I'm a film student. Roast my work, lads

Watched it. You have the aesthetics right - the cinematography is very nice. But there's the authenticity question: it comes across like it was made by someone who watched movies about drug addiction instead of having any first hand knowledge about it. (I'm not advocating drug use of course)

What kind of edgy shit is the second frame, just turn off the tv if it’s not working fuck just the static sound alone is annoying

It's quite mise en scene to be honest

give me Bianca Melchoir's number and i'll give you a full review

but it's "artsy"
nothing worse than trying to do neorealism while also trying to make every shot look as "stylish" as possibly
fucking tedious

You have way too many cuts going on.
You're not giving enough time with each shot for the actors to really draw shit out of them.

Don't listen to what these other plebs are saying, they have no taste.

>middle of winter
>birds chirping
>generic as fuck heroin opening sequence
(would imo have been better if you only have a few seconds with the heroin and the classical music and then a sharp cut to the vomiting and have like ten minutes of morning withdrawals).

>actors are a bit too clean for heroin addicts (although I don't know how long they've been using)

>good camera work
>sound mostly consistent
>acting from the main character is good
>nice aesthetics

I really enjoyed the scene with his mother. Not a lot needed to be said, nor was said, but the scene worked very well.

Overall, I'd give it 7/10 for a student film. I would be interested in seeing how you improve in the future.

It's much better than most of the post-modern bullshit that gets posted here

actually coherent, good dialogue, well acted

you have a sense of color but it needs to be developed, needs a more consistent palette

you need to work on framing a bit too. see pic related as example - pushing the left third to be open like this only works if you have negative space, which you don't here due to the buildings. personal feeling for me at least, but you see what I am saying.

Attached: workonyothirdsnigga.png (1274x539, 1.22M)

also scene right after as example - that pillar should form line on third. it's like the positioning is just a little bit off, or maybe seems that way.

Attached: workonyothirdsniggatwo.png (1273x542, 1.16M)

shit lighting
shit acting (as a film student, casting and acting directing are probably the most important things you need to learn)
excessive mise en scène, seriously it's a student film: if it's not a commercial or a music video just keep it down okay, you're not Gaspard Noé

it's also the wrong focal length and they should be facing the other way (so you should have shot from the other side)

why cant film students into humour

youtu.be/vFART6ZMeEA
frogs make a better story than you

they desperately try to be taken seriously and think they need to be edgy and tacke mature themes. I believe the best way to become a legit good director today would be to direct plays or shoot commercials.

>I really enjoyed the scene with his mother. Not a lot needed to be said, nor was said, but the scene worked very well.

This. shot comp here is good too. that's a very strong scene.

>shit acting

WTF are you talking about, it's fantastic for a student film.

>excessive mise en scène

not excessive, just feels a bit try hard. need to learn to make it more subtle.

Attached: momscene.png (1271x543, 1.13M)

directing is decent but the rest is just way too pretentious

Complete film-illiterate here:

My disconnect to the degree of dysfunctionality and drugs makes me uncofortable watching it, maybe you wanted this reaction thoug?

Sound seemed strange on the balcony.

The nervous excuse/lie asking for money was really convincing, felt real.

Pretty actors.

The pink blue thing was nice, beautiful.

Heroin vs innocence of youth wroks really good at the end, makes me sad. The small frame as if filmed with old home camera convinces.

the lighting was fine, visually it wasn't that bad aside from the fact that all the shots were too still which made it seem so inauthentic

what is it about these weird-ass lingering close-up shots that always - always - make these shorts identifyable as amateur film student work?

Attached: 1547679996598.jpg (872x371, 28K)

>Black background windows movie maker title screen
>inappropriate royalty free classical music
>blue filter for night colour saturation
>meme drug use

Everything within the first 40 seconds is hilariously bad and I didn't bother watching past that because it's every student film ever made.

Enjoy your job pulling cable on some B list film set after graduation Ian.

