam hyde on reporters.jpg (749x534, 60K)

>/pol/ gets laughed out of /his/
>they hate historians now, too
Hmm.

The Clinton emails and Wikileaks were one of the most interesting parts of the 2016 election.
Only a couple of years earlier the right was decrying wikileaks for exposing the nsa and wire-tapping, putting 'soldiers in danger'. But as soon as Clinton was involved it was the opposite. And the same happened for the left.
It's pathetic

Have sex

95% of people are pathetically partisan and the truth is only a good thing when it suits them, breaking news

>gets called out
>doubles down on the retardation
Debating fascists is like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, shits on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.

Quality post

Attached: 1557184398974.jpg (349x373, 19K)

It really is amazing how liberals have turned journalism into a respectable profession to utterly detested in the span of like twenty years.

Fucking fascists!

People have always hated those faggots.

We're not attacking iran stineburg

>more reddit spacing
go circlejerk over how bad men are to reddit or resetera friend, they give a shti about stuff like that there

it was asked but liberals didn't want to take him to task on the important shit and conservative journalists just wanted to get as close to calling him a communist nigger without actually saying it.

Funnily enough, men that refuse to engage with women will erase themselves from the gene pool. Don't forget you all come from a women's womb anons.

It actually happened but everyone pretends like it didn't.
Several prominent figured of the french far right participated, the army took control of the parliament and the FN helmed by Le Pen at the time were serving as ground militia in case of communist insurrection.

>implying the russia shit is only a media deiven obsession
people just want to find any reason to ignore that Hillary was a bad candidate, has little to do with a corrupt media influence

>giving a fuck about jussie smollet or the smirking maga kid at this point

and there literally are kids and people in cages (for what reason I don't know) just because one picture was misrepresented doesn't just make the problem dissapear. and kavanaugh was found not guilty the same way OJ was found not guilty. you can't pretend like rape doesn't happen all the time just because some boomer chad wears a suit and denies it

>But pizzagate is real!
>The Boston bombing never happened!
>Neither did Sandy Hook!
>The earth is flat, btw.

The dude made Jackie brown. How can you accuse someone of this shit when he made an empowering female movie about a black female before Hollywood was even on that trend lmao.

Why is Hollywood so dumb.

Pedogate is real and sandy hook was probably a false flag, but Pro-tip false flag doesn't mean it didn't happen, Boston bombing is really nebulous and the flat earth shit is a psy-op.

>Pedogate is real
Show me the basement.

fpbp

Pizzagate was a psy-op to discredite pedogate, just read statements from victims of Epstein, Spacey and the gay media moguls around hil, or what Elijah Wood had to say.

the fact that people get whipped up into a murderous rage over journalists never fails to worry me
>yeah i want to kill people over movies and video games!

Attached: 1558033189799.png (894x773, 48K)

This. Ever wonder what happened to all the stacies in school? They become Journalists. It's why they have the same braindead personalities.

David Cay Johnston

which part? probably a dyke? or that shes obviously jewish?

Hush, user. You don't want to anger them by disagreeing.

who gives a fuck, nobody here will ever own a gun

i cant wait to see them die ima eat some popcorn while they burn

Quentin's as awkward as ever. He tries to speak like a character from one of his movies but it just doesn't work IRL.

Jew Alert

>SOME WHITE KIDS SMILED WRONG, HERE'S WHY THEY DESERVE TO BE DESTROYED
>huh, turns out it was fully grown niggers calling them things like 'faggot'? Who even cares who they are or where they work?
enemyofthepeople.jpg

Imagine crushing a journalists skull in your hand, poking our their eyeballs.

Why are you a shit eating faggot? This journalist wants to know.

Way to out yourself as a boring cunt.

Why should he explain himself to a feminist bitch, you dumb cunt?

Hey, it's pisshands Ron.

Literally the pink elephant in the room among many others just from watching that...

>there is no accusation
you disingenuous turd

They were right, though. He acted like a faggot and fully deserves to be called one.

Also the fact that the aggressor was the Native American guy. Once the white kid stopped being in the wrong, rather than report on the much bigger story of what really happened and who is to blame, they just decided the story didn't matter afterall.

>Margot backs up Q
Thats a down ass bitch, i'd gonna finna bust up her chifferobe u feel me

Attached: bundy.png (809x253, 263K)

Not sure, his appearances make good gifs regardless.

