Is it just me, or has Hollywood started to intentionally cast actually ugly actresses as a way to subvert 'beauty'? You have ugly disgusting mutts like Tessa Thompson and greasy cunts like Brie Lardson who get to star in giant blockbusters. And unlike earlier ugly actresses, such as Sharon Stone, these actresses cant act, either. So why are they pushed so hard?
Also fuck GoT
Other urls found in this thread:
instagram.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
It's you, Tessa Thompson is beautiful.
who cares? who the fuck cares?
oh no no no no.... OH NO NO... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>unlike earlier ugly actresses, such as Sharon Stone
wew
no shes not
*vomits*
OOOOOOOOHNONONONONONOOO
>Sharon Stone is ugly
Before anyone asks who she is:
>nose ring
dropped
Honestly one of the most beautiful and sexy women there ever were. I still remember her in that movie and how struck I was from it all.
Every women alive doesn’t look like a model user.
t. nigger mutt
I used to be uncertain but the eighth Star Wars movie convinced me that it was no mere coincidence. I guess it's just feminism pushing ugly acceptance for women.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>subvert beauty
Do you really think the people in control care about shit like this?
user, the true reason to why there aren't exceptionally beautiful woman on leading roles, is because of the increase on women as a demographic of watchers. Women don't act like a man act when he sees a man that is beyond the norm in terms of beauty, a man either ignores or wish to be like him, a women when seeing a superior they feel threatened, because most women are insecure faggots.
kek that picture is the only decent one
save hex
what ugly woman was in that movie?
>there were elite societies in history pulling strings
>now that its easier than ever theyve stopped
Fuck man I need to leave germanistan behind and move over to paradise. Polish girls are hot
It's because men don't pay for their media anymore, so there's no financial reason to cater to men's tastes.
Sharon Stone in Total Recall is the perfect woman imo
It's also the only one where she doesnt have a shitton of instagram filters on.
Asian girl.
>we found your Triss
All five of then.
>Rey
>pink haired dyke
>Leia
>that girl with the weird haircut that follows Leia around and probably don't say anything, I think
>the alien with butthole eyes
Oh shit, I forgot the chink.
My brain always confuses her for that fat chinese stunt man from the old Jackie Chan movies, for some reason.
Tessa is not beautiful but Brie is. Don't let cuntines of Brie fool you.
>actresses
Hollywood is notorious for pushing ladyboys and pretending they are women (e.g. Daisy Ridley), they are faggots not women
Literally all of them except Ray
I'm fine with it if they are thicc
Tomboy Butterface mummy milker braphogs are my fetish
>tfw you will never get to whiff her sweaty boobs
bullshit. tell me that's not who they cast as Triss.
You can say that she doesnt conform to what we have been told about Triss and i will agree.
But holy fuck thats a beautiful woman
there are mutts that look attractive but she is not one of them
Make her skin lighter with make up and paint her hair red, and I'm OK with it.
Put her in there exactly as she look now, and I will be pissed.
>trashy tattoos
welp insta boner kill
It's fan service to ugly women, just like there has been fan service to ugly men for decades.
Have sex.
Hot guys are fan service to ugly girls, you dumb cunt. They care about Chris Hemsworth as Thor, not Tessa Thompson as whatever.
She build like a 32 year old strong safety
Actresses shouldn't be your average women
Source on gril?
Brie isn't ugly though, she's just retarded and arrogant
Women want to self insert as the what they are
Men on the other hand want to self insert as what they want to be
I'M SO FUCKING LONELY AND HORNY
Oh, right. She's not attractive right?
Of course hollywood is going to ask for an opinion of a bunch of incels of what's its attractive and what is not, right?
Do me a favor, go outside and if you can (I doubt so) have sex
she's got great tits, I'm fine with it
she's hot, but she's not fucking triss
Get pregnant.
This
Hot guys are fanservice to both guys and girls. But girls hate hot girls and guys hate ugly girls
You are probably right.
Is like those twilight films, bella is the most boring and plain basic bitch ever.
Women only watch it for the attractive males and self insert ugly women.
Is a convenient setup because guys are not threatened by a guy showing his abs like the marvel dudes but it must have some decent writing or action to compensate.
