ITT: Flawless movies

Attached: 742DB032-CA23-4648-8A7D-C88DA409440F.jpg (960x1440, 290K)

I agree, the first half is good

You probably just didnt get the message then.

Every white dude in film school thinks this is the greatest film ever. It's so annoying. It has all the dudebro tropes (nihilist male protagonist, lots of violence, has a "deeper meaning") so it's worshipped by these ingrates. This movie is the worst thing to happen to film culture.

The only way you can understand this film is if your race built the wheel and established functioning societies, and I'm not even memeing. It's the only way you can get in the right headspace for what they're all going through.

The book's ending after the credits would have made the movie perfect. I get why they changed the book plot of him blowing up a national monument into banks, and several bombs instead of one, and it working instead of not, but the twist on a twist of waking up in a mental hospital, and the nurses being in Project Mayhem would have tripled down on the mind fucking the movie does.

Django unchained
Silence of the lambs
A clockwork orange

Go back to stormfront.

Django goes to shit the minute Waltz dies.

Silence of the Lambs is overrated. If it weren't for Anthony Hopkin's performance the movie would flounder and be a boring mess.

Clockwork Orange is grimy and gross. Good film but large parts of it are arthouse movie dull.

It's the truth and the movie basically spells it out for you. Whites more than any other race have more great people to look up to, more heroes, more people that accomplished great things in the past and made something of themselves through massive national or global events. Their entire thing is that there's no purpose anymore, everything has already been done and there isn't another test left. All the fame and the glory and the struggles with a real cause are done with. Blacks cannot understand what that is like because they never had the noble and successful people of their race to look up to. Experiencing a lack of purpose is no big deal to them because they can't compare their lives to anything else greater.

that sounds like something a redditor would say.

you brought up race first, faggot

Does he need to repeat himself, friend?

Oh, great, the Netflix Film Expert is here.

Why would explaining the theme of a movie and the motivations of the characters make telling me to go to that site relevant?

>mental hospital
Wait, that's how the book ends? Holy shit. Is the book worth reading?

>a clockwork orange
Awful thematically muddled train wreck that ends with a series of coincidences that would make a soap opera writer blush. The cinematography feels like an old man just doing clever shots because he was bored. The gang fight scene especially. Ending is retarded. The only good part of the movie is the editing which was impressive for its time.

>all these salty children not understanding the cultural significance of Fight Club

i'm not even white but eventhough he most likely baiting he provided an argument and solid point unlike you who brough races in the first place at movie that its theme is social critique to stuff related

I like your taste. Have a (You)

The fact that it's still just a relevant as ever

>Blacks cannot understand what that is like because they never had the noble and successful people of their race to look up to
Is this serious or are you trolling?

>silence of the lambs is a bad movie. I mean, it is great but if you remove the great stuff it’s a bad movie

Are you retarded?

I enjoyed the book. I'm hit or miss with Palaniuk's books, some were good, a lot are shit, but Fight Club, sure.

Unironically 14 year old me thought Fight Club was deep. The first few times I watched the movie I didn't even realise it was satire. That's not to say the film doesn't have a vitally profound message about the almost prophetic loss of masculinity in western culture. But the film's key flaw that stops it from becoming something greater than a nihilistic satire is its lack of faith. Rather than see the growing clown world of our culture as something to be met with equal tribalism, vandalism, terrorism, cult-like behaviour, etc; the film could have chosen to understand that love for others and for ourselves is a means of weathering these hard times.

Absolutely based.
Absolutely redpilled.
Very concise and sold analysis user. Your explanation patched some holes in my own theories about the film.

Attached: F5B2D0C9-B972-4E7C-991F-D4BFA5C00734.png (576x1024, 821K)

I'm not that user, but it's palahniuk, so no, it's not worth reading unless you're stuck waiting at the airport or some such. Even then, there's probably better options.

The point was far from solid

I'll do some recent ones
> Prospect
> They Look Like People
> Mulholland Drive (not so recent)
Fight me kinofags

>hmm do i have an opinion on this movie
>nope, still cinematically illiterate
>i know, i'll just conjure up a stereotypical figure that the movie "is for" and base my opinion of the movie on whether or not i'd like to be friends with that imaginary person
>that way my mouth will have noises to make without my brain having to actually process the movie!
>in conclusion this movie sucks because i wouldn't want to be friends with it on facebook

You started the race argument here tho, so you should probably go first.

Are there any movies that are like the latter you mentioned?

Okay, Stormfag. Considering the guy who wrote the book the movie based on is gay, and is diametrically against every insipid idea you just spewed, I'll just laugh and call you a faggot nazi.

The one thing Fight Club ISN'T about, is race. But because you're a faggot nazi, everything is "muh race". Because you're a room temperature waterhead.

