Why didn't Hermione use the time turner to save Harry's parents?

Why didn't Hermione use the time turner to save Harry's parents?

Attached: home_made_time_turner_by_mahala_ann-d532axh.jpg (676x960, 87K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uwfdFCP3KYM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

because she's a cunt

Time Turners were a bad plot device that even Rowling regretted creating, which is why she had them all destroyed in book 5 during the battle at the Ministry. But to answer your question, in Cursed Child it's stated that most Time Turners can't go back longer than 24 hours or something.

why didn't she use the time turner to peg tom riddle while he's sleeping?

Attached: hermione.jpg (600x525, 71K)

People complain about the eagles in Lord of the Rings. Yet people rarely talk about Harry Potter having a literal time travel device that's used one time.

who the fuck would design a school jumper to be that low-cut?

Niggle me this, if Hermione had access to time tuners, why didn't she set a time tuner to go off while another time turner was going off? She'd have complete temporal control. In fact, why didn't Voldemort use time turners? It would be real useful if he knew that the prophecy was real, that he'd have a backup from a loyal devotee as a just in-case. Especially when he has people in the ministry who could provide him with time turners.

If that's just the case, you could still go back in time indefinitely, without losing a single second of the future. You could even create a magical object that could turn time back for you automatically.

>third movie/book
>already has time travel
Bravo Rowling

are you retarded? it's a skit.
youtube.com/watch?v=uwfdFCP3KYM

>walking on Hogwarts yard
>see this
What do?

Attached: 1526169670505.gif (245x245, 1.48M)

A man. A based man.

Attached: fast erection.jpg (422x750, 93K)

Because it doesn't fucking matter and it was written by a woman for women and woman-like "men."

cum in my pants

She pants way too fucking much in that movie

of course it's a fucking sketch, i just find humour in applying realistic standards to unrealistic situations

Use the time turner to make her hotter.

I'm not a huge fan of Harry Potter or the universe, but its explicitly stated, explained and shown both in the books and I think the movies that the time turners cant change what has already happened. You cant use them to change anything because it already happened. You already did go back in time in the past in your own timeline, there arent several timelines. I dont know if this scene only happened in the books, but for example Harry was saved by himself from the future, then in the future he want back and saved himself.

The Time Wizards would have stopped her

tell her Ron is HIV positive.

she was too busy massaging my penis with her feet

It's just stretched because dudes keep pulling at it when she's getting fucked in the missionary position between classes

HHAHA BRO HARRY POTTER MARATHON ON USA YEAH BUDDY YEEEEEEEEEEHHH BUDDDDDDYYYYYYYY
HOT BLONDE CHICK UP NEXT ON THE DOCKET YEEEEAAAAHHH BOOIIIIEEEEE
also im not watching it

>Time Turners were a bad plot device that even Rowling regretted creating

Yet The Cursed Child exists.

Why are you looking for logic from the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises written for people whose imaginative lives are confined to TV cartoons, and the exaggerated (more exciting, not threatening) mirror-worlds of soaps, reality TV and celebrity gossip?
Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1485638790859.jpg (1565x2823, 558K)

Based

Imagine the sheer amount of rape in Hogwarts. Memory charms, love potions, sleeping spells, mind control. The average first year likely goes home never thinking they did more than hold hands with a boy but they've had a train ran through them every day since entrance.
God I'd love to be a wizard

You never disappoint

Attached: 1523475838373.png (1000x1000, 77K)

alright i lied im watchimg Goblet now, the superior patrician, and only rewatchable potter film

Based "No!" poster

hogwarts isn't real

>Post some top tier wank material.
>Some cuckold smears his shitestained fingers across the keyboard to type utter autism.
Give the keyboard back to your carer.

Attached: 1555233216443.gif (295x218, 1.69M)

this kills the 20-30 age group in one fell swoop

>jack off to the idea of hogwarts based sleeping spell rape fetishism
>call anyone autistic

100 points taken away from Slytherin

MISTER BARTEMIS CROUCH

Based. Fuck manchildren

they could just use the time turners to go back in time and prevent the time turners from being destroyed during the battle at the ministry

is this ranking high school literature? do people honestly think god tier is god tier?

Or the can just make new timeturners

They actually explain this in the last book

It's a bait image, you utter brainlet.

How come none of the students wore their uniforms in the 3rd movie?

because as soon as she got the time turner she went back in time to ensure that Harry's parents died

why would they do that if they could just use the destoryed ones to go bacl in time and prevent htre oroiwernweel onwes frm beying destoybred

They were all wearing uniforms the entire time, apart from their trips away from Hogwarts into Hogsbreath or whatever it was called.

based stroke poster

anyone getting a pulse?

>implying there needs to be rape
>implying half the students wouldn't be turning themselves into horsecock futas and fucking each other pregnant for fun every day

>punch her in the face and take the time turner
>rape her every hole
>go back in time
>spit roast her with my earlier self

Attached: 1388965252670.jpg (537x561, 56K)

Fair point.

Attached: 1555246632505.jpg (539x477, 34K)

So I just learned that Voldemort had sex with bellatrix and had a baby wtf is Rowling thinking

Cursed Child is pretty much a cash grab that was mostly written by the playwright. Rowling just attached her name and imprimatur to it.

She wasn't, it was some weird fanfic that she said totally happened?

Like from what I recall from the books Voldemort was so shit scared of dying that he couldn't form basic friend bonds, the notion that he'd fuck someone is genuinely retarded.

>spend 7 books repeatedly emphasizing that Voldemort is a narcissist incapable of caring about anyone other than himself
>"voldemort put benis in vagene and make babby with bellatrix!!?!"

Nnnnnggghh