Whatever happened to good movie nudity? It used to be even the most famous of actresses would do it on occasion...

Whatever happened to good movie nudity? It used to be even the most famous of actresses would do it on occasion. Remember the glory days of women like Angelina Jolie, Uma Thurman, Nicole Kidman, and Halle Berry walking around topless every other movie? Nowadays it's all CGI and pasties and shit. The only worthwhile nude scene I can remember in recent memory is Scarlett Johansson in Under the Skin, and even that was years ago by now. Whatever happened to "Now get out there and film your sex scene?"

Attached: ScarJoSkin.jpg (800x1039, 520K)

Other urls found in this thread:

variety.com/2017/film/box-office/beauty-and-the-beast-emma-watson-box-office-1202011723/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Why censor it?

A naked person isn't pornography.

instagram ruined everything
still gets you a three day site wide ban

Almost every single show on HBO and Netflix has nudity now.

We're back in a puritan phase of culture. First it was the Christians being the puritans and the feminists did nudity to spite them. Now the feminists are the puritans who forbid nudity in case a man might enjoy it.

>IP ban

Oh, sweetie... You have much to learn.

I'm paranoid that all nude scenes from major actresses are fakes now. There's already unspoken CGI applied to just about every actor's face even in movies that aren't "CGI movies".

Ok but you didn't censor the feet?

Male nudity in movies is where it's at now

D-Dwarfchan?

It’s not A-listers doing them though, it’s often literal pornstars.

Idk, but I'm glad they're doing away with it. There's too many instances of hollywood objectifying people, especially women by having them shoot nude/sex scenes. I could understand it in some rare instances, but the way it's typically done is disturbing. A woman should only expose herself like that to her husband.

>she's okay with sending the guy who leaked her nudes to prison for 10 years
>couple years later does this
why do women do this?

>Kate Mara
>Kristen Stewart
>Jennifer Lawrence
>Alsion Brie
>Margit Robbie
>Zendaya

Big names are still getting nude

I can identify several reasons, in no particular order. First there's . Second there's widespread pornography reducing the impact of nude scenes. Third, current year social justice prefers less attractive actresses. Fourth, Feminism encourages a culture where getting naked for the benefit of men is degrading (but being a whore on social media apparently isn't).

There was a time when A-list celebs wanted you to jerk off to them.

Attached: dm98u2.png (1920x1086, 2.08M)

Does Zendaya show crotch?

Who cares today’s actresses all suck anyway, I can’t think of a single one I want to see

Right? Sometimes there were movies where the entire point was "_____ gets naked!" such as the example you provided.

>Big names are still getting nude
>Zendaya
...Pardon??

Euphoria. No pussy shot (some of the other cast do though)

Prude.

I'm gonna need pics m80s

>Whatever happened to good movie nudity?

The internet happened.

That is why movies from the 70s and 80s had nude scenes more than today, the actress' in those movie had the security of knowing the nudity stayed in those movies.

Now, with the internet, if an actress googles her name, or if her children or relatives google her name, the first images that show up are her nude scenes. Actress' dont want that, that is why they are not doing nude scenes now. Some actress' have no problem with nudity, but a lot of them do because of their nude scenes online. That is the reason.

>"All women today are such whores!"
>"Man, why are women today such puritans?"

I love MJ

18+ to post on 4 channel, still blocks out a movie still.

The biggest tragedy is that it's not in mainstream movies now, either.

The example you listed? It's a low budget, art-house film.

Remember when actresses would go tits-out for mainstream comedies and action films? That's what I miss.

Someone told these actresses they're more than just a pair of tits and a pretty face.

They're wrong though.

Oh, I wasn't insulting Zendaya, I was wanting to see her naked, lol.

18+ to post on Yea Forums, still get banned if you post nudity on Yea Forums.

If Kata Mara was a big name, she isn’t anymore
Jennifer Lawrence and Alison Brie only did it after there nudes leaked. In Lawrence’s case, anything she can do on film is a huge step up from the butthole shots.
Nobody had ever heard of Margot Robbie before Wolf of Wall Street, she took her clothes off in order to get famous.

Honestly? Because on avarage the actors have become too fat

I tried clover and it doesn't work.

I saw pic related on late night television and went and stole the DVD from wal mart the next day. That disc was worn razor thin by the time I was done with it.

Attached: f6a579f4e6f1d28c5c816fe8f9b4b11b.jpg (852x480, 49K)

Go fuck yourself and jump off a bridge you shithead piece of shit motherfucker

Just unplug your router and clear cookies dumbass

The fuck is your problem kid?

Not all routers assign a new IP

Doesn't work for me. My ISP won't let me change my IP and it's fucking stupid.

If you want nudity, watch porn.

People complaining there is no nudity in big movies is fucking retarded. You watch a movie for the story, you watch porn for the nudity and sex. Tits are tits, they look the same on a movie actress as they do on a porn star. This is not rocket science. Fuck.

yeah, don't do this. it makes mustard gas

Plus phony “leaks” have replaced the publicity grab of old nude scenes.

