Googled "Jesus" after watching Passion of the Christ blu-ray

This is great news! Good, even!

Attached: 1530093149204.gif (267x260, 1.91M)

Based, happy Easter Christian bros

>tfw God is real

Attached: Q94iwXq.gif (235x240, 1.55M)

lolno. And if god exists, anything goes.

Jews HATE him! Find out how to gain eternal life with this one simple trick!

Attached: 1547988813788.jpg (638x1000, 92K)

God is real and hates trannies

huh? it's next week

>real
>sins

>Jewish owned site hates Jesus
Wow, color me shocked.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the_historicity_of_Jesus#Non-Christian_sources
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Christ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephus_on_Jesus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suetonius_on_Christians
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_in_the_Talmud
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mara_bar_Serapion_on_Jesus

Attached: giphy.gif (235x240, 1.85M)

Kek

>lists four sources
>gets quadruple zero
What did kek mean by this?

>all we know is that he was maybe a man, might have been multiple people, who was alive around 2 thousand years ago and not a single account was written during his life and historians are too cucked by the Vatican to just admit he was probably an amalgamation of different people
Based idiot christcuck

>Mythicism in 2019

Attached: brainlet.png (621x702, 56K)

does it matter if we sin if jesus retroactively saved us from hell through his death?

>all we know is that he was maybe a man
what a discordtranny thing to say

Why?

Tipped

Even most atheist biblical scholars believe Jesus was a historical figure. The Mythicist has largely been discounted

imagine being this autistic

Learned that it was 16 guards that would be executed if 1 messed up.

They got fucked up afterwards.

You people can't even argue. Not a single account of him was written even remotely during his life, not a single Roman document from that region, no account of his execution

Not an argument, /pol/tard.

>tfw EVERYTHING is real

Attached: 1465437787006.gif (580x326, 3.76M)

They're the same people that believe infinite Jews died by gassing, user. There's no arguing with them.

Are you implying that you are a Holohoaxer...?

6 billion jews died bro chill

So if for every person in history there weren't written offical accounts during his life, he didn't exist?
You are aware that we would discredit the existence of a fuckload of people that way?

That's called critical standards for proof, user. I'd expect that of any historical figure.

false.

Attached: 1537008883325.png (1292x8757, 3.91M)

I like how you twist it to "official" accounts. Jesus literally has nothing written about him, not even by Romans. Who apparently crucified him. Yet King Tut was a body, multiple accounts and is older than Jesus.

Just admit you don't personally require the same standards to prove thw historicity of Christ as you do with other historical figures. Just be honest.

So if people write about a person 5 minutes after he dies that means nothing? Or 5 months? 5 years? What's the cutoff?

>not even by Romans
Who is Tacitus?

Attached: tacitus_242_.jpg (2600x3373, 3.02M)

FALSE APOCALYPTIC PROPHET

Attached: sjad1TX.jpg (937x1170, 84K)

The point is, how does it not bother you that not a single account of a person who was supposedly so fucking important, comes from even the same century he was alive? Even other prophets have things written about them during their life, why is this not the case with Christ? He apparently touched the lives of all these disciples yet not a single disciple wrote about him, nobody cared until roughly 200 to 300 years after he died and there is no account of his life, his execution or literally anything by people of the time.

begone, harlot

I didn't realize Tacitus was hundreds of years old? Damn, what's his secret?

How big do you think Jesus' dick was, like if you consider he waas an earthly manifestation of the presence of God, if it were me I'd give myself a massive whanger

it's not like it would change anything about being the messiah or anything

>how does it not bother you that not a single account of a person who was supposedly so fucking important, comes from even the same century he was alive
Flavius Josephus. Pliny and Tacitus 20 years after him.
>nobody cared until roughly 200 to 300 years after he died
Why lie?

Because they are abominations corrupted by evil

Attached: 1498090557764.jpg (900x650, 59K)

because Abrahamic religions are the medieval equivalent of CIA and NSA.
God is real, God is government, God is watching.
Fear, consume, obey, freedom is not free.

how many other scripts survived about a carpenter in the Roman empire?

cringe

If you've accepted him as your Lord and savior, all sins you have or will commit are paid for, but continuing to sin just makes you miss out on the better things in this life Jesus wants for you. You're not just supposed to be saved. You're supposed to be an example for others to follow so they in turn accept Jesus as well.