I seriously don't understand why the fuck they thought this was a good idea. She's ugly, doesn't look like triss and her acting is worse than porn acting
absolutely disgusting statement
She looks like a pug dog bro.... Rihanna is much more hotter and hollywood ignores her
>Nose ring
Pack it in, boys. She's a carpet muncher.
yes in most cases but not all
This thread is not Yea Forums
Remember when pic related was always cast as the ugly girl?
go back to one of the 100 GoT threads, faggot
her titties look like THIS???
>started
This shit's been going on for a couple decades my man
Large organizations have trouble identifying and retaining talent/beauty/intelligence/competence etc.
Hollywood would defer to the casting couch for decades and it was highly effective but that's gone now (even before weinstein's outing it was going away).
when was she the ugly girl? Even pic related didn't have her as "ugly"
But he mentions brie in the op and people are telling each other to have sex. 100% Yea Forums approved.
It might just be that the uglier actresses are the most talented.
Pretty girls rely on their beauty. They arent always the best actresses
>douglas quaid got to huff that sweaty body
I'm jealous
Most of these "ugly" actresses are still better looking than the average woman. Just take a look around the next time you're out.
Casting directors told her she wasn't pretty enough to be an actress
Tessa Thompson is a fucking horrible actress with no charisma, while beautiful actresses like Margot Robbie can actually act.
tv/ - Television & Film
Content should pertain to television shows, movies, actors/actresses, film equipment, etc.
All actress and actor discussion should pertain directly to their roles and careers. Off-topic discussion will be deleted.
Global Rule 13 applies—all images of actresses should be accompanied by relevant discussion.
Please make use of the spoiler image checkbox and spoiler tags. Purposeful spoiling of a series or movie is not allowed.
You're forgetting beautiful women who have achieved success (including 10/10 succubus Amber Heard). This is just bias on your part.
Actors are also supposed to be relatable and flexible, something some super model can't quite achieve, and ends up more limited in her possible roles as a result. Also 10/10 women who can act seem pretty rare, and actors still need to act at the end of the day.
>is this thing on?
>*TAP* *TAP*
>Do I have everybody's attention?!?!
>*AHEM*
>I just came here to say.....
FUCK YOU, JANNIE!
Can anyone explain this have sex meme to me?
she cute
i don't know or care about triss or witcher or any gay video games
>as a way to subvert 'beauty'
They're casting intentionally ugly actresses because attractive/beautiful women test poorly with women. Because women instinctively hate attractive women.
Hollywood is desperately trying to engage "THE FEMALE AUDIENCE." Because analytics show the vast majority of entertainment is consumed (read: purchased) by men. So our corporate masters got it into their head there's 3 billion people not spending money on entertainment. Since ticket sales are down, as they have been in steady decline since the 50s, so they're bending over backwards to engage this mythical audience. The issue the female audience doesn't actually exist, since entertainment is a social activity and men are under pressure to purchase for women. Thus, the female audience is the male audience. So attempts to engage the mythical female audience are simply driving ticket sales further down, as men aren't going to purchase two tickets to "ugly bitches talk about their vagina" and women aren't going to see that of their own volition either. "BUT CAPTAIN MARVEL" you say, captain marvel made what it did because people were willing to pay money to see a trailer of endgame, no matter the actual content. It won't be duplicated.
>Sharon Stone
>Ugly
Based gay retard poster
Whites need to take control of the entertainment industry like they did in early days and cast only beautiful Aryan women
Unattractive women who themselves are Incels, using Yea Forums as an outlet for their sexual frustrations. Whenever you see have sex, the poster is probably morbidly obese and sweats when eating macaroni. She also has floppy chimp tits and a lumpy gunt.
>basic
sorry, I meant gay OP
yes she is. Are people saying she isn't?
have sex
Her character was always the "sideway girl with few friends and zero popularity", essentially an ugly girl.
What triggered you my dear friend
Urging you to have sex implies that you are an involunatry celibate (incel), otherwise you would be having sex and people wouldn't need to urge you. Being an incel implies that all your opinions are retarded and worthless alt right drivel, because everybody knows that all incels are failures at life who blame all their problems on women. Hence urging you to have sex implies that you should not actually have sex, but go back to /pol/ where alt right loosers belong.
I'll do more than saving her.
>state a fact
>frogposting
Cancer.
Get lost you filthy boot licker.
Imagine going daily to a website that people would look at you with reprovation if you said you browsed and they knew what an IB is, but still having regard to gay shit like rules.