I
LOVE
TITS

Then get you some idiot. Stop lusting after married women.

what episode

Patrician taste my friend

why does it matter? you get your nudity you're clamoring for. because you want to see a specific actress nude she has to get nude?

You're telling me you'd rather see some random porn star's tits than Scarlett Johansson's or Angelina Jolie's?

>because you want to see a specific actress nude she has to get nude?
sounds good to me

Attached: Scarlet Johannson.webm (1180x580, 2.65M)

>t. The only worthwhile nude scene I can remember in recent memory is Scarlett Johansson
the most overrated thing in hollywood

basado

No I'm not you both breathing retard

Jokes on you I'm jerking it to that bare sole right now

>Angelina Jolie's tits
at least Toilet Yohandjob has bobs.

Fantastic ass, even better than Emilia Clarkes and Jane Levy.

imagine she rape you

Glad she finally showed her tits in Under the Skin. Very nice shape and areola size.

Attached: scarlett_johansson_ghost_world_061.jpg (626x442, 39K)

She's hot but it's grounding looking at things like this. I've fucked girls more attractive than her in this webm from a physical standpoint but she was a sex symbol for a while.
That's why actress don't do this often. It ruins the illusion of them being some next level 10/10 when really they are often 7-8/10 and you literally see girls equally or more attractive every day.

>ive fucked girls more attractive

Attached: 1557685332612.gif (300x162, 1.59M)

I was banned for posting a bare butt once.

Deep down, most still do.

You dont take hundreds of pictures of yourself in nude and/or compromising positions if you don't want guys jacking off to them. It's a turn on for women.

Attached: jennifer-lawrence-nude-sexy-leaked-hacked-celebrity-341.jpg (765x985, 113K)

>people actually fall for this

Look at the webm shes hot but it's not mindblowing. She's like a 7-8/10 there. I am definitely not the only user that has fucked girls that looked better than that

god i wish i were an alien with a scarjo suit

Based and titpilled

>A naked person isn't pornography.

I got a 3 day ban for just typing the word "bum" once, I didn't really I just thought it'd be funny to say

She raised that foot on purpose didn’t she?

Tell us how you really feel user

>f**tfags are this delusional

pretty sure she has basic control over her limbs.

>censoring the word foot

Attached: 1333A71D-5BB3-4C87-9773-6EA0AF3B4AE4.jpg (321x320, 30K)

Most actresses get naked at some point, just look at the list of Oscar winners.

Those who refuse eventually get ostracized as not being dedicated to the art.

U MAD?

Attached: vlcsnap-2016-03-06-00h47m37s224.png (720x720, 599K)

I have no idea why, but I get the feeling Emma Watson will be naked at some point, either on film or in some photoshoot. She's already done topless-ish shoots before. I feel like proper nudity is only a matter of time.

Attached: emma.jpg (789x350, 46K)

I got site banned for a week for posting a /pol/ meme on Yea Forums. The post itself was on topic, but the image obviously made a mod asshurt. Mods are complete faggots sometimes.

SOMEONE POST THE ASS TO ASS JCON WEBM FOR FUCKS SAKE LADS

Yes

>complete faggots sometimes
>sometimes
but honestly all /pol/edittors should be perma banned

ALL ACTRESSES GET NUDE IN FRONT OF WEINSTEIN

Sauce for a real nigga

It works if your ISP does DHCP. 99% of phoneposters are untouchable for this reason. Most desktop users should be, too, because in most places a static IP is something you pay extra for.

This.

Also leaks and "slips" taken by paparazzi have had an indirect effect. Part of the reason Natalie Portman took forever to do even minor nudity was because she was so upset by the topless beach shots that made it onto the web when she was like 18. Back in the day, when it was just the tabloids, that kind of thing would pass within a matter of weeks, but the Internet gave it permanence.

>but being a whore on social media apparently isn't
The difference here is that in a movie setting, there's are men who tell you to get naked.
On social media you are your own boss, telling yourself to get naked.
Anything is empowering if it's done under your own control.

>because she was so upset by the topless beach shots that made it onto the web when she was like 18.

If I was her I wouldve been more worried about the pics of her at the park reaching into her buttcrack, pulling something out, inspecting it then eating it.

No I'm not even joking. Das nasty

This. All she has going for her really is a slim body and a great face. The rest is fairly mediocre-to-above-average.

ISPs are actually getting wise to this. Yeah, you can change it once or twice, but if they detect multiple IP changes in a short period, they'll put you on static for a few days. I've had this happen to me when I was trying to circumvent file host hourly/daily limits.

>I've fucked girls more attractive than her in this webm
And then you woke up, incel.

>they don't have a static IP for the sake of your homeservers
Do you even /g/?

cope

I have too. feels good to be Chad

Sauce

The latin american HBO series are a ridiculous excuse for softcore pornography. "Roommates" was a series almost exclusively about watching playboy models have softcore sex. "o negocio" is a series about a group of escorts, "sexo urbano" is a documentary about prostitutes and strip clubs in latin america, don't really wanna keep going

>doesn't have an offsite VPN for static services and random DHCP for evading bans at home

Thing is I'm not even Chad. I make average money. I'm tall, in ok shape, decent looking. Borderline sperg.
I've fucked a number of girls that look better than scarjo in that movie

people only get naked on tv shows/low budget films

the concept of mid budget films, where there was lots of nudity, is vanishing. there are no longer mid budget films. something like psychological erotic thriller does no longer exist, apart from exceptions to the rule like fifty shades of grey. there's no reason for these fucks to get nude, unless they want to start in artsy fartsy movies, which under the skin is.

