Did based Marlon really rape her in her hairy asshole on the Last Tango set?
Did based Marlon really rape her in her hairy asshole on the Last Tango set?
apparently he didn't penetrate her but plotted the scene with bertolucci, maria schneider had no idea of what was coming in that scene.
it's not really rape since he's not fucking her but it's not a consensual rape scene either
her half sister had some massive jugs
sodomized her buttered biscuit
Post webms and gifs.
bitch got taken by surprise like kevin nash in the blistering heat of the summer of 92
>It was in the script that he had to rape her in a way. And we were having with Marlon breakfast on the floor of the flat where we were shooting. And there was a baguette and there was butter, and we looked at each other and without saying anything, we knew what we wanted.
Females be seething
To be fair, I feel the exact same way as Chastain. It's sickening.
Hey, user, what does it feel like to be a weirdo? Nothing? I figured.
Sort of off-topic, but take it from me, never ever get involved with a woman who likes this movie. They are always, fucking, crazy. Likely 3rd wave whores who wish for no responsibility for their actions in life.
Sort of off-topic, but take it from me, never ever assume you go for crazy women for random reasons. They are always, fucking, related. Likely infant-mother attachment issues that have massive impact for your actions in life.
Women pronounced me to be their enemy and oppressor and use institutional power to strip me of the fruits of my labor. So I stopped giving a shit about things that happen to them.
Marlon was not based at all. He was the first to force politics into the Oscars. He also named the Jew but still supported them.
have sex
>Jessica Shitstain
talentless worthless roastie
>Women pronounced me to be their enemy and oppressor and use institutional power to strip me of the fruits of my labor.
How so?
>Marlon was not based at all.
Post immediately invalidated.
kwab
prove me wrong
Based
Wrong, she's talented as fuck. A gorgeous woman all around.
He was very mentally ill. Any amount of anecdotes from his life confirms this.
>emotional eating
>weird pranks
>rape
>sucks a black cock, not kidding
>ruins Superman's toilet with monstrous diarrhea
Shut up faggot
> the subject of increasing scrutiny in recent years: a rape scene in Bertolucci’s 1972 film Last Tango in Paris. Marlon Brando’s character, Paul, rapes actress Maria Schneider’s character, Jeanne, using a stick of butter as lubricant. In a 2007 interview with the Daily Mail, Schneider said the scene wasn’t in the original script, and that Brando and Bertolucci had told her about it just before they began filming.
>The scene is intended to be violent and disturbing, with Paul hitting Jeanne and penetrating her as she cries. But as Schneider made clear, the feelings of violation we see onscreen aren’t just acting — they’re real.
Not so based anymore, uh?
>“I was so angry,” she said. “I felt humiliated and to be honest, I felt a little raped, both by Marlon and by Bertolucci.”
>a little raped
And that's what happens when I try to defend women. I'll keep trying.
>Brando didn’t actually penetrate Schneider in the scene. But it was an incident of real sexual humiliation nonetheless, by all accounts. And in a time of reckoning around sexual misconduct, misogyny, and abuse of power in Hollywood, it deserves to be remembered as part of his legacy.
He didn't penetrate. Marlon NOT based.
>“That scene wasn’t in the original script,” Schneider told the Daily Mail. “The truth is it was Marlon who came up with the idea.”
Marlon confirmed for a massive fat pervo.
Reminder this actress died of cancer in 2011. No doubt the anal butter was related.
Man, nigga, I'm a scientist, and if we did this shit for science, we'd be in fucking prison. Here's a homo and another faggot doing something like this for art, and they get nothing. What a load of crap.
The most amazing thing is that Marlon managed not to eat the fucking butter before treating it like a suppository.
Sorry but it's impossible to be raped after you've signed the contract to appear and act in the movie. She even admits she was told about so all this before the scene. She knew what they were going to do and went with it anyway. That's not rape. She cashed the check. Accepted payment. NOT RAPE
Boo hoo, bitch is a dollar store Julianne Moore
That's one helluva way to promote a 50 year old movie. Good job LMAO
CUNT WHORES SELF ON FILM GOT HER JUST REWARDS
>Sorry but it's impossible to be raped after you've signed the contract to appear and act in the movie.
