are there any kinos about uncle ted?
Are there any kinos about uncle ted?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
news.yahoo.com
1000manifestos.com
books.google.com
twitter.com
The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
Besides the quite good mini-series?
Luke Smith, the 30 year old unaboomer from /g/
A thread died for this
>Not watching "Manhunt:Unabomber" on netflix
>(((Netflix)))
they don't want to portray ted in a good light
It's not sympathetic but it's the fairest you're ever gonna get I was surprised by it
Stemple Pass, it really changed my opinion of him.
shhhhh
Does his own manifesto count? It was pretty good.
Also, who is Chad enough to play him?
he was a good looking fellow.
Yes he was.
>portrays ted good except he shouldn’t have killed people
>bad light
Cringe reddit
where to watch?
>have valid ideas and write an extremely well-written manifesto
>throw it all away by killing people
He should have chosen better targets, he only did well with two (the lobbyist and the logging CEO).
How would you obtain "front page of national paper" level awareness for your manifesto during the pre-internet age, champ?
Don't strain too hard on this question lil guy.
>pre-internet age
Even in the internet age, assuming he would have wanted to use it (he wouldn't have), it would be impossible for his manifesto to get attention. There's tons of manifestos out there and almost none of them are notable in any way. Considering how unpopular and fringe some of his ideas are it would get even less attention.
Though in theory, he could have sent out some less powerful or dud bombs to people/airlines and then write the manifesto threatening more, if I were to play devil's advocate (not the guy you're replying to). I still think he could have chosen better targets instead of professors and computer store owners.
nation-wide awareness didn't make a difference, yeah some people read his writing, but probably less than 10% of the US population, and out of that
There are only 2 ways to get people's attention. Either by hitting their finances or spilling blood. I'm an edgy faggot and would probably never do anything just like 99.9% of Yea Forums. If you want attention though you have to pretty much do 1 of those 2 things.
Imagine an Unabomber from the 21st century, sending bombs to CEOs of tech companies like Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat and media companies such as YouTube, Netflix and Disney.
haha wouldn't that make for an awesome film or book!
I would love to read/watch that material! I sure hope it doesn't happen in real life though! haha
I M A G I N E
M
A
G
I
N
E
Jake Gyllenhaal could do it.
>if ted had waited another 10 years he could've had his own personal blog or just self-publish
He never would have used the internet, the point is he hates technology. And even if he did he'd just be one of thousands of old kooks blasting his opinion on the internet. Nobody would listen and nobody would care. You're right that most people wouldn't listen to him now that he's famous (especially since he's a murderer), but he certainly got some people listening and he has followers.
You're right, but I think if you're going to actually murder people you need to pick people carefully. His choice of killing a lobbying CEO was a good idea, most people are against big businesses destroying the environment. Politicians would also be reasonable choices. But the majority of people wouldn't like random innocent business owners or professors (or, in a few cases, their secretaries or students) getting mail bombs.
>haha wouldn't that make for an awesome film or book!
Would have been a great prison escape movie where Ted needs to figure out a way to break free to send his bombs. Maybe with a buddy (I would have chosen McVeigh but he's dead now).
Ted deserves a big budget Hollywood movie.
I think pic related is better.
Imagine someone actually going to silicon valley and kidnap some low startup companies' CEOs first to really put the fear in them and train for the bigger fishes, haha!
It would make for a very interesting chapter!
I remember the New York Post published excerpts of the manifesto. Was psychedelic. That newspaper alone is read by millions of people.
see
Lets be honest: if Ted didn't kill those people would we have this thread? Let alone all the other media made about him?
Same with Breivik and what the Facebook livestream shooter also wanted to achieve.
Washington Post did too
I looked into one of these places in Los Angeles. Would have been a nightmare living there.
Other people have gotten attention for their causes without murder. I have to think someone as intelligent as he is could have thought of a better solution.
I say this because in some letter or journal entry (forget what it was) he acknowledged that murdering people likely hurt his ideology, he did it out of murderous frustration. It was more personal than anything.
>could have thought of a better solution
>he did it out of murderous frustration. It was more personal than anything
provide a solution/source, or fuck off
God I love Sam
Changed in what way?
news.yahoo.com
He addresses it a bit here (in the pictures of his actual letters). He also wrote it somewhere else but I'm having a hard time finding it.
inb4 someone posts that Ted quote about academic progressives juxtaposed with a picture of Jordan Peterson.
Incels really love that one
>But — in an admission he appears never to have made to anyone else — Kaczynski allowed that he did sometimes feel conflicted about what he’d done. Were his deadly bombs justified? “A qualified yes,” he told Clarke — depending on his mood at the time and whether he felt his campaign against the dehumanizing effects of modern technology was “winning or losing.”
I don't buy it. I think this is being mischaracterized.
Yahoo used to have more pages up about him but some seem to have disappeared, I'm wondering if that's why I can't find it (I remember reading this a while back and sometimes argued against Kaczynski being labeled a terrorist).
There's some more here, though the author has an agenda (this is not a bad book, by the way, though I disagree with the premise).
books.google.com
Also I meant to add, other than the link, that the point I was making was that his lashing out in the form of bombs was a result of his ideology, yes, but also his personal frustration above all else. The same as a serial killer killing types of victims that set him off and less about a political statement.
From one of his personal journals about maiming someone who was not his intended target:
>I was relieved to read what kind of guy sprang the trap. I had worried about possibility that some young kid, undergrad, not even computer science major might get it. But this guy clearly typical member of the technician class. Might even be one of the guys that has flown those fucking jets over my home. This gives great relief to my choking, frustrated anger and sense of impotence against the system. At same time, must admit I feel badly about having crippled this man’s arm. It has been bothering me a good deal. This is embarrassing because while my feelings are partly from pity, I am sure they come largely from the training, propaganda, brainwashing we all get, conditioning us to be scared by the idea of doing certain things. It is shameful to be under the sway of this brainwashing. But do not get the idea that I regret what I did. Relief of frustrated anger outweighs uncomfortable conscience.
Anyone else think the "Unabomber" thing was a false flag or psyop? There is something off about it.
>oh no he killed people can't read his work now
Absolute boomer. Just call it Industrial Society and Its Future and keep Ted out of it. May find some complications when it gets to the "we've had to kill people" part.
Well, what came of it? I'm halfway between millenial and zoomer so I wasn't there. After the mail bombings started, did the federal government pass laws allowing it to do things it previously couldn't like treading on rights that used to be sacred? If not, it probably wasn't a false flag.
until he gets his own sonichu OC he is nothing!
Popular media, tv, movies made all sorts of unabomber "jokes" all throughout the 90's. It's not about passing laws or taking away rights, it's about planting ways of thinking in people's minds. Also, "Ted" is allegedly in a super famous inescapable prison in Colorado that supposedly houses all sorts of other meme criminals.
And how was his portrayal in media supposed to make us think? He was sometimes depicted as crazy (fair enough for humor fodder, considering his defense and appearance when he was arrested, plus the fact that he was a hermit) but other than that, what? It doesn't jive with his actual manifesto, something most people who have read it or parts of it acknowledge. So what exactly is the conspiracy here?
Glow nigger detected
they definitely do portray him in a good light.
For me it's based Pentti Linkola
That would fix the world.
i
c
u