You know me, I'm a movie guy. Classic Vinewood

He was hands down a good protagonist that suffered by having franklin deflate the entire game.
Two protags was enough but so many games did it they had to go 3
None of them where developed fully game felt rushed which is weird because they spent 5 years making it
Sopranos type Martin scorese 1900-1970s type Hollywood.
I wish we got to see a bit more on the kino side of that part of the game even vice city and SA spent more time taking the piss out of movies like Friday and scarface while making the parody setting a good story in its own right.
Gta 5 had no depth
Pretty much

Boats, obviously

>video games

Attached: 1547996494465.webm (516x436, 2.84M)

Trevor was fun when his two good writers got time instead of his three bad ones. All his rage and anger shit is bad, but his nonchalance about everything was cute.

Attached: Trev&Pat.jpg (640x360, 69K)

Well they ripped off HEAT tremendously and also Thief so mainly Michael Mann and other 70s-80s crime movies I think
GTAV was a step back in nearly every direction from 4 and the characters were completely unlikeable and uninteresting
And RDR2 was very boring

Attached: D4cIkY0VUAI6V2Y.jpg (447x307, 43K)

I think they did Fellini's 8 1/2 in the theatre.

This.
I haven't played Rdr2 but I don't need to.
Looks boring and slowpoke and I loved rdr1.
It's almost playable on Xenia 360 emu as well even at 2k res

His character wants to live in the 80s which was his youth I assume so 80s action movies I guess.

>hyped
>even after 4 killed the series
Why?

sure the story mode sucked and had like 3 good missions and the online never worked right but at least it looked amazing

name 1 good game

I didn't hate IV, L&D or BoGT. I didn't enjoy as much as 3, VC or SA but it wasn't enough to kill my love of the series. And as the years passed and the little bits kept getting leaked I just kept getting more hyped. Maybe I just needed something to look forward to.

Half Life 2

this was my favourite part

really? ,';)

youtube.com/watch?v=J3bCL3fHNqg

Tetris 2

GTA V is clearly the best in the series. Any opinion the contrary is just zoomer meme nostalgia.

The 3 protags gimmick absolutely murdered this game. Most importantly it made it impossible to connect with any of them, all 3 just felt like side characters from a previous GTA. They all had a one dimensional character set up and then the game just milked it. I'm still not even sure what Franklin's was. On a technical level """seamlessly"""" switching between the three took just long enough to ruin the game, although maybe that got fixed in the current gen ports. Plus there was small things like clothes being absolutely useless because they would changed every time you switched away.

franklin was mandatory diversity

The best how tho? It's generic it does everything well but nothing great.
Like the suv of the gta series
Iv had more memorable characters and setting/story.
SA had the best period and comedy.
Vc had the best atmosphere
3 is under rated and low key they best overall I love it's early 00s feel
1 and 2 are great in their own right even china town had its moments as did lcs/vcs
V did everything to a satisfactory level but I can't remember anything I loved about it.
Not from years of playing online nor the sp or offline mods it's just incredibly ok.
Name one good scene apart from the prologue

HL1 and HL2 are video game kino

yeah the story is definitely the worst but its still pretty fun gameplay wise

I quit early on after they gave you flying skills almost immediately. Made the world feel very small.

>3 is under rated and low key they best overall

Attached: 1506859263127.jpg (785x757, 98K)

based but episode 2 is better

Shame there's about 5 minutes of engaging gameplay to every 55 minutes of watching a cutscene or following guy while he talks.

Exploder.

youtube.com/watch?v=JAqZlo5uQ6Y

Yo
My hands are all messed up
So you better drive brother.
Silent protags can be great.
Tbqh their wasn't a single mission I liked.
The ayylmao one and some of trevs random encounters where OK the main quest sucked

For a game that takes place in fantasy LA, there was very little about Hollywood in it.

Heat

this
At the very least much better than the le random psychopath and the plank of wood disguised as a black man

>gta5 is actually great
>all the fags of Yea Forums hate it
If it was bad youd all love it you contrarian fuckwads.

They have all been shit since after SA. And even then I think Vice City was best.

Attached: 1546283964714.jpg (1440x1080, 145K)

I just started playing this game and I'm about 8 hours in or so and I just did the first flying mission. I agree. This game would have been so much better with one protag. The world feels small. Also feels empty. Missions are so linear. Oh well it's a fun time waster

t. nu-Rockstar shill

It was fun

Michael Mann movies, hence the Tangerine Dream score and heists

God, I hated Michael. He was self obsessed and wanted to make everything about himself.

Also writing on this game was shit, Trevor is a monster who doesn't like anyone but instantly likes and respects Franklin. Also everybody is fine with him being a psychopath.