It was more than 20 years, why be disingenuous? Is it because you are Christian?

>implying that matters

Are you implying he was an important religious figurehead 20 years after his death?

Based, chr*Stcucks SEETHING

hmmm

Attached: hmmm.png (579x160, 11K)

Explain to me why an omnipotent deity would waste time hating anything or expending that energy to hate things?

Is it even edgy to hate on Christianity anymore? Who would really do so besides maybe deranged homos or atheist jews

Hating trannies gives life.

deranged atheist homo jews

Reread the post and the post reply.

It feels good to be a Christian and not let heathens get to you with their shitposting.

Attached: 1555810708943.jpg (2028x1549, 1.26M)

>you should only hate pseudos and disinfo shills if it is edgy

Even if you could 100 percent prove that he was a singluar man that absolutely existed, then what? He wasn't magical and not an actual deity.

Socrates didn't exist bro kek

The gospels and all the letters written by his apostles beg to differ.
>th-those don't count!

But I was saying that no major account was written while he was alive, which is true. The most sourced account that theologians were using is dated 100 years after his death...

Literally none of the gospels were written during his life and none of the writers were even born when that shit happened. Stop.

>literally get's factually disproven
>"ummm but he wasn't a magician!"
Absolutely pathetic moving of goal posts, good job.

Atleast you now acknowledge his existence and won't spout random bullshit about people writing about Jesus only 300 years after.

It's still pretty common, but it's not edgy. I haven't cared for what feels like a decade now, but to pretend that the christianity that the militant atheists think exists, actually exists, is pretty sad. The only people that act like what they claim are 80+ years old.

The actual annoying shit is that the neo christcucks, the ultra contrarians, don't even live close to a christian lifestyle and spend their days masturbating and shitposting.

He probably didn't. The only accounts of Socrates we have are from Plato's work. So bad example, he's probably fictional.

>none of the writers were even born when that shit happened.
You are aware that the New Testament has writings of six apostles of Christ?

Why are trannies spouting absolute bullshit ITT again and again

Why does God do anything and why does evil exist?
What if he wasn't all knowing and no longer interferes but watches. Choosing to become an abomination like a tranny should be deserving of hell

Jesus has risen
you should consider believing

First major account of his life was almost a full century, my underage friend.

Why is that relevant?

>muh trannies
Do you actually think the writings from the Vatican are literally from Matthew, Mark, Luke and John? That they wrote them? Because that's largely been dubious and criticized for decades.

"Almost a full century" is a hell of a lot less than the 300 years you stated earlier.
Atleast you learned something today.

>Atleast you now acknowledge his existence
Until the next thread. They're worse than BvS haters.

Different anons, christcuck.

Isn't it somewhat irrelevant if he actually existed or not?

Never trust a god that cannot laugh.

>Me? Yeah, I'm a militant atheist.

Attached: 1542209745703.jpg (832x1000, 41K)

>it was only 100 years! Not 300! Checkmate atheists!
Jeez.

None of the gospels were literally written by the disciples of Jesus you gullible retard.

Those are only the non Christian sources we're talking about.

>jesus
>white

Lo fucking l.

What does it mean to be "militant" in atheism?

>how does it not bother you that not a single account of a person who was supposedly so fucking important, comes from even the same century he was alive

Show me the writings on Julius Caesar that are from the same century that he was alive. Most history is written by people a generation or two later.

>What does it mean to be "militant" in atheism?
By not just being atheist but actively attacking religion and getting into endless arguments on the internet about it.

It's another word for "autistic."

Don't we have Caesar's book on Gallic War?

He doesn't look like a tranny, how dishonest

nobody:

jesus:

Attached: AMD-Ryzen-7-CPU-insocket1.jpg (1500x1001, 403K)

christians are right
>they go to heaven
christians are wrong
>nothing

atheists are right
>nothing
ahteists are wrong
>they burn in hell

any kinos about this precarious dichotomy?

>talk about jews wanting to manipulate you
>decides to follow jewish rulebook for goyim

>tfw based and christpilled thread

christ be with you all

even with you atheists

Attacking Christians by blogging about it, but never attacking Jews or Muslims.

>atheists frantically googling what "precarious" and "dichotomy" mean before they REEE at your post

God being God in his infinite wisdom would see you trying to play the numbers and would send you straight to hell.
Pascal's wager is not very Christian.

