Why are romance movies so bad nowadays?

Honestly how can 3D women even compete?

Because romance has been commercialised which leaves no reason for people to slowly build a good bedrock of friendship to base their relationship on due to shit like Tinder and social media in general. It isn't just films, its in all aspects of romance now.

"Romance in Japan" and "romance in the West" would a better way of putting it.

have sex

Name a good romance in any movie

punch drunk love

The African Queen

Hang yourself, leftist.

Romance is dead
All women are sluts

The Killer

The Cutting Edge

Incel containment thread

Leon the professional

>lmao i can indulge in a materalistic and hedonistic lifestyle through copulating with 300lbs she-beasts
>why aren't you like this user, don't you want validation?

Attached: attempt.png (600x600, 121K)

In reality men are romantic angels who try to counter-signal as promiscuous dogs to appear more sexually desirable

In reality women are promiscuous dogs who try to counter-signal as romantic angels to appear more sexually desirable

The question is why?

based

This says a lot about our society

Why is romance in Japan like this

Attached: wallblock.webm (550x298, 2.69M)

>for men
It's also for women. Basically the film for jp christmas cakes.

I fully imagine that if men did not have a desire for women to sit on their face constantly that they would have been killed off centuries ago in a purge

Women are whores who demand violence and demonstrations of power in order to feel like they were sufficiently wooed before giving it up

Women only have power because it was given to them. 300 years ago you were engaged at 18 to some 13 year old. Really that might even be a big on the low side for male age

You're begging the question. WHY are they like this, and why are men ingrained with unrealistic expectations of metaphysical romantic bonding?

Because Yea Forums coopes whit the lack of kino in western productions

That’s not begging the question, retard. In your first post, you just ask “WHY are they like this”, which could refer to anything in the og post you replied to. That’s a vague fallacy.

We evolved in tribes of 150 people. And women were ultra vulnerable while pregnant and while offspring was

I've heard these arguments for why women behave as sexual selectors even when their objective is not necessarily reproduction, but what explains man's penchant for unwarranted sentimentality? Why do men love women? What is there to be gained from an adaptive standpoint?

Like what? Based and redpilled?

>selfish gene
Stopped reading there

A fun thing you can try:

Ask a group of women if they would rather date Ryan Gosling or a look-alike of Ryan Gosling but without the fame/status. 99.9% say Ryan Gosling.

Ask men the same question about Gigi Hadid in her prime or whoever. Something like 60% choose the look-a-like. They would rather someone with looks and without the fame/status/money

There's no downside for a woman who sleeps around as she's still able to find a good mate in the end, at least if she tries even a moderate amount. At the same time, they know men don't want that so they try to act as though they don't really behave that way.

Alternatively, men know women want a guy that is able to get their way, which can mean being wealthy or being able to sleep around, while at the same time knowing women act as though they want a man that wants a monogamous relationship.

Some pick up artists have actually done a good job explaining this as being that women want to imagine themselves as being in a romance story so guys can do best (in terms of getting laid) if they play out a relationship with those women as though they are these confident bad boys that only that woman has a hope of taming.

Just give up guys
life gets infinitly easier after that

wild guess: during childhood your father was either completely absent or uninterested in you and sporadically violent.

The opening scene of the Dark Knight Rises

I definitely want the version without fame and status, but she can have all the money in the world.

Money is status you pleb.

Then why did you separate the two?
>fame/status/money

An excellent question. We of course cant say with certainty but one solid reason I believe is:

Love lasts about 4 years for most men according to various analysis. Measured by oxytocin release. That coincidentally is enough time to get from zero to having two babies get past the critical 2 years of age mark with a woman.

Remember that birth control is a very modern convention. Its not in our DNA at all. Its actually not natural at all, from our DNAs point of view, for hot 14-18 year old girls-women to not be having many babies.

Well lets argue that loving a woman is not evolutionarily advantageous as opposed to being ruthless psychopath. It turns out that it might be in your GENES selfish interests for you to feel love to a woman you are banging as the child you are likely to have is likely yours. And protection/food/resources/commitement from YOU - desperate being irrational for YOU - is in the best interests of the baby and therefore your genes since the baby is so vulnerable and needs you.

Now consider that loving a woman does mean she will commit to you more as intent is a form of aphrodisiac. See how girls are not interested at all in you and then you hit on them and they start to be into you.

Those are the reasons love can make us so irrational.

Now consider the evolutionary advantage for women to harness that kind of power. Its an arms war, but everything is game theory

I'm not that poster you fucking knave.

monogamy is an alternative strategy to polygamy. If you aren't attractive enough to compete with chad, you instead commit to a woman and help raise your offspring. So those with lower tier genetics can offset that disadvantage through fatherhood, which makes it more likely that your offspring will survive/thrive. See here:

nature.com/articles/srep32472

Arguably a better strategy, given that monogamous societies typically destroyed polygamous ones (e.g Romans over Celts, Greeks over Persians, Europe over everyone etc.)