>He didn't like IV

user, I....

GTA SA

That shirt, so many memories

Ah. Well you see, that's because I like good games.

At least they made the mass murdering psychopath a liberal.

>literal cuck
it didn't sit right with me considering he was a psychopathic bank robber

I bothered beating it, which is more than I can say than 4.

>switching between the three took just long enough to ruin the game
not really

GTAV is my fav after Vice City which is absolutely the best
I liked three character stories tho Trevor was overdone

Michael's existential crisis is relatable to everybody who's not a teen, i.e. 30yo boomers like me

Reminder that GTA IV was a massive leap for video games as a whole and the best GTA. V was a step back in nearly every way.

>Also writing on this game was shit, Trevor is a monster who doesn't like anyone but instantly likes and respects Franklin.
This. he was only a well written character during his first missions in Blaine County, then ever since he arrives Los Santos his writting/personality starts having inconsistencies

"now that i was just getting used to carry the apocalypse in my pocket"

love how he feels right at home with all the fib bullshit cause its like one of his action movies and he's loving every bit of it, playing the hero with catchphrases role naturally.
ese michael es to peliculero

i liked michaels story, i remember how much of an enjoyment i had destroying the tennis fucker house.

I think GTA V started great, the whole clinton&jamal @ that iranian dealer who kept using the race card, shit was hilarious and redpilled. I liked the "analyze this" approach when it got to michael altho it feels a bit too shallow. Story gets kinda weird towards the end or should i say, it feels rushed. The way franklin gets the final decision felt so forced.

Trevor was an edgy retard who i never enjoyed playing.

Michael was annoying as shit. He wanted a perfect family and got depressed when they got lives of their own. His family is a caricature,sure, but the way he wants them to act is unnatural,especially for being estranged from them for so long.

>only a well written character

he was by far the worse.

I didn't like anybody in IV at all. at least there was a little humor in V
i didn't laugh at San Andreas, but III and VC are good

that's the point

how the fuck was he annoying / how was he forcing him ? He was literally fucked by all of them.
>wife cheats on you
>son is a reddit jerkoff loser who plays vidya all games
>daughter is a total whore
>whilst he tries (and does) provide them with at most comfy life in a fucking mansion,

Michael is just your typical man who wants the best for his family whilst he gets nothing in return.

reminder that you're wrong

his screams of pain when damaged and terror when falling from high altitudes are pretty funny.

>story
>worst

you mean best?

all gta VI need is RDR level of details and cut on PC bullshit. Ill still wait for release because after rdr2 im not so sure they wont go sjw on it.

my big thing was I wanted randomized outfits and to be able to set at least 2 custom vehicles to your personal one. i like trevors truck, but sometimes i want him to start a mission with a sanchez or something. if I buy it online, then i have to go to my garage, take it to the mod shop, buy everything, and if i save it in any garage including the ones you buy, once it's wrecked its gone.
give me a reason to spend my money, i'll buy insurance or repay the immense amount of money to have it, just give me the option.

>Plus there was small things like clothes being absolutely useless because they would changed every time you switched away.
Worst part about the game

fuck, that trully was annoying

In the first mission they meet, Trevor tells Franklin to fuck off at least

hl1 is a masterpiece and hl2 is physics puzzle demo game with the other half of the game being story dumps where you jump around on the surrounding while they vomit the story at you and suck gordon's dick

>Also everybody is fine with him being a psychopath.

>he never chose to kill trevor.

Michael kept changing into his ugly ass brown jacket ever time he showed up in another character's cutscene and I hated it

I meant in the game. Trevor literally killed and raped innocent people but when you called Franklin or Michael for a hangout, they would say Cool!

AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW MY DAWG

okay. but if you kill trevor in the end, Michael celebrates Trevors death.

Probably some Dano-kino

i believe he even calls him a psychopath or something like that. calls him fucking annoying and how he has no brakes no morality etc. It literally makes Michaels day. Whats more, michael does the killing shot if you dont do it with franklin (or maybe he always delivers the final shot in a cutscene, idk, i was idling with franklin to see what happens)

OK but what does the V stand for?

This webm physically fucking pains me

virgin

The Decent, the Deplorable, and the Dishonorable

Best sandbox stuff sure, but awful story and characters.

are there any "classic hollywood" movies? besides monster movies?

He’s a fucking apathetic loser that cant take accountability for anything and just let’s life pass him by in a fashion he doesn’t like and does nothing about or if he does do something about it it’s in the most roundabout indirect way possible

everybody in crime loves scarface. its like tony robbins for scumbags

If it ever gets a modern port where the right stick controls a free-flowing camera like SA and beyond, I'm with you.

