Everyone complains about this show being inaccurate...

>tranny supporter
Is that supposed to hurt my feelings? Of course I support myself and my people

You can be factual and still be wrong in your conclusions.

For example, give you're otherwise representative of the general population, everyone reading this post has an above-average life expectancy. This is factually true.
So read all my shitty 4channel posts to increase your lifespan, would be Adam's retarded conclusion derived from that fact.

Haven't really seen his show besides a couple of episodes so I'll only comment on what I know. He did an episode on the Mona Lisa where he argues that the only reason it's famous it's because it was stolen in 1911. While "technically" accurate, there's an awful lot of history surrounding the painting. Just a year prior to it's theft Freud wrote an essay on Leonardo, Napoleon hung the painting in his bedroom, many artists like Ingres romanticized Leonardo, other like Reubens made master copies, Vasari wrote a biography on Leonardo where he wrote about the famous Mona Lisa smile, among many many other things. What the theft did was make the Mona Lisa a household name for people who areotherwise not interested in art. But to say that that's the only reason why it's famous is extremely disingenuous and it's throwing away nearly 500 years of art history out the window.

Why does he wear women's glasses?

That's what he does though. He gives you the disingenuous version of events. Its like that episode where he talks about Christopher Columbus killing all of the Taino people on the Caribbean Islands out of rage. While it's true that he killed some of them, he absolutely did not wipe all of them out considering they were still around after his death

Why do Americans use weird hand gestures when they speak? Genuinely baffles me.

>he says when nearly the entirely of Europe does the same exact thing

it's the same thing with John Oliver's show. people cry about how wrong it always is and then you press them to name some examples and you get crickets.
just admit you don't like his politics and move the fuck on.

Disregard that. I suck cocks.

imagine taking anything a guy who looks like that says seriously

Slavery is worse than death so Adam kind of sanitized it.

Why are niggers so dumb? Just kidding, I already know the answer just as the top geneticists in the world do. Wanna solve the puzzle nigger?

best post

>He gives you the disingenuous version of events
This. His sources and logic are mostly "yes, someone has said that" and he draws conclusions from it without seeing the whole picture. His electoral college one is pretty moronic. He concludes that with the college, campaigning is focused on states with the most electoral votes (a good mix of rural and urban states). Without even mentioning the fact that without the college, only about 5 Highly urbanized states will be running the show

This.

Never ever seen that. Post 3 examples.

His show is literally a numale version of Penn & Teller Bullshit.

Post pics

Zizek is the only European I can think of with noticeable hand signs while he talks.

just listen to this if you feel like questioning adam's credibility
youtube.com/watch?v=JHmktXPdOrQ&disable_polymer=1

He's correct in some places and he does not know what the fuck is going on with other topics.
It's normal, since the show deals with stuff you ought to be very specialized in to be 100% correct.

>Just watch 3 hours of something

He was dead wrong about Columbus episode. Some youtuber debunked him

Adam ruins his butthole

>Highly urbanized state
You do know that most states have rural areas of their own, right? I don't think there are very many states that are entirely or even mostly urban across its whole area.
>states will be running the show
Without the electoral college, no one specific state or group of states could really be identified as the state(s) that won an election since it's just based on pure popular count. You're still thinking within the paradigm of the electoral college where it's the state's electors that actually decide and the individual vote count within each state doesn't actually matter.

get it
from all the gay sex

I mean sort of the ones Trumps and those shitty late night hosts do, not completely sppaz out like Zizek.

The only one I saw was the one about gamers which he strawmans super hard to make his points

youtube.com/watch?v=D7E_Ss5OwWQ
youtube.com/watch?v=CdeRpxHjDOQ

>everyone reading this post has an above-average life expectancy
How is that true?

>the “Wild West” was actually run and maintained by the prostitutes!

Attached: 32E4BD3D-55F8-4982-B82A-36225E6EE63B.png (1024x576, 448K)

don't use that word around me, famalam.

>Obvious incel

>show named after him (a nobody)
>acts pretentious because he can read a script
>completely irrevocably BTFO by Joe “weed has no correlation to car crashes!” Rogan
Into the trash it goes

>and the dudes were still patriarchal oppressers

>Without the electoral college, no one specific state or group of states could really be identified as the state(s) that won an election

California and New York. 100%. Not even really California. More like, Los Angeles and San Fran. Without the electoral college, election campaigns would boil down to targeting specific population centers as opposed to entire states. Great if you're one of the coastal elite, but not so great if you live in Idaho.

I think it's people getting defensive from the claims, and start mildly strawmanning what he says.
The show, and Adam by extension, are just there to tell you why you're wrong, not why they're right. The solutions the show presents are just ways to close the narrative nature of the show (intro, conflict, resolution). The show would be a bummer if they didn't have a resolution where at least some solution was presented.
He didn't say that you should be dehydrated, he literally says to just drink if you're thirsty. That episode was mostly to push back against soccer moms who make their kids drink gallons of water because they think that's the healthy thing to do.
>What the theft did was make the Mona Lisa a household name for people who areotherwise not interested in art
That was also the main point of that segment. He wasn't trying to say that it didn't have historical or cultural significance, only that the reason it's popularity can be derived from the theft, and is why people need to stand 10 feet away from it is because of the theft.

tripfag dumbfuck

>doesn't know what a tripcode is

Back to where you came from

Probably because on average were internet users we have access to healthcare we're not homeless or in a mental institution we're not living in a third world country eating dirt. I'm assuming he's talking about the average human population on Earth, which by and large eat dirt and have AIDS. Or maybe he was just making that argument as an example to prove his overall point. If he meant it, that'sa pretty bold fucking claim without backing it up. He should know better than that.

Attached: IMG_20190410_044417.jpg (634x680, 83K)

the wild west episode was one of the few that i've seen. if that episode is indicative of the others, then his arguments are weak and disingenuous.
it makes me sad to know that my boomer dad dvrs all of them.
i hate what western civilization has become.

Attached: 1480812344441.png (600x638, 497K)

>haha Christopher Columbus was such a yard haha like everyone in the world knew about America before him haha he thought it was the Indies what a fucking moron everyone in Europe knew exactly where the Indies were don't fact check any of this haha

He said the American west wouldn't have been possible without women.

He backed up his facts and made compelling arguments, but I don't like it, and I don't like adjusting my worldview, so I'm going to say he was wrong

The segment had a heavy implication that the theft was paramount to the fame of the painting. He could have emphasized that there were other factors but he skipped through that. The main gimmick if his show is to turns believes people have towards things on their head. Similarly he did one about modern art and how it was all a money laundering scheme. Yes, art has been used to launder money and not just modern art, there also all types of corruption from price fixing to artists buying their own works anonymously to drive the prices of their other pieces up. The government has also recently declassified some files on how they were using artists like Pollock and Rothko during the cold war. My point being that there's all kinds of stuff going on in the modern art wrold yet he chose to just say that it's all a money laundering scheme

*errrrn* nope, the answer was low iq due to evolving in a place where genes weren’t selected for intelligence which is the most important function of them in human being today. Better luck next time my fellow “man.” (You have an iq probably 30 below mine.)

