Are they poor because they have lots of children

are they poor because they have lots of children
or
have they lots of children because they are poor?

Attached: 1547575953911.jpg (767x431, 60K)

yes

>tfw ywn have five healthy sons

Only the first makes sense.

They are just ungodly stupid and low class. They can be lucky that at least one child is a prodigy. The rest will be a drain on society.

No

There were no poor people in the suburbs suring the time this show takes place in only middle class.

When they had Francis (1st) they were well off.
Hal couldn't work in the office as much nor fraternize, which made him stuck in his position. They are poor because they keep fucking like rabbits.

Maybe

Any other white guys have a lot of siblings? I only have one brother. My wife only had two siblings. Don't see many ig white families like this very often anymore.

Attached: 1448500296432.png (467x597, 30K)

boys a hot. A HOT.

They are poor because their parents were poor. Ask me how I know that you are American.

I don't know

they're poor because the mom works in a grocery store and the dad doesn't give a fuck about his career and literally skipped every friday

they're poor because of capitalism and neoliberal rot

>are they poor because they have lots of children
That one. In one of the episodes it's shown that Hal was a young, born wealthy go getter before Francis was born and that with each subsequent hellspawn of a kid their financial situation deteriorated

Because they have too many kids. Literally watch the show. They were well off before their first kid. And even during, but the second one fucked their shit up.

Hal's fathers are rich.

Lois is a terrible mom

Just Francis

What state is this show based in?

Nobody knows. Their last name is also unknown. Wilkerson is wrong. I read somewhere that it's because the writers wanted to make it feel like they could be your neighbors so they left their location and surname ambiguous.