Why does communism provide more artistic freedom to kino regisseurs than """free market""" capitalism?
Why does communism provide more artistic freedom to kino regisseurs than """free market""" capitalism?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
cia.gov
en.wikipedia.org
theguardian.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
holodomor.ca
theguardian.com
twitter.com
>capitalism is goo-
woah
Rabbit is Me, The Legend of Paul and Paula, and The Murderers are Among Us are all good DEFA films. They've also got more artistic merit than any Star Wars movie made after Empire.
Why did he do it, bros? How could he sell his children to white slavers?
>actor annoys you
>call Stalin
>frame actor as capitalistic pig who wants to get rid of Stalin
>???
>get new actor
>Unironically licking Stalin's boots
Have sex
Stalin only ruled for 30 years. The USSR existed for nearly 70.
Because they weren't white but he was getting white prices. You can't pass up a deal like that.
Yeah man, like the freedom to criticize the economic system in which they're made. There's a ton of movies made in the capitalist system which have criticized it(Fight Club's the one that comes to mind, but there's plenty), and I'm sure it's the same for soviet communism. I'm not knowledgeable enough about soviet cinema, but since you brought it up OP, I'm sure you'll have no trouble giving me one(1) example, I won't require more since I've only provided as much myself.
Aren't you a Trot though?