Are you watching the earlier episodes or the more recent ones? Because there is a difference here. The show started out being exactly what it claimed to be. Little disappointing facts you might not have known about common topics. It slowly turned into an excuse to hit all the basic liberal talking points over and over again. It's unwatchable now.

>newfags falling for this shit.

Attached: bait.gif (480x270, 1.72M)

>and my people
You're a crossdresser. Not a jew.

Oh, yeah, I guess that makes sense
Cause he's a huge fucking faggot, right?

It's a common stereotype in America that this is an inherently Italian trait.

Are different cultural perceptions a hoot or what?

Have sex.

Objective proof that he's nothing without his writers.

Have a sex.

The entire nation of Italy.

Why are you talking to yourself bro?

yep, on account of all the gay sex

user, go on cumtown

History episode was full of cherry picked sources and taking sentences out of context from sources to support a false narrative. He does similar shit for the leftist pandering episodes too. He also ignores common arguments completely if it goes against the premise of the segment. The divorce one ignored how much it fucks men, unfair custody verdicts, etc.

His video game episode was especially retarded and I'm not even a gamer.
>THOSE CHEAP, SHITTY GAMES GIRLS PLAY ON THEIR PHONES ARE EXACTLY LIKE THE TRIPLE A GAMES WITH MASSIVE BUDGETS GUYS PLAY

I've only seen a Youtube segment on how drinking too much water can be bad and that you should 'only' consume the necessary amount to fulfill your body's need. It struck me as horribly wrong because he never mentions drinking more water than normal is directly correlated with clear, strong, elastic skin. Adam also tries to state that you can get water intoxication by having too much which while true, is sensational by saying it by itself. Water intoxication occurs when you drink far too much far too quickly. Your body can easily handle a gallon of water a day and will love it if you stretch it out. On the other hand nobody with half a brain is going to immediately chug a gallon of water. The people who get a case of it are runners who end up trying to replenish their lost sweat without waiting for their body to process it properly. Not to mention it's seriously rare as fuck anyway. You see a scare of it because of that moron mom trying to get a Wii for her kids. You should never trust ANYONE saying negativity about drinking water.

I knew all I had to about the series from this poor display alone. He's got that "Well I'm just a white hetero male XD" thing going on too which gives me second-hand embarrassment from the cringe.

Isn't that the guy who got murdered live on joe Rogan?

>He said the American west wouldn't have been possible without women.
And who is making the claim that it would have been possible without women? Of course it wouldn't have been possible without women since women give birth to human beings.

I don't think you realize the population discrepancy between California and Wyoming. Who will campaign or care about Wyoming's interest in a popular election?

oh, i get it
cuz theres a bunch of cum there
on account of all the gay sex

His argument is an argument I always hear from non-Americans who simply don't grasp how big the country is, and how much of a population divide excepts between the coast and center states. Getting rid of the electoral college would mean rural America would be reduced to statistical irrelevance.

They're also morons who think America is a democracy when we're not and never have been. We're a constitutional republic.

HOW ARE YOU FALLIN FOR THIS BAIT NIGGA

dude is a piece of shit that thinks boys should be pumped full of estrogen and have their dicks chopped off. He also thinks girls can compete with boys in sports

At first, prospect towns were spartan dwellings where men ate, slept, shat, and worked, and that's it.

It's not until prostitutes came in that mining towns became actual TOWNS, with roads and infrastructure and houses and stuff. While the men worked in the mountains, the women did the civic planning, and the prostitutes, (being the wealthiest of the bunch for obvious reasons) had the most sway in how the town should be run.

Congrats!

Attached: 1502425328042.png (716x724, 255K)

He names the jew, why would I dislike him?

Wyoming should. Wyoming should care about its local elections

[citation required]

That's great, but they still get a say in who becomes president. Getting rid of the electoral college would lessen that.

>Columbus
youtube.com/watch?v=ZEw8c6TmzGg&t=1184s
well worth the watch

>What are the Romance countries
>What is Greece

If by "lessen" you mean "bring back down to equalize the power of all citizens unilaterally" then yeah.

Everyone gets the same single vote for president.
If you don't think the president will give a shit about you, elect local leaders who will. That's why they're there.

not all citizens are equals, user

I,d prioritize the dude who can grow food rather than the street rat nigger in LA or NY.

Except it doesn't equalize things. It gives unprecedented power to people who have the privilege to live in places like Los Angeles and New York. The President is the President of the entire country, not just selected urban centers. If an elected official is not representing you, then that isn't a call to find someone lower who will care, that's a call to secede into your own country.

Again, I don't believe you understand the sheer size of the United States.

youtu.be/31ZoH5P6UIE

Disregard that. I am based af.

>bring back down to equalize the power of all citizens unilaterally
except no, people who live in small states will be irrelevant in the presidential election.While a person who lives in San Francisco will get more panhandling. How is that equal, and how are you not getting the geographical difference?

This post was me and I'm gay.

>I'd prioritize the dude who can grow food
Why?
>Because he contributes, hur dur
Yeah, and who do you think buys the food, giving him the money that allows him to contribute? It all comes around.

>The President is the President of the entire country, not just selected urban centers.
He's also the President of the entire country, not just selected rural areas
You see how that works both ways?

This man and everyone who ever gave him money should be murdered.

>people who live in small states will be irrelevant in the presidential election

Why?

If you wanna know how your system would work look at Canada. More than half the population lives in like 8 big cities. THe greater toronto Area by itself is around 1/5th of the whole country population

Toronto, the poojet/sikh/nigger/chinese leftist city has as much federal pull as Alberta and Saskatchewan in their entirety.

Meanwhile, both of those provide a shitload of grain, oil, beef and other ressources, while the Greater Toronto Area only exports are niggers and AIDS.

The urban centers are represented by having more electoral votes, and thus power, but the college as it exists now allows for less populated states to maintain relevance. The entire manner in which presidents would campaign would shift, should we vote based off of individual population numbers. They'd specifically target high number cities, while leaving lower populated areas as irrelevant, thus not giving them representation. Why would any potential president care about the needs of the Rust Belt, when they could be hitting up Orlando, Austin, and Las Vegas?

Because the president would not have to even factor in their needs when they could be focusing on the needs of people in juicier urban areas, like Seattle.

ALright, niggerscum, answer this.

We got 2 scenarios.

Scenario 1 : There's a cultivator in Idaho or something who grows potato, There is no coastal shitsking to buy his potatoes. So he eats his potatoes

Scenario 2. There is no potato grower in idaho, but there's a lot of shitskins in LA who are hungry, What happens? They starve

Which one is the best scenario ?

Adam thiccer than a bitch imagine if he was brutally murdered in a completely random act of savage violence that would be fucked up.

Because their votes wouldn't be given undue weight anymore.