Some still do.

Attached: eva-green-300.jpg (1280x1924, 238K)

she's not really A-list though I appreciate her getting naked

If we can say Demi Moore as A-list, why Eva Green is not being in a A-list? It is quite OK to say it

Stop posting with a name.

Internet porn is widely available. The jew doesn't need you to masturbate to movies anymore, plus actresses are more uppity and overpaid now than they've ever been. Remember Halle Berry? Monster's Ball and Swordfish? Tons of money for her to get naked and hardly anyone cared. It's a bad investment when the goyim can get cummies online.

I miss the 90s when every other movie had a gratuitous sex scene

this board has literally become more prudish than reddit.
even posting a nude scene from a mainstream movie with a spoiler tag could cost you a 3 day ban.

I never said demi moore was a-list but one but i would say without a doubt a LOT more people know demi moore's name than eva green. Like by an outrageous margin. And Demi Moore has been dead for like 15 years now

I know, right? Fucking (((jannies))), man.

Because she's not. Eva Green is not a household name. Most movie-goers wouldn't know who she is, unlike someone like Demi Moore or Scarlett Johansson, who normies will know based off name recognition. It doesn't mean Eva is a bad actress, it just means she hasn't yet reached a level of celebrity where everyone knows her name.

It's a blue board.

The rule for blue boards has ALWAYS been no nudity (not "no porn," BTW). And posting nudity behind a spoiler tag has always been a technical violation of the rules, it's just that enforcement of that has never been uniform, probably because it's fairly low on the list of mod/janitor priorities.

why

That toilet and shower placement is weird. Do Americans really have bathrooms like this?

ya

Sex scenes and general nudity used to be extraordinarily common before say idk 10-15 years ago. The reason it changed is because porn became more available. People used to clamor for movie nudity like crackheads. Now who fucking cares.?
Even half of these hot actresses posing nude I'm hardly bothered to look at in the threads. I'm definitely not going to spend money to watch the movie. Not too long ago a lot movies legitimately got better ticket sales when (insert mediocre hollywood thot) showed her tits.

Eva Green could never really be called an A-Lister by any stretch, except for maybe around when Casino Royals was released, but probably not even then.

The only people who know her name are people who have googled her nude scenes. Newsmagazine shows never paid any attention to her,

I wonder why that is though? Is it by her own choice? She's a good actress, has great screen presence, has a nice body, a unique look (she's not my type by any means but I could understand why someone would find her attractive). It's beyond me why she's not a bigger star.

There are a metric fuckload of girls in hollywood with a similar story. Dudes too

>he only worthwhile nude scene I can remember in recent memory is Scarlett Johansson in Under the Skin, and even that was years ago by now
Daddario has some major sex scenes coming up in Lost Girls and Love Hotels.

As amazing as her tits are, does Daddario really count as a big star?

>Whatever happened to good movie nudity?
Actresses are lazy and don't want to get fit, unlike male actors

Attached: D6DuuA2X4AE_peE.jpg (1200x795, 130K)

She was in two big movies with The Rock

>a beached whale now passes for a swimsuit "model"

Oh how far we've fallen

Being in big movies and being a big star are two completely different things.

bro you can see her soles right there what else do you want?

would

I doubt actresses don't spend a lot of time in the gym. It's because movies don't rely on titillation to sell tickets anymore. Porn is accessible to all unlike the 80s and 90s. If Basic Instinct came out next week no one would care.

Pictured shortly before locals turned up with buckets of sea water.

Look at her knee bruises, jesus christ.

You're retarded, the appeal is seeing an actress nude after you've watched her over the years wondering what's under the clothes. It's the same appeal as someone you know personally.

It would tarnish the righteous Christian youth that visit the site daily

Considering how irrelevant she has been since the Beauty and the Beast, it's surprising she hasn't already.

Partly because she's European. It's very difficult for actresses who are not native English-speakers to achieve A-list status in Hollywood. It happens (Penelope Cruz and Charlize Theron would be relatively recent examples), but it's comparatively rare. Actors seem to have a slightly easier time of it.

Eva's English speaking voice is not an asset for her in Hollywood. It tends to be too deep and gravelly.

Attached: Emma-Watson-18.jpg (1920x1080, 422K)

This board is so cringe it's unreal. Imagine thinking any of your shithead opinions matter when you act like 13 year old midgets who need to have sex.

>she's been irrelevant because she hasn't been in capeshit
You're so fucking dumb. She's literally had massive success before she's even 30. She has to worry about nothing while most actresses need to do netflix shit to stay relevant.

>that jawline
>no tits
fucking gross

so, The Fappening was an inside-job?

beautiful

Actresses like ellen page and kate mara who have dead careers just got nude

This. The test of who is a big star is the ability to get top billing, not supporting roles alongside top stars.

