Infinity War has an entire sequence devoted to explaining the creation of the Gauntlet and why it had to be forged

Tony was able to make Time Travel possible, he could basically do anything at this point.

You cant nanomachine the IG since it was made by an omnipotent in the comics

Honestly have sex and you'll stop giving a single fuck about a kids movie

To be fair the second time was to destroy the stones themselves, of he snapped again he’d be fine

Yes because I can replicate a 5 star meal meticulously crafted by someone who exclusively has the resources and talent to make such a dish.

This. Thanos was able to safely hold all the stones at the same time. Hulk and Tony suffered just from holding them and the snap killed Tony. Who knows, if Tony had a properly built gauntlet designed to properly channel the power of the stones he might have survived dusting Thanos.

>Yes because I can replicate a 5 star meal meticulously crafted by someone who exclusively has the resources and talent to make such a dish.

Yea, how could Tony Stark re-create something Tony Stark made using nearly identical looking material? Such bullshit.

>exclusively

This makes sense, as we see the girl explode in Guardians of the Galaxy just by touching the Power Stone. Holding all five stones at once would require the gauntlet so as not to burn/kill you.

>Avengers 1 - Only known "Gauntlet" to exist is in Asgard (Later revealed as a fake by Hela)
>Avengers 2 - Thanos already has a Gauntlet which he removes from some vault-like chamber promising to move on the stones himself
>Avengers 3 - He waits until the Bifrost bridge is destroyed to commence assault on Nidavellir and forces Eitri to make him the gauntlet

The continuity was fucked by AoU. He is shown to have the gauntlet already, however the Events of Thor: Ragnarok have not taken place at this point.. He would not have had the Gauntlet because the bifrost bridge is not yet destroyed so we know Nidavellir likely never saw Thanos. We know Thanos makes his move on Nidavellir after Ragnorok because the bridge was destroyed so that the Asgardians couldn't protect Nidavellir.

The writers for Infinity War and Endgame said the AoU end credits scene with Thanos saying "I'll do it myself" is not canon

The gauntlet in Asgard always bothered me. Yea we know Marvel Execs didn't fully plan the MCU when Thor 1 was made, but it makes you wonder. Whoever created the fake had clearly already developed the blueprint to forging the gauntlet. Somebody knew the gauntlet was capable of hoisting the stones. I never understood why they didn't just play off that existing infinity gauntlet.

it's fan art

Proof of this? I feel like that wouldn't be true simply because it is still attached to the blueray/dvd release. Incredible Hulk had scenes removed from its release to retcon certain things to keep everything else canon. Why wouldn't they do that with Avengers?

"Hey Thor how did they make that gauntlet"

"Well they used this metal from the heart of a dying star"

"Okay so i can *insert technobable here* to reconfigure the neutron density and initiate fusion to smelt an ingot. I can use that to make new nanobots for a new gauntlet"

If you can come up with a plausible explanation in two seconds like I just did, it's not a plot hole.

Nanomachines, son.

If anything, I would imagine that they were trying to recreate the gauntlet in case just slapping the stones to a random glove giving adverse effects, such as, you know, killing its user.

he could have it made before and put it into the vault though. there's nothing saying that he had the gauntlet made a few days before IW. fucking brainlet.

>Everybody it hung up over some rocks and a stupid glove
>Nobody is taking into consideration that Thanos LITERALLY ressurected Vision to retrieve a stone yet somehow we can't get back Black Widow or Tony Stark
>Also after the final victory Snap, the stones were still intact. They could have used Starks Nanotech to make another fucking gauntlet apperently and they could have just snapped as many fucking wishes as they wanted. At least thats what I'm lead to believe

They should have visited Etri to have him help make Tony's gauntlet. They could have just flown there in the Benetar.

Looking at that image makes me a little sad because we'll never have an Iron-Man 4 or more relaxed Avengers adventure where we just get to see him use the nano-suits to do all sorts of interesting shit. He basically only hit that tech-level as he was bowing out.

>Stark makes glove for infinity stones
>used it and dies
Hmmmmmmmm

Bruce says he tried to bring her back with his snap but it didn't happen. The soul stone transaction is permanent. If you could just undo it, then the sacrifice would be meaningless. Gamorrah was an alternate version, not the same one we've seen in the MCU so far. They could go steal another Black Widow but what would that accomplish? She wouldn't have the same memories or experiences. It would also rob another universe of their Widow. They might need her for something. It makes perfectly logical sense that she's gone forever. And you can't just make as many snaps as you wanted. It has a detrimental affect on the user. It almost killed Thanos when he did two snaps.