>Let's idealize women we can never get and then cut ourselves out of the genepool.
>Let's ignore how our ugly selves came to be and pretend that life is all about a stupid simplistic ideal that has no rational basis.
t. seething jannie
She not beautiful but I wouldn't call her ugly either.
@114685976
>Yea Forums is my personal shitposting site like ED told me about.
0/10
>beauty has no rational basis
Ew
I think its because attractive women usually rely to much on their looks and mediocre women can act better than the attractive brainlet chicks
LOOK AT THE TOP OF HER HEAD
Blessed post
It wasn't whites casting those women, oy vey.
Not sure if trolling or just low iq
I would, she's fucking ugly
If there is a secret society pulling the strings they sure as shit wouldn't bother with something as trivial and stupid as "subverting beauty".
Standards of beauty and what is worthy of idolatry has no rational basis, it's subjective and unable to be subverted because of this.
One era we find fat woman with large hips to be the ideal woman worthy of mating, the next it's skinny girls with unrealistically small waists
Beauty isn't rational, it's irrational. It's very much emotional and not logical.
What are you talking about? Young Winona was always cast as the quirky emo chick
>reddit spacing
fuck off, go celebrate ugliness over at your dworkin-dicksucking subreddits
its more like beautiful women can attain limitless amounts of validation (and recently, money) from the internet and thus, don't need to really try at anything.
It used to be easier to consolidate power into a small group, but now we live in an age even worse than that. We live in an age without direction, ruled only by a formless mass of plutocrats whose only concern is degrees of "make me more money."
There is no ideology. There is no conspiracy. That would be something you can crush. That you can defeat. This is just people who would have been kept under the heel of the Christian church 300 years ago ruled by nothing but greed. You convince one of their immorality and another takes their place, because there's not a single moral authority left in the world.
Nietzsche was 100% right when he said we'd killed God.
Grandpa go to bed. She wasn’t even pretty.
Umm... did you forget about casting choices like Jamie Lee Curtis in True Lies? This shit has been going on for decades.
beauty is perfectly rational. it is defined by what isn't commonly seen. When everyone is starving, the well fed are seen as beautiful. When everyone is fucking morbidly obese, the thin are beautiful.
That's a HUGE forehead.
CUTE forehead*
Hot people, especially hot talented people, are increasingly rare. THIS is our cream of the crop. Don't blame 'talent' (modelling) agents. Blame there are no model-tier people around anymore and this is the best we've got right now.
it's cyclical like fashion, late 70's early 80's had a lot of not attractive (borderline ugly) women, Barbra Streisand, liza minnelli comes to my mind
to everyone in this thread:
have sex.
I want to SLAP that forehead!
Stop being useless and help me then. Spread up your buttcheeks and say some dirty things.
That isn't logical. This isn't even a fat. It's economically not beautiful.
A poor man will still want to fuck a skinny woman if he finds her attractive, you don't suddenly want to fuck fatties when there's a famine
We have be our own moral authority. We just do a pot luck of all our best agreed upon values, morals, virtues, and mission statements. Most of the best global and timeless such ideas agree anyway and we all already agree upon. Why do we need some gay mystic deity behind us just being the best things we can be?
Just fyi, but these are the kind of people who say 'have sex'
She's pretty. No idea about the casting, but she's pretty.
>ad hominem meme vomiting
Don't ever reply to me again
Before the internet, if you were hot, you needed a huge amount of talent in order to expand your options to a point commensurate to your physical attractiveness.
Now, if you're hot, you put up and instagram and you'll have millions of followers overnight.
What is even happening with second from left, JUST
>complaining about ad hominems on Yea Forums
yup, it's reddit
I find almost all woman beautiful until they start talking
Anyone else know this feel?
Brie larson might be an insufferable cunt but she can act, anyone saying otherwise is delusional. Not sure why she doesn't even make the attempt in some movies like Captain marvel though, might be a directors choice.
Is this real?
We're talking society wide ideals, but feel free to flit over to individual ideals or whatever definition most suits your next bad-faith argument.
For on an individual level, positive attention can be all it takes for a man to find a woman, or hell, another man, attractive.