They don't have niggers in their walled communities. It's important to remember that leftist retardation doesn't survive where cohabitation exist

What do you define as "undue weight?" If you have a state that's literally as big as a comparable European country, should they not get represented?

You mean like cities? By and large conservatives are the ones who live away from minorities, and that includes gated communities.

I'm saying it would be extremely unbased and not cool at all if someone fucking shot him in the back of his fat head execution style.

The vote of one person in a low population state is worth more than the vote of one person in a high population state. How is that not undue weight?

>Why would any potential president care about the needs of the Rust Belt

Because the rust belt is where most of the country's GDP is generated. The value will never truly go away. And again, that's why congress and the house of reps exist; to make sure *everyone* has a voice. The president actually has proportionately less power, the smaller down the ladder you go. Lots of macro, not much micro. That's kind of the point.

The problem is, there's *always* someone else growing potatoes.

The weight is due.
The office is the President of America's geography as well as its population.

Dirt doesn't vote, dude.

>disingenuous
He might just not know. He's probably reading from a script.

Because those states cover huge swaths of the country, which is what the president represents. The country. Not isolated population centers.

>Because the rust belt is where most of the country's GDP is generated

Doesn't matter when their population is insignificant compared to a major city. That's not what would get the president in office. So maybe the electoral college IS important, since, as you said, the Rust Belt offers a major source of GDP?

thats why we have the electoral college dude

>just as the top geneticists in the world do
No they don't, and the NYT opinion article by Reich or whatever his name is isn't saying anything like that, so don't cite it as evidence. Race science was discredited decades ago.

>forcing children who have undeveloped brains to be funneled into a dicision their parents are forcing on them

You're either trolling or you're a retard who's allowing pseudoscience to be enacted on children. Fucking retard.

Nothing would have been possible without women.

>due to evolving in a place where genes weren’t selected for intelligence
Wrong
Try living in Africa. I guarantee you'll change your tune real quick.

t. basement dweller

I liked learning why blacks are stereotyped as not being able to swim

Highly populous states already get more electoral college votes and more representatives in the House of Representatives.

Small spots of dense populations all sharing the same mindset and ideas should not be deciding who becomes president. They already have enough influence and power as is.

The problem is, you're working off several assumptions that are patently false

>that the president has way, WAY more power than he actually does
>That The interests of rural populations and urban populations are fundamentally different
>That giving one individual more weight to their vote than another is fundamentally broken, so long as it's *your* guy getting that vote

Come back after you've fixed these.

>Small spots of dense populations all sharing the same mindset

It's funny, because you could use those exact words to describe rural areas too

Starving Africans don't go on Yea Forums, white males between 16 and 32 do

Well of course it wouldn't be possible without women. In my wildest hopes and dreams, he presented the idea that homemakers and child-raising mothers did more for society than the "independent" tramps these days, but I know that just isn't true.

It is the height of irony that the morons who want to get rid of the electoral college are the same morons who believe wealth should be shared equally.

Only partially. While rural states share the same mindset, they however don't carry near the same amount of electoral college votes.

Is correct. There is a reason the electoral college exists. (See Republic)

Where ? And why would you grow potatoes if you can just live in LA and get showered in promises from the feds?

>that the president has way, WAY more power than he actually does

I'm sorry, but whether you like it or not, the President of the United States is the face of the country, and represents who we are on the world's stage. You can talk all you want about the importance of Congress or whatnot, but let's not bullshit the sheer political importance of this position. I'm more and more beginning to believe you're not from here.

>That The interests of rural populations and urban populations are fundamentally different

Again, a position from someone cannot grasp that a person who lives in San Diego may have a fundamentally different life and opinion on things than someone who lives in Altoona, Pennsylvania. These people can be almost worlds apart in terms of culture and experience, and the trouble lies in how they all fall under the umbrella of Americans, and they both need representation.

>That giving one individual more weight to their vote than another is fundamentally broken, so long as it's *your* guy getting that vote

It's not "anyone's" guy. Ignoring a people who live in a place that is comparatively the size of a European nation, is insane.

Except all the other places are not small spots of dense populations.

I don't know what's the issue with everyone sharing the same mind virus when they become crammed together in small areas, but it would be a disaster for our country if the individuals running for president only needed to appeal to three or four cities to get enough votes to win.

2 trannies on the prowl

Have you heard the concept of white flight? I suggest you ponder on the meaning

he literally pretended pearl harbor didnt happen and said we put japs in camps out of racism for complimebting them in a stereotype

>he literally pretended pearl harbor didnt happen
He didn't.

>and said we put japs in camps out of racism for complimebting (what the fuck is this word?) them in a stereotype
We did.

>white males

go sex

>between 16 and 32

?
And the whites in areas where they isolated themselves are more conservative while the whites who stayed in cities are more liberal.

>dense populations all sharing the same mindset and ideas
They don't. The only reason you think this is because conservatives in more liberal states and liberals in more conservative states never get their votes counted in the electoral college.

Sorry, was meant for

The second

I too support your kind, you do more to clean up your own messes with waves upon waves of mass suicides and self harm than any right wing death squads ever could. Keep up the good work man

Attached: 1555246632505.jpg (539x477, 34K)

I hate to break it to you, user, but no one really campaigns in either state during the presidential elections right now

>We did.
No we didn't, retard. We also put Germans and Italians in those camps too.

youtube.com/watch?v=D7E_Ss5OwWQ

youtube.com/watch?v=CdeRpxHjDOQ

He is trash.

The votes are broken down by county, user. You can easily see how many people vote and whom they vote for.

Densely populated cities are nearly monolithic in their voting.

Adam downplayed the usefulness of a wall on the Southern border by claiming that it would only cut illegal immigration down by 40%.

...40%.

That's huge.

he did one about 401ks and retirement and said it's impossible to save money so it's impossible to retire

Adam said himself doesn't really do anything other than say the script that a team prepairs for him he is just the face for the show

lol he also said they could still use airplanes as an excuse to not build the wall.

You guys are pretty funny

Attached: file.png (645x729, 169K)

That's on the same level as Jon Stewart's "LOL I'M JUST A COMEDIAN" excuse whenever someone tried to criticize him.

Sweaty, Yea Forums is a tranny board.

i like you.

You misunderstand the point of OP's post. What he said he didn't mean, he just wanted to signal to you all that he's supportive of that gay faggot.

I see that argument so fucking often

''dude it wouldn't remove every single instance of illegals''

No shit, it would still remove a shitload. THe kind of retarded magical thinking that we need a 100% foolproof solution before we do anything. Seatbelts, crumple zones etc in cars don't reduce car death to 0 but THEY HELP.

