GEMINI MAN - Trailer (Will Smith vs Will Smith)

youtube.com/watch?v=WEMUbTBvkLY

This looks questionable

Attached: gemini_man_xlg.jpg (1012x1500, 617K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/x091jfFFe9g
thefilmstage.com/news/ang-lee-preparing-120-frames-per-second-4k-3d-release-for-gemini-man/
youtube.com/watch?v=MOpaJiP36Ig
youtube.com/watch?v=lLD1DV01164
youtube.com/watch?v=1bdeuCGFoGM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

jcvd made this movie like 30 yrs ago

>Shit actor that has been nothing but box office poison for at least a decade now
>Put him in your movie TWICE
This is insane.

>alternate version has a goatee
KEK

Attached: mirrorspock.jpg (1440x1080, 92K)

Young Smith scares me, he's a plastic man.

Attached: Screenshot_3.png (434x524, 426K)

>not calling it KILL WILL

Attached: 1533064126868.png (400x381, 108K)

Why does it look like a direct to youtube fan movie?

AYYY HOL UP HOL UP HOL UP

this looks intentionally awful. you cant even make this shit up. also isnt that poster very similar to after earth? WHAT WERE THEY THINKING.

Attached: 1555853634487.jpg (460x613, 41K)

What the fuck is Ang Lee doing? Why is the cinematography so terrible? Why are the deaging effects, especially in the first scene of young Will so bad? And most importantly when will Ang finally stop with the 120fps meme?

>Why does it look like a direct to youtube fan movie?
It's shot in 120 FPS. Couldn't care less about Will Smith, but I loved the way it looks and understood when I saw Ang Lee's name pop up. It's also the same DP who shot Collateral, Miami Vice and 13 Hours. I expected comments like yours, and of course the top comment on youtube is another pleb just like you saying it looks low quality. When it actually looks like pure kino. Pleb.

The digital cinematography looks awful.

>also isnt that poster very similar to after earth?

Kinda

Attached: MV5BZDU2ZmVhYzgtNzZjYy00Y2M3LTg2ZjktYjU5MDI5YTg3NzAyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTIzOTk5ODM@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,67 (674x1000, 106K)

I hope he has better luck with that shit than he did with TriStar with Billy Lynn. TriStar refused to show the film in 120 fps and only 5 theaters in the world could show as he shot it

It's meant to be seen in 120FPS, in a theater that actually shows it this way. You'll probably never see it the way it's meant to be seen. Only two theaters showed Billy Lynn like this.

You may find the movie dumb and ugly or whatever but what irks me is when a mainstream filmmaker is doing something genuinely experimental with a high-budget blockbuster and the automatic reaction is to shit on it only because it's different from accepted conventions. Meanwhile you faggots lap up those shitty marvel movies with the laziest and dullest TV-tier photography without second thoughts.

AYO HOL UP
DAT NIGGA MY CLONE OR SUMTHIN?

GIVES BLACK AND BLACK CRIME A WHOLE NEW MEANING

only 5 showed Billy Lynn like that, and mostly because Sony refused to provide theaters with the support for it.

Two in the US (1 in LA, 1 in New York), three in China.

And you couldn't even sit in the front 4 rows to see it

I admit the experimental nature of both this and Billy Lynn are what interest me the most.

why does it look so shitty. its like unpolished workprint

because its shot in 120 fps.

Keep in mind, this clip is 60fps down-scaled from the original 120

youtu.be/x091jfFFe9g

This doesn't looks like he has the ability to turn invisible because a satellite exploded in his face...

Billy Lynn was an absolute garbage movie though.

what's MEW's screentime?

yeah the movie was awful but it took risks, so I give it balls for that

Paramount already sent a letter to theaters so they should be preparing for the film to be shown in 120fps. I probably won't see it that way because every theater around me is bad. And yes the movie looks dumb but that's not what i was complaining about. It just looks visually terrible. I appreciate that he is trying something new, but it looks unappealing.
Also i have never seen a marvel movie except for Raimi's Spiderman films. I just talk and write shit about them.

minus negate itself, maybe

other user interested in the technical aspects of the film here

how do you know about the letter?