Sorry, but when you sign for a script, you only sign for what is in the script, obviously. The rape scene was not in the script, and so she didn't sign up for it.
>“That scene wasn’t in the original script,” Schneider told the Daily Mail. “The truth is it was Marlon who came up with the idea.”
>“I should have called my agent or had my lawyer come to the set because you can’t force someone to do something that isn’t in the script, but at the time, I didn’t know that,” she added.
>raped
She probably fucked him after it happened, and wanted to before. Women want to be raped.
how can one man be this based?
You're an idiot. It's not rape because there was no penetration. There was gross violation nonetheless, because the director wanted her to feel violated for real. He admits it.
She was 19, a kid, and if you think it's fine to trick young people this way, you have issues worse than you know.
Payment has nothing to do with it. She thought she was obligated to do the scene and didn't know what it entailed. The way he bashes her head into the floor, fucking hell. I've never seen anything like it.
>Don’t forget the butter
>why marlon
>I’m method baby, I’m method.
>.........
Hello incel.
you wish you could do it, STEMcunt. the holocaust and unit 731 shows what happens when you're given the green light
They still told her, even it was the day of shooting and she agreed. This is a mistake on her part due to naivety but regardless of anyone else, she still had the ability to decline. It wasn't right to keep her in the dark about it but it's her fault if she went through with it. She should've tried having some self respect.
>She was 19, a kid,
go back to twitter
Did Marlon Brando really suck cock like that infamous internet pic depicts?
I don't, why would I? Nuremberg is when we started developing strict rules of ethics and deontology for this stuff.
John B. Watson didn't wait for the Holocaust.
>Little Albert
He only lubed her up. He never put it in. Not even the tip.
This is not sexy at all. Marlon had a small, weak ass.
Would you like to have stranger massaging your anus with butter without your consent?
>They still told her, even it was the day of shooting and she agreed.
You are not paying attention. They didn't tell her everything, as admitted many times by the director, Spaghettiman. You can't agree to something you don't know. Stop acting dumb.
>This is a mistake on her part
See the above.
>she still had the ability to decline.
She wasn't told. It was designed to surprise her and make her feel violated. She didn't know what was going to take place. Especially not the head bashing and that rather ignoble nose thing.
>It wasn't right to keep her in the dark about it but it's her fault if she went through with it.
That makes zero sense my friend.
>it's her fault if they fooled her
The footage shows just how not OK she was with it, she fights tooth and nail until he punches her in the face. That shit is insane, but it's basically a snuff movie at this point.
A lot of porn does this trick with young 18 yo but you still fap to it you disgusting incel. I hope you never have sex and shoot up a school in your white fragile rage
I don't have "Twitter". I work with 19-year-olds. They're kids. You won't change my mind.
>Bertolucchi Admits He Conspired
wait, that isn't confirmation he succeeded
it's just a free butthole massage
My concern is how could she go on with the scene and with the rest of the movie then?
She even said her lines perfectly during the scene
Im sick of you arseholes joking about rape.
Yes. You can look the picture up
Have sex
Yes.
He tried, but the fat covered his smol wahyt dick, so no penetration.
>A lot of porn does this trick with young 18 yo
Uh, no. Stop believing porn is real, my dude.
>I hope you never have sex and shoot up a school in your white fragile rage
I'm 42, been maried twice. 20 years of long term relationships. I think you're projecting that "white fragile rage", my sweet boi.
Maybe they shot it last. What choice did she have? What could she do? Back then, women were raped casually and they couldn't do anything about it. My mother was a secretary in the 70's, and raped every Friday night, just to keep her job. Nothing you could do. 'Twas the 70's for ya.
19 year olds weren't 'kids' in 1972. They were adults. Like the law says
>She even said her lines perfectly during the scene
Well, her lines being stuff like "Stop!" and "It hurts!", no big surprise.
But was it necessary to literally break her teeth?
> Schneider said that the scene was not in the script and that "when they told me, I had a burst of anger. Woo! I threw everything. And nobody can force someone to do something not in the script. But I didn't know that"
>They only told me about it before we had to film the scene and I was so angry.