This is part of the issue. But, again it's a larger societal problem of eating too much crap, not exercising enough, too much stress, not knowing hot to be the healthiest and hottest and smartest and best version of oneself, values being warped, people becoming too tall and lean, particularly women, faces becoming elongated and weird due to mouth-breathing and other nasal-passage and breathing-related maladies, too many broken homes, the rich, powerful, and beautiful becoming more and more nihilistic and shitty and lose their grave within a few general, etc.
tl;dr general moral decay and lack of pragmatic eugenics
This is one of those scenes that makes me pissed off that the Jews never figured out smell-o-vision.
>be a /pol/cel
>never had sex
>worry about Hollywood casting "Aryan" women
HOLY CRINGE
I want to sit in her cute face resting my balls in her cute nose, and see if the tip of my dick can reach the end of her huge forehead!
ayayayai i know right jajajaja el justo jajajaja
HRT + male pattern baldness.
She literally posts nudes and still got no followers...
What do you need to do? have ass and tit implants??
women hate beatiful women
based schizo poster
Not even one woman in the table. Not even one. Just a dozen faggots and three dudes.
Why is AGDQ gatekeeping real women?
>beauty is perfectly rational. it is defined by what isn't commonly seen. When everyone is starving, the well fed are seen as beautiful. When everyone is fucking morbidly obese, the thin are beautiful.
It may actually be that there is some idea of liking viewing a simple face. However that isn't going to lead to superior genetics in actual performance.
A woman having to have a face that conforms to some ideal of simplicity or a certain shape may not function as well for her actual mental/etc performance.
Additionally, for ages women didn't look like they do now. People had no trouble mating. The standard that is being pushed is literally leading to people not mating.
For one obvious thing, asians are conforming to western standards whereas back in the day they idealized women who look utterly disgusting by today's standards.
None of these are reproducing, RIGHT?!!?
It's bad enough that they're here to begin with.
looks like an arab
girls like your pic related were never actresses. they are either models or completely unrelated to showbusiness
>sharon stone is ugly
Fucking faggot.
It's a bad faith argument because you disagree with it and don't want to discuss it or rationalize in good faith.
You're still pushing your stance without any give because you've made your mind and never wanted to be challenged only to challenge
mamamia!!!
You say that about margot robbie but a lot of guys call her an ugly and a fridge
This tape project thing might be the greatest innovation in fashion since the tunic
>out
I havent been outside my apartment in over three and a half years.
This is a well know concept and has been going on for quite some time in mainstream movies. At first this was more a thing with movies targeted at women. But since the new formula for success is selling cape shit to all genders, they can't cast too hot women in too skimpy dresses anymore in 200 million budget films. It's basically the same with gore and nudity.
>If you disagree with me then you automatically argue in bad faith
Only someone who never leaves echo chambers could ever say something so stupid.
>Additionally, for ages women didn't look like they do now. People had no trouble mating. The standard that is being pushed is literally leading to people not mating.
This is true. Fair to say standards were different and altogether lower in the past. Indications of health were much of what was necessary for beauty (something Brie Larson has fine).
>For one obvious thing, asians are conforming to western standards whereas back in the day they idealized women who look utterly disgusting by today's standards.
This is also true but it should be said that the "disgusting by today's standards" Asians are natural Asians, they typically require tons of modern technology to be attractive to modern standards.
>tats
>nose anything
>bad/boring pictures
>no shtick or niche to make her stand out
>not a natural blonde
>body okay but not great
>bland, basic bitch
Jeez, you tell me, user.
Imagine if this caught on and we all dressed like this
Oh God, imagine all the unashamed flaunting of our disgusting bodies just bordering on nudity as the final stage of humanities end came to be.
I wish it was more popular and widely used
Friend, I called your argument bad faith because you read an assertion that was operating on a society-wide definition of beauty and attempted to counter it with an individualized definition of beauty. But I still did you the courtesy of defeating every possible form of your bad faith argument.
Exactly. It should be against the law to ever wear something like this if one doesn't have model looks and is proficiently in shape.
Bad faith hominem
Yea Forums is for people over 18.
Asexual teenagers like you need to stay away
based schizo poster
"people" aren't mating because the internet allows any remotely attractive woman to pull the entire gamut of male attractiveness and choose the ones they wish to mate with. So the top 20% of men are pulling the top 80% of females, and the bottom 20% aren't mating at all.
I would die happy, specially if it became popular between a very wild age range, ranging more to the lower spectrum, if you know what I mean.