Captain Falcon will just be a flying man with a super shield and no Super soldier Serum

Attached: Vicky Valencourt.jpg (1400x700, 594K)

Vision is a robutt

This bothers me more than anything. The dude was never a scientist. He was an Engineer. The franchise just made him evolve into a scientist because they needed a bonding characteristic between Banner and Stark. Then somehow techno-tony does some Iron Man 2 holographic schematical bullshit that nobody understands and has a eureka moment again.

Glad im not the only one who thinks this. Its the little things that bother me most about this franchise as much as I love it.

Captain America is ridiculously smart, consistent with the comics. I see no problem

Tony stark*

I would imagine Starks glove killed the user because it was Stark. It was established that a mere mortal could not bare the stones alone. And contrary to what many are saying, even Thanot succumb to injury after the first snap in IW. You could see his injured arm and the limp.

>It almost killed Thanos when he did two snaps.
but wasnt that because of what he did with the 2nd snap?

user, the point of his character is that he's an uber-genius. He can easily be a scientist and engineer at the same time.

>And you can't just make as many snaps as you wanted. It has a detrimental affect on the user. It almost killed Thanos when he did two snaps.

see
This. A being like Thanos can snap and heal as many times as he likes over time. It depends on the user. Titans are clearly more fitted than humans.

the first snap fucked up his left side, you see it in IW. the second almost crippled him.
did you just tell me to see a reply to my own post? he obviously can't snap indefinitely. there's nothing in the movie to suggest that and everything to counter it.

Iron Cock isn't dead, he lives on in Spidercuck. He will become all of an the new technology is going to have to be with him when he becomes the gauntlet in the avengers part 5.

Attached: Tropic-Thunder-Cast.jpg (1500x844, 166K)

Attached: 1450072335261.gif (260x320, 1.08M)

The only way the gauntlet would work is if it was crafted by the drawf fucker and his magic and shit. Not some smart dude on Earth.

>6'0'' god like Robert Downey is smarter than 5'11 manlet Dwarves
How is this a plot hole?

Attached: gwyneth-paltrow-gorgeous-gams-18.jpg (765x1222, 209K)

>We know Thanos makes his move on Nidavellir after Ragnorok because the bridge was destroyed so that the Asgardians couldn't protect Nidavellir.
No we don't. IW is kinda unclear about this part. Nova Corp & Xandar were destroyed a week before Ragnarok but they never said when did Thanos attack Nidavellir.
Odin & Heimdall were banished by Loki after Thor Dark World. Thanos could attack the dwarfs at any time post this event.

So Tony can perfect Time Travel, but not plagiarize a glove?

Tony is nearly Reed Richards levels of smart in the MCU, it's no wonder they had to kill him off.

>the entire movie shouldn't have happened because of my headcanon from the previous movie

this is you.

Soon

Attached: Galactus.jpg (279x448, 42K)

Thanos learnt about infinity gauntlet from Mind stone. His first infinity stone.
You can tell the concept was a long. From Bor's time maybe but Asgardians ultimately didn't make a real one.

When they set up rules in a universe I expect them to adhered to.

Tony is just "MUH NANO" wait till Reed Richard formerly Seed.
That man can asspull anything.

Did endgame have a post credits scene? I didn't stick around to see if it did.

Did the movie confirm that? Ronan and Loki were able to use the power and mind stones by putting them in a hammer and a scepter. I think the implication is that the stones can be used only when it is in another container to use it. Like how nobody can use the power stone barehanded without disintegrating.

nope

Add the fact that he's black and now the left has a new hero. Oh no...

Thanos used the power stone without the gauntlet. Remember against Cap Marvel? he took it FROM the gauntlet, closed his fist around it and punched the hell out of the bitch.
The stones can be used without a "container" to call it something.

Perhaps to wield one at a time in its own contained form. But I thought it in order to wield and control the power of all stones they had to be in the gauntlet (which exists solely for that purpose). What would be the point of making these macguffins if you can just replicate them at will? It’s lazy writing and I’m sure wasn’t the intention when they were introduced to the story. They make a big deal about the fake gauntlet and shit. If you could just make something that serves the same function then it’s not special. The fake gauntlet is either a well placed red herring or it implies that they couldn’t just make another one likecthe real one. Which obviously is bullshit considering the magic dwarf and Asgardians could easily create another one if fucking Tony could.