So they told her right before it was meant to happen. She still could have declined. You can't be "tricked" by something you know is going to happen.
19 in 1972 is the same as 19 today. It makes no difference. If this happened to my daughter, I'd have the guys beat up bad. If anyone did this to your girlfriend or wife, you'd feel cucked and would want justice. So don't bullshit me.
>inserts butter into your ass
>against your will
>not in the script
>done on purpose to make you feel bad on camera
That's pretty fucked up AND illegal, period.
>So they told her right before it was meant to happen.
They didn't tell her they would shove butter into her anus.
>She still could have declined.
She didn't know.
>You can't be "tricked" by something you know is going to happen.
But you can be tricked if you don't know something is going to happen.
>What choice did she have? What could she do?
She could scream at the director "Stop, I'm not doing this", and the scene couldn't have been made
It's been a while since I watched it but iirc Brando was saying some political crap and she had to repeat every phrase he said, I don't remember her asking him to stop in the scene
>She could scream at the director "Stop, I'm not doing this", and the scene couldn't have been made
Uh, she did. They edited those parts out.
>Brando was saying some political crap and she had to repeat every phrase he said,
Brutal. "Indias are based, say it!" "INDIANS ARE BASED WITH BUTTER IN MY ASS, PAPPI."
You are stupid. If you literally have it in your power to stop something from happening to you and you don't it's your own fault. At any point she felt uncomfortable or like things weren't right she should have put an end to it. I don't agree that what happened was okay but she has a level of personal responsibility in these situations.
>Sorry, but when you sign for a script, you only sign for what is in the script, obviously
no you don't. What you can't do is have nudity and sex scenes when it wasn't planned initially (HBO had some trouble with that recently)
>At any point she felt uncomfortable or like things weren't right she should have put an end to it.
Man, are you naive. She did what she could. She wasn't as strong as Marlon, she wasn't a man.
>girl gets raped
>it's her fault she didn't prevent it!
>no you don't.
Yeah, you do. That's what you sign for. If something is not in the script, you can refuse to do it and the law is on your side. Check it out.
This is all bullshit made up by the actors and director
>Did based Marlon really rape her in her hairy asshole on the Last Tango set?
Hollywood would never take advantage of struggling female actors.
No you check it out. If you think the vast majority of films stick to their scripts you're beyond naive. Like I said, they couldn't force her to do nudity and sex scenes if it wasn't agreed upon before filming/when signing. But Last Tango in Paris feature plenty of such scenes.
I would've too
By our own law you're incorrect on every level. A 19 year old is a legal adult. Your personal opinion on the subject is irrelevant.
There’s a lot of porn out there ofgirls who got tricked and are currently litigating. I know you’re a retarded boomer but Jesus
>If you think the vast majority of films stick to their scripts you're beyond naive.
Strawman, as this is not what I said. What I said was: if it wasn't in the script you signed for, you are not obligated to do it. There is a difference.
OK, it seems you need an explanation as your autism keeps you from understanding me.
I am not talking legally when I say 19 yo are kids. I know the law, they are legal adults, but at 19, they are still teenagers and easily fooled and abused, as was the case there. A woman of 30 would not have been fooled so easily, though anyone can get tricked this way. An older person may have reacted.
I hope you stop missing the point. Good luck with the 'tism.
way to sell your dignity to Hollywood jews, thot
I challenge you to provide a single source of that.
>have them beat up
>not murdering them in righteous anger personally
cuck
It was for a laugh, you idiots. A LAUGH.
Fuck off Yea Forums
So if she would've said that she wasn't going to do the scene, what would they have done? Thrown her on the floor and raped her for real?
I'm not a savage, plus I'm too busy having sex.
>So if she would've said that she wasn't going to do the scene, what would they have done? Thrown her on the floor and raped her for real?
Am I actually talking to some pleb who only saw the theatrical release? That's exactly what they did, for fuck's sake. That scene makes Irreversible look like a movie.
Fucking kek
Here's your Marlon Brando, bro.
And yes, it's 100% real.
BIG...
So now you are saying she was 100% raped for real? This is getting really dumb on your end.
If a 19 year old is manipulated, it is his or her own fault, regardless of your opinion. The person is a legal adult and therefore considered responsible for their own actions.