>It's not until prostitutes came in that mining towns became actual TOWNS, with roads and infrastructure and houses and stuff.
Wouldn't the shop owners be the ones mostly responsible for this? The shop owners were certainly much wealthier than the prostitutes and I know you aren't implying that the whores actually built the roads. This argument seems to be Adam magnifying one part of a phenomenon and claiming grandiose truths as a result. It's true that women showing up correlated with a town's prosperity increasing, but to argue that it was women increasing that town's prosperity is disingenuous because:
1. Women are only a part of the "exploitative" class of service-providers (such as cooks, toolsmiths, store clerks, etc and yes, prostitutes) who would move into mining towns to fleece the miners
2. Women (and other people looking to make money off the miners) would only move to towns that were prospering. They weren't rejuvenating ghost towns, they were following the miners on whose labor they depended.

1 person, 1 vote. Sorry this concept has triggered you. Not everyone who lives in rural areas is even a farmer. Agriculture has been mechanized for decades now. Something like 1-3% of the population actually works as s farmer. And low population states aren't even the only states with rural areas either, large population states have their own rural areas.

I don't even know why we're talking about rural areas to be quite honest. The only states that actually benefit from the electoral college are swing states.

Due to the electoral college, a Wyoming person's vote is worth 3x a California person's vote. This is a good thing because Wyoming is filled with small-government Whites and California is filled with spics eager to vote themselves more bread and circuses from the public purse.

>1 person, 1 vote. Sorry this concept has triggered you.

I'm 'triggered' over something that is not part of the election process? In fact, I haven't been talking about agriculture at all. I'm not sure where in this conversation you've gotten that. I've been speaking of representation for the entire country, not just urban city centers, which is what would happen if that '1 person, 1 vote' rule you suggest got instated.

>youtube.com/watch?v=CdeRpxHjDOQ
This fucking retard, I swear. His airplane argument is that the people who come over here on airplanes do come here LEGALLY, but overstay their visas. Yes, faggot, and the point of a border wall is to stop people coming here ILLEGALLY through our southern border.

>We didn't do that thing!
>We did that thing PLUS these other things too!

Okay

>Similarly he did one about modern art and how it was all a money laundering scheme.
Funny /pol/ generally thinks the same.

He also said the amount of immigrants it would stop would be totally offset by the disruption of flow-through immigrants, meaning the number of illegal immigrants coming over would actually INcrease.

Also the amount of illegal immigration has been steadily declining for the last decade.
(or rather, it WAS. It's seen a sharp spike in the last couple months because Trump's rhetoric has been convincing people to try now because it could be harder later, which is hilarious in its own ways)

The government didn't put Japanese Americans in camps because of racism. Stop pretending to be retarded.

Then why'd they put them in camps?

For the same reason they put some German and Italian Americans in the camps; because we were at war with those countries and the government worried about insurrection.

>He also said the amount of immigrants it would stop would be totally offset by the disruption of flow-through immigrants, meaning the number of illegal immigrants coming over would actually INcrease.

Wtf are you talking about.

And immigration was down because of the recession. Now that the economy is better, more illegals are flooding in.

stop shilling your gay shit here and get a good microphone, faggot

So here's how this works:

The majority of the people who come here illegally are flow-through immigrants, meaning they come, they stay for an indeterminate time, they work or otherwise build wealth, then they return to their home country and take that wealth with them.
The thing is, it's easy to enter the country illegally through natural ports of entry, but it's easier to *leave* by crossing the border on foot.
If you put up a wall, the people that come in, stay, and work, instead of going home, will just stay, being the exact drain on capitol and resources you fear they will be.

>If you put up a wall, the people that come in, stay, and work, instead of going home, will just stay
lol I'm sorry, buy are you and Adam stupid enough to believe if an illegal alien WANTED to leave, wall or not, the government wouldn't let them?

People aren't going in and out. They stay in this country and send remittances back to their family.

The entire point of the wall is to block new illegals from coming in and then, over time, deport the ones that are still in the country through aggressive ICE policing.

Being deported is one thing.

Leaving with all the stuff you came in to get in the first place is something else entirely.

>The entire point of the wall is to block new illegals from coming in

Which isn't going to happen
Because the vast majority of illegal immigrants come in through legal ports of entry.

So illegal aliens are a drain either way. They stay and they drain our resources. They leave and they take the money they've obtained illegally.

Even that faggot Adam admits the wall would cut down instantly on 40% of illegal aliens. That's nearly half. And then we close the loopholes on visas and asylum seekers.

>I haven't really seen anything presented in it that's nonfactual

youtube.com/watch?v=Ir5kMIvXCd8
youtube.com/watch?v=CdeRpxHjDOQ
youtube.com/watch?v=D7E_Ss5OwWQ
youtube.com/watch?v=wDu4RjCek80

>40% of illegal aliens.
No. The term he used was "illegal CROSSINGS". Meaning a wall would make it more difficult to cross the border illegally.

Which it would.
But for a solid fucking wall, a 60% pass-through rate is piss-poor.

I actually made a mistake. He said 27-40% of the illegal immigrants come in via plane.

That means, at a minimum, a wall would stop 60%. More than half.

You're right, illegal aliens *are* a drain.
But most of that drain comes from the illicit methods they have to resort to, to obtain what wealth they have, due to their status as illegal aliens.

It's not a 60% "pass-through" rate. I made a mistake.

Adam actually admitted that the "pass-through" rate is at its highest is 40% with a wall.

>But for a solid fucking wall, a 60% pass-through rate is piss-poor.
Because that 60% is from overstaying their visas and fake asylum seekers. And there are already sections along the border that have walls that illegals avoid because they're too difficult to cross. So it's perfectly reasonable to assume a wall across our entire border would dissuade them just as much as those walled sections already do.

>But most of that drain comes from the illicit methods they have to resort to, to obtain what wealth they have, due to their status as illegal aliens.
No. They use our resources such as healthcare and welfare.

youtube.com/watch?v=c_VDQVs7OE8

Yes, they are drains, but that's not the worst problem. The worst problem is that they have kids that overwhelmingly vote for Democrats. The entire reason the Democratic Party does not care about border security is that they're trying to ensure an electoral majority by allowing new voters to flood in. Either the illegals are granted amnesty, or they wait long enough and the illegals' children are U.S. citizens who vote Democratic.

Then you'll get a whole wave of AOCs and Bernies.

You need an SSN to get healthcare and welfare. You can't get those if you're illegal

>what are emergency rooms, public utilities, and their children being put in public schools

The hospitals can't turn them away or else the hospitals don't receive Medicaid funding.

And they do steal SSNs to commit fraud. It's very common.

spectator.org/the-cost-of-providing-health-care-to-illegal-aliens/
cis.org/Report/63-NonCitizen-Households-Access-Welfare-Programs

You still need an SSN for public school.

This is also true. Identity fraud is the most common crime among illegals (aside from coming here illegally).

Okay, well, the Spectator is inflamatory and sensational as FUCK

And the CIS link referrs to "non-citizens", which are not the same as illegal aliens. You still need a green card or other form of ID to get into welfare programs. Illegals don't have that.

