>has an invisibility cloak
>doesn't sneak into the girls bathroom
>doesn't sneak into the girls dorms at night to molest them
>doesn't use it to steal Hermionies dirty panties
Was he autistic?
Has an invisibility cloak
Grayson Evans
Andrew Nelson
>written by a woman
woah...
Logan Roberts
Are you?
Benjamin Kelly
Deh!
Gabriel Sanders
BASED AND REDPILLED
James Ramirez
Good post
Ethan Rogers
I was just saying earlier to someone how weird it is there's not a single rape spell in Harry Potter universe. Like why is it not one of the forbidden curses that instantly gets you life sentence in Azkaban. How has not a single horny incel wizard in history never concocted a rape spell in his head and created it.
Gabriel Thomas
it was a different time
Leo Wright
rape's magic enough on its own sweetie
Nolan Campbell
>doesn't use it to bem
Isaac Nelson
IT WAS ALL A DREAM
Matthew Evans
well yeah, there is the love-potion
Oliver Morris
>children's book
>rape
Ayden Nguyen
>has an invisibility cloak
>doesn't sneak out of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises
Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Kevin Rogers
>mfw Hogwarts strickly forbids the use of black magic
Easton Martin
>children's book
>murder
>slavery
>genocide
>torture
>racism
Hmmmmm...
Jonathan Bennett
voldemort is literally a product of magical rape, iirc Rowling says that's why he's so fucked up
Camden Parker
Imperius Curse
David Gomez
the forbidden curses are basically rape spell
>one lets you controll a person (obvious)
>one tortures a victim with pain which basically immobilises them
>one produces a fresh corpse
Levi Sanchez
Isn't that kind of messed up to claim a baby who was spawned through rape is responsible for the acts of his mother or father rapist?
Jonathan Gutierrez
I think it's more that being the product of a completely loveless marriage and having the stigma of being a magical halfbreed led Voldy down the path of pureblood wank and genocide, but I see what you mean. Rowling is all about hamfistedly shoving the idea that loving family = moral superiority.
Chase Jackson
>okay class, are you ready for defense against the dark ones?
>excuse me did you mean dark arts?
>no
Henry Peterson
>girls
>girls
>panties
uh, son, give me a minute to figure out how to break this to you...
Samuel Rodriguez
wait so all the girls in the hp universe are trans?