Was I the only one who liked it then?

Was I the only one who liked it then?
All I see are people getting mad about women and time travel.

Attached: Avengers-Endgame3.jpg (1024x683, 189K)

I like it. It's just annoying how forced some scenes are while other characters make uncharacteristic choices in the most crucial moments. Thanos portrayed as being weak without the gauntlet really take the wind out of the sails of the sacrifice of one person.

Yea Forums's like that. They hyper-focus on the shitty parts of the movie and pretend like the better parts don't exist.

But sometimes their rampant criticism is better to look at than constant lavish praise in other websites.

I loved it, but I’m a cuck so

>Time travel is a bullshit way out for lazy writers. As I understand it, Thanos destroys the stones, including Time, so they cannot reverse things, but they do it anyway?
>The end is basically "Remember this character?! Here they are again!" ad nauseam.
>Thanos falls into the same bad guy trope as so many others. He becomes a bumbling idiots, making uncharacteristic bad decisions when it's time for him to lose.

I honestly did not like this film. Yes the women scenes were cringeworthy and all the SJW white male cucking, I must be honest. But the real reason I didn't like this film was because it was just depressing. It didn't have the optimism of the previous films. It didn't even really feel like they won. In a way it sort of felt like they lost. The movie begins with people being snapped out of existence, the middle is support groups and people worried trying out time travel and it ends with tony stark's funeral and captain america is now an old man and Thor leaves. It's like they saved the universe but the Avengers lost and have been irreversibly destroyed. And all that character development with Gamora is now meaningless since that version of her is dead. Thanos, the big threat is now dead, thor is fat and cucked. Asgard is still destroyed. Loki is still dead. And the final action scene felt like it lasted only a few minutes desu. And Thanos motivation made no sense. If he was trying to cut life in half to preserve resources what happens when it bounces back? He destroyed the gems so he could never snap again. You would think he would have kept them so that he could re-snap every hundred years or something. I guess you could say he's just a psychotic killer, OK, but why? Nothing is explained. He's just badguy.jpg. It's dumb.

you know Yea Forums pretends to hate these but has seen every single one of them, and will see the next one.

>Thanos portrayed as being weak without the gauntlet really take the wind out of the sails of the sacrifice of one person.

Why was Thanos so nerfed in this one? He boxed the Hulk easily in the first film.

>DC-uck can't appreciate depression kino

Back to your Shazam fag

Why aren't the leftists screaming over the fact that the poster features three straight white miles in the center, with minorities pushed to the sides and shrunken in size?

Attached: ada-puzzled.jpg (1024x1000, 190K)

hey peter, you got somethin for me?

This was actually explained. Everytime he snapped it took a toll on his body. The stones were probably meant for Celestials to use or something, not Thanos or humans. So the energy was destroying his body. On the first snap it wrecked his body, plus he got Thors axe, on the second snap it really fucked him up. when they saw him on that planet it was like he was recovering from a virtual car accident. Thor also caught him by surprise if you didn't notice. During the final battle he was strong again because none of that snapping had happened.

Also, destroying the stones lead to time travel...And that's bad.

I liked it but then again I try to have the normie mindset when watching most movies. I actually kinda liked that depressive feel at the start. And I'm usually someone that hates "sad" movies. Also, I actually ended up forgetting that Iron Man was dead by the end of the movie. Honestly. By the time Thor's and Captain America's scenes ended, I had already forgotten that Stark died. Maybe cause those scenes were a little bit more bright than Stark's. Even though I'm kinda iffy about how they ended Cap's story.
As in laughing at shitty jokes, not being an Americlap. I liked the visuals, the soundtrack, most of the dialogue, most of the action, most of the actual fight.
But yeah, even then, that Girl Power! scene was cringey.

All they did to win this time was mob on him with more people, and the gaunlet working against him.

You see, in the first movie he was supposed to win, so that allowed him to be strong and smart and thus really menacing. Now he's supposed to lose and since the writers can't come up with a way the heroes could oneup a villain that powerful they just nerf him.

not everyone who criticizes Marvel likes DC you caved in head human toilet. I don't like 99% of DC or Marvel. As for "depression kino" *goinginmyCRINGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!compilation!!!!.jpg*
And no I don't want to watch depressing superhero movies you idiot. I want to see people with superpowers having fun not people dying and getting old and fat and flying away. Fuck off you marvel dickslurping corporate bukkake faggot.

Wait, was he nerfed? He was kicking Thor's, Cap's and Stark's asses without a single stone. And sure, you could say Thor was weakened but Cap with Mjolnir and Lightning powers? Stark shouldn't be weakened at all. Maybe his reflexes but he even blasted a giga thunder laser with Thor and it did nothing to Thanos. Literally the only person to give Thanos trouble was Captain Marvel and we all know she's bullshit so that's not even worth talking about. I thought Thanos was "unrealistically" strong. Unless you guys mean when Thor killed him? If that's the case then they explain that he was weakened literally in that same scene.
Also, Why Could Cap use Lightning powers? I thought Mjolnir was a way to channel Thor's power or something and it wasn't the Hammer of Lightning, just a tool to channel the God of Lightning's powers. But I guess anyone using it can tap in to Lightning powers? Was that explained in the old movies and I just forgot?