Maybe
If they didn't have to come in illegally
They wouldn't have to resort to Identity theft

>You still need a green card or other form of ID to get into welfare programs. Illegals don't have that.
California gives drivers licenses to illegals. And you'd have to be pretty daft if you don't think illegals are included as "non-citizens." Illegal aliens ARE a drain and this is irrefutable.

>and if I had let that burglar in through the front door he wouldn't have had to break my window to come in to steal my TV

Attached: 1556276558071.jpg (300x168, 6K)

His episode about the hot coffee McDonald’s incident was pretty biased. It was basically that ‘le corporations are evil’ and tried to say that 80 degrees was excessive for coffe to be served at despite the fact that most espressos are poured at 91 degrees

Why do you idiots always act like illegals aren't paying taxes like everyone else? As a group, they input roughly much as they take out.

>As a group, they input roughly much as they take out.
No they don't.

MANY school only ask for a ''proof of residence'' like a water bill. Mostly in leftist states, obviously

Espresso is a shot that's put into a typically ceramic cup. fast food coffee is a large volume of liquid put in insulated to go cup. Learn thermodynamics.

Please see Plyler v. Doe.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe

It's just nature - Rome did not become an empire because some of some tyrant. The people collectively realized society is horrible at electing leaders. The first person that seized power the Senate murdered and the citizens themselves rioted. Bernie and AOC are just symptoms of what is to come: you don't need to have merit or be good at balancing a budget to get governmental powers. Just make false promises and tell people what they want to hear (free shit at the cost of someone else) It has happened before and it will happen again.

Attached: 694CED61-184E-491B-89E4-9C332DD56D82.jpg (470x313, 8K)

Attached: 15265859079916.jpg (534x400, 58K)

>Im economically illiterate
Well yeah, we all understand that. No need to keep rubbing it in our faces.

Attached: adam.jpg (319x550, 71K)

Doesn't he source huffingtonpost? How can you take someone seriously if they don't almost exclusively source .edu sources?

Did he talk about what Japan did to all its neighbors? What it did to the Americans in the Philippines? Were the words "Death March" uttered anywhere?

lol they are a drain in every way, shape, and form. They do not add anything to our economy except cheap labor for rich cunts.

Most of his sources are far left-wing. Incredibly biased.

>campaigning is focused on states with the most electoral votes
That's not even close to true. Campaigning gets focused on states with competitive electorates. Without the EC, general elections, which are typically more moderate to appeal to moderate voters in moderate states, would turn into primaries with each side trying to whip up their respective populaces.

>I'll just repeat what I already said.

>i hate what western civilization has become.
The period of fastest technological and scientific advancement in the history of mankind?

how can one be this dumb...

He literally just sources his left wing friends.
What a fucking joke.

Imagine watching this thinking you're not being brainwashed by corporate left wing propaganda. This is why we have a cheeto nazi in power rn. Leftists are totally out of touch with reality.

And? She spilt it on herself you dumb fuck, it wasn’t because she burnt herself from the cup

>The period of fastest technological and scientific advancement in the history of mankind?
>implying that's a good thing

Attached: 1549424549860.jpg (474x295, 25K)

Jews paying off jews and whites to let in hordes nonwhites into our countries so their corporations benefit off cheaper labour and their governments grow due to social unrest and changing demographics, all while you're racist if you point it out.

>retard doesnt actually know thermo
Based retard

>nobody with half a brain is going to immediately chug a gallon of water
I had a friend who was big into lifting and hydration, and world carry a gallon jug around so he could always drink water. Whenever someone questioned why he'd need so much water and doubted he even drank that much in a day to make it worth it, he'd immediately and without saying a word chug the entire contents of it in front of them. Was pretty hilarious cause once he was done he'd let out a nice "ahh." One time some girl questioned it right after he had filled it and she just stood there in disbelief while he held it upside down for a good while and emptied it effortlessly. Cool guy. He probably drank a few gallons a day. I was up to a gallon per day while I knew him. It really clears your head and helps you feel healthy. You just have to work up to it.

Why wouldn't it be?

So illness and hunger are at record lows in the history of mankind and quality of life is at a record high yet that's somehow not a good thing.

The first season is SIGNIFICANTLY better than the rest of the show, but even then a lot of it is badly researched

It feels like the writers/researchers had a few things they really wanted to talk about and knew pretty well (e.g. Diamonds, Flushable wipes) then fucks up on shit where they missed the point or didn't look into it enough (e.g. Electoral College, Video Games)

>So illness and hunger are at record lows in the history of mankind and quality of life is at a record high yet that's somehow not a good thing
I would prefer my country to thrive and africa to stay shit than have my country fall while africa gets slightly better.

>doesn't understand why we have a Senate and a House and how they're different, and how the presidential election mirrors their structure and purpose
oof

>actually watching this
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

YOU PROBABLY BELIEVED IN RUSSIAN COLLUSION YOU FUCKING FAGOT LOLOLOLOLOLOL

>Adam Ruins Weight Loss
>In this episode, Adam discusses the irony of low-fat diets, why counting calories is a waste of time
>why counting calories is a waste of time
>for weight loss

show can be discarded, it is fucking retarded

Illness and quality of life is also better than ever in your country.

A bunch of chemically lobotomized commies in california shouldnt decide what goes on in the rest of the country.

I don't watch it anymore, that's the point.

>YOU PROBABLY BELIEVE DIN RUSSIAN COLLUSION
Why would I have believed in something that had zero evidence of existing?

Attached: Trump's relationship with Russia.png (750x503, 237K)

The economy is shit, suicide and drug overdose is way up, taxes are ridiculously high, culture is degrading and being replaced by non-westerners

Attached: electoral college for retards.png (1114x457, 89K)

Good. You should never have watched it.

>1 person, 1 vote
Each person has one vote, dipshit, and all are counted equally. Each STATE has varying numbers of votes.

Because it's called the United STATES of America, not the United PEOPLE of America

I was just glad someone was calling out the bullshit that is the Diamond Industry

I should have known better than to expect them to keep it up

Sounds purely anecdotal.

>sounds
You're a retard

one person, one vote

even if they contribute less/more, even if they're stupider/smarter

It is.
Fuck off Ted.
Go work 80 hour weeks and die at age 30 you retarded piece of shit.
YES you people are leftists.

Ya, and to be fair the left werent total corporate/big govt sell outs a few years ago unlike now.

Where are the numbers, bro? Historically, taxes have never been lower around the world.

Why should a bunch of inbred illiterates decide what happens in the important states?

>I would prefer my country to thrive and africa to stay shit than have my country fall while africa gets slightly better.
I want this too.
I don't see what technology had to do with this.

>The economy is shit,
Thanks to central banking and government intervention and immigration.
Not technology.

Thats pure democracy which is no better than mob rule, libcuck retard.

Get it through your head you fucking commieshit. We live in a constitutional Republic, NOT a democracy.

This is by fucking design

Can't wait for automation and the Singularity. Literally the only thing that truly matters in our current society is AI development.