OH NO NO NO NO
>Fair to say standards were different and altogether lower in the past. Indications of health were much of what was necessary for beauty (something Brie Larson has fine).
But there's not really a rational standard. A head being a certain shape may actually be inferior for development of the brain and yet become the standard. Or Asian head shape as it was idealized in China may or may not be superior, but is not considered absolutely butt ugly.
If China ruled the world would they have still idealized western head/face shapes?
It's possible that we like simplicity in faces, but is the morphology of faces that is the current standard truly superior for the function of a face/head? Same with body standards. Who is to day that some body with a non-ideal bone structure is not actually superior for some function, and if so, how can it be justified for that to not be the standard or, in any case, for there to only be one standard whereas in reality there are multiple roles one can play or even many possible shapes being good for the same role using different strategies?
Agree!
So, let me get this straight
>top 20% of men get top 80%
>mid 60% of men get bottom 20% of women
>bottom 20% of men get nothing
I want to fornicate her tenderly in missionary position and as we reach climax and I aproach my face into her, she comes at me for a kiss, and I bend her face downwars to lick her huge forehead with fierce might as I also fill her womb with my baby juice!
You interpreted something wrong and used a meme as a way to attack it instead of the actual point also wether something is in bad faith or not is dependent on context unavailable in a two post exchange therefore it's not an actual logical fallacy you can even call out. It's in fact a logical fallacy to even use that term as it's a tactic of deflection
the tape project isn't practical. The amount of "glisten" on them is petroleum jelly, which is necessary to keep the tape from being uncomfortable, but also means it doesn't last much longer than their walk.
She has too much face
Friend, at this point it seems you aren't even reading posts, and are just trying to pretend to be stupid in order to assert some control over a conversation, to get attention.
On all levels, beauty is defined by what is in contrast to standard experience.
Because the rich aren't necessarily smart, and need someone or someghing to stop them from being retards.
If the Catholic Church still had any power, and the Pope agreed pollution was bad, you bet your ass the businessman who genuinely believed in Hell would stop polluting out of fear for his soul, real or imagined. But now? He just sheugs his shoulders and promises to plant a tree or something. After all, everyone's doing it. Why should he fall behind and end up poor?
We killed God and we killed kings, but we didn't replace that authority with anything. People like to imagine there's some Jewish or Illuminati plot, because, ironically, that's comforting to them. The idea that there's an enemy to fight.
The reality is that the common man killed all of his "enemies" two-hundred years ago, and replaced them with a ruling class of elites who are now essentially immune to being taken down a peg due to their decentralized nature.
>earlier ugly actresses, such as Sharon Stone
here's my (you)
There's a difference between a beauty standard and a baseline for attractiveness. A relatively young, visibly healthy person was probably considered attractive by his/her society for most of human history, with maybe some outliers who were born with very unpleasant features but people like that are normally rare. The ideal for beauty would vary, but would generally be an attractive person as described above with extra features considered beautiful by the society they lived in (say, extra pale skin for a Chinese woman). But as I said before, standards of beauty were simply lower in the past because people weren't exposed to the few rare outliers of extreme beauty and because standards have become more strict over time. Brie Larson would likely have been considered a lovely woman hundreds of years ago, less so now (though I certainly don't think she's ugly by any means).
My theory: there are features associated with idealized beauty that are generally are in most populations, but do occur, and for various reasons just ended up slightly more predominant in Europe, hence "European beauty standards." It has little to do with European cultural imperialism. Even cultures that had little contact with Europeans idealized things like lighter features, smaller and more delicate noses, larger eyes, etc.
And someone upthread said that beauty standards are inherently often absurd and they are. If beauty were simply about functionality a woman like Serena Williams or Brienne from GoT would be the ideal, but they aren't.
>the year is 2234
>80% of the United Northern Hemisphere Federation's population is obese
>and we all wear tape as clothing in our perfectly climate controlled mega domes as the rest of the planet is a fucking desert tainted with fallout
all you really need to do is compare her instagram to one with tons of followers. As people tend to follow the ones who are beautiful but haven't gotten nude yet, waiting for them to get nude. She posts her nudes publicly so people don't need to follow her.
AGDQ is home for the ugliest trannies in existence that aren't whoring thenselves to buy drugs, so I really doubt they are.