If a 19 year old is "manipulated" into selling drugs, they are tired as an adult. If a 19 year old is "manipulated" into murdering someone else, they are tried as an adult. If a 19 year old is "manipulated" into forming a relationship with a 50 year old, that relationship violates absolutely no laws.
This is not my opinion. Your opinion is still irrelevant. This is the law.
The director's cut doesn't really leave much doubt. He bashed her head against the floor, broke a few teeth, and the anal bleeding is too real to be a movie.
>if it wasn't in the script you signed for, you are not obligated to do it
no, and many films go into production with no script
Best dad ever
>If a 19 year old is manipulated, it is his or her own fault, regardless of your opinion.
Being manipulated is your own fault?
>If a 19 year old is "manipulated" into selling drugs, they are tired as an adult.
Selling drugs sure is tiring.
Autism, everyone.
What we're talking about here is specifically the part where they withheld information from her, nothing else. Did you really not understand that?
If people are going to introduce butter into your asshole, what does your age have to do with it? If they didn't tell her, they didn't tell her.
That's the point, dummy. They aren't being manipulated. They made their own choice as an adult.
>no, and many films go into production with no script
Literally bullshit from a pleb. Nothing gets any money until is a script is approved by a number of people, you dummy. Short of being Malick and not needing a script, everything that comes out of Hollywood begins or ends with a script.
>That's the point, dummy. They aren't being manipulated. They made their own choice as an adult.
>they
Which part of them withholding the butter anal insertion was her fault exactly? What part of that plot was not her being manipulated. Be precise.
I have no opinion on the Last Tango subject. She's not alive to give her full account of the story, so there's no point in speculating.
The only point I'm making is that a 19 year old is not a kid. If they raped her, they raped an adult.
>She's not alive to give her full account of the story, so there's no point in speculating.
She already gave her account. You are not paying attention.
If my wife was in a glorified gonzo film, she would not be my wife.
I would be pretty fucking angry with my daughter (with my prior warnings) if she chose to go into Hollyweird acting and if she got abused on set AS AN ADULT. Them being fucked up freaks who need to be tire-ironed would not absolve her of her own stupidity. If she was 13 and locked in a room and raped that would be different and more partly my own fault
see
>The only point I'm making is that a 19 year old is not a kid. If they raped her, they raped an adult.
Damn, Reddit wasn't laying when they said you guys were so autistic you could not function in everyday life or even get any sex.
I can see why now!
>if she got abused on set AS AN ADULT
Yeah, it's unacceptable for adults to be violated! How dare they?
You dodged like a faggot because you can't respond. You have been defeated like a bitch.
It's time to go back
>Literally bullshit from a pleb. Nothing gets any money until is a script is approved by a number of people
haha you fucking retard. There are a numbers of directors that can get into production with the studio backing them up with nothing more than a story treatment, locations and some storyboards. You've never been remotely close to a film set.
You moved the goalpost and tried to change the subject. I'm not getting dragged into this last tango shit. The only point I came to make is that a 19 year old is a legal adult.
not only that but at 19 you're supposed to be able to not make retarded decisions without your parents backing you up.
No, he just put butter on her ass which pissed her off because, well, she got butter on her ass. You'd be annoyed by too, probably. Nobody got raped. The controversy around this scene is retarded.
ofc you come from fucking reddit
>19 IS A CHILD, SWEETIE!! PEOPLE ONLY BECOME ADULTS AT 35
>a 19 year old adult is not a vulnerable person
Wow grand wisdom
was the rape in el topo real?
Okay I'll bite. I'll skip the first two because those are obvious and can be easily found on Twitter on any given day. With institutional power,
>Alimony
Women date up, so you will most likely be making more than her, and if she divorces, she gets your stuff and your house if you have children.
>Child support
You have to pay for the child regardless of whether you consented to having it (woman stuffing used condoms into herself) a legal precedent was also set for women being allowed to use a man's sperm bank sperm without his consent.
>Abortion
If you want to have the child, but she doesn't, you get ignored.
If you don't want to have the child, but she does, you get ignored. I mean you have to literally be stupid to not know this already, but clearly this is good bait.