Attached: sad-pepe-telegram-sticker-3.png (512x415, 60K)

>WTF are you talking about, it's fantastic for a student film
yeah but that doesn't make it good. Just because I'm not cringing at every line doesn't mean I feel engaged with the characters (okay and I really don't like the characters)
>just feels a bit try hard. need to learn to make it more subtle
that's what excessive means

>film student
Yeah I can tell

I disagree with you, I think that given time and experience in the real world, this person could easily produce something of real value.

no, imo the lighting is one of the biggest problem. There is not a single sharp shadow in the whole film, in fact I'm pretty sure most of it is natural lighting bar the occasional lightscreen (big mistake in winter, especially if you film in an urban setting)

it tries to be personal and close to the characters while completely failing to really establish setting and using that as a method of creating additional layers of realism and depth into the narrative

poor composition and lighting everytime

Could you center the pillar?

color grading too aggressive/10

tfw a motif ive seen in a fucking gq circa 2013 gets jacked by art students

no Wes Anderson

Right off the bat really bad sound mixing, as it is with most film student films. The noise gaiting between the dialogue lines is extremely obvious, the boom mic gain was set way too high so you clearly had to limit the fuck out of the audio which in result makes any other sound they make while talking (like scraping the concrete with their shoes) extremely loud in those segments as opposed when they are not talking.

Bad soundtrack selection, the juxtaposition between the shooting up images and the piano/jazzy soundtrack is not that kind of "right" juxtaposition where it molds together into a whole, here the images and the soundtrack exist entirely on their own.

Scenes are cut either way too short or left way too long. For example the scene where it cuts from the girl and dude spinning all drugged up to the dude puking, the spinning scene should be longer and the puking should be shorter and more instanenous, cut right at the puking part so it's immediately shocking/disgusting for the viewer before he even realises what just happened. The puking should be a full close up and the sound should cut out instantly, not have a reveerbed fade.

Not a fan of the 2.39:1 ratio in here, far too wide of a frame when the majority of the film is shot interior with you clearly not having enough distance to utilize the extremely wide frame properly, which is why you overuse the negative space without much weight behind it at all.

No glaring technical flaws when it comes to the visuals, but the framing and color pallette fits more to a music video than for a film with this narrative. You could easily re edit this entire thing and sell it to a local indie band as a music video.

Won't comment much on the writing, also highly cliche """depressing""" film student work. Avoid the cheesy cliches like the boiling kettle at the mother talk.

All in all typical student flick that will get a passable grade, but extremely bland and derivative. Find your own true style/voice.

Read Tarkovsky’s ‘Sculpting in Time’ and read into ‘poetic consciousness’. This movie is too grounded in reality and the rational, not even average mundane life for a man follows a logical or rational movement, why should films? Your logic of movement in a movie can be your own, the way time develops and fluctuates can be however you want it to be, time can be thrown around, a characters inner psychology can leak out of their heads and flow into the picture. Dreams and random musings and being blasted by deep cohesive structures inside the deep wirey cords of your pinky spongey brain can be more real than a person standing in front of you, in a movie and in real life. It was competently made and I think you could easily please a big audience, and I liked this closeup, felt visceral and intense, I would also remove the subtitles when they’re speaking in French when it’s just little stuff that a person could pick up on, I felt it was immersive breaking. But yeah too modern in tone and philosophy for me to say it’s kino, and your exhibitionism is a tad misplaced and overbearing, the expressiveness of an image comes from context and mise en scène, not from picturesque stills or technical precision. Just my two cents, give up rationality or what makes practical sense, throw it in the trash, in life and in art.

Attached: 49B40364-5956-4252-995C-AA01566D74A9.png (1334x750, 1.8M)

>consistent palette
>pillar of thirds
>should be facing the other way
>mise en scène
>movement is problem no lighting is problem
>motif (french?)
Wut

Do they do this in my super hero movies and game of thrones. I dont mean to derail this to be about what 99% of the board is about I'm genuinely curious.

yeah, you could do that too. Again, it's a choice of having negative space in the scene as it relates to the characters. There, a centered shot with each character at third would have been pretty effective. I think a flat angle shot might be better in that case, though.

Stiff and pretentious. Generic and uninteresting topic. The only thing worth being said about drug fiends is that they need the bullet.

