Still not topped. GoT was only hot air after all

Why do you type like a nigger or a whore from twitter?

and yet it will still be beloved in a hundred years whereas Asoiaf will only be remembered for how lazy its author was and how it was only ended through a poorly written adaptation, if it is remembered at all.

kids fairy tale vs. kids edgy wank
mmm

Lmao. It’s more mythological. But you’re a goddamn brainlet so let me advise you to drink some bleach and chase it Down with some ammonia

not him. You're the one with a lousy grasp on grammar, bro. Stop shitposting. A GoT thread died for this.

Lord of the Rings had a very medieval philosophy: that if the king was a good man, the land would prosper. We look at real history and it’s not that simple. Tolkien can say that Aragorn became king and reigned for a hundred years, and he was wise and good. But Tolkien doesn’t ask the question: What was Aragorn’s tax policy? Did he maintain a standing army? What did he do in times of flood and famine? And what about all these orcs? By the end of the war, Sauron is gone but all of the orcs aren’t gone – they’re in the mountains. Did Aragorn pursue a policy of systematic genocide and kill them? Even the little baby orcs, in their little orc cradles?

How about you finish the books, fatass?
See

Upvoted for le obscure Idiocracy reference. That movie was so prophetic

Tolkien was an ebin writer

youtube.com/watch?v=wMLcd-zobJ0

>little baby orcs
the slander of all orcs as dangerous is certainly problematic

GoT treats evil people as morally ambiguous, it's sickening

>and he was wise and good
that answers all his questions in a simple manner because it doesn't need to be all detailed since it's a fantasy story, not a political drama

The two towers was the best

>Lord of the Rings had a very medieval philosophy: that if the king was a good man, the land would prosper. We look at real history and it’s not that simple.
that was the point you stupid fuck