Being in a movie with a big name is something that up-and-coming actors certainly aim for, so that they can hopefully make a name for themselves, but the ultimate goal is to have their own name on the marquee. The usual definition of an A-lister is someone who can consistently command top billing in high-profile films.

>no tits

Attached: BG_Emma_Watson_in_Elie_Saab_alla_serata_Vip_Lancome_ad_Hong_Kong-24.jpg (630x472, 97K)

Wow, she's had 1 successful movie other than Harry potter. And it was a Disney Remake that sucked ass.

the mod staff is full of leftists who immigrated from r*ddit

Evertyime you post something here you need to toss a coin. I can't count how many times I got a 3 days ban for no real reason. I even got a permanent ban once for posting Isabela Monar in a Dore the Explorer thread because "underage" content...

Attached: 0000000.jpg (733x1089, 81K)

Halle Berry walked around topless in every other movie or hers? Way to reveal your age, child. When she went topless in Swordfish and had her sex scene in Monster's Ball, the general attitude wasn't, "Oh, here we go again," but rather, "Holy shit! I need to see these movies just for that! I never thought this would happen!"

>1 successful movie
Says you the faggot who is ignoring her other successful movies. You literally have a capeshit brain. Bravo.

Massive retard. IT was actually the only disney live action movie that was good the last 8 years maybe. Stick to game of thrones threads kiddo.

I wonder what changed in this age of limitless high-definition porn and fast broadband internet

10 billion dollars in gross 2 billion from the last 6 years. Get fucked for thinking that's bad.

>A naked person isn't pornography.

Yes it is you degenerate. If it makes my dick hard its porn. Same reasoning applies as to why women should cover the fuck up in public. Rape shouldn't be a crime.

Attached: arthur dayn gif.gif (245x178, 1.75M)

>SACRE BLEU IN THE SHITTER
I remember having a ninja wank to this as a 13 yo before my mum took it back to the video shop. I tried and tried within that 24 period to get me and DVD alone but it wasnt until she went to make a cuppa tea before heading out to return it that I snuck one in.

She can live off of her Harry Potter residuals, but her career can't indefinitely. And the success rate of the films she's starred in since then is not that good. She's only been in four films in the past five years (with one currently in post-production), and only one of them was really successful. Of the other three, two were bombs (The Colony and Regression) and the other one (The Circle) was critically panned even if it essentially broke even. Her A-list expiration date is fast approaching.

user the circle grossed 45 million dollars despite not getting good ((((((critical)))))) reviews. Look up the bling ring or noah or perks of being a wallflower on metacritic they have combined maybe 1 or 2 negative reviews. combined. Stop posting. She's miles ahead of any actresses in her age group, most of which have to do netflix shit or capeshit or have already done capeshit.

>Her A-list expiration date is fast approaching

Attached: 1499210634311.jpg (600x733, 29K)

She can do whatever she wants big and small movies, she doesn't care about anything except doing the movies she wants to do. Her big movies gross big and her indie movies gross indie amounts, some of them get moderately good amounts considering some indie movies get only 2.5 or 3 million grosses a lot of the time and some of her indie movies grossed 20 mil or more

Andrew Mackey has been in movies grossing more than that, does that make him an A-lister?
Nobody sees movies because Emma Watson is in it. Harry potter and B&B would both have grossed just as much had she not been in them.

>Andew Mackey
No you fucking capeshitter
Stop talking about capeshit
It really makes you seem like an idiot. Shes a massive star even her movies that dont get good critical reviews become the directors highest grossing movie by tens of millions of dollars.

>nobody sees movies because Emma Watson is in it
shes exactly one of the few actresses who people actually do go see movies for
stop posting already
As a sign of her popularity, 28% of audiences in a ComScore survey said that Watson was the major reason for attending the film. That figure rarely tops 10%, according to the research firm.

variety.com/2017/film/box-office/beauty-and-the-beast-emma-watson-box-office-1202011723/

Not necessarily. I'm just saying girls love to feel desired, feel wanted, even sexualized. In J-Law's case she sent whomever all those nudes and sexy photos knowing full well the gentleman who received them would likely masterbate to them. It turned her on, as does being an actress for men to lust over.

I'm pissed that Men's magazines are no longer a thing. Maxim, FHM, etc... they really showed which actresses wanted and enjoyed men beating off to them.


(Reminder: sweet, wholesome Lacey Chabert did multiple covers - last in the streets, a freak in tha sheets!)

Attached: 1_9f26af98192fb3efb1bf261f54636bbb.jpg (785x1080, 188K)

>nobody sees movies because Emma Watson is in it
You post with people this stupid on Yea Forums...

This board is so underaged, must havan average age of 16

As if Harry Potter or a Disney live action remake is any better than capeshit. I could have used any of the B-list actors from F&F or Transformers or Star Wars as an example. Just because they are in movies that have grossed 10bil doesnt make Rose Pico or Tim Oliphant A-list stars.

>user the circle grossed 45 million dollars despite not getting good ((((((critical)))))) reviews
Yes, and given a pre-marketing beudget of 18M, that's not much more than breaking even.