ABSOLUTELY BASED

>Watching movies for romance

What are you, gay?

I remember watching a reality TV show, think it was a Bear Grylls thing, where they stuck a group of men and a seperate group of women on an island for a month to see if they could survive without help.

The men sat around talking about their loved ones, their spouses, girlfriends and kids on the first couple of nights, how much they missed them already.

The women sat around talking about guys they'd fucked, discussing dicks or laughing about crap sexual encounters they'd had and generally just stuff that would be classed as "locker room banter" if it was men.

Think you might be onto something there.

Then perhaps it is possible to isolate the gene which makes men capable of true love and use it to fix women/the human race in general.

>nowadays
What are you talking about?
There's almost no romance movies anymore.

Is this where i'm supposed to say based and post a pepe?
God, why is nu4chan so repetitive and boring.

ITT
dumb, boring, shallow people complaining about other dumb, boring and shallow people

have sex

You could have just said ITT: millennials.

cringe

Dawkin's selfish gene has been vastly refuted

Yeah, yikes, oof, cringe and bluepilled and whatever other ebin "I don't agree with you" sinonyms you took from Twitter and Reddit, nu4chan.
This website doesn't even produce memes anymore, it just regurgitates shit from social media, which is crawling with the people you claim to despise.
Moot should have just shut down the website.

I have a female friend who is BPD. Histrionic Personality Disorder to be precise. She feels intense love. However its often to the wrong person. And it shifts. Love and hate come together. Sometimes stoicism and rational planning is superior to love which is irrational. Many people fall in love with abusers. And what if you have the love gene and its unrequited love? Or you get dumped but love someone loyally and can never recover?

There is no real way of changing the circuitry or forcing people to have love genes. The evolutionary benefit of opting out of the procedure is too great. Its best just to accept the way things are; it could be far worse.

More importantly: Its also eugenic for you to reach acceptance as fast as possible - you have have more success and happiness for doing so. You can help your loved ones with your wisdom. And fix the root problems in relationships that others cant articulate.

Worse yet, it does not generate lulz. Pour one out for my troll niggas.

>He doesn't understand irony
How does being autistic feel?

Trolling isn't even fun because people now bite even the most obvious baits.
Disagree with anyone here and they'll actually, genuinely believe you are a woman.
Trolling loses the fun when everyone is an oversensitive bitch.

City Lights

>Love lasts about 4 years for most men
What do you mean user? Do people stop loving each other after 4 years?

I think trolling lost a lot of the fun when the whole internet became 'savvy' to the gambit, and it now being practically a federal offense to fuck with any of the sites where 90% of the people congregate. The internet literally became serious business.

Ah yes
>i'm going to talk like a redditor, spam reddit memes, talk about reddit topics, discuss reddit media and behave completely like a redditor but it's fine because it's le ironic even if it makes reddit think it's welcome
Fuck you and fuck your worthless irony and sarcasm, you stupid millennial.
The schtick of being covered in 10 layers of irony is already getting old.

Attached: 1546665782612.png (1825x221, 75K)

Fucks sake Im already enough enough without snarky retards looking to use one thing to disregard everything.

It has not been 'vastly refuted'.

I am sure the book is not 100% representative model, but it is a very useful model that does explain a huge amount. I wonder if you would equally point out Origin of Species has its flaws

If you have something constructive to say then fucking say it

It's just how it is grandpa

what is the movie on the left please thank you

Grandpa?
I'm 20, you stupid idiot.
Being permanently ironic it's just a defense mechanism insecure people use because they don't have the balls to be sincere and then get shat on.
After all, people nowadays seek to ban anything that might be deemed offensive, even if they are just opinions.

Which is why the usage of irony means that person is 20 points below the average IQ.

>It has not been 'vastly refuted'.
It has, whether you like it or not

A sileHRUGHEHGUHDUHWUHHHNNGHHH

A Silent Voice. Read the manga instead since it doesn't end half way like the movie does.

Naw it’s still fresh and funny. Oldfags needs to get out hahahhaa

Attached: CF10E778-20BE-4294-87F1-14D011B62202.png (381x339, 34K)

weebshit isn't for men

Why are you so ass blasted about shitposting?

Attached: 1542235360420.jpg (328x404, 69K)

it's a mango? it's not korean?

Post a scientific source that is not left wing tabloid trash you cunt.

He's not an oldfag he's 20, aka a le wrong generation fag.

Not about shitposting, about ironic retards.
Everything is irony to the point when someone says a sarcastic joke irl I always get the urge to punch him.

>sarcasm=irony
My friend...

You are literally on the spectrum

Sarcasm, irony, all cancer.

Have... nevermind

oh my god i want to go just one fucking day without reading some pseud's screed about what's wrong with Yea Forums

This.

