Who was the killer in friday the 13th?

>who was the killer in friday the 13th?
why do so many plebs get this question wrong?

Attached: s-l300.jpg (217x300, 23K)

Because everyone has seen movies other than the first one. Stupid question from a stupid boy.

Horror movies are shit

Phonetards are shit.

Pretend patricians act like the first one is shit and the sequels are the good ones, but they're wrong. The original is the best one because it has the best atmosphere and filmmaking style, which makes it creepy. The way to spot a pleb is that he talks about how much better it is when Jason shows up

Attached: 1551562919771.png (555x644, 553K)

>the original is the best one
Top 3 in the series:
6 > 1 > 8

And that's just the original series, Jason Goes to Hell is massively underrated.

I've literally never seen any of these movies. Not sure why. I'm 31 and loved the Halloween series and other horror from that era, but somehow I've never got around to watching these.
Should I just watch the first one? Or should I watch the whole series?
Are they actually creepy and unsettling like the first few Halloween films or are they just generic slashers?

Then why are you here...
I'm fine with any one but part 5

That depends. Do you recognize that the original Halloween has some suspense and all the sequels are generic slashers? Cuz the first Frday takes it farther in the gore department, and is less well-made than Halloween, but is a pretty solid flick. Most of the rest of the sequels are just gore-porn, except 6 and JGTH, which are solid stories, and Manhattan which is hilarious.

They're worth a watch through the series, camp/shitty just like halloween, kind of like the basics of halloween, mixed with the killstyle of freddy

6 is fucking shit, godawful metahumor, stupid fucking Zombie Jason, kids at the camp, forgettable counselors, only plebs like it. Then I just realized you also included Jason Takes Manhattan so I hope it's a joke

>I'm fine with any one but part 5
THOSE TIDDIES THO

The first movie actually has really good atmosphere. First time I watched it I was surprised who the killer was.

It's not really scary though.

Horror movies are shit only fatfucks bothering everybody around for candy likes it

>Do you recognize that the original Halloween has some suspense and all the sequels are generic slashers?
Absolutely. I love the first one, and like the second and third. The rest are schlock. That's mainly why I never made an effort to watch any of these, they always seemed comparable to the later Halloween movies.

>Jason Takes Manhattan
>joke
100% yes, that's exactly what I was >implying

i haven't seen all of them, but I caught Pt 2 last october and it was written by a child. I've seen pornos with more plot.

Ok fine, and maybe the chocolate bar retard kill

wow, you convinced everyone in this thread. great post.

I mean yeah...I consider the 3 series, pretty generic...so, right.

>the 3 series,
wat

The appeal isn't the writing, what exactly did you expect? Gone With the Wind?

Attached: wut.jpg (792x605, 76K)

That I listed, the post he was responding to

was it his mom in the first one?

regardless, jason being the killer always had a stronger plot

some are better written than others. if you're just watching it for splatter-kills, then you're probably the same asshole who skips through action movies for the explosions. i.e. also a retarded child.

Slasher films are about the setting and the characters, which the F13 films have in spades. You and your assumptions, go fuck yourself faggot

The first two are sorta like Halloween. The rest are more ridiculous. Basically extremely violent action movies.

what the fuck, then you agree with me. I was saying good kills + shitty movie = shitty movie. Character and setting make it work and Pt 2 had none of that.

>isolated summer camp
That's a good setting

>relatable 80s teens with fun dialogue
good characters for a slasher

The end. It's not as good as other F13 films but it's decent by all standards for a campwood slasher.

i binge watched all of these in 2014, jason’s mother? The only thing i remember about this one was the very end scaring the shit out of me

it's not even isolated, most of the kills happen in pt 2 when there's a huge party going on with like 100+ people in the main house. The entire plot is "Jason is on his way to the camp and kills someone, he gets to the camp and kills someone, the Sheriff discovers his altar and he kills someone. It doesn't even have an ending.

It's basically porn except the action sequences don't take as long.

Are you sure? From what I remember, in Part 2, some of them are in town at the bar while Jason is at the camp killing the counselors-in-training who stayed behind. I don't recall any party

I've only seen the first. No reason not to see it. It's totally fine and enjoyable.

I'm surprised people haven't said this, but the average person probably hasn't seen any of the Friday the 13th series. They know of Jason from pop culture and they're aware of some details scattered across the movies.

Attached: qzZt2Ug7_o.jpg (2329x3500, 1.65M)

I want to suck her feet

Attached: Jessica-Chastain-Feet-886410.jpg (1666x2500, 480K)

They didn't pay attention during the opening of Scream.