Six Kingdoms

>Six Kingdoms
>Elective monarchy

Attached: 2htxDxf.jpg (789x789, 119K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_election
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_elections_in_Poland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

GODS how hard was it to add 1+1 together and DISSOLVE THE KINGDOM THAT TARGS CREATED - BREAK THE WHEEL

,FIUUUFIKKUYU

Whats the ASOIAF equivalent of Voltaire?

Breaking the wheel would have meant destroying the major houses of westeros's power and creating a more centralised government.

>Bran dies
>war breaks out because no one established any rules of succession
ok

>just let the poor people control everything, what can go wrong?

Attached: It's_All_So_Tiresome.png (1022x731, 643K)

impossirbu

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_election
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_elections_in_Poland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_monarchy

Westerlands
Riverlands
Vale of Arryn
Stormlands
Reach
Dorne

What's the issue, exactly? Iron Islands is independent by Danerys's agreement and so is the North. Crownlands is just the royal demense its not a kingdom unto itself.

They effectively remade the late holy roman empire

Elective Monarchy is the best monarchy in CK2, if you aren’t shit at the game.

Tanistry is better in my view since it ensures you don't risk losing your top title to rng cancer if you get suddenly killed in battle for instance before your chosen heir accumulates all of the votes.

This

What keeps the various kingdoms from seceding? The North could do it, there is precedent. How would the king stop it? He has no royal army and the only ones who might support him (northmen) were just allowed to leave.

the rules of succession are an elective monarchy where the lords of the great houses vote on a new monarch, it worked for centuries in the HRE

that system is what made the polish crown so weak and ineffectual, allowing the nobility to do as they please, resulting in constant instability and the eventual collapse of the state

I mean it's pretty obvious the books are going to end with the seven kingdoms being revived and Westeros splitting back to its original states

>Worked
>Costantly civil wars for centuries until Habsburgs just create a de facto hereditary monarchy

A better (and even more disastrous) example would be the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth mess

Martin state that it the end someone will indeed win the game for the Throne, if i remember correctly

Democracy only works under very specific circumstances.
>population has basic literacy skills
>Basic needs are met for most citizens
>Infrastructure to hold fair and free elections.
What westeros has right now have is an oligarchy not very different from china.

>American
>mocks other countries for being oligarchies
clap clap

it's not that elective monarchy didnt exist, it's just practically retarded

the og three eyed raven lived for 100's of years and if he wasn't killed he would have lived far longer, I don't think successions is gonna be an issue

the og three eyed raven was hooked up to an enormous system of ancient trees

he is technically a foreigner, easy claim for a kill

So what if someone kills Bran lol

Iron bank will take over. PLC was total horse shit because of this shit...