Why does everyone hate Franklin? I didnt think he was that bad.... Is it purely because he has black skin?

HL1 was also about puzzles through all the game.
Stop with the hipster spacing

>RDR level of detail
You mean RDR2 right? Because it is far more detailed than any other R* game. Hell even GTA5 is probably more detailed technically than the first RDR

When did this happen? My characters always wore whatever clothes i put them in between switches. The only time they would "change" clothes was when I exited the game.or maybe reloaded saves...

>gta4 is better than 5
This fucking meme

he was just a worse cj and had nothing really going for him. could easily forget he existed desu

I liked him. He just wanted money, no drama. I can even forgive his stupid girlfriend he can't forget because she's only in one cutscene, her voice is in a cutscene, and has two email exchanges. She's a retard who can't decide what she wants and doesn't deserve him.

Because he has no depth, no hook to his personality. He just drifts aimlessly through the story. Worst type of protagonist for a GTA game.

Sometimes the characters would change clothes when I switched to another character for a little while.

those were the main character gets cucked has himself

Why were you so disappointed user?

I enjoyed RDR 2 very much, even though i haven't finished it yet. The story is kinda boring, but all the fluff around it makes for some enjoyable roams through nature.

I didn't hate him, but his character has about zero development going for him. I think his friend Lemar had more character development than he did.

shit that sucks about gta v was that rockstar knew how to make likable protagonists like arthur and niko but dropped the ball hard in this game.

Attached: arthur scared.jpg (1280x720, 84K)

All you did was list of films similar in setting and tone to GTAV

>And RDR2 was very boring

I hear you have to make coffee and other Sims shit like that. Is it true?

OOOOOOO BABY PLEASE DON'T GO

Vice city was straight dope.

SA is arguably the best video game ever made.

HAHAHAHA LE HL2 IS A TACH DEMO AM I RIGHT

After a few minutes, most missions, or two "random events" in a row
i gave up trying to dress them because you can't save an outfit. if you could just use the M menu like you can for other shit it'd be no problem, but to have to go back to your safehouse

Life is Strange

He is right, you know.
GTA IV was a leap when compared to GTA SA, while V is more of a step to the side

>im not sure what franklins story was
How? It was very obviously him trying to get out of the hood and the criminal lifestyle...

There's this movie review website ingame where he's posted a few comments

Okay yeah. After enough time passed they would change as well. But doesnt thst make sense? Why would the characters stay in the same outfit for days?

RDR2 is no more slow or boring than the first one. Typical fucking Yea Forums old=good new=bad shit.

No, he's not. You've already contradicted him in your post. The story in GTA V was more thematically coherent than GTA IV, and less bogged down in the mechanics/ structure of the gameplay.

Attached: Trevor's Sexual Fantasy.jpg (640x360, 131K)

Yeah. They worked pretty hard to make the characters feel like actual people so they added alot of more "simulation" type of stuff. Like having to eat etc. Honestly adds alot of immersion to the game.

In other words stick to fortnite faggot

IV is the best GTA though

This was satisfying because fuck bikers and fuck cuckolds.
What people don't like is how they default to the same 2-3 outfits instead of wearing a set you buy another time. Michael wears suits, but he'll only ever put on the grey suit even though I own all of them.

Attached: Trevor&Johnny-GTA5.jpg (1017x525, 77K)

This. His story probably had the most depth to it. At least more than Trevor. But of course Yea Forums has to hate him because he is a nigger

EDF 4.1

Mega Man 2

>the default 2-3 outfits
Okay that I can understand. Its been awhile since I played. I could have swore they would wear actual outfits I bought. But i could very well be mistaken. I honestly thought the game was impressive considering the absolute garbage hardware it was originally programmed to run on

So who is everyones favorite R* MC? Im gonna have to go with Arthur.

gta iv didn't have planes

You've got to fist fight her for her virginity. Do you win?

Attached: Mary-Ann_GTAVpc_Aggressive.png (451x451, 157K)

>Stop with the hipster spacing
>1 line
>hipster spacing

ah you're a phoneposter

I'd wrestle her down and matingpress her, giving her the child she needs

I don't really understand this retarded objection to the GTA V characters being bad people.

Wow. Bank robbers and killers are shitty people. Who fucking knew?

Thats literally the fucking point. Holy shit.

Franklin's special is the most op

Reminder only contrarian brainlets claim GTAIV is better than V

True. Michael's the worst

Best intro
youtube.com/watch?v=Ag6H1e1rXJ0

I just now remembered there were specials

Wasnt trevors better? You became basically invincible and did more damage... Franklins was shit. Just made driving easier.

