What is Jerusalem worth?

What is Jerusalem worth?

Attached: saladin.jpg (637x480, 35K)

Nothing

STANDING HERE I REALIZE YOU WERE JUST LIKE ME TRYING TO MAKE HISTORY

And everything.

whatever happened to orlando bloom?

About tree fiddy

He was always a dogshit actor who lucked out into being in a few great epics

>CHRISTIANS BAD
>MUSLIMS GOOD

classic dogma

a nice thorough bombing

About tree fiddy.

Christians were bad then. They are bad now too. But they were bad then, too.

This but unironically
>Muslims put their women in their place, Christians let their women vote and whore around and destroy society
>Muslims kill fags, Christians tolerate them

I actually watched this today (director cut),was a good movie but felt like something was missing,they lost too much time on that stupid blacksmith arc while i would ve enjoyed more information and sets on Jerusalém

sneed

Saladin spent half of his life battling against his relatives and other muslims

Precisely one nuke.

>Wipes out Jerusalem, kills tens of thousands of christians
>Sees crucifix on floor, puts it back on table.

>Obviously a lover of christianity.

That movie was a big stinking piece of propaganda shit.

let's just remember for a moment that the whites were thousands of kilometers from home in this fight

GODS I WAS STRONG BACK THEN

Reminder that the kikes opened the gates of Jerusalem when he came back.

the muslims were just as bad then too, arguably badder with their whole "conquer every neighboring region" thing

>kills tens of thousands of enemy troops, that happened to be christian
you mean

>this is your mind on /pol/eddit

A Syrian girl fell in love with me once. Shit was cash, but a bit hard to deal with. She had an adulterous husband and wanted to get rid of him. She was looking for someone to hold on to, she was pretty fucking crazy. She didn't care that I wasn't a muslim though, seeing as her husband may have been one, but he was an adulterous piece of crap.

BULLSEYE!

Attached: DEAD ON.jpg (1247x904, 205K)

>what is respect

Attached: 1366099528406.jpg (406x395, 20K)

>According to later interviews, the screenwriter was preparing the second draft of the script for "Kingdom of Heaven" when he accidentally hit "paste" instead of "delete," which inserted "Everything" immediately after the intended "Nothing." He and his studio assistants then failed to detect the mistake even after several copyedits. Errors like this are almost always caught and removed by the time the shooting script is prepared, but one or two inconsistiencies inevitably sneak in, only to be discovered during production. Of course the director and actors immediately realized the mistake during shooting, but the line had to be filmed merely to comport with the Writers' Guild rules included in the screenwriter's contract, which is why its delivery is so bizarre and overstated. No one on set expected the line to actually make it into the final cut. But then, in post production, the editor had no choice but to use the footage to maintain lighting consistiencies and direction of motion between shots. Everyone involved was upset with the resulting nonsensical line, but acknowledged it had to stay in for technical reasons. Viewers and critics were of course far less understanding, and this dialogue has gone down in cinematic history as one of the worst nonsequiters ever uttered on screen.

>>kills tens of thousands of enemy troops, that happened to be christian
>you mean

Easter worshippers, my bad.

What is this post worth?

>Precisely one nuke.
Funny how so many movie plots can be solved by a single tactical nuclear weapon, or a planet killer.

Nothing
Everything

Muslims aren't worse than cuckstains. Salafists are dogs tho

Imagine believing this.

came here for this

I don't know let me call an expert.

>t. roastie that didn't understand the movie

Is the board getting more reddit because GoT is coming up or are all you just acting particularly faggy recently?

>Christian faction brutally kills and disregards laws and customs to ensure they kill as many Muslims as they can while being show as hyper aggressive and borderline nonsensical

>the Muslims are a mostly peaceful, lawful and honorable group lead by intelligent and graceful men who do almost nothing wrong and even "respect" Christianity at the end

yeh, really historically accurate and fair portrayal of these two major groups.

this but unironically
Christians were always bad guys

>7 posts in and /pol/ is already seething
based

>Christianity spreads throughout the Roman Empire and beyond through word of mouth and grows exponentially despite constant persecution
>Christians practice non-violence and walk to their executions with smiles on their faces
>Muhammad rob, rapes and kills all his political enemies and dole out slaves to his followers like some brigand and dies after being poisoned like some crappy politician
>His successors launch unprovoked invasions on all their neighbors (and conquer the lands where Christianity was born and which had been Christian for centuries) and kill all pagans and reduce jews and christians to second class citizens
>Muslims beaten back once at the gates of Constantinople and threaten it once again and begin to persecute Christian pilgrims on their way to Jerusalem
>Christians bad
Christianity could only been seen as becoming somewhat violent once it became a part of a political system that made it into a rallying cry. And even then it was limited to times of war or when people wanted a scapegoat, IE the christ-killing jews. Islam was always as much a political ideology as it is a religion.

Amerishart fingers wrote these posts

Don't you have some nine-year olds to fondle, Muhammad?

Dont you have a school to shoot, Hernandez

It is worth the cost of manufacturing a nuclear bomb and the fuel required to transport and release above it.

Attached: Patriarch Vader.png (500x500, 220K)

>get hyped to see this movie
>It's trash and apologist for Muslims
>watch the directors cut!
>watch it
>It's a far better story but it's still loaded with a lot of apologetics for muslims
I want this movie to be good. Why'd they have to bullshit their modern sentiments and try to uphold lies about the crusaders and Muslims?

Attached: DtjLmh2VAAA0PM1.jpg (1280x702, 257K)

Reddit please leave quietly.

