How do you tell the difference between good and bad cinematography?
How do you tell the difference between good and bad cinematography?
you look at what won at the oscars for best cinematograpy
>good cinematography
it look good
>bad cinematography
it look bad
I wonder what Nate is up to
Reviewbrah was in Nathan for you?
Good: it evokes emotion. It makes me think. It makes me feel.
Bad: I can't tell what is happening or what emotion is trying to be conveyed.
lighting, framing, movement, focus, etc
I want to fuck Aly.
honesty
dishonesty
Big did it first
legendary
>good
A E S T H E T I C
>bad
everything else
relevant mis en scene
or whatever the fuck frogs call it
ah-bloo-bloo
>and you may ask yourself, "what is that beautiful shot?"
How about this shot?
This movie had some serious kinomatography
In context it's usually some form of metaphor, allusion or successful blocking/framing, not "damn those colours look a-maaazing!!"
It looks good.
That was a good scene.