How did they get away with this?

How did they get away with this?

Attached: theylive_114307.jpg (706x1060, 206K)

Other urls found in this thread:

virily.com/entertainment/the-missing-mysterious-21-minutes-in-eyes-wide-shut/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

based filmmakers do whatever they want.

Just wonder how (((they))) still haven't shut down Carpenter for this movie like they did with Kubrick. Maybe it hurts the most when you expose (((their))) dirty secret rituals to the masses and they somehow feel that this could get people questioning things more, than just faceshoving moral and anti-capitalistic, anti-slavery elements.

Attached: C1TgXmZWgAEFUvv.jpg (877x391, 54K)

wasnt kubrick a jew himself?

Who is they?

John Carpenter is pro-Jew.

>Not realizing to defeat the Jew one must first become the Jew

They didn't. It's pulled off from theaters a couple of weeks later.

Yes but a very antisemitic one acording to some "people".

He was not antisemitic. He just wasnt religious. But he admired Jews and couldn't help but to be Jewish though non-practicing.

>it's capitalism bro
Our boy John sure tricked them ;-)

I'm not claiming he was i'm simply stating that some people he was very anti-semitic.

Now that's probably just slander.

>John Carpenter is pro-Jew
Try these glasses Yea Forumsro

Attached: They-Live-Sunglasses-.jpg (1087x725, 140K)

*that some people claimed

He is /our/ Jew

Attached: img.php.jpg (978x734, 112K)

>wasnt kubrick a jew himself?
So was Bobby Fischer.
Your point?

Attached: Bobby Fischer.jpg (1200x1200, 193K)

It was about Reaganomics and capitalism

As if socialism is freedom

how could anyone watch this movie and think "mmmmh yep, thats Yuppies alright".

wtf was he thinking when tweeting this

>they still try to believe that Carpenter was some red pill hero rallying against the Jews to hide the fact that he was an SJW critiquing alienation and ruling class ideology

Attached: tumblr_m6wvv3ewHe1qebtweo1_500.gif (500x325, 943K)

he was trying to save himself from the eternal jew with a bullshit excuse and it worked

>shit post
>tumblr
Like clockwork

well, it's not like cutting off an entire major scene of 25 minutes that weighs in the entire premise of a movie just days before its premiere

those are not mutually exclusive

>well, it's not like cutting off an entire major scene of 25 minutes that weighs in the entire premise of a movie just days before its premiere
What's this about

Wonder Woman if I had to wager a guess. The ending was pretty blatantly changed on exec orders.

Didn't see it. Details?

>ruling class
So basically the Jews

Why does the alt-right get so mad when you BTFO their head canon?

Attached: they live.png (833x801, 93K)

Jews and capitalism go together, it's in their culture to be merchants and rich capitalists. If as a jew you don't inherit a family business of dealing with money - you failed as a jew

It's not anti-semitism to recognize their centuries old tradition of being capitalist scums. It would be strange for jews not to succeed in such system considering their culture

So now the Jews are capitlists? What happened to the communism meme?

>jews are the winners under communism
>jews are the winners under capitalism
>jews have their own ethnostate and are killing poor brown people and taking their land so they’re doing well for fascism as well
Can’t lose if you play all sides I guess

Jews play all sides, the truth is that "with jews you lose".

I love how frantically Carpenter tries to claim the movie isn't anti-semetic

It's pretty clear that the ending was originally going to be that the god of war wasn't real and it was humans who started the Great War, and nobody else. The young and naive Wonder Woman would have her world view shaped by literal fairytales her mother told her when she was a child (alluded to much earlier in the movie when she outright told Wonder Woman he wasn't real) shaken but emerge all the stronger for it.

So of course it's revealed at the last second that he WAS real and he DID start WW1 and was disguised as a one-off side character from the middle of the movie the whole time and reveals his true form which looks like Satan despite being based off a character from Greek mythology and then they have the pedantic over the top CGI battle that is required for capeshit and then the movie finally ends

It is believed that around 21-24 minutes of the final cut of Kubrick's 'Wide Eyes Shut' were removed, and those missing scenes consisted mainly of child sexual acts/nudity. Even though it was explicitly stated in Kubrick's movie contract that the studio had no rights whatsoever to make any changes of it, they still cut those supposed parts of the final version. Just days after the movie was finished, Kubrick dies of a heart attack in his sleep in very suspicious circumstances. There's lots of other information about this topic on the forums, so you can search for it.

virily.com/entertainment/the-missing-mysterious-21-minutes-in-eyes-wide-shut/

Also, this faggot is fucking with you

Oh, ok. Now explain why (((they))) didn't just shelve the movie or kill Kubrick before he made it, since they control everything and are all-powerful.