Once my cousin told me he wanted to finish Ocarina of Time again, but now in speedrun. First thing I did was taking away his cartdridge, the second was buying him a new system with new games. Speedrunning is a mental disease.
Pretty woman can make twice the money of any acting gig by just being an instagram model
Nigga, I may not have any problem at all wit hher being Valkyrie in the MCU, but I wouldn't call her beautiful by any standards
>tatoos
and my boner is gone
thanks user....
This, and for far less effort. Also, they can shoop/filter the fuck out of their pictures (as you posted) so even if she isn't pretty she can look pretty on her instagram. A woman doesn't even need to be beautiful.
This. People want to be teased. If they wanted naked girls there's porn available.
The point of instagran fame is being just above porn and just below higher modelling
>DJ boring starts playing
Who is this semen demon?
>why dont they cast beautiful actors like in the past
>The point of instagran fame is being just above porn and just below higher modelling
That and I think instagram comments gives the idea of them "interacting" with followers, something that isn't possible with porn.
>instagram models are basically cam girls without any of the upside of seeing women nude
jesus fuck, betas really are the problem.
its truly interesting. Helga Lovekaty was a nude model before she became an instagram model. She has plenty of full nude photos out there. But once she started becoming more modest, she absolutely exploded in popularity. We're talking millions of followers.
I think its because if you're a nude model, you really only have the horniest of guys following you. But if you're a "fitness" or "body goal" IG, then you can have all sorts of people follow and like your photos.
Yes.
Ugly fat women started getting annoyed about it because they were casting beautiful white women, so I guess they got their way... again.
Also helps 70% of them are pajeets and south americans who have no shame in ogling girls and commenting on them
Sharon stone wasn't the problem
Jamie lee Curtis, on the other hand . . .
>If beauty were simply about functionality a woman like Serena Williams or Brienne from GoT would be the ideal, but they aren't.
For an evolutionary basis, beauty should be about funtionality. This is why it is obvious that the standard is artificial. Yes there should be some idealiziation related to health. Features that don't look diseased.
But, no, Brienne is not necessarily better. Women like her may be better in certain roles, but also they require more food to sustain, and their brain's have to manage a larger body which takes the focus off procreation.
For different roles/situations, different sizes and shapes make sense.
And her genes exist for a reason. Also if you want to breed for a really tall person you take someone like her and a guy who is tall, not some random short woman and a tall guy.
And her genes exist for a reason: because her parents gave her those genes. The standards we have today are completely artificial and very negative.
every time the pope has said something that is against mainstream beliefs and common biblical interpretation, people accuse the pope of forgetting his place and speaking for himself, rather than god.
She is ok for a black girl.
Left: perfect tite
Right: Too tite
Left: perfect tite
Right: perfect tite
Not Tite Enough
perfect tite
because actors have to represent the people that the movies are being sold to. USA is no longer a white country (white births were a minority since 2016) so all you get now is mutts and brownies.
besides, where would you even find those women. they no longer exist in USA in any significant quantity, and there's less of them every decade. for example only 8% of women today in USA have blue eyes. eight fucking percent. good luck finding attractive actors.
>and their brain's have to manage a larger body which takes the focus off procreation.
This is fucking retarded, I'll stop responding after this, but just to add:
Features such as strength and height are usually considered attractive, they are both functional and indicative of good genes and good diet, something wanted in both men and women. The beauty ideal for women though, often does not match up to what is practical and desired in a healthy partner to produce the best offspring, hence why beauty standards for women have varied so dramatically over time. The same is not true for men, at least not to the same degree, which is indicative of beauty being partially absurd and held sway by irrational beauty standards that have little to do with genetic (or physical) fitness.
>people say jamie lee curtis is ugly
I wonder how such people react to
youtube.com
and
youtube.com
Find a new buzzword sweaty
female beauty isn't defined by practicality because the only practical function women need to embody is fertility, and fertility is primarily simply what is healthy.
aaaaaa what the fuck, this ugly non-human hair
>>and their brain's have to manage a larger body which takes the focus off procreation.
>This is fucking retarded, I'll stop responding after this, but just to add:
Body size is a burden on the brain. The brain has to constantly monitor, process, and deal with all of the sensors in the body. Bigger body-> more to manage.
This is why scientists talk about brain/body ratio, not pure brain size.