>the bling ring or noah or perks of being a wallflower
All 5+ years ago. And none of them made more than a modest profit.

It doesn't matter what you gross, it's return on investment, i.e., profit, that matters, and she really hasn't been in many films since Harry Potter (other than the one Disney film) that made big profits.

And of course she can do whatever she wants --- for now --- but if she doesn't have some more big budget hits within a few years, she's not going to be able to command those roles any more. She's always going to be a household name, of course, in the same way Macaulay Culkin is, but the point will come where that's not enough to earn her starring roles in big budget films.

>Lacey Chabert
literally who

>every movie needs to make a billion dollars like marvel to be successful
Post what actress you think is successful you dumb shit. She has a 544 million dollar average gross. Name someone and I will look up their average for you and you will be shocked how much lower it is.

Movies like Enemy starring jake gyllenhall directed by villenueve gross 3 million dollars does that mean either are failures? No it means that indie movies aren't made to make money but for artistic purposes. Her movies make a lot of money compared to other actors and actresses. It's that simple.

>she hasn't been in many films since harry potter that made big profits
She's doesn't need to be for the rest of her life
Noah was the highest grossing aronofsky film and beauty and the beast was the highest grossing musical

how is she in a bad condition you are literally placing the most ridiculous standards on her when shes been massively successful and can do whatever movies she wants for the rest of her life. there are tons of actresses who will never even do movies as popular as all the movies shes done post potter already.

>I could have used any of the B-list actors from F&F or Transformers or Star Wars as an example.
That's not comparable to the stacked english cast and the great films that are the harry potter series. Stop posting you seriously have such shit NPC taste. There haven't been good blockbusters since them really. And batb was great compared to the trash movies like the nu star wars, nutcracker, marry poppins 2, jungle book. fuck off

Hey user emma watson is emma fucking watson
the people you named are literal whos
you are a fucking autist if you can't differentiate
literally AUTISM

you have zero common sense

Stop posting

Attached: top grossing.jpg (420x416, 111K)

Highlight his name, hit the little arrow and filter.

batb was 2017? the fuck are you even on about.

You make me sad user :(

He's being a retard, capeshit has rotted everyone's brain when it comes to discussing movies and general standards.

i like how retards act like anyone on this list needs to do anything. they literally can just sit on the pile of money they already have and never act again if they want to.

They are set for life and for good reason

>Very nice shape and areola size.
are you indian

>Has a lower average gross than Warwick Davis.
>Impressive.

Maybe someone should starve her family to death.

user Warwick davis has the highest average. Watson has a higher average than every single person on that list but warwick
thats impressive

you can't even read a fucking graph, that's also impressive

Fuck, I was thinking of playing Tyranny, this is a sign

As I said, GROSS MEANS NOTHING.

Profits and profit margin are what matter. And even indie movies are profit-driven, don't kid yourself.

>Noah was the highest grossing aronofsky film
It also had his biggest budget, by far. Black Swan was far, far more profitable, because it grossed 90% as much as Noah on 10% of the budget. Producers see that and care about it.

>beauty and the beast was the highest grossing musical
Again, so what? It was also one of the most expensive films ever made. Highest-grossing is not most-profitable.

>how is she in a bad condition
Financially? She isn't. As you say, she's set for life. But if she wants to continue to be considered an A-list actress (and maybe she doesn't: I don't know), she can't continue to rest on her laurels forever, and indie films won't cut it, either.

Americans are scared of nudity. Boobies are bad!

Are there any other decent CRPGs out there? I want something with an old-school feel but modern playability. I want to have random encounters and fight skeletons and have DnD style character progression, but I don't want it to be some clunky old unplayable mess.

I'm pretty tired of actresses building their career on their bodies and sex appeal and then acting like they're above carnal matters and deserve as much pay, recognition, and leading roles as actors and actresses who bust their asses and learn their trade. The least they could do is flash a tit.

Scarlett's one of Hollywood's many, many nudist women

Where are you even getting your numbers?

Attached: Screenshot_20190514-193102_Chrome.jpg (1079x1667, 621K)

From before your precious capeshit movies came out this year and skewed everything, stop posting already.
Nobody gives a shit about avengers.

Graph? It's a table you fucking moron.

Dude you're coping so much. There are no up and coming actresses who are stars.

spotted the seething janny. go fuck yourself

Attached: giphy (10).gif (263x350, 823K)

Those numbers clearly aren't inflation-adjusted, either.

What? Where did I argue that there are?

BTW, I'm also not arguing that EW has to do nudity (or is likely to), either. Usually actresses who haven't done that before they were big stars don't do it afterward. There are exceptions (ScarJo, JLaw), but the vast majority of top actresses who are willing to do nudity have already done it when they were on the way up (that was the case with Angelina Jolie, Demi Moore, Sharon Stone, etc.). And I tend to agree that the era of studios shelling out like they did with Halle Berry are over.

Noah grossed a lot of money while being inherently divisive and being a religious movie. It's gross is impressive and noteworthy. There won't be a higher grossing aronfsky movie.

All these is to say is shes major famous and can do whatever she wants.

