Https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/apocalypse-now-final-cut-movie-review-real-drama/

>Coppola’s final cut of his Vietnam War epic reminds adults of what real drama looks like.
>Apocalypse Now: Final Cut, Francis Ford Coppola’s latest rendition of his 1979 Vietnam War epic, premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival right on time to correct the media hysteria surrounding Avengers: Endgame.

>The big-screen experience of Apocalypse Now is intellectually and aesthetically incomparable to what today’s streaming technology and television considers “content.” It’s more substantial than the Marvel Comics Universe, which avoids the serious issues that occupy moviegoer consciousness.

>MCU placates contemporary political sensibilities. Every characterization panders to political cant about equality and diversity while the overall narrative actually simplifies ideological and philosophical differences, hastening conflict, division, and self-righteousness in the guise of comic-book struggle.

Our King at it again. Capeshit BTFO for a second time in a week by our man.

Attached: 1406432319399s.jpg (250x234, 9K)

No one cares what a literal nigger faggot thinks.

>want to read Apocalypse Now review
>instead half the review is reminding us capeshit exists
I like this trend no more than he does but can we go for one minute without someone reminding us how awful capeshit is?

Is this longer than the Redux version for instance?

I love him.

yeah, but someone has to make a stand somewhere.
The retards on this very board should show you that the amount of intellectually deficient morons, who unironically see value in capeshit, is out of control.

>review is mostly contrarian virtue signalling which actually tells us nothing useful about the movie in question
Fuck the grievance industry and its posturing

he's articulating the (un)popular rage

Attached: faye.jpg (1023x696, 171K)

Apocalypse Now Redux > Theatrical Cut

How can you not approve of this guy?

based and redpilled

>t. SEETHING false flag discord tranny

has it been said what the difference is between the cuts other than a full 4k restoration?

This article is the only thing I know about it.
Hopefully he has added more than taken away, as the redux is objectively better than the theatrical release.

Smartest thing I've ever read from him.

wait, there is a new Apocalypse now cut?

there will be soon

Wow, he actually liked a popular movie! Incredible

>Apocalypse Now
>popular among today's audience of zoomers and mouthbreathing retards

>Hollywood’s infantilization is tied to Millennials’ unquestioned belief in market manipulation over patriotism — their naïve faith that commercialism is its own reward.

ETERNALLY BASED TO THE HIGH HEAVENS

>When the Tribeca Film Festival screening ended, a young female usher with a sweet smile asked me, “Did you just see that Apocalypse movie? Do you know when it’s going to open? Because I like zombie films!”

What the fuck

fucking zoomers

>a film made for art purposes is superior than a film made purely for commercial reasons

color me shocked

Made for art's sake, don't make me laugh. It's just as much of a pandering mess as any capeshit. That movie was always garbage and so are the simpletons that rave about it.

Redux without half of the French scene and without the playboy scene>Theatrical>Redux

Attached: 182c229133b2abf8ceca7bf4637b2712[1].jpg (1008x740, 83K)

WAR BAD!
>damn this is fucking art dude!

>nigger faggot
I was wondering why this literal who cut the playboy bunnies scene. Makes sense now

yeah because when i think of movies about vietnam i think of how comparable it is to capeshit, fuck this clickbait-tier article

>cabegino good
>abogalybse now bad

Attached: 1553030400927.png (1300x1300, 231K)

war is bad is a totally secondary and arguably tertiary theme. The two main themes is the decent into madness and thin veneer of civilization

haha yeah right on my zoomer bro, war is actually epic and cool just like my videogames am i rite haha

I don't know if it really paints war as bad. The three most iconic characters in the film, Kurtz, Willard, Kilgore, are all realized entirely through their roles as soldiers, and immortalized by it. If anything, that's a pro-war theme.

it just uses the war to explore other themes, some themes that are joined to the theme of war but it explores themes separate from war is bad too, the entire climax and final 1/4 has nothing to do with the actual Vietnam war really.

Platoon is WAR IS BAD, apocalypse now is war is bad and multiple other theme too, that are explored more in-depth than "war is bad", which is more accurately described as a bi-product of the films setting.

I don't think it tries to paint war one way or the other, it simply shows the constant chaos the state of war is.

>I've seen horrors, horrors that you've seen. But you have no right to call me a murderer. You have a right to kill me. You have a right to do that, but you have no right to judge me. It's impossible for words to describe what is necessary to those who do not know what horror means. Horror! Horror has a face, and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and moral terror are your friends. If they are not, then they are enemies to be feared. They are truly enemies.

>We train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won't allow them to write "fuck" on their airplanes because it's obscene!

and for the longer one

>I remember when I was with Special Forces. Seems a thousand centuries ago. We went into a camp to inoculate the children. We left the camp after we had inoculated the children for polio, and this old man came running after us and he was crying. He couldn't see. We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile: a pile of little arms. And I remember I...I...I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn't know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized, like I was shot — like I was shot with a diamond...a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God, the genius of that. The genius! The will to do that: perfect, genuine, complete, crystalline, pure. And then I realized they were stronger than we, because they could stand it. These were not monsters. These were men, trained cadres — these men who fought with their hearts, who had families, who have children, who are filled with love — but they had the strength — the strength! — to do that. If I had ten divisions of those men our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have men who are moral and at the same time who are able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling, without passion, without judgement. Without judgement! Because it's judgement that defeats us.

Which character journey signifies that war is bad? We are acquainted with the characters entirely as soldiers. Unlike a movie like Platoon, or American Sniper, they aren't dehumanized by their actions. Quite the contrary, as I said, the movie only shows them as fleshed-out characters in their roles as soldiers, while any civilian in the movie is a useless dud. If Coppola wanted to make an anti-war movie, he'd show the Vietnamese having their country destroyed by imperialist invaders, and the innocent civilians caught in the middle.
The only scene that you could argue is sort of anti war is the opening shot of the forest burning, but then Coppola himself exploits that to create on the most iconic film openings of all time, which isn't exactly a put-down.

I am not arguing that the films main theme or focus on War Is Bad, I am saying its almost a bi-product of just making a war film, there are only a small fraction of films set in war that are pro war.

Rather than bad, you could call it a War is Insanity film, because it's main theme is madness and the breakdown of society and human morals.

That monologue is heavily inspired by the book, where it deals with themes of will to power and the way doing what it takes tears down the human soul. Sure, that was a powerful indictment of imperialism, but it's just as much an indictment of native savages.
Like you said, chaos, good point.

>final cut comes out in 4k this august
My fucking dick

>>MCU placates contemporary political sensibilities. Every characterization panders to political cant about equality and diversity while the overall narrative actually simplifies ideological and philosophical differences, hastening conflict, division, and self-righteousness in the guise of comic-book struggle.
hallelujah

I don't think most war movies are anti-war, quite the opposite. They tend to trivialize it for entertainment, and turn the participants into icons of masculinity, which is a pro-war if anything.
True anti-war movies would be something like Beasts of No Nation or Grave of the Fireflies, which focus entirely on the dehumanization and innocent victims, offering no redemption to anyone but in death.