Happy Easter, mutt heatens.

who actually christian here?

>mutt heatens
Heathens?

Refute those quads first

4 sources, all worth nothing.

4 repeaters all worth nothing

Attached: Bo0U_0bIcAAIh71.jpg (480x640, 37K)

Caesar is a bad example because we have both writing from Caesar himself and his contemporaries

However there are historical figures and reports we accept are fact based on accounts from a generation or two later. However its far less common by the time of the roman empire. Not to mention the romans and jews did record accurately and often by that time

Wasted quads.

The James ossuary is not fake and has been proven in a higher court of law to be authentic.
Josephus has one statement that seems to be truthful.
There's the testimony of the gospels, which when you strip off all the bullshit has the following factual information:
There's this guy
He has twelve disciples
He preaches to people
He claims he is some sort of Messiah

Proving a guy walked around proclaiming he was a savior is one thing, proving he was superman is another.

>he watched zeitgeist and believed
lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

B A S E D
A
S
E
D

I just found out that the Titanic was real.
And so were Jack and Rose!
So cute. (˶˶)

Attached: titanic-expedition-2018.jpg (2800x1582, 478K)

I used to be.

I mean I believe Jesus actually existed, but I think he was more of a preacher of good. Like a wandering friendly hippie. He didn't do miracles, but his fame got so overblown that the other religions got jealous and had him killed.

I don't believe Jesus thought himself the son of God really. I think that's something that's been added on with the years after his death.

I am.
Unfortunately, thanks to the redditors from /pol/, you’ll find that most “Christians” on this site are just larpers.

Was Jesus really nailed to the cross or is this just a fake story some guys wrote in a book and pretended it was real? There's no way for us to really know is there?

>There is more evidence that he DID NOT exist than there is that he did
there is no evidence he did not exist. you can't prove a negative. furthermore at least 2 of the gospels are written by first person accounts (Mark and John), Luke is written from a 2nd person account (Luke interviewed several of Jesus's original disciples and 2nd gen disciples, it's believed Barnabas's accounts are used mostly in Luke), and Matthew is believed to be a "summery" of mostly Mark and several other non-included-in-the-bible sources.

Furthermore the early church clearly started almost immediately after his execution, next there are some respected Jewish and ROMAN historian accounts of both Jesus and John the baptist. Next they have physical proof of the existence of most of the main players in the story (such as Pontius Pilate and Caiaphas, heck they have Caiaphas's bones in a reliquary).

The proof Jesus existed is pretty extensive.

imagine the smell..

Attached: 1541121670399.png (475x792, 490K)

On a scale of Robin hood (3) to Napoleon (10), Jesus rates an easy 7 as existing.

>implying Napoleon was real
kek
you weren't there

Most works were passed down orally, this was not uncommon for the age as written works required tremendous amounts of effort to make even one book. It took stories, letters, and other works passed down from his disciples, and combined it with the old testament. Just because it was not written about the same day does not mean it never happened.

People with autism often have problems with social, emotional and communication skills. They might repeat certain behaviors and might not want change in their daily activities.

Memes aside, until I was about 8, I thought the Jesus thing was just Americans being stupid. Id never heard of or been exposed to Christianity. Later on I came to know Jesus, and realized he;s hella based

>wahhh don't attack my religion please!
Are you some sort of a spineless cuck?

Are you seriously comparing a time like thw fucking late Neolithic to the time Jesus was alive? You realize that people had papyrus as far back as the Old Egyptian Kingdom? Are you completely stupid?

You know it's fun to have this copy paste once every while
But not every fucking day you fucking cretin

Attached: 1528213144325.jpg (378x300, 14K)

Just because someone wrote about it a century later, doesn't mean it happened either.

>all these asshurt responses
who taught the christian moms what Yea Forums was?

Attached: 1553624376727.jpg (1438x576, 85K)

incel,have sex

>People had access to paper, thus literature was clearly as wide-spread and accessible as it was when the printing press was invented!
I'll pray to God in hopes that he forgives you later brother.

it's just autistic behavior. the most outspoken atheists tend to come from a religious background that they rejected for whatever reason. we get it, you're rebelling.

>Christian sources
>reliable
Kek.

>a Roman province was illiterate
This is your argument.