I haven't played many but, modern ones, the only ones I know are Divinity 1 and 2, Path of Exile 1 and 2 and Wasteland 2. Mind you, I haven't played them so I don't really know if they're worth it.

Also, a bunch of no-names from Harry Potter have much higher averages.

Holy shit you dumb fucking idiot. They aren't famous and haven't lead a billion dollar movie since then have they. So stop being stupid and making me actually have to tell you to use common sense.

I own Divinity 1 and 2, there's only one Path of Exile and it's an ARPG not a CRPG (you may be thinking of Pillars of Eternity, I own both) and Wasteland 2 doesn't really have the "crypt full of magic skeletons" feel I'm looking for. Thanks anyway, I think I just own or know of every decent CRPG around these days, there might be something being slept on that I don't know about but I doubt it.

Attached: angry about elves.jpg (550x281, 14K)

Again, link your numbers. The list I posted has the same top 6, but somehow 1 movie pushed Watson down 20 spots with exactly the same numbers. Take out Harry potter's 7.3 billion and her numbers aren't that impressive.

>you may be thinking of Pillars of Eternity
You're right, I always get those two mixed up, I'm a retard. Maybe Torment: Tides of Numenera?

When Jungle Book remake makes 960mil, beauty and the beasts numbers aren't impressive. It's a kids Disney movie. Watson is a bad actress, isn't a box office draw without already popular IPs, and is average attractiveness at best.

this angers the Yea Forums poster

All nudity in movies is unnecessary and pornographic.

>There won't be a higher grossing aronfsky movie.
Well he's certainly not likely to get that kind of a budget to work with again the way he's going.

And again, gross is only impressive to the casual observer. To the industry, grossing $360M on a $125M budget is far less impressive than Black Swan's $330M on a $13M budget, or even The Wrestler's $45M on a $6M buget. In fact, it's not even clear that Noah actually made money for the studio (with marketing, it probably cost $250M, and even if the theaters took an unusually low 30% cut --- unlikely even with the film being banned in China with its 90% theater cut --- it will have only just broken even).

I'm hoping the reason is that fathers no longer tolerate the pointless degradation of their daughters in exchange for money.

you cant show nudity in china

Do you know how "hacking" works? There was never really any doubt. Whether the actresses themselves were in on it is debatable, probably some were and some weren't.

Why didn't you censor the bottom of her foot?

Attached: thinking.png (741x568, 29K)

OEY VAY!!!

Attached: 1479250644135.jpg (2817x4200, 2.28M)

what a fucking beautiful body SJ has in this movie
she's short but her proportions are perfect

She didn't give a good audition.

Attached: basedharv.jpg (618x410, 24K)

Attached: 1475479322865.png (491x491, 284K)

>the chad scarlett
>the virgin brie

Shes bland as fuck

>Alsion Brie
Only went nude because of leaks, and she did it when she was her literally rock bottom of hotness.

It might have been in a hotel or something. I've had some super weird hotel room toilets in my time. Or it's a ensuite deal for the main bed room.

>jungle book remake makes 960
>marry poppins flops
>nutcracker flops
>beauty and the beast does 1.25 billion
>highest grossing film in march at the time
>highest grossing opening for a female lead film
>its number aren't impressive
You're such a coping fucking incel dude. Watson is a better actress than whomever you like. Clearly this has been your problem this entire time you can't give one ounce of credit because you're an ugly fucking faggot freak. Kys.

Go watch you literal who's that are unattractive and actually can't act.

Holy shit you're seething

You like a shit actress who is way worse. Everytime.

I'm married with 3 kids, kiddo. I'm sorry to bust the bubble of your childhood crush, but the Harry potter movies are average, and being based on kids books, they're no different than capeshit or Transformers.

>I'm married with three kids
And you have shit taste in films and actresses. You also literally cope out your asshole about one of the few ones who has actually been successful the past 10 years.

You're literally a fucking retard if you think they are the same as Transformers. You're retarded. watch more films.

Because adults apparently can't handle sexuality, even though it's the most normal thing in the world.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Harry Potter movies make all major blockbusters made since look like trash. And that's the gods honest truth.

so you're a cuck who posts on this game of thrones capeshit board with three kids?
yikes i feel bad for your children

maybe watch some good movies with them and stop being a shitty father

This thread is pretty hilarious, you waifufags are the best. I can't think of any actress I would go out of my way to watch, actors sure, but name 1 actress that could not be replaced in a role with a dozen other generic actresses.

have sex

>I can't think of any actress I would go out of my way to watch
That's probably because you have shitty taste

Actresses need to do "look at my tits and ass" type roles again

Dude Ryan Gosling is just like me! Love all his movies!

>Whatever happened to "Now get out there and film your sex scene?"

The business got slightly less exploitative in that regard. Which is fine.

Also, people who complain about the lack of nudity tend to only remember the nudity that was good and forgets that people tended to shove nudity everywhere and like always, only a minority of it was actually any good. That's partly the reason European movies to this day do nudity better, there it tends to serves a purpose and has semblance of significance when it occurs, instead of Hollywood's pandering teenage boys who want to get their rocks off.

Hi abdel

Scarjo made it stop with her tub of lard body

Jlaw sent those photos to Weinstein who later published them when she had angered him.