Shelving the movie would raise too much suspicion, releasing it while discreetly removing some scenes in the last moment and killing its creator to avoid any further shitstorm wouldn't look that obvious at all. I remember reading somewhere that Kubrick had a meeting with some representatives of the studio days before the release and during that meeting some scandal erupted and was heard outside the cabinet; after the end of the meeting it is said that Kubrick had left the room entirely infuriated and mad for some reason. Note that this is not confirmed.
As to your next question of why they didn't kill him prior to all - they probably didn't have the full developed script at that time, thus Kubrick could've added those controversial parts later, considering that they were supposedly planned to take place at the end of the movie (or more precisely, at the culmination, respectively after the sex scenes in the mansion). I'm not sure if the script in its full form was already ready by then, so consider this just as a pure presumption of mine.
Now you may ask why Kubrick didn't just expose everything he knew to the public without the need to make a symbol-filled, obscure movie. Well, I'd say that he:
1. Probably knew less to none about the supposed secret elite and just wanted the masses to pay more attention to the whole picture of reality
2. Knew some shit, but didn't want to reveal it directly, and therefore decide to conceal it behind controversial scenes

>2. Knew some shit, but didn't want to reveal it directly, and therefore decide to conceal it behind controversial scenes

Forgot to add: didn't want to reveal it directly because (((they))) probably threatened his entire family or something like that

I never seen one "source" for 20 minutes missing from Eyes Wide Shut without it just being some random fucking blog

Because Carpenter is a contender for GOAT.

Is In The Mouth of Madness any good? Watched Halloween, The Thing, They Live, Escape from New York and Big Trouble in Little China so I don't know if his other movies are any good.
Oh, I loved his albums Lost Themes

yes, there's another apocalyptic movie of his that's also good, but I forgot its name (it has an alice cooper cameo)

As was our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ

>unrestrained capitalism

so jews

Prince of Darkness?

that's the one

Prince of Darkness?

Yea Forums being extra edgy this afternoon

Prince of Darkness. I like in more than Mouth of Madness.

In the Mouth of Madness is highly Lovecraftian and 4th wall breaking
>Cue Chthulhu fart noises

Makes sense since the kid disappears at the end of the movie

Because they figure everyone would just take the movie as just entertainment
Which most everyone did

Thanks, gonna download Assault on Precinct 13 too and maybe watch Vampires and Ghost of Mars

Who's gonna tell Ridley Scott and Roddy Piper they can't do something?

>it's an incel thinks a movie is an allegory for something that isn't episode

>He says as he gets paid large sums of money to do nothing.

I'll never not be a fan of his movies, but every hollywood liberal is a hypocrite.

Attached: john-carpenters-house.jpg (500x500, 40K)

>he doesn't look up to rich hypocrites
not gonna make it

I just don't know how you can spend so much of useless status symbols and preach to everyone else how it's a bad thing, and it's hurting our country. It's mind boggling.

Don't go into those expecting much. AoP13 is pretty good, Vampires is cheesy, and Ghosts of Mars is a good concept done laughably bad. It's one of those comfy movies you used to watch on like TNT on a weekend morning when you were a kid.

Yea Forums has been a redpilled board for as long as it's been around and it's the reason I never dropped Yea Forums.

Attached: 1509667167562.jpg (903x295, 65K)

not him but many people in this system think that in order to so good in this world, they need to first make money THEN help people. Problem is, you can't make real money without hurting people in some way. Amd once they have it, 99% of em tends to convieniently forget why they gathered it in the first place.

Most of the "hypocrites" were once good people, before they got corrupted to high heavens and beyond.

>I remember reading somewhere that Kubrick had a meeting with some representatives of the studio days before IT'S FINISHED

To correct myself again, just now noticed the factual error

in my experience most progressives are good people, that's exactly their problem, their hearts are in the "right place" but their minds aren't.\

The reverse is true for reactionary types, they
usually aren't good people in a modern sense but their minds are in the right place.

Yes but what does that and Kubrick have to do with They Live?

Attached: at_last_i_truly_see.gif (500x270, 997K)

>Writer-director John Carpenter has said of this movie that it was a critique of Reaganomics, a "vehicle to take on Reaganism". However, over the years, several neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups co-opted the movie for their own purpose, spreading rumors that it is really an allegory for Jews controlling the world. This forced Carpenter to respond on Twitter in 2017 by stating "They Live is about yuppies and unrestrained capitalism. It has nothing to do with Jewish control of the world, which is slander and a lie".

Fuck off pol

(((((how)))))) (((((((did))))))) ((((((t))))))))(((((((h))))))(((((e))))))((((((y)))))) ((((((get)))))) ((((((away))))) (((((with))))) ((((((everything))))))) you might ask

Attached: 1549574557422.png (203x171, 3K)

Attached: they.png (2517x1194, 2.79M)

Of course he has to say that. Jews won't let him work again if he doesn't disavow.

it's pic related

Attached: USER_SCOPED_TEMP_DATA_thumbnail1555088869069.jpg (289x512, 25K)

>see hyper advanced ultra-intelligent race that controls you as cattle
>this is just like jews
Imagine having this bad of an inferiority complex

Jews are the legit master race according to incels

shitty bait and waste of dubs

sure. thats why he got no job since then...