>Ang Lee hasn't given up on high-frame-rate cinema despite the expensive misfire that was Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk. The two-time Oscar winner is shooting his upcoming film, sci-fi assassin thriller Gemini Man, in 3D at 120 frames-per-second (fps) and 4K resolution. There's just one problem: theater chains may not be able to screen it in the format. To ensure it gets a wide release that matches Lee's intended vision, Paramount is writing to cinema owners with instructions on how to bring their projector equipment up to speed

It's definitely interesting; I'll admit the story looks like dumb shlock but even with that shitty youtube quality you can tell it must be super vibrant and immersive in 120FPS and on a big screen. It's something new and unique. Of course it's better when you have a new tech with also an all around good movie.

How it's made is interesting, there were stories about Billy Lynn shoot for example, because of the high framerate usual movie makeup didn't work so they had to develop new standards and techniques. It completely changes the way a filmmaker has to shoot even a simple dialogue scene, how you shoot a close-up, etc.

There's a parallel to be made between Ang Lee paving the way and what Zemeckis did with performance capture and 3D; he got strong backlash with the first few movies but by the time he released Beowulf it was more polished and accepted, and in the end it was Avatar who reaped the profit. Theaters are gonna fight back on this so they can cheap out as usual etc. but they'll have to bend over and get ready because our Lord and Savior Based Jim is coming back in 120FPS also.

Attached: Cameron.jpg (548x723, 74K)

The script is garbage. There’s a reason it floated around Hollywood for like 20 years without getting made.

thefilmstage.com/news/ang-lee-preparing-120-frames-per-second-4k-3d-release-for-gemini-man/

I miss when Ang Lee made good movies. How fall he has fallen.

Attached: 44769b6f-00bc-44ce-a648-514cb4e4ca21.jpg (1280x720, 283K)

why do they keep letting YouTubers make movies?

I admit the film looks uncanny as fuck but I kind of like the way it looks.

And I had no idea James Cameron was doing that too

what if we remade looper but with guys who are more blacker this time

Attached: large_g9FW5mfDN26sNjOcDPB5mIGe8jv.jpg (400x600, 74K)

Rain Johnson copied this. This screenplay has been well known in Hollywood since the 90s, the technology just hadn’t caught up to actually make it until now.

literally his only BAD movie was Hulk.

I want the version with Clint Eastwood:

youtube.com/watch?v=MOpaJiP36Ig

Attached: gemini-man-sizzle-reel.jpg (669x267, 31K)

What race is Will Smith? His profile looks like the bush people from those 'the gods must be crazy' flicks.

Pleb opinion. HULK was kino.

Dark-skinned Caucasian.

Hulk is kino

>Billy Lynn used an unprecedented shooting and projection frame rate of 120 frames per second in 3D at 4K HD resolution. It is the first feature film ever to be shot in such a high frame rate, over twice the previous record (Hobbit: 48 fps) and 5 times the standard speed of 24 fps. Lee undertook such a bold step since he wanted the film to be an "immersive" and "realistic" experience of the reality and emotional journey of soldiers.

>Lee wanted to up his use of technology in filmmaking, especially in terms of frame rate, since he thought pursuing a higher frame would help him find answers. Lee wanted to try and shoot the film with at least 60 fps at 2K resolution in 3D as he had experimented with 60 fps before. He undertook research and found what Jackson was doing with 48 fps, but did not wish to use such a frame rate after Jackson's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was poorly received. He visited filmmaker Douglas Trumbull who was doing his own 60 fps tests, and so was James Cameron.

>Shooting close-up shots in 3D with such high resolution meant the cast could not wear make-up and could not deliver less-than-authentic performances. Since no make-up was allowed, make-up artist Luisa Abel spent months of preparation on their skin tones. "[Abel] found this silicone-based makeup because we found that it can see through skin." The production team had to rethink everything, including different approaches to lighting as the camera needed extra lights due to the higher frame rates. To film the war sequences, Lee strayed from the usual practice of moving cameras to create confusion. Instead he did the opposite by shooting mostly from the protagonist's POV to capture the realism and to look more authentic.