>The business got slightly less exploitative in that regard. Which is fine

Ha ha ha, no. Hollywood is as exploitative as ever, it's just that the favors are more behind doors than just out in the open now, as the sexualization of culture is fully succesful and instead now can be focused on trans agenda.

Says the Harry Potter Tumblrina.

Wankino

>but name 1 actress that could not be replaced in a role with a dozen other generic actresses.
Vera Farmiga

Attached: 1403643701989.webm (1920x1080, 1.63M)

That bitch is so generic lmao

Based crazy mommy poster

thrusting your sword into the ground like that would damage it

Have sex: the thread

Good thing he has an other one at his waist

i wanna see the roast beef

>SEX BAD
>VIOLENCE GOOD

Attached: long_term_player_plans.webm (640x368, 1.36M)

Its all on Tor now

China's scary

why are celebrity nude scenes so much sexier than seeing porn stars naked?

I don't get how people can still express this sentiment fourteen years after Yea Forums came to be. It's its own form of social media and checking in to post in a thread takes the same amount of time as any other. And I'd rate this more highly, since you actual have to articulate yourself in the anonymous format to avoid scorn. I'd also wager Yea Forums, because of the vitriol, is less unhealthy because it's less likely to have an associate dopamine mechanism.

Why are you so mad? It's technology. It's a part of communication culture.

>haha nigga you read printed pamphlets, fuck what a shitty dad, good job sucking Gutenberg's fat block instead of raising your kids

She wanted Weinstein jerking off to her.

Forbidden fruit

He's right though. Can you name anything else she's been in?

kino sole shot

Idealization of celebrities as culture icons. Nice trips-dubs desu

I don't give a fuck at all about some Chinese bugman getting annihilated, but I'm not going to watch sweet innocent animals die.

Someone smart once said a culture that idealizes actors more than soldiers is doomed to die

What a convoluted way to defend going to a kiddie porn web site. You sound like a teenager defending his video game addiction. Re: AT LEAST IM NOT OUT DOING DRUGS MOM

>If it makes my dick hard its porn.
uh oh

Attached: wilde stinky pitz.webm (720x720, 1.4M)

Atleast half of those are B-list at best

It doesn't die. Have you never seen a lion tear apart a baby gazelle? Nature is not nice or innocent.

Nature killing nature is fine.

Like nigga just look up the nude scene online there are sites dedicated to it

She hit the wall hard recently so it's likely

We are part of nature.

youre projecting women dont know about the jacking off, girls just want you to be thinking about them. we are the ones who take that and go jerk off in our rooms like cave trolls

>doesnt use a browser with tor already baked in

Maybe 500 years ago.

It used to be that an actress would get naked the moment she could. Fucking Jennifer Conelly went full nude in a film the second she hit 18. In the 70s and 80s the directors were so eager there was even a spate of underage starlet nudity, something that would still actually happen occasionally until around the turn of the millennium

female bodies are a glory to behold and it used to be that that people had sense and were determined to behold them in their prime

You you imagine things being like this now? Today the paradigm seems to be
>be acclaimed as a beautiful woman
>refuse to do nudity, I'm a feminist god damn it
>oh no my looks are fading?!
>I'd better do nudity now! I guess women's bodies are meant to be objectified after all!
but it's too late, lady, it's too late, and audiences are disappointed to see what you're offering now that you've relented
or also
>oh no! my nudes leaked online?!
>guess I might as well get naked now, what do I have to lose?
the respect of the audience?

basically my point is modern actresses have their priorities backwards

i guess thats it.

>Idealization of celebrities as culture icons.

but i think most celebrities are vapid morons and their opinions are trash. i just really like to see the cute ones naked.

Identity politics - feminism etc. They treat women like kids without agency and then claim they’re oppressed by men.

Oh gawd I want to piss on her.

Leave. Don't come back.

Just watch it faget
You won't be disappointed

>This whole thread
Cringe.
And btw there is still tons of nudity in movies you are just not 13 years old any more, Disobedience comes to mind

Attached: snacks.jpg (1200x795, 358K)

This but unironically

>b-but le 4chins is literally /pol/ when will they learn !!
Back to your containment board, dumb faggot.

I was banned for posting a picture of the scarjo sucking an ice cream
but in that case the mod was chasing me because I said badly things about captain marvel and this mod are one of the "have sex" posters

It's literally the most popular board on the site. Sorry about your luck, weeb relic of the past.

her mother was 11/10

Young european actress who never appeared naked
best example impossible

>smartest people on the planet
Chinks are fucking retarded. Like dumber than niggers.

Jews are the smartest

Rumors say Natalie Portman fappening will be the biggest in history

French films have lots of nude scenes
And many have explicite sex scenes
Other european countries also have movies like this
Stop looking for this in america because now everyone here follows the example of Disney

Kek

>Angelina Jolie, Uma Thurman, Nicole Kidman, and Halle Berry
i hate gratuitous nudity unless it's a guy. get those tits and vaginas out of my face

Attached: 1366939658336.jpg (500x447, 55K)

The rules change, racist. You're not allowed to post /mlp/ content outside /mlp/ and you can't post /pol/ shit outside of /pol/

I got a two week ban for sharing a pornstar's cell number on here. I was back in literally less than two minutes.

