Is twin peaks: fire walk with me worth watching?

was a fan of the series and was wondering if the movie is any good.

Attached: 92105E16-948B-4646-B3E0-0D90897D26DA.jpg (390x240, 37K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mDise_Em_Ug
youtube.com/watch?v=vKBRyNNW3u0
youtube.com/watch?v=jxlGtcW1Qg8
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I loved it (except the Coop scenes)

It's great but if you're only a fan of TP and not Lynch all together you will fucking hate it.

you watch all 3 seasons without watching the movie?
it's pretty mandatory
and yeah it's good. it's like season 1 and 2 but creepy and edgy

I loved it (especially the topless Sheryl scenes)

Darkest Lynch movie I've watched. Gave me mood whiplash coming off the warmer vibes of the tv series

It is a fantastic movie and I really don't get why it has been completely panned by critics and fans alike. one of the most unnerving films I've seen

It's great and pretty much necessary viewing for Season 3. It's also closer to typical Lynch stuff than the first 2 seasons, so it's a good transition from Season 2 to Season 3 regardless.

Sheer kino

>don't get why it has been completely panned by critics and fans alike
because it's not like twin peaks

It's based and dare I say it also redpilled.

Because its "not like muh tv show"

Even though Lynch goes out of his way to smash a tv screen at the start to say "hey, buddy, we're in a different place now"

absolutely give it a watch, the first act with chet desmond is some of my favorite in the whole series

Like others have said, it's very good but it's basically nothing at all like the first two seasons of the show. The tone, the atmosphere, the cinematography, pretty much everything is very different and it doesn't feel like a continuation at all. The first time I watched it I was like what the fuck is this?! But after watching it again a couple years later knowing what to expect, I really grew to love it.

So definitely give it a watch, but go into it expecting it to feel completely different from the show in every way.

That's a pretty awful reason for a professional critic to pan a movie. I can however understand if a critic might dislike the movie because the plot requires the viewer to have seen the show beforehand. Seems like people are slowly coming around to how decent the film is

Attached: fwwm.gif (490x276, 1003K)

it's the closest thing to evil I can think of in all the movies I've watched

The movie is the best part of the twin peaks universe. Also Lynch's 2nd best movie

thread theme youtube.com/watch?v=mDise_Em_Ug

It's better than the series desu
so yeah

then why everyone hated when it came out?

Attached: ,,.jpg (225x224, 7K)

i´ve never watched this movie and i saw season 1,2,3 and the deleted scenes

Quenteen Tarantula also said he hated it, you can tell who's an artist and who's a hack fraud from there

yes this bitch is so good

I think that Fire Walk With Me is better than the rest of the Twin Peaks but it's necessary to watch the first two seasons first
Season 3 is just Lynch jerking off for 20 hours or whatever length it is

its a good movie, literally pleb filter

Yes

what´s the difference between the movie and season 3 (aside from the filler)

Are you retarded? Use your reading comprehension and critical thinking skills to solve that mystery yourself.

i never watched the movie, that´s why i´m asking

watch that shit

It might be the best part of the franchise, honestly.

>that dinner scene
Jesus fuck, that was tense.
That fucking soundtrack, man.

As I said in my post, the movie is absolutely nothing like the TV show whatsoever. It has a completely different style, atmosphere, tone, cinematography, etc. It feels like something completely different. So when you're going into a movie that's a continuation of a series, and it's absolutely nothing like the series whatsoever, obviously your initial impression isn't going to be great. That, plus the fact that people weren't generally familiar with Lynch's true style yet, which is on full display in FWWM, makes it pretty obvious why people hated it.

It's like going to the same malt shop once a week for a couple years and ordering a milkshake every time and loving it, but then one day you show up and the malt shop is now steakhouse that doesn't even sell milkshakes. It's a great restaurant and the steak is fucking fantastic, but you'd still be pissed for a while that the malt shop is gone and you can't get your milkshake anymore.

Absolutely worth watching. It's David Lynch's masterpiece. BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT'S DAMN GOOD COFFEE, find the fan-edited "full cut." It is three and a half hours long, but one of the best, and tensest movies I've ever watched. It's amazing. I'm neutral on the theatrical cut, but the full version (which follows Lynch's script - and therefore fleshes things out, and provides a lot of answers - as well as expanding Laura's story, really making everything that happens to her hit home) is one of my favorite movies of all time. Watch it!

Dont tell him how to feel. Yea, the movie has a different tone than the show, but that doesnt mean he’s not going to like it. Your milkshake/steak restaurant is pretty accurate though

>Dont tell him how to feel.
I didn't. He asked why people didn't like it when it came out.

yes. It focus and enhance upon the darker elements of twin peaks
I can only guess it was very confusing if you haven't seen every episode of season 1&2

the movie is a doppelganger of the show. The filming is close up shots and has a gloomy, sick feeling to it. It is perfect

Attached: never here.jpg (1920x1080, 278K)

• Final cut: 2 hours 20 minutes
• Missing pieces: 1 hour 40 minutes

Don't confuse yourself for The Return, watch both and remember that the time-indicating screen titles on the final cut were wrong.