Marmaduke

Birdman

>considering the guy who wro-

Death of the author, user, but have some cliffnotes anyway: Works of fiction are experienced primarily in the viewer's (in this case) context, and his analysis may very well be right, or wrong for that matter, independently of how many dicks palahniuk sat on and his sociopolitical views.

Up to you if you want to understand this or bark at the nazi boogeymen.

I never thought you were suppose to root for the characters in this movie and see them as correct. What I'm saying is what they are thinking and the things that drives them, doesn't matter if it's flawed. Other user mentioned he was confused as to why whites loved this movie, I let him know why. Never once said anything I wrote are my own personal opinions on life so it's no big deal, relax.

it's 2019. if you don't have a post-ironic appreciation for Fight Club then you're a redditor who's behind times and pic related probably applies to you tb h

Attached: 1555737356955.jpg (500x521, 68K)

>flawless
>20+ plotholes
no

You have to understand Palaniuk. Go watch his Rogan episode. he isn't writing for any of the aesthetics you think it should have. The only thing you're right about is the issue of the de-masculination of culture, which even he saw, as a gay man. The rest is out of his "dangerous writing" mindspace, and the main character being insane. It's not supposed to be uplifting, or inspire faith, or anything like that, it's supposed to be dark, brooding, and depressing. Again, the main character is INSANE. That's the point of the story, his descent into madness. It's not satire, either.

It's always amusing how people read themselves into the movie, and completely miss the point and intent of it, even when Palaniuk has point blank said it's about the Narrator being crazy.

I watched this at a very strange time in my life.

LOL. Fuck off, /litfag. Go jerk off over your bookshelf of philosophy books you've never read, and never will, but post pictures of.

Lord of the Rings
>Core message of love and friendship / fellowship in the face of evil / hard times.

Star Wars Original Trilogy
>Luke is able to save Darth Vader and defeat the Emperor not through strength but through choosing to die rather than continue to fight his father, who he loves despite his evil history.

Rocky
>Film was about going the distance, not beating Apollo Creed. If he hadn't forgiven Mick, forgiven Pauly, saw Adrian as a diamond in the rough, then he would never have been able to do that.

Home Alone
>Kevin fights with his family, which doesn't solve his problems with them. At the end of the film he accepts he was wrong and grows up. He helps an old man reconnect with his who he lost contact with through feuding with. Through saying he was sorry he gets his son and grandchild back. Kevin gets his mother and family back. It's not about beating the criminals who break into his home.

Passion of the Christ
>Christ refuses to deny that he is Christ, and is tortured mercilessly and murdered for it, when his core message is that he is the son of god, to love god, and to love others as yourself. He's willing to die for these ideals for love of humanity.

Don't mind me, just being objectively correct.

Attached: 81Bvpn2irrL._RI_.jpg (1200x1600, 455K)

So the great stuff is 8 mins of the entire movie? It's not great then.

Death of the author. I'm a Christian so take that for what you will, I'm biased.

Is there any kubrick you like?

>not a christmas movie
>its a thanksgiving movie

Name 5

Neckbeard, is what you are.

Barking it is then. Well I wish you good luck in getting out of your hangups user, really. We need less drones around. When you get over your insecurities, your projections won't be just a way to engender petty identity conflict. Don't take this as trolling, if you can.

>considers fight club as 'culturally significant'
>calls others kids
I'll have 40 keks for today

"Drone", lol. /litfag, confirmed.

Watch Django instead of Django unchained.

I think it's weird that none of his followers let his secret slip, I get that they didn't even know what was going on, and where under instructions.
But that nobody said anything that tipped him off is weird.
Maybe in his madness he would have blocked out such comments? But the competency of their secret keeping astounded me
Someone ought to be confused enough to start asking questions they shouldn't.

the unnecessary reference to palahniuk's politics nonwithstanding, he is correct that the nazi user's racial reading is unsupported by the text. all that shit about comparing yourself to the heroes of the race is nowhere in the movie, and project mayhem is explicitly multiracial. meanwhile the movie is dripping with class imagery like durden pissing in rich people's food etc.

Eh whatever, I tried. Clutch attempt: Know that slavery like the one you're teaching yourself only exists in a tiny world that necessarily exists in your head. Self love before analysis, user, then you won't need anger nor subservience.

Was Yea Forums raided by reddit?

A Man Escaped
Vertigo
Apocalypse Now

>he is correct that the nazi user's racial reading is unsupported by the text

I know user. I agree with that, it's why I mention the viewer's, or reader's context. The emotional necessities stem from there, both the of the "nazi" user's and the butthurt user's. Obviously, mine too, but I remember being more interested in the protagonist(s) struggle with his identity and his self hatred. Beyond that, I felt he was mostly just taking it out on easy targets.