Hello Ahmed from UKstan

Someone on/tv/ does not know who Lacey Chabert is? Your credibility has gone down a good bit. Now, I gotta read more carefully to try to discern whether a poster is a troll or just an idiot. High quality bait if troll.

All I know her as is the voice of Meg Griffin for the first 6 episodes of Family Guy
>masterbate
fucking god damn underage posters, get out

Another reason [a/ is superior.
Spoiler nudity from an official source has been allowed since Kinomod ruled it so in 2011.

Based.

Based inshallah

Sigourney Weaver in Aliens franchise.
Emily Blunt in Edge of Tomorrow.
Angelina Jolie in Maleficent.
Linda Hamilton in Terminator.
Carrie Ann Moss in Matrix franchise.
Uma Thurman in Kill Bill movies.
Milla Jovovich in The Fifth Element.

There's quite a few more, but when I look at an actress in a movie, I am looking for believability, attractiveness, dedication to their craft, and acting. Every one of these actresses worked their ass off for these movies. Weaver made it big in action movies years before even Linda Hamilton became the hardass in T2. My belief, actor or actress, is if even years after seeing a movie, you still believe that the person who played that character was perfect for it. Capeshit bashing aside, no one else will ever compare to RDJ as Iron Man. Or Heath as The Joker. Or Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. That, I feel, is what is inherent in acting that is missing in a lot of movies nowadays. Imagine an Apocalypse Now with no Brando, instead, Henry Cavill with his mustache CGI'ed out. It's bullshit.

Are the mods truly this bad?

Of course they are.

I remember there was this Australian channel that had this movie show on during lunch time, and it just so happened that that day's episode featured a girl getting licked by another girl. Not Aussie though so I don't know who they are (hoping some aussie does). Can't remember much about the channel but after that movie Winx Club came on.

never encountered them on this board so I don't know.
I was only ever banned once on Yea Forums for posting a pic of a young girl holding a sliced carrot.

Attached: the_what.jpg (125x79, 2K)

Based oldfag

Goddamn this guy is a butthurt tranny janny. Go dilate.

>back in a puritan phase of culture.
Oh fuck you with this "moral" bullshit. ALL this time people have been against sex and nudity because it's nothing more than EXPLOITING THE BIOLOGY of the audience. That's it.

OF COURSE we all want to see nice tits and ass, because we're BIOLOGICALLY programmed to do so, and taking advantage of that biology to make shekels is about as right as asking people if they want to breathe while watching their movie and charging them extra for oxygen in the theater.

Nudity is a scam to get your money while putting out a shitty product, and always has been.

20 years ago, she was waifu status. Now, she has mommy status.

There used to be plenty of good male nudity too. There's still a fair amount but it's not the same for some reason.

Citing /pol/ means YOU ARE /pol/, faggot.

The janny has no jurisdiction...he’ll find him and make him reeee. I know the reeeers when I see them and....

>biology bad
>pleasure bad

Based
What are your favorite instances of gratuitous male nudity?

Not bad, just crude.

Attached: 1398003794504.jpg (630x438, 48K)

EXPLOITING biology is "bad" user, and that's exactly what the kikes do, and why they should be held accountable for it by the people.

quick somebody roll that poor whale back into the ocean

how the fuck are there 4 of her on that beach? Are they body doubles to avoid assassination?

Topkek. Sad no one will get it though

I got banned for posting a girl in her 20s wearing gym clothes in a reply. This place is lame as fuck. Also got banned for saying rudypoo when 4channel launched but I guess its cool again.

you're confused, the jews are the ones who push pornography.

quality post

think of the advertisers user

>because you want to see a specific actress nude she has to get nude?
Exactly. If she's getting spread and stretched out by every producer I deserve some of the spoils for contributing with my shekels.

Intelligence is a flat circle

here's the real question, why would harvey fuck a 3 like that?

>Nudity is a scam to get your money while putting out a shitty product
But now we're getting shitty products minus the sex. Its fucking bullshit

>I got banned for posting a girl in her 20s wearing gym clothes in a reply.
Based mods desu. Next time pick an appropriate picture, sperg.

>getting shitty products minus the sex. Its fucking bullshit
Just because some kike makes a film doesn't mean you have to pay to watch it, user, so stop.

Just use the FREE porn on the web if you're looking for naked bitches. That's why it's there.

Sure you did faggot. Cry more.

that's cool that's still legal where i live

>Jew like this user wants Jews to have sole control over porn

>someone smart
No, brainlet. That guy was a retard or he was trying to manipulate brainlets like you. Fuck soldiers! They're idiots that sign up to die for kikes.

>1488

have sex

let's try it. artsy naked pic. will I get banned?

Attached: Gwendoline-Christie-Nude15-682x1024.jpg (682x1024, 97K)

>mfw I'm lacking this pic in my ScarJo folder
>OP has to censor it

fuck it ban me

Attached: scajo tits.jpg (1232x1600, 587K)

BASED

Attached: r3.gif (324x244, 2M)