>counting calories is bad!
>you just regain the weight after you stop!
>count calories
>lose weight
>stop counting calories
>gain weight
>this means counting calories doesn't work
Every fucking time.

What did he mean by this?

Attached: 1920px-U.S._states_by_GDP_per_capita,_2017.jpg (1920x1120, 224K)

This is why nobody sides with the left anymore. You people are self-absorbed elitist scum.

The reason the diamond industry is the way it is is because of severe government control of industry.

Democracy needs to be mostly abolished.
Any political party that wants socialism, social democracy, government programs etc etc needs to be banned and anyone who thinks that way needs to be banned from voting.

In what ways are we advancing currently?
Name 5 meaningful technologies or meaningful scientific or medical breakthroughs. Currently means in the last 10 years

>and to be fair the left werent total corporate/big govt sell outs a few years ago unlike now.
They've been that way since the 90s. It's just now they've gone full blown national socialist with wanting government and business to be completely entwined.

are we still talking about california?

>GDP
lol

Don't be ridiculous user, everyone knows the laws of thermodynamics don't apply to weight loss

>? Historically, taxes have never been lower around the world.
So? In my country and in the US they are very fucking high, and we pay millions for disrespectful opportunist coward muslims to live luxuriously for months and months in hotels while the homeless rot in the streets and the sick cant get proper healthcare. Where are your fucking numbers? Going to post some globalist UN propaganda?

Carbon Capture

I am not blaming technology. But technology does allow an extreme centralization of power that these groups abuse.

>He might just not know. He's probably reading from a script.
Someone had to write the script.

I guess that makes sense.

It works, but to be fair i dont think you can simply write an energy balance like
IN - CONSUMED = GAINED
There are complex mechanism at work in the body. Also muh genetics.

>"You're all stupid!"
>"You're inbred"
>"H-how dare you insult me! Waaaaaaah!"

>Wanting to give money to people who wasted their privileges and opportunities simply by being born in the U.S as opposed to giving the money to the truly needy who lost everything BECAUSE of the U.S

You are literally on the wrong side of history and you are too nearsighted to see it.

If you hate democracy fuck off to North Korea, you don't belong here.

And you are all just a bunch of cuckolds who bend the knee and spread your cheeks at the first sign of trouble.

Quantum computing, machine learning, 3D printing, self-driven automobiles, gene therapy, hepatitis C was essentially cured, the first artificial pancreas, natural language processing,

IT'S EITHER DEMOCRACY OR MONARCHY! NOTHING IN BETWEEN!

>muh morality
>muh lets give all these opportunistic third worlders everything because who gives a fuck about our own
>muh the US citizenry is the blame for all the worlds problems
You have a very juvenile and ignorant view of the world. You'll grow up and realize how much of a fucking retard you are now. Assuming you have an IQ above 90 and any ability to self reflect.

And you willing and happily suck the dicks of rich elites and giant corporations because you're too stupid to know they're playing you.

There are times he takes facts and twists them to fit a narrative. His home ownership episode is a good example of this. He basically argued that owning a home is terrible and awful for you. His reasoning, "what if you get a job offer in hawaii now you can't accept it because you are tied down by a house" and "paying a bank is no different than paying a landlord so you should just rent apartments your entire life anyways"

As someone who came from the "third-world" as you call it I will enjoy it. And it pleases me to see you old racists getting angry that we are no longer impoverished at your behest.

If you support redistribution of wealth youre a flat out dumbass. Why should we import the endless amount of needy people into our own countries? That would destroy everyone you fucking child

>if you hate this one specific form of authoritarianism, you should move somewhere where they have worse form of authoritarianism
Are you honestly this retarded?
Kill yourself democracy lover.

Attached: 1497349206156.png (500x638, 153K)

>scientific studies may show one thing but my trans says another so give your children hormones bigots

I'm a centrist, I do not vote for massive companies like the right, and I don't vote for giving literally everything to other people who weren't even born here like you left. You both are cock sucking cucks.

Socialism is inevitable, unless technological progress is forcibly halted or machines taking away human jobs is regulated or downright forbidden. Neither of which will happen because China won't stop.

>niggerfaggots like this are why we aren't colonizing space RIGHT NOW

Attached: 1548365993085.gif (221x245, 1.84M)

>you old racists
But you pieces of shit are the MOST racist of all.
You hate a certain ethnic group an are actively trying to destroy them and their culture.
Kill yourself.

>the truly needy who lost everything BECAUSE of the U.S
like who?

>Slavery is worse than death
if your culture/aggregate genetic personality of a population values individualism and self-determination it can be. for a lot of cultures it was and even continues to be a part of everyday life. british anti-slavery patrols were raiding villages strongarming local chiefs into giving up the business and killing ones that wouldn't iirc. it's been more of a moral/philosophical crusade by the West than any inherent antipathy in the human spirit to a life under the yoke of some social better. serfdom was not so far from slavery either, everyone living on the land was property of the noble who happened to own it. i'd bet that a lot of people even in the west would be satisfied with a comfortable life doing simple but fulfilling work for a benevolent (ideally) authority figure. lots of time for family and friends, all needs provided for--miserable workers are not very good ones after all. i'm not sure everyone knows what to do with freedom. there are counterexamples such as 19th century America. but the people taming the wild west and thriving in the midwest boom towns were a special breed, self selected from the broader european population for that specific task

>if you dont want to import an endless amount of ungrateful low IQ third worlders into your home country youre a racist
Coward. You should have stayed in your shithole country to make it better, not run off to white countries to leech off our system which took centuries of hard work to create. Please dont blow yourself up in a public area of your benevolent white host country, weakling.

Fucken balls on this prick

>You hate a certain ethnic group an are actively trying to destroy them and their culture.

Incorrect, Just their white supremacist culture. Once they accept their place as an equal (once the equivalence in politics, population and big tech are evened out of course) then there will be no issue.

>I do not vote for massive companies like the right
The Right do not vote for massive companies. At least not anymore. The Left have very firmly become BOTH the party of big government AND big business.

Both the left and right cuck to big corporations and big govt now. Its a sham. The only thing you can do is try to vote for party reformers on either side.

The issue isn't so much information being wrong outright, but rather the strawman arguments and taking things out of context.

For example, the episode on childbirth where he says "ACKSHULLAY, IT'S NOT TRUE THAT WOMEN CAN'T HAVE KIDS AFTER 35! THERE ARE PLENTY OF EXAMPLES OF WOMEN HAVING CHILDREN IN THEIR 40S!"
As if the concept of bell curves doesn't exist and the existence of outliers with higher-than-average fertility in old age negates the factual trend that fertility drops off and it becomes exponentially less likely to produce a healthy viable child once a woman gets older, with a soft cutoff in the mid/late 30s overall.

Another example would be using the existence of intersex people born with legitimate birth defects to justify any person declaring themselves "born the wrong gender" and cutting off their cock and taking HRT. That shit is just disingenuous and fallacious.

