Why didn't he just shoot Harry with a machine gun instead of trying multiple times to use a wand when it wasn't working?

Oi bin that wand

I'd rather be riddled with machine gun bullets that be foreced to view one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>muh muggles
lets face it a war of wizards vs muggles would only end in a magical shoah

machine guns and artillery trumps spells any day of the week

>Why didn't he just shoot Harry with a machine gun
He couldn't get a license for it.

Why didn't he just throw Harry into a nearby lake or something?

Just yeet that four eyed nigga before he learns to walk

They're illegal in the UK.

harry shitter takes place in a delusional fantasy world in which guns don't exist. that's why leftists love it

Attached: 1534780680144.jpg (1024x1024, 400K)

cheeky

It's wizard world, theres prolly some magical wench in there that would have caused trouble

Incorrect.

Good point, pretty sure he knew the insta kill spell wasnt gonna work

Liberals are not leftists, you nigger

Attached: ChYD7ub[1].jpg (823x586, 162K)

IIRC the wizarding world doesn't know what a lot of muggle technology is. That's why Arthur Weasley is seen as such a weirdo for collecting muggle stuff. Yes its retarded

Voldemort lived with muggles for 11+ years, he knows what guns are. But his ego is too big to ever use muggle weapons

Why didn't he just Nuke Harry with a Nuke?

>no picture

This is one of the things I don't like about the HP movies they make wizards seem too weak

both hate guns and love niggers so they're the same to me

Why didn't he just transfigure Harry into a pitbull and set him loose on some toddlers so he would get put down?

Attached: 1522315134855.jpg (640x480, 224K)

Why didn't he transfigure into a pitbull and maul baby Harry?

STOP
leave them alone

Attached: 652645765244.jpg (1280x720, 73K)

Deh!

Attached: the deh.png (640x360, 352K)

good job, that picture actually made me feel angry.

Attached: 2w3e4r.png (250x250, 55K)

Don't worry user, they grew up on consumerism and are miserable.

>i'd rather have a wand
>fireballs, torture and killing curses okay, guns not okay

>is he honking??

>harry shitter takes place in a delusional fantasy world in which guns don't exist.

So... Britain?

Britain has tough gun laws. He could've used a knife though.

they would probably be able to make nearby guns malfunction or something, its a dumb meme

a wand can be used to clean up your house and stuff like giving life to a broom and make it sweep the floor for you. its a multipurpose tool that can kill like a car or chainsaw.
a gun however has no other purpose but to kill.

why didn't he just wear earplugs and carry around those plants that kill people if they hear them

why cant he transmute to uchiha madara and mangekyo sharingan all of hogwards

What happens if one of the students who was working on those plants had their ear plugs fall out?

It would be extremely painful

The ministry's best squad of obliviators come to the school, and then visit that student's parents house. In the morning, nobody remembers who the empty bunk in the hufflepuff boys dorm belonged to.

Its the UK he ain't got a loicence

>killing is always bad

Attached: 1515079413482.jpg (400x417, 107K)

No he couldn't, knives are banned.

Why didn’t he just shoot Harry riding on the eagles to mt doom?

what I don't get is how they can claim Hunger Games taught them to hate guns when the whole tyranny of the Panem guys wouldn't happen if they weren't the only ones with guns

Bow and arrow good.
Gun bad.

leftists think that if nobody had guns, there would be no violence, because they think it's guns that make people violent rather than people being naturally violent

Low effort

They do, when you have a things that can kill it makes tou want to kill. Whenever I pick up a sharp object I have to remind myself not to kill with it. Same goes for driving, it's a constant battle to not run people over. I'm not crazy and everyone has these thoughts.

Attached: 1480570230590.jpg (232x260, 8K)

do you see trucks getting banned in europe after nice?
no. because trucks have other uses than turning 80 frogs into mince meat.

wtf, I love voldemort now

Why didn't he just read the "Wizarding for Dummies" book.
Fucker was always using the wrong wand, or the wand belonged to someone else, or there was some old love magic involved, etc.

Is this pasta? Because it's at the very least true. Harry Potter was never very good, Children liked the wizard kid aspect but it was intolerable for adults outside of Voldemort himself. And it was a lot of stupid British humor, not even the good kind like Rowan Atkinson.

They should have been.
If we can save even one life by banning something, that's enough.

Oh you sweet innocent child