I liked it. The woman uprising scene was really hokey, but fuck it. It was like 2 minutes out of 2 hours.

Despite not really caring about the whole marvel movie franchise, this was a pretty nice way to wrap up 10 years of pop culture movie history

Attached: 1527719505733.jpg (350x350, 35K)

Has anyone else noticed that Asgard was destroyed at around the exact same time period that they started propping up Wakanda? They literally destroyed Asgard (a place they just HAD to include minorities into btw, because Asgard has "always been multicultural"), now it's no longer in that mystical realm, it's just some place on earth after he literally destroyed the place to protect it from his sister(his blood line), then they made thor fat and shitty and killed off loki and now he's literally leaving asgard and grants some random black woman who enslaved him to be Queen and leaves. Imagine if Black Panther did this! Imagine if Wakanda had always been multicultural, had been totally destroyed and the people had to leave, then 1/2 the population killed off and all the people but black panther were killed, then black panther became a fat drunk playing videogames and he named Bucky the new king of Wakanda and then flew away with GOTG. It's crazy when you think about it.

Attached: d09.jpg (684x546, 76K)

desu, the only good Marvel movies are Iron Man 1, Captain America 1 and 2 and GOTG 1. And those were just kind of good, none of them were exceptional. The original MOS was good also and The Dark Knight Trilogy by Chris Nolan. So both DC and Marvel have bad and good movies. Not everyone is joining these Marve/DC cults.

>because it's about time Biiiihhhhh

It was fine. Pic related is the average hater

Attached: o3bbpdhoo2l21.jpg (1469x2885, 1.57M)

>Thanos portrayed as being weak without the gauntlet really take the wind out of the sails of the sacrifice of one person.

he isnt portrayed as weak without the gauntlet

present thanos is weak because he destroys the stones which almost kills him and severely weakens him. half his body is charred and he can barely walk

past thanos is strong as fuck and single handedly owns the entire avenger crew and wins yet again before being snapped out of existence due to some trickery on ironmans part

>Thanos portrayed as being weak without the gauntlet
Did we watch the same movie?

Did you don't see that sick fidget spinning that thanos do, it's pure kino

>Shit opinions the post

Or bait claiming Man of Steel wasn't complete garbage, doen't matter either way in you go.

Attached: 1527720284645.jpg (680x645, 76K)

LMAO I'm getting 3 more tickets for CM now

Attached: 1533469255024.jpg (500x726, 71K)

I genuinely liked it, I just haven't been participating in a lot of threads.

CLEAN THIS BOARD OF CAPESHIT JANNIE
THANOS DIES
IRON MAN DIES

Attached: 1542306981376.jpg (1000x1000, 151K)

The most useful females in the movies were aliens. White males pretty much did everything. I'm actually kinda shocked.

The forced SJW is very minimal in this movie. Only like 2 scenes total out of a 3h movie

Now of course they set it up so the next movies are SJWs to the max
>black cap
>black female ruler of asgard
>fat thor on wacky adventures across space
>no white male team leaders

I liked it too desu, it just didn't reach the highs of IW (i kinda expected it to be better than it, don't think it was) aside from a couple of scenes like Cap lifting Mjolnir or Wanda raping Thanos

Yeah, i think Endgame is a good drop point. I'll still check Strange's solo movies.

And here's me wondering what made Thanos able to fight Thor (with Mjolnir and Stormbreaker), Captain America and Iron Man at the same time.

Glad I never bothered to watch Captain Marvel, damn. She played a pivotal role at the end but still, she could have been in it more.

My femanon ass

Attached: Mjjhv.gif (300x300, 1.84M)

So how the fuck does the timeline even make sense? They killed past Thanos, that by itself should undo everything

Time travel is just a bad plot device

Thanks user gonna text that to so many people

how did Captain America put the soul stone back in the water?

>So how the fuck does the timeline even make sense? They killed past Thanos, that by itself should undo everything

did you not listen? in the marvel version of time travel, the past does not affect the present, it simply creates a new ''branch'' from the point it is altered. which means they can go in and out of time and fuck with shit whenever and however they want

Ever watch dragon ball, its timeline based time travel

>and time travel.
these are the same people who don't have a problem with a talking raccoon. you should stop listening to them.

He probably just chucked it off the cliff.

Past Thanos almost kills the avengers & wields fucking Mjollnir

Christ, I don't think I've ever seen more pathetic SEETHING.