>Socialism is inevitable
Why are you people so brainwashed and retarded?
>muh automation
Another economic fallacy.

Attached: 1392340749661.jpg (421x1000, 268K)

yes

This is your brain on HRT

Attached: 1556419647755.jpg (678x603, 97K)

>Incorrect
it's not.
You're doing exactly that.
You're a black/mexican/asian etc etc supremacist.
Statistically you people are MUCH more racist than whites.
and you constantly attack them

Attached: whites are the least racist.png (311x295, 70K)

>Once they accept their place as an equal
Hey man if we're all equals then why is your homeland a shithole?

>this country that i ran off to fora better life from my own shitholes country has a white supremacist culture
Youre so fucking stupid, and an excellent argument against immigration. It has nothing to do with your race either, it is your character and delusional ideas thatcmake you an undesirable. Fuck off, the west doesnt need you.

>once we force people to deny their natural instincts there will be no issue

You're like Breen from Half Life 2

Attached: Breen_upset.jpg (620x819, 354K)

People like you are why racism exists.

The biggest thing that has destroyed the third world's ability to becoming prosperous is smart people leaving their countries to come to the first world.
You people are disgusting.

Anyone who hates America and the principles it was founded on is lower than a bug, kys.

They are, for good reason.

Not an argument.

>They are, for good reason.
Oh boy!

Attached: dyjkk.jpg (1316x730, 203K)

>This guy believes beta males don't exist

for fucks sake

>Ted
>Go work 80 hour weeks
????????????

Democratic republic.

What?
I'm the one that supports original american principals.
The founding fathers hated democracy.

Socialism isn't inevitable, it's in the dustbin of history.
The economy is shit because of central banking, not capitalism.

If you're not willing to stand naked in front of a group of women you're the beta male, user.

>the Singularity will make human labor worthless
>genetic modification will make race worthless
>post-humanity will make biology worthless

There is nothing Conservatives fear more than technology.

No they arent. You're a brainwashed fucking retard if you think land can be racist.

Ok Bernie, you can give the vote to violent criminals, rapists, pedophiles, terrorists, and non-tax paying illegal immigrant welfare leeches. Let me know how your starving shithole works out for you.

Attached: Venezuela before and after =p.jpg (800x800, 148K)

Not him but as a thirdworldfag I am sympathetic. You can't give CPR to a corpse; if the overwhelming majority of your country votes for a party with stupid policies for election after election after election, what can you do?

>Quantum computing, machine learning, 3D printing, self-driven automobiles, gene therapy, hepatitis C was essentially cured, the first artificial pancreas, natural language processing,
You have to understand, that:
a) none of those things are immediately useful to common folk;
b) technical progress is a double edged sword: some of it used for good, but the governments use it to consolidate their powers.
See China, for example. They're literally creating the most massive surveillance state and technology is at its heart.

Socialism is the literal inevitability of technological development, it has nothing to do with culture or the economy.

People worked long long hours before the industrial revolution.

>>the Singularity will make human labor worthless
Based, that means capitalism will become more powerful as prices drop to zero and hardly anyone would have to work.
>>genetic modification will make race worthless
No it wouldn't.
People wouldn't just stop associating with their own kind.
In fact they would want to genetically advance their own kind.
Look at China.
>>post-humanity will make biology worthless
No it wont

Why should you not fear the biggest centalization of power in human history controlled by maniac billionaires? You're an idiot if you buy into their save the world bullshit.

Nigger I streaked and waved at busloads of people for New Years Eve for a solid 10 minutes in the snow.

Attached: Black Hispanic White Asian crime rates.jpg (417x466, 28K)

He says x, and then he says y, and then for no reason he links x and y as if they're significantly relevant to each other in some way which they aren't.

>i found a quote by a fringe technocrat saying robots are taking all the jobs in literally 10 years and that's why I DON'T HAVE TO GET A REAL JOB MOM

>Socialism is the literal inevitability of technological development,
How?

>In fact they would want to genetically advance their own kind.
>Look at China.
They don't want to just "genetically advance" people, they want literal NPCs, working drones, mindless killing machines.

>what can you do?
be based as fuck like pinochet and abolish democracy

>Socialism is the literal inevitability of technological development
No it's not.
Your retarded fan fiction has nothing to do with reality.
I can't wait for automation because it's only going to strengthen capitalism as prices come down and living standards increase.

The endgame of technology is making human labor worthless.

>They don't want to just "genetically advance" people, they want literal NPCs, working drones, mindless killing machines.
Sure but they are racist and fuck and only advancing their own people at the expense of others which is my point.

Sorry, did you just try to make fun of a group of people for fearing the end of humanity...?
user?

>stuff being literally free and human labor being worthless is capitalism
Wew.

So? What about the industrial revolution? That made many forms of labour worthless but gave way to even more jobs and a thriving capitalist economy.

Youre a fucking moron like all socialist kiddies.

Which will only result in prices dropping to zero and everything being free.
Based capitalism.

The AI revolution has absolutely nothing to do with the industrial revolution.

Avoiding minorities in cities is one of the main benefits of living in the suburbs. Has nothing to do with the land.

Read about the Niihau incident. The American public opinion initially supported Japanese Americans, but deteriorated over time and was exacerbated by the Niihau incident.

why are right wingers so insane and bloodthirsty?

What an astute fucking observation

They're literally not comparable. The point of AI is to become completely self-reliant, period.

Call it what you want, capitalism created it.
It's not capitalism or socialism, it's basically the end of economics.

So? How is prefeing to live with your own kind racist? Every ethnicity does this. And how does that make a land mass racist again?

Im sorry leftists these days are just too stupid to take seriously

>The point of AI is to become completely self-reliant, period.
so was the industrial revolution

You're a bad person

Its just your brainwashed view of the world. Both sides are violent, although the far left are currently much more violent in this paradigm, ie antifa assaulting old people for no reason and beating innocent people over the head with bike locks because theycsupport trump

They are, and you dont understand AI well enough. And again, how will this lead to socialism, if we pretend for a second that your misguided future predictions will become true?

>only advancing their own people
That wouldn't make sense unless the CPC wants to go suicidal.

Discredited, perhaps, but not disproved. Differentials in intelligence due to where and how different peoples evolved is pretty universally accepted by anyone with half a brain who isn't driven by political agenda. People who evolved in a warm climate with plentiful food and water are obviously going to have less developed brains than people who evolved in a harsh environment where food had to be preserved and shelter needed to be a great deal more sophisticated to ensure survival. Hard science aside common sense should tell you that a hundred thousand years of natural selection will inevitably produce different results in both above groups. Whatever your political leanings are or your views on humanity, ignoring logic is never the correct course of action.

For the sake of argument: would you consider a wolf and a pug to be of equal intelligence?

>Everybody who hates trannies and the current tranny/pedo culture must do so because they've never had sex

I never understood why we're at the point where the insult is literally "You've never had sex! checkmate."