No. There's no creative spark or soul, just a series of shots and ideas stolen from some award winning directors (most of whom have no idea what they're doing either). This is made by some rich kid who desperately wants to be a director, not someone who makes film, whose goals consist of being a celebrity douche bag spouting nonsense in interviews about his powerful new film before going out to clubs to pop champange over whore's tits. He's your bog standard film student and since his name doesn't have the chosen ring to it best case scenario Ian winds up directing a straight to dvd movie like The Conjuring 6.

>Do they do this in my super hero movies and game of thrones. I dont mean to derail this to be about what 99% of the board is about I'm genuinely curious.

Yes

Well, not in capeshit, those are all directed by hacks, but many of the movies you watch use this sort of stuff. Done well, it's not something you pick up on, which is sort of the point. also it's

>Rule of Thirds

not

>Pillar of Thirds.

Have you watched any film from before fucking 2014? Why is every frame in your picture one goddamn color, real life doesn’t look like that dumbass. I’m not wasting data on your video but for fucks sake if you do anything in life stop making videos where the whole fucking frame is RED or PURPLE because you saw some boring digital film on Netflix and thought “wow that’s coolio!”

Should've gone to films instead

I disagree, I found the scene with his mother to be the core of the movie, were it hits its highest point, which was higher than it had any right to be.
It felt believable and for a moment I forgot I was watching some pretentious films student slop.

I hope that one day you can form a coherent sentence from all of those artsy references

motif means pattern, and yes even in capeshit and game of thrones that shit matters. You'll never see an "incorrect" close up in a Marvel film for instance, that shit is jarring even to the most uninterested audience.

rule of thirds is used in pretty much everything, it's one of the few memes in filmmaking that actually works well

Where are the superheroes?

You heard it here first. He's the next Ozu

This. shooting the other direction would have worked with the transition to the next shot better as well.

I imagine there's a niche of film-making that gets off on breaking as many of these rules as possible and every such production gets a total of 20 views from very enthusiastic derailees.

I was writing it while taking a shit and my hands hurt. Just read into poetic consciousnessness and watch Bunuel and Wojciech Has films and you’ll get what I’m talking about

No iron or cap and you lost me boah

Is there a single film student short film out there where the narrative is something positive or happy?

It's like they all desperately want to be taken seriously so they think only le depressing subject matter will entice the viewer, while I'm sure anything other than that will make them stand out far more in the never ending sea of "depressed character getting out of his bed" student flicks

In Vino Veritas. Get ready for the real world. Except in the real world the most you'll get someone to care is cutting you down withing one or two sentences at most. You got someone to care, respect and dissect. Which is more than you'll probably ever get, or deserve at this point. I you truely believe in your dreams and have ambitions, there's a one in a gorrilion chance you might make it. Don't be a wino when the truth comes out and you don't have enough talent or vision. or luck. If it doesn't happen you can stay bitter and stuck, or accept the fact that you were always mediocre or subpar. Just like most of us are. There's nothing wrong with it. Few are chosen and there's something to be said for a life of so called 'mediocracy'. You settle.

there is a reason those rules exist, some faggot didn't show up one day and said this is how it's done, it was figured out

clean that fucking room jesus christ

film school is the echo chamber to rule them all, even the outcasts in them are just edgier than the others.

>first 25 seconds
Pretty shots but who cares
>30 seconds in
heroin.
>12:40 minutes total.
Nigga you done fucked up
Eight minutes is the average length of shorts that make it into film festivals these days, your shit is loose.

Well, you're a film student I suppose, so I can't really judge you for being low budget. The common trap that a lot of film students follow into is taking themselves too seriously and being derivative of others work. Really it's that way for most students of the arts before they find something they can sync with.y main issues are just the noticeable cliches, like the kettle boiling over to represent high stress or the saturated moody colors highlighting sadness next to the music of a lone piano/ guitar.
colors. Creativity and expression is key, art is not merely a hobby it's your livelihood and passion and as such needs to be more personal. What made movements in film and various forms artistic expression unique we're the times the artists were living in that drove them into innovation. Keep in mind that film is influenced by various other arts as well, music, painting, poetry, etc.

Neorealism was born in Italy at the aftermath of WW2, in stark contrast to the previous Futurist Movement within Italy. Both we're incredible artistic movements. You need to tap into what makes you unique as an artist and get a general sense of the zeitgeist you are living in so that you become a part of the next great thing.