There are also problems with moving around with a massive frame. It is a bigger burden on the body and the brain. Bigger burden on the joints, etc. Shit doesn't scale well, which is why giants don't exist.
>Amiah ever not perfect
gay
>Still not asking for it
>She thinks she is a model
>female beauty isn't defined by practicality because the only practical function women need to embody is fertility, and fertility is primarily simply what is healthy.
Shape/size has a massive impact on fertility. We aren't being told to even consider fertility, in fact we are being told we cannot even consider fertility important.
See: Gay marriage, and trans.
it's clearly too tite user
Virgin shaming, its nothing new. And it's working.
I'd bang her tho
Hot chicks don't get into acting anymore they get into being "influencers".
This. The young female demo actually goes to the movies, then they post a selfie of them at the movies, then they tweet about the movies and how much they enjoyed them. The young male demo torrents the movie.
Naturally, the studio will cater towards the people who actually pay for their shit, and women don't need or want every actress to be a 10/10.
G A Y
Anime was a mistake.
>Polish girls are hot
and easy, if you are a foreigner they will openly spread their legs for you, you don't have to do shit
we have a cuck culture here, and even if you knock her up, there will be some pollack willing to step up
>Is it just me, or has Hollywood started to intentionally cast actually ugly actresses as a way to subvert 'beauty'? You have ugly disgusting mutts like Tessa Thompson and greasy cunts like Brie Lardson who get to star in giant blockbusters.
Turns out that bad diet, lack of exercise, miscegenation, dysgenics and the cosmetics industry ruined most women change of at least being a 6/10.
They do it so they can hide the trannys better. This is also why you do not see many women with curves
incels tend to derail threads with racism, misogyny, alt right rhetoric and an overall angry, hateful attitude, and it's generally a symptom of their sexual frustration from being unable to get a gf
so it's not so much an insult as genuine advice -- focus on your problems and have sex, and leave the nazi larping alone for a bit
Also yea hollywood has an agenda.
this unironically. Meets need to put down the goddamn mouse and controller and go to the cinemas more or this will only get worse.
uhm, no? what are you gonna do about it, soaking wet 80lbs skinny fat nerd
lmao sit down and stfu
She's beautiful incels.
>we
for starters, speak for yourself.
Secondly, you're considering fertility via health whether you realize it or not. Smooth unblemished unblotched skin, resonant voices, no heavy breathing, no ridiculous amounts of sweat, etc. women people agree are attractive do not appear sickly. Even rebel wilson's image is built around a projection of health, as she never appears sweaty, weak, winded or cellulite ridden. you know, intellectually, a lot of this fakery, (makeup airbrushing photoshop etc) but your monkey brain doesn't care.
whenever a young female goes to the movies, a man pays.
>all those SEETHING roasties on the side
Kek my sides
>without direction
Yeah i mean a human factory would seem to work without direction to an ant. You arent on the level i guess to see the proper scope.
they aren't roleplaying. this is weimar 2.0. They can't have sex because they aren't in the top 20% of men who are pulling all pussy.
Is that electrical tape around her "hair"?
>posts nathalie emmanuel
GREAT BAIT FOR RETARD RACISTS!
kek
>ugly actresses, such as Sharon Stone
>hating on the founding father
Dude, you realized that about a decade too late.
nice
>nothing can work unless someone is in control
god isn't real dude. the universe is composed entirely of systems that work without anyone controlling them.
>nigger
>beautiful
wow
>Tie.
>Me.
>Up.
One of my first boners and partly responsible for my light bondage fetish... That and Michelle Pfiffer's vinyl cat suit in batman returns.
She was pure sex
>user
>racist
wow
I'd sell my soul for just a taste.
Holy shit, I saw this scene as a kid before I even knew what sex was but damned if I didn't know I wanted to do it with her
I wanted to do something sweaty with her with her clothes off!!! but what??
>instagram.com
Where the fuck is op's pic then?
>Do you really think the people in control care about shit like this
are you fucking retarded? literally all show writers do is create symbolic meaning.
there's a reason why every bully in generic school movies from the 80s has blue eyes and light hair
just like how brutalism was used by eastern europe to destroy the souls of their citizens
unattractive women in managerial positions are taking it out on the beauties. it's as simple as that.
The person you replied to mistakes tinder statistics for real-world interactions.
>basic hoe
>rails all the incels up
like clockwork
im so fkn mad