>there are no valid reasons to criticize religion
You're out of your mind if you think this.

>Being able to read.
>Having ample access to writing in every home in a time when the mass production of books was nearly impossible due to the labor required.
The only one illiterate here is you brother.

>0 reading comprehension
>strawman
sad!

You've really twisted my point into the most bizzare strawmen. There were literally hundreds of different tomes written about dozens of other religions the same fucking way for centuries before Jesus came along and NOW, all of a sudden, writing about Jesus is some fantastical new invention? Your entire point is retarded bullshit. The Chinese predate most civilizations by a long mile and they equally have similar messiah myths. Everyone did.

The fact that you believe in Jesus completely destroys the whole experience BC.

Attached: 1554837825969.jpg (618x750, 56K)

You're implying that the only reason people have criticism of religion is due to being "rebellious" which is just a way of dismissing people who have valid criticisms.

what does the lord god and scripture say about suicide?? doesnt jesus commit suicide by not using majick to throw down his roman enemies? is giving up not suicide? i would have invented rock and thrown down on thos douches

Attached: 1547103920435.jpg (750x558, 64K)

Criticizing how people interpret God's word is one thing, but the word itself is law. Criticize it all you want, it isn't going to bend to your will.

Probably because being Christian in the Roman Empire was illegal for a while, and being able to create religious texts for an illegal religion in the land of your enemy was either impossible, impractical, or insurmountable to do in secret or in public. Religions in other regions of the world such as Japan, India, China, Afirca, and Scandinavia were embraced.

The Romans, Greeks, and Hindu-ish nations were the only people that documented their religion in writing, and being Christian was illegal under the Roman Empire. Norse religion was almost completely lost, and even tales like King Arthur, the backbone for the creation of Britain (although not really religious per say, except for Christian influence in later stories) was nearly forgotten about to time until it had a resurgence in the 1700's due to the fucking French cuckolds. Point being, something being large and influential is irrelevant to how much writing there was about it. Pagan traditions were nearly lost, only to be (foolisly) preserved by Christian scholars who tried to preserve as much knowledge as they could.

Also remember that Christianity is a continuation from Hebrew, and Judaism, when the church and believers turned away and went forward. Those that remained follow an outdated text that was corrupted by foreign tribes that turned away from the truth of Jesus Christ. It's like saying being protestant is bullshit because Martin Luther was born a thousand years after Jesus.

Making a sacrifice =/= suicide. He died to cleanse the world, and mankind of its sins. Your death would only bring sadness and pain to those around you that stems from your own greed. The Lord's path is not yours to take into your own hands. It may be difficult and full of strife, but you will be a better man because of it. He loves all his children, including you. Never give up hope, he is behind you all the way. Pursue time in the Church and its community, away from this godforsaken place, and you will see your life improve. Also Christian girls are literally the purest women alive.

I hate that too.

Good for you being christpilled

happy easter

I actually prefer LotR to Passion Christ when it comes to this genre of movies

>this thing I believe is law
Sure it is, bud. Whatever you say.

>The Romans, Greeks, and Hindu-ish nations were the only people that documented their religion in writing
That is demonstrably false.

>literally just answering a question
>gets triggered over it

If Jesus didn't die as he did, christianity wouldn't be so big

>King Arthur, the backbone for the creation of Britain
Holy fucking shit you are history-illiterate...

So we've reached the impasse of all religion vs. atheism arguments.

Easter is a catholic psyop

>I got better

I’m not sure if the condemned were even nailed to the cross in reality. I think they were just bound. They would be stood on a tiny ledge and would have their legs broken so they could barely support their own weight, causing slow suffocation as the sapped energy and restricted bodily movement prevented them from being able to breathe properly.

delete this

You're moving the goalposts faggo

Attached: 1555867042691.jpg (720x796, 46K)

>and Hindu-ish nations were the only people that documented their religion in writing
lmao of all the cultures you chose the one that for the most part shunned writing and developed an incredibly autistic system of oral literature and memorization, especially for its sacred texts

MEGAN!

have sex

That's not what an impasse is or means. Things aren't just real because you believe it. Your feefees for Jesus don't magically make it true you retard. There is nothing to create an impasse, you have no evidence.

>mocking me means you are triggered

Woah, epic! Going to church right now!

nah it's fake

This is why homeschool is a fucking plague on America.