>get her number with all 3 characters
>can't ever do anything with it
>can't do Ursula with Michael
why does this game hate me

If you want slow-mo aim, you can put in a cheat

He’s just a tony soprano rip off.

>was more thematically coherent
In what way? In IV you had Nico trying to get away from crime buy getting roped back into it, running away from Bulgarin while looking for Draco.
V had 3 different character plotlines all mumbled and jumbled together
>less bogged down in the mechanics/ structure of the gameplay
again, in what way?
The physics introduction in GTA was very impressive in 2008, but instead of pushing it further with V, they toned it down
They dialed back car damage and instead of fixing their driving model threw it out in favor for a purely arcadey one.
The game suffered from being held back for 360 and PS3 instead of releasing for current gen

Attached: boomer.jpg (633x640, 87K)

I actually enjoyed the story.

Yeah but the combat was already easy enough. The driving one was nice to have when you were riding a bike

A lot of the game is driving and a lot of driving is evading the cops, Franklin's Special can make you untouchable if you're good

The driving in V was better then the driving in IV

I liked Franklins for turns, it gives him more grip and control while it's up. Also I think entering it and leaving it speeds you up a little
never used Michaels, played with Trevors during the 5 Rampages but that was it.
one of the ideas for the endings was that Franklin would die and you'd control Lamar. what would his special be?

Everybody knows that GTA IV is the best game after SA.

youtube.com/watch?v=GWVtZJo-HqI

NO IT'S THE BEST GAME EVER

-IGN

>the game was held back being made on 360 and ps3
Exactly. It was literally made on the same console as 4. Is it any big surprise the physics and damage were tuned down?

>i ams just wantings to be dones wit dis bloodsheds
>proceeds to kill five people for hees kousin

Calling people niggas

Attached: lamar.png (350x436, 178K)

annoying obnoxious faggot
i killed him many times

Driving was easy as well though. Ig sure it was useful on bikes ill give you that...

Its almost already that way without the special...

Tbh i hardly used any of the specials.

The thing I hate most about the modern GTA games is how hand holdy and controlling they are. The old games were all like "Hey yo do this mission. We don't really care how"

The newer games are more like "RREEEEEEE! You didn't do it the exact specific way we assumed you would. Mission failed you nigger!"

>i hate niggers
Okay we get it user

Mario 64

I also killed Amanda because she's a cunt

this

>i also hate women
Par the course user

My gripes with gtav are the Casino should have been in the game, they should have mini games for betting inside it like RDR. Maybe even the horse track could have been open for betting and the horses could've been ridden.

Also they could have used the drug dealing side-missions from GTA Chinatown Wars and make it a breaking bad simulator. Franklin as a street dealer, Trevor as a meth cook(already is), and Michael as a drug lord kingpin

>"I just want to live a quite life"
>Pulls down a 2 million mansion because he is being cucked

Wiseguys
The Capo
The Capo II with Roger DeBlanco AND Mike Sardino
Tony Bracco
Last Train To Grove Street

GTA represents very well everything wrong in the videogame industry. It's big budget blockbuster made by an army of slaves and zero creative game design work because no one outside of the storywriter has any kind of creative freedom. Imagine if all the big budget blockbusters movies got all the serious rewards because big companies are control freaks who owns everything on the market including the press. This is the state of the videogame industry now.

Bloodborne

what the F word you doin' here, Trevor?
you ain't my G-damn cousin.

Attached: Floyd.jpg (1280x720, 79K)

Yea and that's it for the entire game. Exactly what I mean by one dimensional like a side character from a previous GTA,

I liked how his circumstances changed throughout the game. Once you started getting money he wore more expensive clothes, and his apartment was pretty cool. But other than that, he was completely blank. Had no real personality.

this, the intro is straight out of a tony melfi session. Not to mention the whole dysfunctional family

Your wife getting fucked on your dollar in your bed isn't the same as your dumb cousin who lied to you being in debt and getting himself into trouble.

how many of you were even around when the original, 2D came out?

The satire of tech bro culture with the iFruit shit is particularly ironic coming from Rockstar.

Attached: 1379860289927.jpg (987x1280, 343K)

Infinitely better than any film of equivalent popularity from the last 20+ years.

RDR 1 was way more arcady and it worked. Not to mention that RDR 1 was for the time it came out way more an achievement than when RDR 2 came out.

Holy shit. Thats the fucking point. Michael wants this quite life but he keeps doing dumb shit to get dragged back into it. None of this is that complex. How you people cant pick up on this is beyond me

I'd never heard of the first before playing the second, was aware of the London one on PS1 and didn't know it was part of a series, and played GTA 2 on a friends computer in the late 90s.

Attached: A hey what do you say.jpg (468x468, 82K)