Attached: Edvard_Munch_-_The_Kiss_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (2591x3173, 2.35M)

>The only thing worth being said about drug fiends is that they need the bullet.
Stiff and pretentious

I'm just going off what a mate that studies music tells me about jazz music. He says there are all the rules that music should follow to sond good but after you've studied those rules enough you try to find ways to break the rules to make it interesting. I'm simplifying things but he said that's where a lot of jazz music is, in breaking rules.

dropped after a minute. Okay shots and editing but there is no worse feeling than music that doesn't fit the scene. I literally can't watch when it happens.

based

Still from my short film I made at university.

Attached: 304923.png (1658x722, 1.62M)

kys fiend

I doubt what you mate meant by that is playing false notes though

That kid's ugly

I won’t watch it but hopefully you are making movies that make you proud and happy.

Nice cinematography work, given the limitations I imagine you had. The compositions are good enough, you make interesting, unexpected choices, a bit visually forced at times but that's fine. The visually disjointed edition of the speedball is cool. Thematically it's not my cup of tea, but, imho, a good work user. Keep on going

>cliches, like the kettle boiling over
Is this a problem even if the audience is like me totally oblivious to the fact that it is a cliche, subconciously?

Also is there no value in going full imitation of others like an homage of sorts. It's not like you can achieve identical results even if you tried. Or is it just sad?

unironically not that bad 7/10
Audio mixing in the balcony scene in the beginning is fucked and needs adjusting.
Shots with his mother, way to zoomed in on her face (but overall the scene was well done and the acting was superb)
At 10:51, it looks like the main character is looking directly into the camera (or he is extremely close to doing so)
Ending with the scenes of youth at the same place are great and impactful.
Some of the shots are a bit too long with not much happening or anything interesting visually (Main one being when his mother is getting the money)
Cinematography overall is great

Good point.

it's a fucking short, the shit you usually screen at festivals, no one wants to see the same shit over and over again

im going to watch it later, but for the moment i will congratulate you for being doing something to reach your goals and happiness.
Do your shit and conquer the world user.

Didn't think about that. The format does seem aimed at a more versed audience.

I think it's funny that you can tell what class the film fags here are currently taking based on their answers

i'm dl a game so my internet is too slow
Watched the first few minutes
It seems good so far

Artsy is just for Loser main characters, people with GFs are normies and don't deserve any kind of romanticism of their shitty situations.

Unless your film is trying to debunk city life as something to aspire for, and you throw some kind of critique of costs of living and income now vs then, you should just stop.

>Ryerson

how did I know ?

you spent WAY too much money for this.

t. 2nd year drop-out

don't worry bout it if true, seriously

m.youtube.com/watch?v=SuHM2bVXcQE
Roast me faggots

kek no worries

it's true alright

christie pits. nigga you by me

you're opening shot is too "perfect" with its blocking and placement. IT screamed student film.

>look mom I went to film school check it out I'm an artist

what did ryerson let you shoot this on a RED?

>Is there a single film student short film out there where the narrative is something positive or happy?

No, they're either depressing muh artisinal soul garbage or nonsensical penguin of doom randumb. Film school is a hack machine. Why do you think modern movies suck so fucking hard now?

It's hideous and pretentious.

>Why do you think modern movies suck so fucking hard now?
Do you think film school is something new?

>This is made by some rich kid who desperately wants to be a director, not someone who makes film, whose goals consist of being a celebrity douche bag spouting nonsense in interviews about his powerful new film before going out to clubs to pop champange over whore's tits.

you see this FAR too often in film. FAR too often.

omg its so artistic I know humans. I know life. I am amazing.

Will watch when I get a minute. I like the OP shots, so keep trying.

this is why I stopped making short films at a younger age (20). I didn't feel like I had enough life experience to really tell something.

its farrr to cliche

not bad but it's easy to tell it's a student film for a number of reasons

Overall good work. I wrote down a few of my thoughts as I went along.

