>All British elites are depicted as depraved predatory homosexuals
What did Kubrick mean by this?
>All British elites are depicted as depraved predatory homosexuals
What did Kubrick mean by this?
He was based and redpilled so they killed him off.
No coincidence he died after eyes wide shut (his best and last movie)
If he was so based and redpilled why did he help NASA fake the moon landings?
Ask him and buzz dood
He obviously was strong armed and made co/ews to get back at them for it
>What did Kubrick mean by this?
Kubrick didn't have anything to do with it aside from putting it on film.
Anthony Burgess wrote the story. Maybe you should ask him what he meant by it.
The book has way less homosexual subtext though, Kubrick added 90% of it
What are you even talking about?
I just re-watched this the other day and have no idea who you're talking about.
It was for the greater good ergo b&rp
>School truancy officer feels him up in his underwear
>Prison officer strips him naked and leers at him
>Writer gets a muscle gay boyfriend
>Priest keeps touching him up
>Government guy also touches him up
>homosexual subtext
I never noticed. Perhaps those who do are merely projecting their own homosexual tendencies on the film. Homosexuals are often prone to see homosexuality in everything, no matter whether it's actually there or not.
I like this movie. Any modern movie would have tried to make Alex sympathetic, show how tortured and tragic he is. Like that stupid ass Joker movie they're making seems to do. Kubrick was smarter than that. Alex is a gang member, a robber, a bully, a druggy, a rapist and a murderer. There is no sympathetic backstory or a deeper reason. He can be quite charming but he's not sympathetic.
But still, what the movie does is depict the society that created him and makes it quite clear that Alex may very well not even be the worst person to be in the movie. You have this fucked up world where the government abuses it's authority, crime is rampant, hard drugs are served at a bar, violence is commonplace, the fashion is fucking hideous... you can see why a society like that would produce someone like him.
At curtain level of senses, those kinky-ness on sexual activities could explain that one has all on normal ground so he or she go look for more. It’s exceeded wealth.
Don't forget the handsome young lad his parents rent his room to
Written words content needs to be transferred to visual ones that could cover just right amount or do too much.
>Kubrick completely butchered Schintzlers Traumnovelle
>his best and last movie
t. illuminati disinfo agent
based schizo
Maybe you're just gay, and simply projecting.
>Writer gets a muscle gay boyfriend
I forgot that. The old man got Fran Dreschered.
absolute power corrupts absolutely
>Kubrick famously one of the most meticulous directors of all time who imbues meaning and symbolism into every single frame
>nah dude ur just a homo lmao
You didn’t notice the homosexual subtext in the guy who grabs Alex’s testicles or the guy who keeps a bodybuilder dressed in pink in his house?
He didn't "grab" Alex's testicles in a homosexual way. He smacked him in the balls hard and in anger at his frustration over his failure to straighten out the little thug that he was.
You don’t see homosexual subtext in that?
No. I didn't.
People with autism often have problems with social, emotional and communication skills. They might repeat certain behaviors and might not want change in their daily activities.
The priest was the only one that didn't have any homosexual undertones though. If you listened to what he said, he made strong moral arguments. He was earnest. The prison officer wasn't phased, that's all, doesn't make him a faggot. The only character with real overtly homosexual undertones was the truancy officer. I think your projecting most of it tbqh
The idea of homosexuality is bourgeois decadence. They're emasculated degenerates who despise tradesmen or any kind of work that requires labor so they flock towards business schools where they could decide the value of their labor.