WE

What else do you propose with talk about? The thinly veiled sex politics bait?

The Cancer question is a much more pressing issue.

best and only good romance movie

fuck off

Classic rom-coms are the best

Attached: philadelphia.jpg (723x552, 191K)

>he cares about the content posted to an anonymous image board

Attached: 1555089968003.jpg (480x360, 22K)

You know that old meme about the guys will believe the impossible, but not the improbable? Well it's sort of that. When your (((writing))) has to now incorporate the retarded and illogical (((SJW))) crowd, well, don't expect good things to come of it. Remember Jews/(((Communists))) only destroy things, they can't create anything except poverty and death. If they were capable then they would show it instead of the opposite and proving me right.

Should we just pat each other in the backs over the social "experience" autistic people here have gotten from reading cherrypicked social media screencaps of stupid americans?

It's not korean. That poster just is. Still a grest read.

>>he cares about the content posted to an anonymous image board
Nothing matters more!

Attached: mfw.jpg (220x221, 11K)

Japanese things can't be weeb.

Fuck off weeb, all those high school romance animus are the same

i don't care about your meta bullshit. fuck off.

No they aren't.

Good Romances men can enjoy
>500 (days of summer)
>About Time
>Lost In Translation
>The Apartment
>When Harry Met Sally
>Titanic
>Groundhog Day
>Grosse Pointe Blank
>Casablanca
>Roman Holiday
>It's A Wonderful Life
>Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind
>Punch Drunk Love
>In The Mood For Love
>Don Jon
>50 First Date
>True Romance
>Romeo + Juliet
>First 10 minutes of Up

For some people, which is sad

Damn half of those movies are about men who never find love.

Attached: thomas_crown.jpg (375x551, 64K)

Name three other websites that are equally or more entertaining than Yea Forums has been.
If you genuinely do not care about the quality of the internet then we have an irreconcilable difference in values.

there are none, and entertainment is subjective. Caring about the quality of the internet is a lost cause and you shouldn't even bother, it is completely out of your hands.

Wrong, it is what we make of it. At least until it is hijacked entirely by bots. Until then you should always keep in mind and truly meditate on the meaning of the old adage that there are only two posters on the internet, you and me user.

true dat

It already is hijacked by the bots, when it was a new thing I can understand wanting to defend it but it is so mainstream now there isn't any point at all. The unwashed masses flood every space on this shit hole.

>Left wing
The selfish gene is left wing, you dumb boomer

>left: incel's fantasy
>right: real world

have sex

Kill yourself, leftist.

>Titanic
>good

Attached: 1463356031732.gif (480x324, 663K)

Anyone who prefers the left is subhuman, there’s nothing romantic about Japanese writing, it’s written by incels for incels

>tfw no deaf gf that will accept all of my shortcomings and love me for me. while I try my hardest to understand her even with her difficulty in communication
it hurts lads

I think as long as you and I are able to have this conversation and articulate ideas about this coherently the bot posters with their canned responses such as the next two/three posts below mine are nothing more than sophisticated spam. When this site is dead and Julian Assange is dead i'll give up for good, but in the mean time there is always room for hope.

Kill yourself, leftist.

When Harry Met Sally

High Fidelity

That's up to you, if it makes you feel better or even makes a little difference I respect it. God speed.

Oh fuck off
That deaf shit is absolute garbage and ended with neither of the protagonists showing their emotions

the lake house

>A 3 hour James "based" Cameron Directed record number of Oscar winning box office record breaking historical epic
>Not kino
Hello, Reddit contrarian!

Attached: JC.jpg (194x259, 5K)

Mr. Deeds

>It's good because it was popular and made a lot of money!
Imagine being this much of a sheep, and accusing anyone who disagrees with your shit taste a "contrarian"

No it's good because it's a James Cameron movie, faggot. Making a lot of movie is a reuslt of that.

His only good movies are the ones featuring Arnold. Everything else is crap, including that overrated tripe Aliens.

they were never good

Based pedo

The logic of going out with a deaf girl who was vindictively bullied into a suicide attempt but also still being friends with the 17 year old girl who did the bullying and isn't sorry is way more fucked up and weird than what you'll find in almost any western romance.

>Bridget Jones's Diary
>Jones's
>s's
Shouldn't it be Jones'?

Nah, her name ends in an s. Jones's is correct, plural possessive is for like... Airplanes' wings

Right is realistic and left is beta jap fantasy

What makes it "beta"?

I'd be happy if they just remained in the kitchen, laundry room or bedroom.

>"""realistic"""
Consider your expectations subverted.

Why is the first post always the best post bros

this girl i have a crush on, her favourite movie of all time is A Silent Voice. when we watched it together for the first time. we took completely different perspectives. she hated the deaf girl and thought she was a bitch and i related to her and liked her the most and thought she was too selfless