- barely a nitpick, but you could have used a better edition of Claire de Lune for the opening. I did like the transition to the jazzy version of the song.
- hard cut from merry go round to vomiting was extremely effective. good work.
- I get what you were going for with the extreme close up on the mother, but I think it was the wrong approach. We're meant to feel the son's discomfort by his mother's judging presence, but the problem is that I already felt that with the extreme close up on HIM. I would have preferred a stable medium shot on her, to show their difference in emotional balance. would have also made her look akin to a CEO squaring down an employee, if you catch my drift.
- when the mother was going for the money, I would have loved to see a reincorporation of the shot where the son initially sat down; extreme close up on him in the foreground, mother goes for the money in the kitchen in the background. In the existing shot it seems we are meant to reflect on the son's decision while he's alone, but I feel this could have been done more effectively with my suggestion AND leave the viewers with some visual catharsis.
- you can hold on your long shots more, especially the one in the pink bedroom scene. the second shot in your OP was a good shot, you should have just let us hard linger on it and let us see the characters act with their bodies. combined with the static on the TV it would have been actual kino. This is my biggest critique. Don't go for close-ups so much.
- I leave the film feeling that the general intent was somewhat unclear. Are we meant to feel as if these people are stuck in a vicious, drug-fueled cycle? If so, I would have reincorporated elements from the beginning, such as bringing back Claire de Lune, or throwing back the merry go round scene. Something to indicate that we're back where we started, and this cycle is going to repeat.

Attached: ceo.jpg (1266x537, 92K)

neorealism sucks mainly yours

>Are we meant to feel as if these people are stuck in a vicious, drug-fueled cycle?
My guess is that this was his intent, and it would probably have been shown more clearly had it not already been over twelve minutes long.

Kek

12 min too long. it got boring. no offense op.

we get it. they take drugs. you liked requiem for a dream too much

im gonna be honest as someone who used to study film just like you
the close up shots annoy me so much since every single amateur is doing them.
be more creative. try new things, ditch the normal. go crazy.

>Student movie
>It's about depression

Attached: a96fc38147b52d1.jpg (600x600, 34K)

The story has been seen too many times already and the sound mixing can be improved. Overall pretty decent, tho.

>he expects me to watch this

Attached: 1552513694997.png (662x478, 22K)

>it comes across like it was made by someone who watched movies about drug addiction instead of having any first hand knowledge about it.

Yeah, for real. Just watched the first 30 seconds, maybe, but nobody cooks heroin for that long. You'll burn away a lot of your dope, and you'll get a superheated shot that'll be way too hot to inject.

But the real reason you don't, is because you don't have to. The purpose of cooking it is to get it to dissolve. A lot of places, people don't cook heroin at all because it just dissolves without it, and it's a whole complicated extra step. In places they do, it only gets heated up to where bubbles form for an instant before the flame is taken away. Anything more than that is just totally pointless.

which is probably a bit deal why this didn't feel to have a soul. The director has never used heroin.
the problem with young film makers. It's not from a experience in their life. Its just an idea.

>im an artist!
Stop trying to be an artist and make something fucking interesting.

cinematography is a meme
if you wanna be a photographer be a photographer no one cares about you inserted wallpapers in film

He expects me to watch his amateur film
AND GIVE HIM MY THOUGHTS

Attached: 5AA0CE65-622B-4034-9B16-81CA65945DAD.gif (240x134, 1.76M)

this. a story is being told not showing off your le meme cinematography.

movies are made.
quick, cheap, good.
pick 2.

wtf why do the mom and her son talk in another language but then in english, I don't get it

Yeah, I mean, not that he should go out and use heroin, because it's going to take your soul away rather than give you the soul of an artist, but yeah.

You should only make a movie or write a book or create something if you have something to say. Wanting to say something doesn't mean shit unless you actually have something to say. Look at porn, some dude can be waving the camera around shitty as fuck, barely filming it half the time, no sound, and it fucking captivates people. Andy Warhol said that his idea of a great picture was one that was in focus and of a famous person. It's all about what you say; that's the only thing that really matters. That's the cake; the rest is just icing. Icing is important, you can't have a great cake without it, but it doesn't make the cake.

I'm assuming you're not from a bilingual or immigramt home. It's actually pretty normal.

a story is told through cinematography in film you dumbo

OP ofcourse tried to do that in some way with the extreme negative spaces and wide framing separating the characters (the mom and the son), but the problem is he where every decision hits the viewers on his head again and again, as opposed to all the filmmaking elements forming a whole and portraying a narrative together.

you're a normie faggot

>generic skyline
>RED
>close up of a kettle
>clouds

I think you're just fucking with us but I'm not watching it anyway.