Attached: 1550198809711.jpg (443x455, 96K)

If anyone should leave, it's the Westcuck advertising the place. Go back to circumcising your children as a sign of slavery.

Attached: 1314971453291.png (361x358, 133K)

Crusaders were filthy subhuman mongs as much as the muzzies, you catholishit scum

Then why aren't you agreeing with what I said?

at least the crusades were a reaction, not an act of aggression


>religion of peace

best thing is, it doesnt even stop from there, keeps going into spain and outwards to the east and also into africa

Attached: Mohammad_adil-Rashidun_empire-slide[1].gif (1196x580, 84K)

I'm literally only here for some KINO Endgame discussion :^)

>at least the crusades were a reaction, not an act of aggression
You mean they were a reaction when they weren't busy being an act of aggression against the Orthodox and therefore an accelerant and contribution to the success of the Ottomans.

3 dollars and 50 cents

>contribution to the success of the Ottomans.
and the Mongols as well.

Crusaders literally attacked fellow Christians and got btfo'd by orthodox in the Balkans and Byzantium, they were greedy scum

>it only took 20 years to convert all those people
bunch of camel fuckers didn't even put up a fight they just joined the rest of the camel fuckers

Europe is to blame for everything. The little pissant kingdoms were at war with each other so often that they ignored the muslims rolling over the Christian middle east.
Even now the Euros are the stink of the world, creating 2 world wars and now creating a 2nd soviet communist empire in Brussels.

Surely you realize that the sacking of Constantinople was from a financial and political collapse between the crusaders and the people of Constantinople, right? And this movie doesn't take place in the fourth crusade so why even speaking of crusaders so broadly?

>Surely you realize that the sacking of Constantinople was from a financial and political collapse between the crusaders and the people of Constantinople, right?
The Siege of Constantinople is the only event you know right? Uneducated retards who haven't read any history should shut the fuck up. The first knife was pulled by Cucktholics on Orthodox, you are the Muslimshits of Christianity, you even have a system which encourages priests to fuck altar boys you fucking degenerates. Be a good Westcuck and shut your mouth as is expected from you.

convert, be killed or pay a insane tax. choose.

you should read up on what the 1st crusaders did to jerusalem

>It's Europe's fault because they didn't come to fight the group conquering the middle east
>It isn't the fault of the people doing conquest

Nothing.

You're speaking over a 600 year span so I'm not sure what you're considering actual sectarian violence besides the sacking of the removal of the Jerusalem patriarch.

They massacred the town like what happened at the end of any siege in that era. It doesn't excuse it obviously but singling it out is dishonest.

I don't buy it. Sounds like they were going for a cinematic sounding line they were hoping everyone would gloss over and forget about like the plane scene in tdkr.

You are missing two important facts:
1. Each of the regions in the map were mostly unpopulated over vast spans of geography and were concentrated in a few cities, villages were so small and poor they could all be massacred by a dozen men each, so you are achieving much more geographical coverage in conquests there than you would be in say Europe. You can see how the conquests slow down when they reach Persia and even more so with Anatolia.
2. Zoroastrianism was so fucking conservative and strict that even the shitlike Islam was preferred to it with open arms when it was offered.
Of course there's also Muhammad being a unique prophet in history, a warmongering madman with a propensity towards inducing fear in people through various methods in tandem to also giving the carrot as an option.

In order to ascertain what it means, the faces need to be studied in more detail. The refraction of the light within the glasses allocates more of a particular realm and has more with time dilation that compared to the other. As to answer why, the reason remains unknown.

The corner describes another instance in which the shadow of the temple regarding the facial structure eats away at them simply. Therefore, it should be noted that despite all this, the realm of reality and fiction in which they exist cannot simply be explained with simple precautions but must be known.

Behind that, behind your vat of blood, there lies it. The God of it all demands the dragon of the golden crown to eat away at the vat of blood and feces. The God of the machinations dislikes the scripts and upon the screen of death, hates that with the passion of death. The abyss and the void of death clings onto the void of the screen. The abyss and files within the abyss cling to the vat and the refraction of the light continues to press forward onto the screen and mirror of disrepair. In order to properly contain it, the addendum of time must be added onto the dilation of the screen and exit out onto the God of machinations and the fiction must be coincided with them. The screaming and the void.
>Regarding the void

The simple equation is resulting of about a life to another. A mammal in which is equal to that of a fox equals about a human life. So, a cow with a head of a pig can thus equate to about two human lives. Therefore, you can say that the lives in the escape of the exit can see forward through the abyss and into the vat of blood and feces of about two human lives. Therefore, it should be stated that the life of a pig with the body of a cow can be seen with the lens of a pig with the body of a fox. With the abyss, it cannot be understated. Therefore, it should be with Lain instead. Inside the machinations of it, lies the fiction of the refraction of the light.

Attached: yyyyyy.jpg (512x512, 48K)

You forget the best part: immediately after Muhamnae kicked off, Muslims started a political struggle between themselves and killed or revelled against most of their own "Righteous" caliphs.

have sex, worked, seethe, KINO,

Attached: npcmeme.jpg (1400x1400, 225K)

Doesn't matter my friend. The West won't save you from the inevitable karmic backlash your people will suffer when the West is weakened enough to become incapable of playing world police and hypocritically defending Muslims when it suits them.

Attached: Breaking Down Geopolitics For Contemporary Western White SJW Brainlets And Ignorant American Blacks. (4500x2592, 1.01M)