Racial stuff isn't in the book but it's in real life and the answer to why that one user was so confused as to why it was a white people thing.

Paths of Glory is his best. Eyes Wide Shut is good. The Shining and 2001 have a lot of good qualities but I just feel disconnected from the characters and the characters' motivations don't feel clear.

Now I'm interested in your tastes too, user. Favourite movies off the top of your head?

Well put. I never understood the extreme fascination with clockwork orange, but I also never worded its faults this good.

The Bridge on River Kwai

It literally won every important oscar (Picture, Acting, Directing, Writing, Editing, Cinematography, Music).

>feel disconnected from the characters
What are you on about
2001 is an anthology who's characters are almost inconsequential to the picture hes trying to pain, and The shining is a character study that does an excellent job of portraying everyone involved.

this movie. only thing that flaws it is his fag run

Attached: Law.jpg (693x1000, 155K)

Kino

Attached: 5-things-you-might-not-know-about-roman-polanski-chinatown.jpg (1600x1204, 294K)

Bump

2001's meaning is that no matter what meaning we prescribe to the universe we can never for sure say we know anything absolutely. You get that in the first 20 minutes when they discover the monolith on the moon and last 20 minutes. The movie in the middle isn't interesting. HAL's shift sucks. Jack's shift was never convincing to me either.

Never really thought about it before. Idk. The Conversation, Rear Window, Perfect Blue, Floating Weeds, Alien, The Terminator, The Thing, Angel's Egg

this poster was born in 2002.

it's not nihilistic

Palahniuk didn't make the movie though you fucking retard. I'm not a fan of fight club, but if you take it for anything else than satire you're a fucking bluepilled zoomer who needs to anhero

this is the youngest person ITT

>mp eva is a good guy
What did that kid mean by this?

the entire point of the movie is that "nihilistic masculinity" is toxic and terroristic and bad. It's used to manipulate rootless men towards self-destruction.

Not that this isn't bait. Tits or gtfo .

>ending of 2001
>objectively the worst part of the film by far
You're taste is extremely normie tier

Attached: 25984-l[1].jpg (483x600, 56K)

It is, but that doesn't disprove the point.

lol your "race" built the wheel. Your race didn't exist when the wheel was built. And unless you're fucking greek you have little chance of being related to the people that did.

Nothing is more embarrassing that a """white person""" that has done so little in their life that the only thing they have to feel "proud" about are the lottery conditions of their birth. You've done NOTHING for white people but embarrass them and you really think you're in the club nigger?

post pics of your tits

>2001's meaning is that no matter what meaning we prescribe to the universe we can never for sure say we know anything absolutely.
nope it's about Hal being monitored by space aliens for his entire life in what they thought was a natural habitat for him.

meant Dave not Hal

Excuse me, coming through.

Attached: 51zUFRZ7JAL.jpg (337x500, 50K)

Oh really? You're right! You've changed my mind! Thank youuuuu!

np

That you "tried" says all that needs to be said. You're a serious /litfag.

Cry more, faggot. The movie is a pretty faithful rendition of the book, you low effort spastic.

Amadeus

Attached: amadeus.jpg (960x450, 54K)

it seriously is perfect
youtu.be/-SeVpY8Pxx4

Rocky 3 is a flawless movie and I'll fight anyone who says otherwise.

Agree

>tropes
>a meaningful pattern exists therefore its bad
>truth is cliche
kys

A Masterpiece.

Attached: 91zBlQ1iqoL._RI_.jpg (1920x2560, 923K)

>want to post this horror Kino but the stupid ending ruins my chances

Attached: Untitled.png (1523x1460, 3.24M)

There's a part at the end where a frame of a penis appears and you can see it came from another movie. It was a mistake nobody caught.

Attached: JL.jpg (678x1000, 71K)

Attached: p13259415_v_v8_ae.jpg (960x1440, 341K)

Attached: hered.jpg (675x1000, 86K)

Attached: merm.jpg (675x1000, 123K)

Attached: shaw.jpg (674x1000, 984K)

>capeshit
does not qualify

Attached: starship.jpg (671x1000, 114K)

Oculus is horror kino. The ending makes me turgid.

Attached: cind.jpg (674x1000, 96K)

Attached: fant.jpg (634x1000, 120K)

Wait I lied posting this one. Flaw is that the director tried to smear the book because he didn't understand it, so the final product is awesome but weirdly disjointed. youtube.com/watch?v=kVpYvV0O7uI

Days of Heaven
Mulholland Dr
Being There
Chinatown
Dazed and Confused (fite me)
Stand By Me

Kubrick is my favorite director and none of his films are 100% flawless. 2001 has that awful 3M scotchtape in some of the Dawn of Man shots. Redmond is also neither chopping, halving or splitting the logs in the establishing shot of Barry Lyndon. I know those 2 will be used against my claim.