>. Race science was discredited decades ago
Nope. Far left jews wanting you to think there is now difference between ethnicities doesnt mean anything. Youre actually a total fucking retard if you think all ethnicities exhibit exactly the same qualities on average.

Meanwhile the right is shooting up mosques
btw, ISIS is right-wing too.

Lol

>Race science was discredited decades ago.
Then why do most biologists and scientists agree with it?

Attached: 12345678765433.png (686x427, 43K)

There's a pretty strong correlation between complaining about trannies online and not having sex. Not saying one causes the other, but...

>eco fascists are right wing
>ISIS are right wing because i say so
>all this incel could come up with were rwo shitty examples
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Youre such a fucking retard. I bet youre hella racist too.

laugh now but this shit is going to revolutionize the world and make fuel super cheap

youtube.com/watch?v=VtOhPEU8CrA

FUCK YOU JEW ANTIFA RAPED AND MURDERED MY ENTIRE FAMILY

Meanwhile the left killed one hundred million people in Russia and China.

>There's a pretty strong correlation between complaining about trannies online and not having sex. Not saying one causes the other, but...

Attached: 1556076364108.png (2484x2072, 1.59M)

>oil, banking and tech make a shitload of money
really makes me think. a median would be more interesting

also lol at mississippi. come on guys. literal empty deserts with next to no resources are ahead of you

>There's a pretty strong correlation between complaining about trannies online and not having sex.
But conservative have higher fertility rates than leftists.
You make no sense.

Attached: 1541933122548.jpg (576x770, 63K)

Isn't it rather convenient every monster is right-wing?

>assblasted tranny just making it up by the minute
Lololololol

Have sex fat mutt dike

Meanwhile the left is destroying the entire world and has elevated the rate of rape and murder across Europe 1000%
btw, Stalin was left-wing too.

right wing and left wing are meaningless terms nowadays

Incels aside, there is a massive difference in criminal behaviour and economic status worldwide between blacks and literally everybody else.

If you dont believe me go live in their neighborhoods/countries to quickly find out why. Most African cultures are antithetical to long-term planning and respect for hard work. There are a few that break the mold like the Ugandans.

Christian conservatives who think birth control is a sin get married young and have a lot of babies.

Edgy internet right-wingers like you and everyone else on Yea Forums don't have sex at all.

A hundred thousand years isn't enough to produce significant natural evolution. You can't compare artificially bred dogs to humans.

>assblasted tranny
xe wishes...

Traditionalist religious zealots are right-wing, yes. Dumbass.

Being right wing seems to just mean "traditionalist". Depends on how you define right-wing.

True, it is more authoritarian and globalism (Hillary and the neocons and neolibs, merkel,macron) vs populism/nativism (trump, bernier, bolsonaro etc)

>don't have sex at all.
and you base this on what?
You're simply projecting you asspained leftist virgin.
How do you people live with yourselves, being wrong about everything all of the time.

Culture =/ race

It's almost as though the term is being used by some group or people with a particular amount of influence over the media and education system to vilify anyone who disagrees with their own agenda being made manifest.

It's just so strange, you know? I wonder who would possibly do such a thing...

>Traditionalist religious zealots are right-wing
>its true if I keep repeating myself
Based retard

>A hundred thousand years isn't enough to produce significant natural evolution.
lol yes it is you fucking idiot
youtube.com/watch?v=P78Zd8265_k

It doesnt at all. Even trump is considered right wing but he isn trad at all.

this is more true then these people are willing to admit

>bernier
BASED
I voted for him in the leadership election.

He's fucked though and his party is falling apart.
Sad.

Attached: bernier.png (1765x1904, 3.79M)

Do marxists count as religious zealots?

Why are you linking a propaganda video? You got me interested thinking you had linked something worthwhile about observed differences in animal types, not this nonsense.

>and you base this on what?
reading the posts they make

Your problem is assuming that there's something wrong with being racist.

Tell me how you think ISIS would fit on the political scale we're using here.

Nigger, the lifespan of a single generation is long enough to produce significant natural evolution.
>drop a group of people in the rainforest
>strong will survive, weak will die
>next generation will carry the genetics of the strong and not the weak and be more likely to inherit their traits
Are you ignoring basic logic due to ideology goggles or are you legitimately thick in the head?

>Why are you linking a propaganda video?
What's wrong with a propaganda video?
Why are you unable to refute anything he's saying in the video?
Just watch the first minute and a half and see if you can debunk it, you literally can't.

>You got me interested thinking you had linked something worthwhile about observed differences in animal types
He links all of the peer reviewed research he cites in the description.

Taxation is literally redistribution of wealth. You can argue against taxation if you want but you would be retarded to do so.

What they say and do. How they're always bitching about women and not having sex, how they're always on Yea Forums, how they're generally very ugly, how they always get angry and deflect whenever someone tells them to have sex... the list goes on.

say it...

k

Attached: Genetics changing our understanding of race.png (1815x1039, 118K)

stalin wasn't even political. he was just a thug

there brown so their left wing duh

>reading the posts they make
As opposed to cucked leftist comments that females are absolutely disgusted by?
What are you even saying?
Leftists are fucking losers.

>How they're always bitching about women
Actual men do this all of the time.
Stand up comedians have been doing this since forever.

>how they're always on Yea Forums
Leftists are always on reddit.

>how they're generally very ugly
Now you're just projecting. I'll wait as you post the same cherry picked examples you people always post though.

PLEASE have sex you left wing loser.

>this is the kind of drooling mong you share this board with

Taxation should remain a small ante that competent members of society enter into willingly and continually fiercely negotiate.

Taxes should not be expected to eternally rise to take care of adults who have forsaken their responsibilities and choose to live their lives out as children. I do not need nigger tier neighbours from any race. I need responsible adults because lifting the burden of society is difficult without help.

Attached: Black Crime over representation everywhere.png (960x846, 46K)

>no argument
every fucking time
when will you leftists learn that you're factually WRONG

>moves goalposts
Seriously though, thought it was fairly obvious I was being facetious to point out the retarded oversimplification in the post I was replying to but apparently I greatly overestimated the intelligence of certain elements in this thread. Next time I'll spell it out and add irony tags for you.

ISIS would be extremely right wing, yes. But in a white country they would still vote left because Muslims abuse the fuck out of welfare at astronomical rates.

The point is, we do not want to pay for inferior peoples. We want to live peacefully without them. The problem is we stopped having our own children because we became irresponsible, lazy, and didn't want the burden. But that burden is what gives life more meaning and we have shirked it at our peril. We need inferior peoples gone from our shores to lessen the burden on those what work to produce.

A people who have an average IQ of 100 do not belong with a people who have an average IQ of 95 or even 90. That deviation alone is more than enough to cause massive differences.

Attached: Percent on welfare - Dutch.jpg (588x426, 38K)

Present an argument for me and prove that I'm a drooling mong and I will suck your cock and devote my life to social justice right now.

Yes taxation is gay and should be as limited as possible, you fucking retarded pervert.