Movies with this thematic?

when fascists propose that black people, for example, are generally low IQ what are they proposing to do with them? As well as this, what are they proposing to do with the higher amount (because of higher total population) of low IQ whites in America?

IQ is not objective
Any "science" done with IQ testing is in the domain of psychology and sociology, so chances are you're just using this specific argument in those fields despite agreeing both are barely science.
Economic nepotism has a massive effect on IQ. Compare a nig in an American ghetto to a rural Pajeet who can't even read.
1/10 since you got me to respond.

Attached: 56F185EE-A1DB-423A-A4A0-6008887356B8.jpg (960x720, 73K)

see

Attached: 1555565186741.jpg (556x604, 65K)

>what are they proposing to do with the higher amount (because of higher total population) of low IQ whites in America?
hmmmmm almost like its nothing really to do with IQ and everything to do with hating blacks?

Give blacks their own racial state in the South. I propose allowing abortion only for whites who fall under a certain low income.

>whites who fall under a certain low income.
why? are you saying that low IQ is a result of low income?

Attached: 154810093318.png (645x773, 11K)

Dios mío...........

>when fascists propose that black people, for example, are generally low IQ what are they proposing to do with them?
who are these fascists? Are they the 30K people that post on /pol/?
Why do lefties dumb down their speech when talking to minorities when right wingers don't?

>I'm white therefore I'm part of the cognitive elite. Praise kek!

Attached: pSuKsv7.jpg (500x587, 30K)

>who are these fascists?
They self described fascists, the white nationalist groups, yes I'm sure some are on /pol/ but I don't browse that board

Like Liberia?
youtube.com/watch?v=ZRuSS0iiFyo

Not necessarily, but there is some correlation. Regardless, it would help prevent those who can't afford it from breeding too much.

What gives you or the government the right to decide who can breed or not

If that's what it turns into, that's what it turns into. Then, we shall if systemic racism was the cause of their woes or not. But, at least they won't be ruled by evil whites anymore.

heh

>who are these fascists?
Protip: If you want to ban degeneracy, that implies you want the state to intervene in saying what is and isn't acceptable speech. You want to limit the free expression of others to protect and promote an ideology. Fascism.
See: Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc.

Dragged across concrete

Eugenics is a tool for improving the quality humanity, as opposed to the society we live in now which is highly dysgenic. Might makes right in the end.

>Eugenics is a tool for improving the quality humanity
It literally isn't. Look what happens when trying to control dog breeds, the pedigree dogs are much more likely to have health problems etc. When you try to control breeding it has unintended effects in the genes.

If we could 'CRISPER' all black babies to 100 IQ's would ghettos and low socio economic neighborhoods still exist?

While not all blacks are bad, the less niggers in a society, the closer to utopia that society is.

Attached: 1555699124696.jpg (1440x1738, 156K)

We're not talking about inbreeding here. Eugenics is a proven way to select for the best possible traits in humanity and select against the worst.

Concerning ni-

Yes, because IQ is just one of many genetic factors.

>Men make up ~50% of populations
>Commit 90% of violent crimes
why not just get rid of men?
>Eugenics is a proven
Its not

This just in: anti-degeneracy laws in the 50s on Hollyjew that were struck down were FAsHIST!!11!

Cognitively weak argument. The truth is that Christians wanted a certain standard of morality in all facets of public life. Thats not facism or communism.

>if systemic racism was the cause of their woes or not
They are the offspring of slaves returned to Africa with full US backing and support.
The first thing they did was enslave the local niggers, the second thing was start a civil war over power and destroy everything.
This is what niggers do, they destroy.

>If we could 'CRISPER' all black babies to 100 IQ's
Science fiction.

I agree with OP. Jews are the smartest therefore they should be allowed to run things.

It absolutely is proven
See: Romans

>See: Romans
What?

crime and anti social behavior is correlated with IQ

Attached: 1488681057119.png (1023x653, 271K)

You realize that some eugenics practices still exist today like abortion, right?

t. never spent any time in black communities

Honest question, do you think they're this much smarter than Asians?

Attached: 1502775072603.jpg (693x770, 148K)

>You realize that some eugenics practices still exist today like abortion, right?
Not government mandated, no. People making a choice not to have babies is not the same as eugenics programs, or abortions because the child or mother would not survive.

Yes, Jews should have their own country to run just like everyone else and they should stay there.

>Jews should have their own country to run
American Jews should run America

Notice how casually this user brushes off laws that violated the 1st amendment. He doesn't present any real argument, other than mocking you and saying "you're wrong".
Fascists love to pretend to be pro-free expression, but will openly call for banning things they don't agree with. They realize they can't get the general population to accept their views, so they try to get the government to do it for them.
He doesn't want you to remember that the free world was founded on the tarring and feathering of people harmful to democracy.

Attached: 1920px-Philip_Dawe_%28attributed%29%2C_The_Bostonians_Paying_the_Excise-man%2C_or_Tarring_and_Feathe (1920x2640, 1.85M)

keep in mind that black Americans average around 25% Caucasian DNA and average an 80IQ

Abortion sprang from the eugenics movement.

crime and anti social behavior is correlated with income inequality

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient

Attached: income-inequality-vs-crime-rate-graph.jpg (909x660, 84K)

>Men make up ~50% of populations
>Commit 90% of violent crimes
Women are inherently inert you stupid nigger.

*Women are inherently peaceful
Lock men up except for breeding and violent crime would go way down, this is a fact.

B-B-B-B-B-BUT INCOME DOESN'T CORRELATE WITH VIOLENCE SO THAT MUST MEAN YOUR GRAPH IS WRONG
I'M A /pol/TARD WHO IS TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LOW INCOME AND HIGH INCOME INEQUALITY REEEEEEEEE

>Not government mandated
Can you imagine to be such a retarded zoomer that you don't know about china?

And low IQ.
randomcriticalanalysis.com/2015/11/16/racial-differences-in-homicide-rates-are-poorly-explained-by-economics/
>Source for pic.
unz.com/isteve/chetty-affluent-black-males-much-more-crime-prone-whites-at-fault/

Attached: 1545225393687.png (1122x812, 98K)

>randomcriticalanalysis.com/2015/11/16/racial-differences-in-homicide-rates-are-poorly-explained-by-economics/
Kek, called it, see

low IQ equals low income

True, but you would run into the little problem of other countries where men still dominate.

other way round

Attached: poverty.png (745x835, 968K)

youtu.be/6nkbAO6QpCQ
youtu.be/4oJNN-hnjsg
youtu.be/XCbMzH0kAU4
youtu.be/CSqpDvi9FFI

Attached: common-cause-of-gun-violence.png (1280x629, 309K)

no.
IQ is the best predictor for economic success. This is basic Darwinism. Some are better than others.

Attached: 1490252567954.webm (320x240, 1.72M)