How do you tell the difference between good and bad cinematography?

How do you tell the difference between good and bad cinematography?

Attached: cinematography.png (629x614, 340K)

you look at what won at the oscars for best cinematograpy

>good cinematography
it look good
>bad cinematography
it look bad

Attached: thumbup.jpg (680x544, 33K)

I wonder what Nate is up to

Reviewbrah was in Nathan for you?

Good: it evokes emotion. It makes me think. It makes me feel.

Bad: I can't tell what is happening or what emotion is trying to be conveyed.

lighting, framing, movement, focus, etc

Attached: LorArabia Garish AF.webm (1920x876, 3M)

I want to fuck Aly.

honesty

dishonesty

Big did it first

legendary

>good
A E S T H E T I C
>bad
everything else

relevant mis en scene
or whatever the fuck frogs call it

ah-bloo-bloo

>and you may ask yourself, "what is that beautiful shot?"

How about this shot?

Attached: 59328a278c8151410542a74c7b2513f9.png (500x528, 344K)

Attached: giphy.gif (337x230, 314K)

This movie had some serious kinomatography

In context it's usually some form of metaphor, allusion or successful blocking/framing, not "damn those colours look a-maaazing!!"

Attached: stolen from Tokyo Drifter.png (1440x900, 971K)

It looks good.

That was a good scene.