What the FUCK is wrong with Will Smith?
youtube.com/watch?v=lLD1DV01164

His name is James,
James Cameron.
The bravest pioneer.
No budget too steep, no sea too deep.
Who's that?
It's him! James Cameron.

Attached: james cameron raises the bar.jpg (1024x576, 47K)

hairline is getting just'ed there , will

Imagine if all this work had been put into a movie that was actually worth the effort.

Soooooo....

Attached: trust-nobody-not-even-yourself-.jpg (475x457, 53K)

>Gem N Man

Is this set in the Steven Universe universe?

This is creepy, and I will not be watching this garbage.

You don't want to make Hulk with Ang Lee.
You wouldn't like him when he's Ang Lee.

It's one of those movies that's been in development hell

youtube.com/watch?v=MOpaJiP36Ig

Looks pretty good except for when young Will speaks. Looks a little off. They are sure loving CG de-aging lately

I'll watch it

Attached: like.png (950x534, 100K)

No one can stop Dirty Harry, except Dirty Harry!

that was pretty sweet

>when you realize Bill is short for William

Is that suppose to look good? It looks like utterly dog shit.
Logan looked much better than this, and I thought it was easier to make niggers young, like Samuel Jackson on Captain Marvel.

Attached: Annotation 2019-04-23 203020.png (568x566, 169K)

When will they realize that Will Smith doesn't have the star power to carry a movie anymore?

Making special effects look good when filmed in 120FPS is a lot harder.

If there are no BMWF couples in this film, maybe i'll watch it

He starred in Suicide Squad not that long ago and it made a shitload of money despite being banned in China.

suicide squad was a huge hit
>bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbut my rt score
literally zero people give a shit

film it in 24 fps then, who cares?

>Shit actor

Attached: 1534710294466.jpg (470x470, 31K)

Will Smith entered Nic Cage territory a couple of years ago, where he just does as many shit movies as possible for the paycheck with zero regard for how it'll impact his career.

Strange thing is, Smith isn't even divorced yet. But I guess he's just saving up front for the alimony payments.

and yet it looks worse than Tron Legacy.

Should have hired Jayden Smith to play young Will instead of using a shitty CGI face

Attached: jaden-smith-surprises-fans-by-bringing-his-dad-will-smith-out-during-coachella-set-ftr.jpg (620x350, 125K)

>who cares?
gamers who think movies and tv should be shot in 60 / 120 fps

Will Smith.
An actor so shitty that he cannot even play himself, playing himself playing himself.

Attached: NOPE.jpg (361x409, 27K)

>Ang Lee
So its going to be shit?

youtube.com/watch?v=1bdeuCGFoGM

Most definitely

>skip around the trailer
>literally throws a motorcycle at someone like 3 times just in the trailer
Why

I thought it was After Earth sequel at first. At least his retarded son won't be in this flick.

he actually hasn't done that many movies the last 10 years. Most did well

Attached: Screenshot (296).png (1920x1080, 219K)

$160 million movie. Poster poorly communicates the core gimmick, where I would have no idea it's about a clone. And the idea that an SFX clone is a wowzer that can make $200 million US when there are real clones and chimeras being created in China right now. Nick Fury was already de-aged better than this poster or trailer.

this actually made me like will smith more. was funny desu

Will smiff versus will smiff

this reads like an auto feed response from Yea Forumsbot

wonderous

Two negatives cancel and become le positive nigga

This gave me Foxdie.

>you faggots lap up those shitty marvel movies
>implying

Well its not like they can cast his fucking son again ist it?
Not after earth and the whole "pregnant dragon" episode

Attached: amusedalcoholic.jpg (125x124, 2K)

I just want to see it in an actually equipped theater.

the movie looks like ass but isn't the young will smith cgi pretty amazing?

other way around for me.
Movie looks interesting but young Smith looks kind of wooden when he talks. Just looks weird