Attached: TwinPeaksShitAss.webm (896x504, 2.99M)

Attached: TwinPeaksFatTrout.webm (576x312, 2.98M)

Watch that shit ASAP

It was supposed to be a 4-hour movie but the studio demanded he cut it down. He shot the entire thing. Released the rest in 2008, edited by himself (months after divorcing the old bag who edited the original). She probably wanted to edit it into a 4-hour cut. He probably whigged out and said "I like George, but he doesn't really love directing" and imagined Tarantino ripping on him

WATCH IT, BOZO

Attached: TwinPeaksWatchIt.webm (1536x832, 2.96M)

The balls on this man to blow that much high-speed film through a camera to catch such kino

Attached: TwinPeaksBobbyZombieLarge.webm (768x432, 2.99M)

Haven't finished the show yet but already pissed there's only two seasons.

Checked

>I can however understand if a critic might dislike the movie because the plot requires the viewer to have seen the show beforehand.

Not really. As a 17 year old fuckface I watched FWM before I bought the series on DVD. It was still one of the most emotional viewing experiences I’ve ever had. It’s such a gripping story. Perhaps one might be a little lost for some of the Cooper scenes early in the film, but it still works and you’ll “get” him being there in the end without knowing fuck all of his role in the series. You’ll “get” why he’s there and what purpose he serves.

Consequently, I also never felt that my experience of the series was ruined by having seen the film in advance. This just goes to show that who the killer was, really wasn’t what the intrigue and mystery was about. It was something deeper.

FWWM > Season 3 > Season 2 (finale) > Season 1 > Season 2 (the rest).
So yes, watch it.
Also some of the best Lynch in general.

youtube.com/watch?v=vKBRyNNW3u0
comfy thread theme

no

I have mixed feelings about it. It was certainly dark and I found myself missing the comedic parts of the show. It was also insanely "loud" with Laura screaming at almost every scene. I have to give it another watch in the future tho.

Absolutely. It gives more context to what Laura went through and just a bunch of more details in the Twin Peaks world. It also had David Bowie with a Louisiana accent so that is cool in and of itself

The thing is, it's tonally not like the show presented itself through the lenses of "comfy" shit. It's unfiltered and dirty, in the style of what Bobby complained about in Laura's funeral: the city is morally corrupt and everyone knew for sure she was in trouble, but no one did anything about it.

TP S1-2 tricks the viewer into ignoring how oppressive and tense the city is because Laura isn't there anymore, and she was suffering the worst out of everyone. There's a hole where she used to be, and everyone is a little different because she's not there, sadder. But that doesn't mean things were rosy before she was gone, not at all. Laura corrupted.

Attached: RedRoom.png (744x476, 436K)

>start watching Twin Peaks with the GF
>she's really into it
>just about to start season 2
>find out recently GF was sexually abused by her father
Oh fuck what do I do lads? It's only a matter of time before they reveal Leland as BOB

Attached: pokemon-anime-distressed-rowlet-1162483-1280x0.jpg (1280x718, 53K)

Let her. Assuming she's an adult, she'll feel bad and find some catharsis. She'll talk to you if she needs to.

Invite her dad over for a beer. Shake his hand then finger her later.

Unless she's an overly dramatic bitch she ought to be able to separate real life from a TV show

there's an undercurrent of existential horror through the original show which is completely lost on modern audiences due to it being a satire of then current soap opera tropes.
As in, soap opera characters would be grotesquely superficial or straight up disturbed when placed in a realistic setting.
As you said, the movie did nothing but show how things actually are beneath the soap opera façade when seen through the eyes of the victim.
The modern show did a similar thing with modern trends in tv shows (constant cliffhangers, and use of deus ex machina. The existential horror takes the form or otherwordly creatures guiding the story to a climax beyond any of the characters' knowledge or participation, just like writers of garbage such as game of thrones manipulate events in a nonsensical way in order to get their big emotional moments so that people share gifs of them on Twitter) but it went over most people's heads too even though it was quite on the nose about it.

it's mandatory for S3

An unexpectedly sensible and helpful response. Thank you user

The kind of response I did expect

Attached: coop.gif (267x199, 1.61M)

Hated it at first, like it now, makes more sense after watching s3 too.

that's not best track

youtube.com/watch?v=jxlGtcW1Qg8

Attached: 1555859457886.jpg (1158x585, 277K)

it's great

give her a trigger warning imo

>The modern show did a similar thing with modern trends in tv shows (constant cliffhangers, and use of deus ex machina. The existential horror takes the form or otherwordly creatures guiding the story to a climax beyond any of the characters' knowledge or participation, just like writers of garbage such as game of thrones manipulate events in a nonsensical way in order to get their big emotional moments so that people share gifs of them on Twitter) but it went over most people's heads too even though it was quite on the nose about it.


I've always thought the little subplot with the assassin couple was a clear jab at Breaking Bad and Tarantino movies and other "cool" and "edgy" crime dramas (although Lynch said he loved Breaking Bad, so probably not an entirely hostile jab). I wish more people paid attention to the shit you're talking about other than basic plot questions which are obvious to anyone with half a brain.

I wasn’t too hot on it initially but I have to admit now it’s probably in Lynch’s top 3 films. Twin Peaks as a franchise, in general, is the best thing he’s ever done.

If that clip isn't kino I don't know what is.

wow OP wow

>>find out recently GF was sexually abused by her father
kinda hot not gonna lie

What's going on over there, Donald?

Attached: C0-Hyn1UkAETfA3.jpg (1200x689, 76K)

i've never watched fwwm or the return and i probably never will

>Used goods
Run.