I always like how passive-aggressive critics can get about a dumb action movie without outright calling it bad.
I always like how passive-aggressive critics can get about a dumb action movie without outright calling it bad
Jonathan Adams
Other urls found in this thread:
nytimes.com
twitter.com
Julian Harris
Cameron Reed
Carter Foster
Damn
Kayden Gray
they brought it on themselves
Connor Jackson
This one is good:
>None of the 22 films in this cycle are likely to be remembered as great works of cinema, because none have really tried. It’s fun to see the actors in these roles we know are capable of better, and also satisfying to appreciate the efforts of those who might not be. Some first-rate directors have taken up the banner and burnished the brand. Their past and future masterpieces will most likely be found elsewhere.
>Still, “Endgame” is a monument to adequacy, a fitting capstone to an enterprise that figured out how to be good enough for enough people enough of the time. Not that it’s really over, of course: Disney and Marvel are still working out new wrinkles in the time-money continuum. But the Russos do provide the sense of an ending, a chance to appreciate what has been done before the timelines reset and we all get back to work. The story, which involves time travel, allows for some greatest-hits nostalgic flourishes, and the denouement is like the encore at the big concert when all the musicians come out and link arms and sing something like “Will the Circle Be Unbroken.” You didn’t think it would get to you, but it does.
nytimes.com
Still counts as a positive RT review so Disney doesn't get angry.
Adrian Ramirez
does this mean they turn on the MCU now?
Ryder Lopez
this is where disney money comes in.
Other films would have gotten a rotten rating for these reviews, disney gets a fresh rating they can use to advertise the film further.
Levi Collins
Explain Shazam. Oh wait, you can't. Dumbass. N**ger. Kike. Loser. Nerd. Turd. Bird. Goy. Onions. Toy. Boy. Coy. AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH reddit. Heh. Reddit. Red. It. Reddit. REddit.
Joseph Thomas
Luis Foster
>it was good but wtf no epic twist :( 3/5
lmao critics are even more pleb than fanboys
Brody Ortiz
Why do incels take screenshots of reviews/tweets/headlines like this
Jace Reyes
Angel Long
Because it’s all we have.
Jaxson Cook
post the justin chang one
Kevin Flores
Samuel Kelly
I have to hope they're trying their best to tell people Disney's paying them off/threatening them.
Joshua Wood
Have fun
Angel Smith
I'm kind of turned on by emotionless women.
Michael Anderson
Endgame is gonna be another mediocre Marvel movie but I'll never understand the love for the first Avengers.
Logan Perry
Me neither. Whedon was a worse director than the Russo brothers.
Asher Russell
It had funnier quips than all the other capeshit
Easton Lee
They should have just said "I am paid to give it a high rating, and if I don't then my entire organization will be permanently shit-listed by Disney from future releases."
Because that's basically what he just said in a more indirect way.
Jaxson Lopez
this guy's entire review is basically "this movie is bad but it's good because it's part of the MCU".
>The MCU is something that has never been done before. What's the basis to review a film that's the culmination of ten years of interconnected cinema with so many characters and stars that actors whose names are usually listed above a movie's title aren't even mentioned until 20 rows down in the end credit scroll? No one has done this before so it's hard to say that something is flawed in some way because it's quite possible that it was the only way to get it done. The mere fact that Endgame even functions and exists is kind of a cinematic miracle that can not be ignored. The conclusion here is that, of course, Endgame is good because it exists at all. It works. It is. At some level that is enough.