Are their armors made of butter?

Attached: product.webm (720x480, 937K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/WRYM6B7CTs8?t=43
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Leaving the country won't be enough for D&D to run form this

most light combat armor is built to resist the slashing motion of swords, but can still be pierced by spears or arrows

But that isn't light armor, that's like full heavy armour. If they were wearing light armour they would be just wearing a helmet and gambeson.
Also, arrows couldn't penetrate plate armor after the late 14th century.

>segmented plate armor
>light

Attached: help.jpg (456x628, 606K)

Yup, even a point blank shot from a big fuck-off crossbow couldn't penetrate a good breastplate.
The only possible explanation for this retardeness is that those armours are in fact mostly leather, with only some metal elements fixed to it.

Glorious European steel spear tip fucking weak ass Eastern style armor suited only for slaughtering peasants.

ahh you're the guy who keeps posting how cute and edgy the new dany is

>weak ass Eastern style armor suited only for slaughtering peasants.
It looks more Roman to me than anything else in particular, too bad they didn't have shields to go with their swords

Attached: lorica-segmentata-3D-model_0.jpg (1000x800, 74K)

>gets hit by spear shaft while wearing helmet
>dies
top kek

>insists on fighting with a spear, doesn't use the reach provided by the long shaft

I can definitely see that, but with the way they are kind of loose flaps and pleated skirts feels more samurai to me. It's just fantasy armor, maybe they combined them?

They don't seem to be full face and just have little cheek guards hanging down. The big puff of debris when he hits the guy off screen looks like a spit take. He just got smashed in the jaw by a plot strength stick, so he's probably not dead but knocked out.

Attached: f9d68f50-7fa8-4fb0-82a2-927e4f6d5baf[1].jpg (2839x3301, 792K)

I'm convinced that D&D have never even seen a war movie in their lives. Not putting the battle scenes in the first couple seasons was smart because they are terrible at portraying it.

what's the point of the groin belts

protect your groin

They were into CBT and having the little weights bounce around smacking you in the junk got them amped up to fight harder.

What series of movie is this from?

Its from the last game of thrones episode

Man fuck that scene remember when Beric has his plate armor stabbed through by rusty knives? Armor in GoT is fucking pointless unless you're a main character

>series has dragon,witches,zombies,etc

>"BUT MUH REALISM!"

find a female and have sexual intercourse,im begging you!

bend over

BURN THE WITCH!

Or this:
youtu.be/WRYM6B7CTs8?t=43

melted plot butter

But he will never be a female

this isn't a negotiation

Attached: 1234236456.jpg (339x235, 13K)

basically the only time armor has mattered in this show is when they followed the books. gurm explicitly spelled it out how powerful armor was back in those times in certain scenes. whenever gurm's influence isn't there, d&d likes to pretend armor doesn't do shit

Did he blow up someone's skull with the handle?

wearing transmogged light armor for the movement speed

Also, he said that the reason why Tyrion lost his nose was that he wanted to show what happens when a combatant doesn't wear a helmet. Changing it to cheek scar isn't here or there, but other main characters who fight in battle shoulder wear helmets or get scars.

the displayed absolute ineffectiveness of armor portrayed in films and shows always bothered me. protag always slashes through dozens of enemies who are wearing full thick armor with ease

>falls down near the edge of the crowd with the hut to his right
>next shot the hut is behind him and they're both standing in completely different places
>that awkward pause after the guys sickle thing gets stuck the dothraki actor is just standing there with his chin up
>a cut to the cheek kills him instantly
I don't remember early GoT being this bad

>asking movie industry to portray armors, armies, formations, sieges, or anything properly
My fucking sides. What else do you expect ? That armies have archers or do not use trebuchets as frontline troops ?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Give me one movie with a proper medieval battle.
Hint: there are none.

Ever saw a movie with a shield wall ? With regiments of infantry with spears supported by archers, with flanking cavalry ? Ever saw a movie with the most basic of basics ?
With a single drop of realism ?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Hint: all movie battle are shit. Period.
Pure crap. None are good. None.

didn't spartacus have that? also in that new Robert the Bruce movie they dig a defensive trench which I haven't seen in any other movie battle

300

My fucking sides. Naked muscle men pretenting to use phallanx tactics but always trying to not to.
Another garbage movie.
First, suit up, second, maintain the shield wall. They fail on both. It is just a homo erotic fiction.

No it didn't. It was crap. Like the rest. Just another shitty movie battle.

This, however it's still idiotic he was in that close and in reach of the sword, which would also be a piercing weapon in that scenario.

He should have been playing keep away staying out of range.

They still fucked it up, it's called the Battle of Loudoun HILL because Bruce only won because they defending on a hill.
Even the ditches are in the wrong place, Bruce placed ditches to the side of a swamp in order to prevent the English from going around the hill. So the hill was in front of a bog, which bottlenecked the English.

Attached: ee.png (392x902, 78K)

Too bad the most common weapons were always spears. And you are retards. You could write hollywpof scripts. Gratz.

i meant the graphic novel, stupid

He should have been extremely mobile always maintaining distance to his reach advantage, trying to stab his opponents in the face/neck /whatever else they have more vulnerable. Instead he turned his spear into a fucking dagger and every opponent just went full retard/zombie target drone mode.

The graphic novel is even worse. Homo erotic in black and white.

>Opening battle of Rome
>300 before Leonidas slo-mo
>The Eagle prisoner rescue

Would have made more sense if the lannister soldiers were wearing brigandines instead of full plate. You could potentially stab through it and common footsoldiers would be more likely to have them. Full plate was mostly reserved for lords and knights.

Yeah. Lets start with realistic things then make hollywood bullshit.
Mmm.
It iseven worse.

Lannisters wear plastic shit, not full late. And their retarted helms prevent them to see anything.

brigandine armor is layered plate m8

Brigandines are jackets with metal plates riveted or sewn to them. Cheap to make since all the metal plates are identical and can be low quality. Very different from layered plate armor.

Tell me how you intend to stab through this user, please. The downside when compared to plate is that it's heavier, not that it's bad protection.

Attached: brigandine.jpg (1600x1022, 410K)