WHAT THE FUCK SAM, GOLLUM IS OUR FRIEND

>WHAT THE FUCK SAM, GOLLUM IS OUR FRIEND

Attached: frodo.png (704x800, 283K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Gyges
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Frodo identifies with Gollum because Gollum knows what it's like to be addicted to the ring like what Frodo is suffering with. the ring is an allegory for drug addiction.

I don't know if claiming allegories in LotR is a subtle form of trolling.

Never read the books, did you?

Why didn't they just go to rehab?

Drug addiction wasn't a think when Tolkien wrote the novels for a start.

It was pity that stayed Frodo's hand.

Gollum is a creepy little faggot, they should have bashed his head in with a rock

I think that's a yes?

>what are opium bars

well user? have you thought about it rationally?

Attached: 1549404556462.jpg (720x888, 334K)

What are opium, cocaine, and alcohol?

lol

bruh...
You better be American, at least then you have some defense.

Attached: durrrr.png (250x202, 7K)

a good time

No, Tolkien never reference drug addictions in his lore, all that smoke you see are tobacco, not weed.

>Language is hard. This was maybe my answer to Martin, whom, as much as I admire him, I do quibble with. A Song of Ice and Fire had a very modern philosophy: that if the king was a good man, he would get his dick chopped off. We look at history and it’s not that simple. Martin can say that Bran became king and reigned for a hundred years, and he was wise and good. But Martin doesn’t ask the question: How was high Valyrian conjugated? Does the pluperfect tense of bravosi derive from the suffix? How did dragons understand the verb, “dracarys”? And what about all those lost westerosi languages? By the end of the war, the night king is gone but all of the autists aren’t gone – they’re in the Godswood, watching beautiful sisters be beautifully raped. Did Bran pursue a policy of monolingualism and kill all other languages? Even the little baby dialects in their little dialect regions?

>trolling
>book has trolls in it
Holy shit

he obviously doesn't reference drug addiction directly (other than Saruman scolding Gandalf and then it turns out Saruman has been smoking Old Toby all that time too), but the Ring is addictive like the most addictive drug, so obviously there are parallels. People will do anything to get it and hold on to it.

intro to linguistics makes a Yea Forums the post

what the fuck is that even supposed to mean? Ironically you worded that really badly.

>Language is hard
Maybe if you're an ESL

Tolkien hated allegories

Gollum is our greatest ally Sam

Same

Attached: 1473210204683.png (493x276, 34K)

You have a tiny brain

>no themes
>no allegories
>no profound message
>b-b-ut muh linguistics!
No wonder it's so popular with social failures.

interesting to know Tolkien's thoughts on Game of Thrones

cannot believe people fell for this bait

it doesn't mean his stories have no relevance to universal problems like addiction.

>1821

Attached: De Quincey 1821 - Confessions of an English Opium Eater.jpg (1000x1600, 581K)

The ring represents temptation and sin, which are addictive, but equating the ring with drug addiction is retarded.

Also, this:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Gyges

yeah im gonna need some of what this guy is on

Attached: 1499132888172.jpg (250x239, 7K)