>"well, i just reject your hypothesis"
>Tarantino BUTTBLASTED & FURIOUS xDD

any large actor or actresses political agenda is designed specifically to reach the largest audience possible whether that audience is feminists or incels or whatever. showbusiness is brutal and disgusting. these stars don't care what's right. they're trying to get theirs. quinten tarantino still has massive respect from the industry and audiences. speaking against him would be bad for margot's career.

Journalist spotted

journalists arent people

wikileaks

I havent liked journalist ever since I was a kid. This was before they just blatantly lied and shit too. I always thought it was real scummy how they would invade peoples private lives and ruin not only the subjects life but also the lives of their whole family just to get a front page story. Scum of the earth

worthless conjecture, not worth a legitimate reply

let me introduce you to something called logical inference

To prevent that, scan each item individually

Double checking this. Seems to be more or less legit. Truly he was one of the most based of the incels.

Looking up info around it was kind of fun and enlightening
> Soren Kierkegaard pointed out that before the invention of the daily press stories had a beginning, a middle and an end. We read them for the significance of the story itself. But with the arrival of the daily press another possibility existed that by taking sides in the story we as part of the public might change its outcome. It became the journalist’s task to create such a public.
Exactly what the clickbait journalist is trying to do.

>There is, needless to say, a story behind this animosity. In 1846 Kierkegaard had perhaps foolishly picked a fight with The Corsair, a satirical tabloid which presented itself as skewering the upper classes on behalf of the people, but which was really a vehicle for middle-class resentments and which punched down as often as up. The Corsair returned fire in brutal fashion. For months, the paper’s writers and cartoonists mocked Kierkegaard mercilessly: poking fun at his self-importance, his broken engagement, his trouser cuffs, his voice, even his curved spine.

>For Kierkegaard, whose daily routine involved long walks through the streets of Copenhagen, striking up conversations as he went, the results were devastating. Children began to taunt him in the street, and he no longer felt he could interact with people in the same way. In a small city, he’d become a laughing stock. In one sense, Kierkegaard ultimately won: within the year The Corsair had folded and both its editor, (((Meyer Goldschmitt))), and secret backer, P.L. Moller, had left Denmark, the latter never to return. Both are now otherwise forgotten, while Kierkegaard is read in dozens of languages every day. But the affair clearly left a bruise on what was left of Kierkegaard’s life.

Especially female ones. Chaos incarnate.

Maybe journalists should actually ask questions then instead of thinly veiled criticism? She didn't want an answer from Quentin, she just wanted to hear herself talk.

Cronkite was the Last of the Based. All who followed were degenerate filth.

Attached: Walter-Cronkite.jpg (1908x1305, 335K)

But what if he didn't want to?

Whatever, journalists have the right to critique an artist's work. Tarantino's too autistic to understand that.

>Takes sip of water
>It's actually boiling
>"MMMMMM"

It's a black male thing

Katawa Shoujo is a Yea Forums staple famalam. You're being an open access vanilla faggot.

>all these people in the thread defending click-bait blog journalists
We're even talking about real journalists you fucking cucks.

Attached: 1488741710117.png (540x480, 204K)

to make sure everyone can see him detesting them

Both my parent's are journalists and i agree

*hits pipe*

Attached: 1544270091818.jpg (1368x1688, 240K)

>says this
>watches e-celebs

What did Gen Z mean by this?

Tarantino was really retarded here, he could just have said that Margot character was not the focus of the film and was not the main character and that was it.

that's another thing, she slipped spoilers INTO THE QUESTION ITSELF. f*ck her

inadequate when being grilled about inclusiveness

>youtube.com/watch?v=nyErR1FS1_0&feature=youtu.be
>very talented actress... actor ?
well ok then

The YouTube comments on that video are based and redpilled.

Attached: dwarf_twin_peaks.gif (500x378, 982K)

she wasn't a journalist asking a question. she was a political activist with an agenda making an insinuation.

Hey quentin yeah i know you did two entire movies with a 'strong' female lead but this one chick in this one movie didn't have a ton of lines so i think you're pretty sexist you pig

Based

Journalists generally are scum. When ever I hear one being killed, I love it. I did a module in journalism, and they’re an entirely different type of individual to a normal human being. They’re unrelenting (possibly Ayn Rand objectivists) psychopaths.

The same goes for anyone in Silicon Valley. Absolutely selfish nutcases.

says the literally mentally ill incel on 4channel dot com