20 years later, this movie is still a 10/10 for me.
Fuck the contrarians.
20 years later, this movie is still a 10/10 for me
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Is this a Jojo reference?
What is?
Fuck off zoomer.
I cant recall this exact shot despite watching the movie twice in the last two weeks
there are a few qualities
but I can't get passed the fact that the novel was written as a allegory for underground homo-sex
You knew that, didn't you user?
Was that confirmed? I know Palahniuk was a repressed homosexual, but I can appreciate the movie for what it is regardless.
>the contrarians
their only criticism has always been "b-but edgy teenagers like it too! that means it's bad!"
Yeah exactly. Disliking everything universally loved makes them patricians.
Wallpaper time
He looks just like me
Having read SIEGE and stuff it seems like pretty straightforward fascist propaganda. It's a really enjoyable movie in a variety of ways.
it's an extremely popular movie and widely considered a 10/10 by everyone but okay
>but okay
Back to Twitter faggot
LOL PLZ MY SIDES
you... you know people can use Yea Forums AND Twitter right?
I was going to make a clown world pepe meme of when Tyler says "you should join our club" but I can't post images any more here :(
fincher resilvering is fucking sexy
>I am thirteen and this is very deep
Its message is literally more pertinent and valid than 99% of popular philosophy.
Look guys the movie isn't shit but it also isn't that good. Much of the dialogue is really embarrassing and feels that the movie is reading the book to you. Now I know it's supposed to be a criticism of Durden's mindset, but its so tiresome.
Big yikes
based
This
I was exactly around 13 or 15 when I first watched it, but the average age of the users of this website seems to be like around that age so I'm just hatin
>all these reddit zoomer words
Anyone else didn't liked Marla at all (in sexual way), but now I find her very hot?
>this thread
Technically you can but once you use twitter you're a twitterfaggot, not a chanfaggot. It's called regression to the mean or something.
This is such a stock take on this flick by now it's no longer contrarian but anticontrarian.
>Now I know it's supposed to be a criticism of Durden's mindset
Absolute state, etc.
>20 years later
>20
>years
What the fuck am I doing with my life.
Man, that was another timeline
you've only been here for a few months, fuck off
Even by cope standards this is weak.
you don't even know what you're saying
Oh shit, you're right. These are just random words formed by mashing my face into the keyboard. Thanks for setting me straight fag.
No.
youtu.be
is not a matter of confirmation
its a matter of fact that the book is totally gay with a side of gay
does Palahniuk have a few apropos things to say? maybe... sure
but the number of double-entendres in the book where any "fight" could be word swapped for "fuck" is a bit trying
Get your blood pressure checked son.
I am anons wasted life
I still hate how this movie threw me into existential angst when I was 12 and it's still going
This flick formed a lot of my mindset. Not really the masculinity aspect but ever since I'm obsessed with making something out of my life, meaning, and became increasingly antisocial. Funny how things can go.
Sure thing...dad?
>fighters tend to "seize up" everyone they come across
>author's knowledge of fighting is comparable to joe rogan
wow. what a fucking retard. confuses "size up" with "seize up" and then claims rogan doesnt know anything about fighting (rogan knows more about fighting than he does about comedy). dude has this many fuck-ups in the first 6 minutes.
Based and redpilled