>coming to Yea Forums for intelligent criticism
this board is nothing but 20 year olds pretending to not enjoy super hero movies, you will gain nothing from doing this.

get a better camera

Very pretentious just like every "film student"

Have sex

sure an overall look can be achieve but more then just these super long cuts which far too perfect blocking. The guy hardly moves his camera. It feels like he lead with his "artistic vision" more then a story he wants to tell.

I've heard right what you know. I hardly doubt the director has ever used heroin. I'm sure he has done acid/mdma. Perhaps he should of used mdma or adderall which is more for his generation. Instead he did.
Requiem for a Dream le shots omg XD heroin? no way this guy is nuts. he is spinning out of control!!!!!!

also move your fucking camera.
these are BORING shots.
go watch other film students shit and DONT DO WHAT THEY DO.

Next time you goto a student ryerson film fest. Sit in the audience and take in the whole night as 1 giant film. Instead of 8 small films. See patterns? See the same bullshit?
yah don't do that. Stand out.

Stop enjoying the smell of your own fucking farts.

also this video did the spinning playground thing better.
youtube.com/watch?v=XDN2wbm6zi8

>pretending to not enjoy super hero movies
Oh look, another retard who thinks Yea Forums is one person.

Why do all film students have to make every shot so pretentious?

>drooling retard can't fathom that some people might not enjoy meaningless spectacles

>also move your fucking camera
Worst possible advice you can give to any film student.
Film students can barely frame a scene at all, let alone incorporate camera movement with it aswell. It's not like if the camera was dollying up down left right any of the scenes would suddenly become great out of nowhere.

Every time you move a camera you have to have a reason to do so, film students should first and foremost learn to properly compose and frame a static shot before they even attempt to move the camera at all.

he wanted advice so I gave it. I don't think the guy is thinking too much in the idea of "oh wait I can move the camera".
Even just punching in a bit would work for some shots. Hell he can do that in post production. drop a transform node and bump that scale up at the tail of the shot. Might make things less boring.
Maybe he wanted to give a feeling of boredom. Like they don't have any emotions when they aren't high. That horrible come down feeling from any drug.

like Ryan goslings first attempt at directing attempting to ape malick-Refn-Lynch

he could have also made the camera its own character and sorta witnessed them when they're high. this can be done subtly but its an idea.

I see zero experimentation in the slightest in this. its merely DSLR time baby

I once played a robber in a student film. I don't think it went anywhere past editing.

Watch Jan Troells ‘The Emigrants’ camera movement can change everything.

youtu.be/7imdotObtz0

hey guys roast this instead

Okay, so I watched beyond the first 30 seconds, getting ready to tear it apart, and it's actually not terrible. They're using a fucking horse needle like they're doing IM shots, that no one would ever use to IV. Like if you gave that needle to the junkiest IV junkie in the tent city, they'd be like, "what the fuck am I supposed to do with this?" And the whole thing is way too melancholy. People are closer to frantic than they are hypnotized by the bubbling in the spoon.

Heroin is the greatest thing ever. There's a Johnny the Homicidal Maniac where he dies and goes to heaven and hell, and heaven is just a bunch of people sitting in chairs blissed out, because it's heaven. Most desires, like food and sex, heavenly when fulfilled, but only because you get hungry and horny with no release. Real paradise, you couldn't have the satisfying high of a great meal, because being hungry all day before that isn't paradise. So heaven is just sitting in a chair, perfectly content, and that's what heroin is. You don't eat, or fuck, because you don't want to, because you're totally content. You can win an Oscar, get handed $10 billion dollars on stage, and have a threesome with supermodels while you're stuffing your face with cheesecake at the podium, and you won't get nearly as many feel-good endorphins and dopamine as you would from a 0.5 gram shot.

Side point, though: how'd you get his eyes pinned? Dude looks like he's on heroin.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-05-06 at 12.46.07 PM.png (514x443, 331K)

>20 minutes of student film
Jesus Christ

Well ofcourse camera movement affects the fucking film, I'm saying blindly incorporating camera movement without even being able to frame a static shot is dumb and OP should first focus on learning to shoot static scenes alone before trying out camera movement aswell

Anybody that has ever tried shooting up heroin says it's the best feeling they ever felt in their life every time.

