Why aren't you watching your movies in 60fps? It's the next revolution and you need to be ready

Because it looks like a fucking computer game

Why does it cut through the other ship instead of pushing it as well?

star destroyers are sharp

Rogue One.

How are the ships falling in space

>hi-def
so when moves go beyond 720p?

>t. lunatic

Attached: PJ.jpg (630x472, 49K)

Planets have gravity, crazy I know!

why dont they have shields?

The one getting pushed had its shields disabled. The one getting crashed into, uhhhhhhhhhhh

good visuals but bad story
sad!

then why not just shoot it?

>uhhhhhhhhhhh

Reminder that the reason movies look shitty at a higher framerate (like that Dark Knighr video) is because it's done through editing. It stars through at the beginning, if a movie is actually filmed for 48 fps, it would not look anything like it.

Attached: dude.webm (700x544, 579K)

counter point : the hobbit trilogy

The hobbit trilogy was fine, people just aren't used to it

Yeah but there's no retrograde burn

Video games need to be more like movies, not the other way around.

the hobbit trilogy looked shit because of all the cgi and props that don't look believable in 48 frames

>modern sci-fi FX look worse today than they did 40 years ago

How is this even possible?

t-thx Lucasfilm

>ramming ships in space causes them to fall downward

There's literally no reason to keep the 25fps standard now that we use digital instead of celluloid

>all those people dead
haha we're the good guys

Where you not paying attentions. It's obvious they were trying to show the rebels are squeaky clean. Cassian Andor or whatever his name is shoots a guy while his back is turned

Reminds me of that time a bong tugboat rammed the Bismarck into the Prinz Eugen, and then they both crashed into some u-boat pens destroying them.

The high framerate stuff is shit but my real problem is that the empire's ships and whatnot look too clean
Like a high res scan of a 3d printed white plastic model
There's not scratches or surface differencesm, it's sterile whitish plastic instead of steel covered in scratches and blemishes
Again showing just how sterile and lifeless the Disney Star Wars are

Attached: 61231994_p0_master1200.jpg (977x1171, 237K)

>so when moves go beyond 720p?
I appreciate you trying to be a condescending asshole, but I'll assume you understood what I was saying the first time.

this. it was just 2x shitty frames in the hobbit

High frame rates are best used for anything you interact with or control such as a video game or desktop UI
Just watching something in HFR sucks and the novelty wears thin

>higher framerates make every aspect of the film—from the sets to the costumes, vfx, and the acting—look substantially worse and of lower quality, since everything up until this point has been designed with 24 frames in mind
>BUT DUDE ITS MORE FRAMES

>60fps looks bad
youtu.be/BwpTty1Zg-w

At this point I´ve simply stopped giving a fuck.
Watch your gramps 24fps for ever, but at least shut the FUKUP already.

Attached: 60fps.webm (1920x800, 2.82M)

>Why aren't you watching your movies in 60fps?
Because I'm not a tryhard faggot?

They're spaceships, why would they have scratches on them?

>my real problem is that the empire's ships and whatnot look too clean
>Like a high res scan of a 3d printed white plastic model
That's because they are. They 3D scanned each pieces of an old Star Destroyer model kit.
Garreth Edwards wanted the models to look and feel closer to the OT.

Why not build a shit ton of those and completely destroy all imperial ships?

>this is what manlets actually believe
ahahahahahhaaha

Call me when it's 144fps as God intended.

>That's because they are. They 3D scanned each pieces of an old Star Destroyer model kit.
>Garreth Edwards wanted the models to look and feel closer to the OT.
Why didn't they make actual ILM models

>actual ILM models
Because all those guys have been fired long time ago and are in retirement anyway by now.
It´s all SJW millennials CGI wankers now.

They are warships and get shot at all the time and enter many different planets atmosphere.

Because [current year] ILM is all CGI.

space dust

Attached: D4cIkY0VUAI6V2Y.jpg (447x307, 43K)

>It's the next revolution and you need to be ready.
Kill yourself faggot

Because the Empire would catch on really fast. This only works because there are two Star Destroyers in relative proximity to each other and the swarms of TIE fighters that would normally be protecting them against small craft like this were occupied elsewhere. Assuming the Empire had a way to review this battle later they would have changed the protocols on the distance between Star Destroyers during a battle and probably the protocols on leaving a Star Destroyer unprotected as well.

Should've kept the Venator

They have massive force fields though. Plus this is early on in the empire so a lot of these ships might not have seen any combat yet.

>is early on in the empire
Its been around for 20 fucking years you fucking corporate cock sucking mouse shill.

>t. autist
I haven't watched a star wars movie the Phantom Menace and I highly recommend no one else watches or discusses anything star wars related before or after the OT. The only reason I'm here is because I heard this movie was supposed to be a throwback to the actually good star wars shit. Also
>calls me a shill even though he has the exact dates for this mediocre spinoff movie memorized and is seething at me for fudging the details

>no shields

Attached: Laughing_Data.jpg (1800x1355, 966K)

Nope, it just looks like shit CGI

ILM shut down its practical effects department back in 2012

>i dont know or care about star wars but i sure do love sucking mouse cock.

>he has the exact dates for this mediocre spinoff movie memorized
>movie literally ends moments before the original star wars begins
Are you fucking retarded?

I do care a lot about the OT and some video games based off it.
I didn't watch this garbage and the more I hear about the better I feel about that decision.

Space ships in the star wars universe have repulsor engines. It's how luke had a hover speeder.
It's such old ubiquitous tech in the star wars universe that knowledge of it's origin is lost to history.

>60fps
>doesn't make the running time go faster
useless

folded over 1000 times

shitty director, those shots never look good

this looks better in a theater with black frames and a 96 hz refresh rate

In general CGI is not at a point where adding frames to it makes it look more realistic, usually it ends up looking like a video game

am I really gonna have to be the guy to ask for source on both of those

>uses webm of one of worst movies when it comes to cinematography to prove that a certain frame rate is bad

Do any home releases even come with HFR versions?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 74K)

Doppel

Attached: D4IQOPUU4AAJXBk.jpg large.jpg (616x775, 134K)

No because 60fps on tv looks even weirder than in cinema

more than 24fps is mexican soap opera terrytory

That Hammerhead pooshit was wide open when it was coming from behind that disabled Star Destroyer.
Why didn't the other Star Destroyer unload a shitload of its aft starboard turrets and shit at the turd when it was wide open? This is fucking retarded.

Attached: 1534850766254.jpg (468x598, 76K)

I'm amazed at the universe-ruining bullshit Star Wars fans are willing to ignore. They're not even tolerating or excusing it - they straight up don't even realize that some of the shit they've put in the movies entirely breaks the universe's sparse rules.

because it makes everything look fake and shit.

Attached: 1553186390007.jpg (480x468, 20K)

This guy gets it. The correct way to watch a movie is how the director intended. Directors can be incompetent and have shitty cinematography, but if that is the case why bother watching it?

>There's literally no reason to keep the 25fps standard now that we use digital instead of celluloid
The only modern capeshit movies that have true 4k are Snyder's, guess what he uses.

based

People only shit on high framerates because they're not used to them