I'm gonna say the V word!

I'm gonna say the V word!

Attached: harryangry.png (790x350, 410K)

MUGGLES

MR. DUMBLEDORE GET DOWN!

Vagina

*AHEM*

Fuck Voldemort and FUCK Slytherin

Attached: image.jpg (768x431, 31K)

LORD MOLDYBUTT

Well done, well done

Voldemort was the only person who thought about the long-term.

What will happen to Magic when the magical community and especially Hogwarts allows muggle born mongrels in and attempts to teach them?

The magical bloodlines of the world have to be kept pure, or otherwise their magic powers would be diluted generation by generation, until none of it is left. It would start by Hogwarts making appeasement curriculums to the untalented masses of mudbloods. There would be more potion making, more quidditch, more gardening, but less wizardry. The great wizards of the past would be so outlandishly powerful compared to the new generation of mudbloods that soon they would become myths. The mudbloods would reject the greatness of the past and demand that more mudblood history be taught at Hogwarts. Then, when they fail to perform even a simple Wingardium Leviosa, they'd pretend magic has never really existed anyway.

Sooner or later, wizardry would simply die out due to mudbloods being talentless mongrels.

Lord Voldemort (pbuh) has foreseen this terrible future and attempted to do what was necessary to stop it. His methods may not have been the nicest or the most empathetic, but he was a man of judgement and a man of action. Lord Voldemort was the hero Hogwarts needed but didn't deserve.

HOWEVER

Clearly wizardry isn't passed on in quite that way if wizards can be born from juggle parents.

>juggle
it’s spelled “jugglalo”, dumbfuck

You are investing to much time in a franchise some annoying cunt thought up.

I've read the books and watched the movies. Big deal.

Its the M word you retard

>"Deh"

What was the Ministry of Magic’s tax policy?

Despite making 13% of the wizarding population, mudbloods commit 50% of magical crime

>Voldemort wants pure bloodlines
>is a half-blood

They skirted over this in the books, Harry brings it up to the Death Eaters at the ministry and they basically just say REEEEE SHUT UP

VLIPENDO

Reminds me of a certain other subversive historical figure, who's skull in Russia wasn't even his.

Doesn't work that way. Consider the evidence: wizards can be born from muggle bloodlines without a drop of wizard blood in them. Meanwhile, pureblood obsessed families inevitably produce nonmagical children, like Mr Filch.

And, most importantly, LITERALLY EVERY POWERFUL WIZARD in the books with one single exception has muggle ancestry within the past two generations. Harry has muggle blood, Hermione has muggle blood, Voldemort has muggle blood.... etc. The only person who was an A-class wizard and was a pureblood was Dumbledore. Everyone else was mixed.

Pure breeding produces weak magic users. Muggle bloodlines produce stronger wizards. Voldemort's plan is based on a fundamentally flawed understanding of wizard genetics, though an understandable mistake.

He was a half-blood who could only be rivaled by Dumbledore.

If anything his entire existence proves that the whole "pure bloodline" shit was stupid because Voldemort wasn't one, nor was Snape.

so what happens if you said voldemort? would he comeback? if so, why didn't the bad guys just said voldemort from the beginning?
and if saying his name wouldn't bring him back then why was everyone afraid of saying it? why would they be superstitious when they live in a world were magic is actually a thing and they know that there is no spell that brings someone to life by saying their name?

Uhhh fuck Drumpf and fuck purebloods!

You're a nigger Harry.

That's quite a small bulge in your robes Potter. You realize there are spells for that.

Attached: Is that a wand in your pocket potter.jpg (730x1095, 163K)

UH, ALL MUGGLE BORNS OR MUDBLOODS AS I LIKE TO CALL THEM, GET OUT OF THIS SCHOOL BECAUSE ITS FOR PUREBLOODS ONLY, UNDERSTAND, CAUSE IF YOU DON'T I WILL UNLEASH THE BASILISK AGAIN!!!!!!!!!

Based Tom

vigger

magnets = magic

Who dis

piss off

Attached: ron.png (509x445, 269K)

Based

Draquesha

>Little Tom Riddle

When he is in power saying his name let’s death eaters know your location. I’m pretty sure it’s how they get caught in book 7. Outside of that it’s superstition

Was hufflepuff the stoner house?

Attached: B1E01D67-DD0D-4161-BE60-0375B6327887.jpg (640x920, 108K)

Amongst other things

Attached: CaRcFp2UUAACr64.jpg (503x755, 66K)

Yeah, but Dumbledore was stupid strong. Voldermort got his power from selling his soul. Harry got his from his dead mom. So it can be explained and still keep the consistency of the wizard genetics.

Voldemort was magically powerful before he went down the path of the dark arts, he learned how to use his magic to kill pets and torture people before he even learned he was a wizard. And all his wizard ancestors were barely a step above squibs due to years of inbreeding, it was the infusion of muggle genes that made him better than them.

No, it was his willingness to kill. Even during that time there were multiple wizards stronger than him.

He didn't start killing people until his seventh year, but all the teachers were very impressed with him before that, especially Slughorn and Dippet.

They were impressed with Herniawhiney too, and she's not that strong power-wize.

Why not group sex?

vave vex

Because that's pedo, user. And she's PC. Duh.

You should say the N word instead...

I'm gonna say that Harry Potter is one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1546523551732.jpg (1565x2823, 558K)

NIFFLER

Attached: 19-19[1].jpg (894x595, 100K)