So why don't we give heroin to people that are inevitably about to die, just so they die in complete bliss?

>Claire de Lune
Jesus christ REALLY faggot?

Attached: 2342342423.jpg (219x333, 13K)

Boring eurotrash.

this is what I thought too.

feels ciche af

We kind of do, don't we? "Oh shit, Bro, sorry about the cancer, here's your prescription for opiates."

We do r tard. Hospice patients get blasted on morphine and ativan

I don’t think it’s really that much more complicated, if you’re already at the stage where you’re filming a short film camera movement should probably be pretty intuitive if you’ve watched a lot of shit.

>vimeo.com/333481544
>student film
>it's about drug addiction
BRA VO
do you wanna know how I know that this is the last time all of us on Yea Forums are hearing about you, you fucking SLAV SHIT?

What are those disgusting black strips?

>film student
>makes boring film

seems about right.

have you even done heroin?

I'm the CEO of a dishwasher producing company.
Do you want a job?

>sitting with static on the tv

yah this happens all the time. fucking retard

B-B-BUT IT LOOKS COOL user

lol bich!

>has access to any music

picks clair du lune like its a fucking hallmark tv movie.

well done dude.

same

This
Btw Who is witching the tv? Why is the tv there? Who will watch it there? Why is it on with static channel?

I'm one of the actresses in this short about an incel. What do you guys think?

a.uguu.se/1IPy43MMYDbv.mp4

Why is on if no one is watching it?

>Why is it on with static channel?

show chaos, blank mind, emptiness, bleak, not ON, depression etcetc

could of used a clip from a movie that helped with the theme. maybe added some static in post. idunno.

again this guy spent / in debt LOTS of money to get to this point.

zero originality
zero creativity

honestly film school is a joke.

Attached: 1322161523977.png (202x206, 46K)

No need. Life will do that for you.

either using it as light or just finished watching a vhs tape
will u be my gf
>Training on the full-time department of the post-graduate course costs on average 240-260 thousand rubles * ($ 4,000-4,370) per year. The minimum cost is 136 500 rubles ($ 2,275) per year. The maximum – 405 000 rubles ($ 6,750) per year.
you aren't very bright

>he was proud of this
>he posted this
>he thought he would get fake internet points
>he will always be a wagie at a theater

Pick up my left over popcorn, wagie

yah india to make fucking bollywood.

go eat a kabob

Hey how about you actually MAKE a movie with an INTERESTING and COMPELLING story and SCREENPLAY? For fucks sake what am I supposed to look at here? I am genuinely not interested, there’s nothing that hooked my attention. Decent cinematography? Yeah I’ll give you that but then again you have NOTHING to show. You could as well show yourself sitting in a chair for 10 minutes straight. I don’t really understand what young filmmakers expect to achieve without writing compelling stories. An average filmgoer doesn’t really care about the technical nuances of filmmaking

Attached: AEADD0A8-39DE-44B5-AA12-30CFD3D1AA67.jpg (480x360, 16K)

literally me: the character

I like it, good job.

I thought the beginning was charming and humorous but towards the end his actions become totality unbelievable, someone could be that autistic but that was something straight out of American Pie. The ending tone is sort of brutal and angry and made in that classic modern sense — I’d compare the tone to something like Backcountry in spirit, coming down very hard on this sort of gullible clueless — dare I say blameless man, in a sort of vulgar and ‘Darwinistic’ fashion

I'm not going to watch your fag shit nor will I read a thesis or anything else a student shits out UNLESS, it is white supremacist themed. If you make nazi kino or anti negro shit I'll absolutely watch it but I know your mind is slave to the jew and you would never make a movie exposing the blacks for what they are

Based

You tell 'em user

Attached: 333.gif (500x209, 1.73M)

Attached: 1552364357194.jpg (437x431, 21K)

>either using it as light
Why not just remove that shit?
>or just finished watching a vhs tape
Where is the VHS player?

Attached: 1557163905426.png (1364x648, 1.68M)

I love animatons like this